<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: O&#8217;Reilly Does Not Know What Open Means (Let Alone Free)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techrights.org/2009/11/23/perversion-of-openness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techrights.org/2009/11/23/perversion-of-openness/</link>
	<description>Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/11/23/perversion-of-openness/comment-page-1/#comment-76293</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=22392#comment-76293</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s good that feedback is taken into account like this.

Last week I went through Jono Bacon&#039;s new book (from O’Reilly). It was plain PDF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good that feedback is taken into account like this.</p>
<p>Last week I went through Jono Bacon&#8217;s new book (from O’Reilly). It was plain PDF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yuhong Bao</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/11/23/perversion-of-openness/comment-page-1/#comment-76292</link>
		<dc:creator>Yuhong Bao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=22392#comment-76292</guid>
		<description>&quot;including Adobe whose blobs are now required to read O’Reilly-published literature.&quot;
Yea, I know that fiasco. And posting my link to the original BN article on this issue finally forced Tim O’Reilly to respond:
http://radar.oreilly.com/2009/10/safari-books-online-60-a-cloud.html#comment-2197553</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;including Adobe whose blobs are now required to read O’Reilly-published literature.&#8221;<br />
Yea, I know that fiasco. And posting my link to the original BN article on this issue finally forced Tim O’Reilly to respond:<br />
<a href="http://radar.oreilly.com/2009/10/safari-books-online-60-a-cloud.html#comment-2197553" rel="nofollow">http://radar.oreilly.com/2009/10/safari-books-online-60-a-cloud.html#comment-2197553</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/11/23/perversion-of-openness/comment-page-1/#comment-75960</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=22392#comment-75960</guid>
		<description>Yes, the API can be substituted by native deployment/s. That&#039;s why many people use identi.ca.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the API can be substituted by native deployment/s. That&#8217;s why many people use identi.ca.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dyfet</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/11/23/perversion-of-openness/comment-page-1/#comment-75957</link>
		<dc:creator>dyfet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=22392#comment-75957</guid>
		<description>That is also true.  With proprietary API&#039;s, whatever work one does may become unusable if the vendor chooses to withdraw them, for whatever reason it may choose and can potentially do so at any time.  With a free software API, at least even if the original authors loose interest, others have the freedom to continue using and improving them.  But I liked the border analogy :).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is also true.  With proprietary API&#8217;s, whatever work one does may become unusable if the vendor chooses to withdraw them, for whatever reason it may choose and can potentially do so at any time.  With a free software API, at least even if the original authors loose interest, others have the freedom to continue using and improving them.  But I liked the border analogy <img src='http://techrights.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/11/23/perversion-of-openness/comment-page-1/#comment-75955</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=22392#comment-75955</guid>
		<description>In Microsoft&#039;s case, APIs expire (or are phased out or die along with a product).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Microsoft&#8217;s case, APIs expire (or are phased out or die along with a product).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dyfet</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/11/23/perversion-of-openness/comment-page-1/#comment-75952</link>
		<dc:creator>dyfet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=22392#comment-75952</guid>
		<description>An API is more like a border, in the traditional sense.  And a Microsoft API is far too often more like the old Berlin wall.  If people try to leave with knowledge of how the actual stuff works, they are &quot;shot&quot;, well, in a legal sense, in what are called non-disclosure agreements.  Those looking to come in may often need to arrange special licenses like passport fees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An API is more like a border, in the traditional sense.  And a Microsoft API is far too often more like the old Berlin wall.  If people try to leave with knowledge of how the actual stuff works, they are &#8220;shot&#8221;, well, in a legal sense, in what are called non-disclosure agreements.  Those looking to come in may often need to arrange special licenses like passport fees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

