03.27.10
Posted in Antitrust, Deception, Microsoft at 6:30 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz
Summary: Microsoft’s past as seen from the eyes on people who make money from Microsoft, courtesy of IDG ‘News’ Service
“Appeasement, said Winston Churchill, consists of being nice to a crocodile in the hope that he will eat you last. At the moment, the biggest crocodile in the world is Microsoft, and everybody is busy sucking up to it,” wrote John Naughton for The London Observer.
Microsoft is like the crocodile that has already eaten many companies while committing heinous crimes and antitrust violations. We can’t go though them today because there is just too much ground to cover. What worries us greatly is that Microsoft has been rewriting the past quite a lot recently. We gave an example just a couple of weeks ago.
“I wonder if it’s as simple as this, that many people are a little afraid of computers, so they felt reluctant to swap in something new until there was a page saying it was OK and nothing would break?”
–Pamela Jones, GroklawMicrosoft’s booster, Preston [1, 2], is doing that again and it gets promoted by Microsoft Nick. They are desperate to pretend that Microsoft has legitimately earned its current position and with so many Microsoft boosters in the press (even in publications that used to say the truth about Microsoft before they got intruded), there is a danger of whitewashing of scary proportions.
Microsoft Nick is boosting Microsoft in many other ways and another Microsoft Nick trivialises the situation with the browser ballots as we addressed it a few days ago. “I wonder if it’s as simple as this,” writes Groklaw in response to Nick, “that many people are a little afraid of computers, so they felt reluctant to swap in something new until there was a page saying it was OK and nothing would break?”
One must not forget the crimes against Netscape and others. People do not choose Microsoft’s browser and if they use it, then it’s because Microsoft previously broke the law and had people associate the “Blue E” with “the Internet” (the BBC perpetuates this myth). Given choice, people do not choose Microsoft, but they are rarely allowed to choose. Despite all of this, Microsoft’s products continue to lose market share. From Reuters we have:
Microsoft’s Internet Explorer has lost market share in major European markets, such as France, Britain and Italy, after the U.S. software firm started to make it easier for European consumers to use competing browsers.
Microsoft’s pledge to allow easier access to rival browsers in Windows by the middle of May, ended a long antitrust dispute with the European Union.
People must remember that Microsoft was forced to do this. It’s not about Microsoft giving opportunities for a diversity, it’s about antitrust regulators responding to Microsoft’s abuses. We are disheartened to see how Microsoft has spun this debate, but then again, the monopolist is controlling media with new companies and appointments involving Microsoft employees (new example in [1, 2]). Those who want an accurate description of Microsoft’s historic role in computing can start here. █
Permalink
Send this to a friend
Posted in Courtroom, Europe, Microsoft, Patents at 5:31 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz
Paper innovation
Summary: Patent news with particular focus on how Microsoft and its patent troll (the world’s largest troll) do business
“Microsoft licenses caching algorithms,” tells us a reader who points in this direction. What the following article shows is that Microsoft does not actually act as a software vendor but as a licensor that manages the sales through lawyers who also abuse GNU/Linux (that would be David Kaefer [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11).
Adaptec has announced benchmark results for its MaxIS solid state drive (SSD) caching card and revealed it’s based on licensed Microsoft code.
[...]
Adaptec said it licensed ideas from Microsoft about using SSDs as read caching devices. Its release about the benchmark quoted David Kaefer, general manager of Microsoft’s Intellectual Property Licensing, saying: “When our datacenter team came up with some innovative ideas around using solid state devices as read caching devices, we determined it made good sense to license these advances to Adaptec because Microsoft itself doesn’t sell these types of products.”
Here is the press release. It shows a new business model that develops at Microsoft and also its patent troll Nathan Myhrvold, who said that “intellectual property is the next software.”
A few days ago we showed that Myhrvold was allegedly using Durham Logistics as a shell and Glyn Moody covers this now, claiming that “The King of the Trolls Strikes Gold”.
What’s just so perfect, of course, is that not only did Intellectual Ventures not invent anything here, but that it used other companies to hide the fact it had acquired the patent – the very opposite of the disclosure that the word “patent” implies. It’s a perfect demonstration of what is wrong with Intellectual Ventures and the US patent system, and with their unhealthy symbiosis.
It will be interesting to see what happens now. I’m sure that lots of conversations between Intellectual Ventures and smartphone manufacturers are underway; deals will be done, and we’ll never know the details. So now might be a good time for companies and engineers to dig through that prior art at the bottom of their filing cabinets in the hope that the patent can be blown away rather than bowed down to.
Microsoft and its trolls are not exactly in a position where they can claim any moral ground. Based on many new reports [1, 2, 3, 4], Microsoft has been sued by an ophthalmologist for patent violations.
A patent-holding Illinois ophthalmologist has sued Microsoft over the Zune, alleging the software company illegally added his patented technology to the media player after he tried to license it to Microsoft.
This patent may seem absurd, but it’s no more absurd than Microsoft’s own patents.
An eye doctor has sued Microsoft for allegedly nicking his patented technology with its Zune media player.
Dr Edward Yavitz, of the Yavitz Eye Centre in Rockford, spotted two wizard ideas to quickly tag and downloading music via a device’s FM radio receiver.
Microsoft Nick writes about the ongoing VirnetX case (VirnetX is suing Vista 7 now, having just won another case [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]) and IDG has this new slideshow which contains some notable patent lawsuits against Microsoft [1, 2]. There are over 50 of them at the moment.
TechDirt has just published a rebuttal to a man who promoted software patents.
His take is that by only allowing for seven years, “patent trolls” lying in wait to pounce on a technology to become successful would lose their window in which to sue. This of course ignores the cases where lawsuits are filed almost immediately after a patent is rewarded.
TechDirt has also found this dangerous precedence [via] where the migration of cases to the Eastern District of Texas is said not to matter. Should judges simply ignore patent troll tourism?
The FFII’s president points to what he describes as “FRAND and reasonable royalties for patents on Philips CDs and Orange Book compliance used by a Dutch Court.” From the lawyers’ den (they call patents “IP”):
The relationship between IP and competition law is one of the hottest topics in IP law. It now seems that two respected European courts have come to different conclusions on the applicability of the “competition law defence” (although in the result, the decisions do not differ).
In Europe, the danger persists that a unification will eliminate safe havens for developers. █
Permalink
Send this to a friend
Posted in Apple, Microsoft, Security, Vista, Vista 7, Windows at 4:41 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz
Summary: Windows security still broken, judging by Pwn2Own
WINDOWS is not doing terribly well. The margins are low and Microsoft relies on bundling alone (which requires a hardware buying spree). Looking at the past week’s news, there was one headline alone with “Vista” in it and just 5 clusters of headlines about “Windows 7″, 1 of which was a whitepaper.
Vista 7 is hardly mentioned these days, except for occasional complaints or PR fluff. Microsoft continues to improperly count “sales” and we have already explained how Microsoft fakes these to achieve an illusion of success. In many ways, Vista 7 is just Vista, but it looks a little different (notably the new deskbar). “Well the initial impression is how much it looks like Vista,” said Microsoft’s booster Jack Schofield about Vista 7, “Which I think is…uh…the thing I’m not supposed to say.”
In previous posts we showed that Vista 7 is considered worse when it come to security than its predecessor, Windows Vista. To name some posts on the subject:
According to IDG, “Hacker busts IE8 on Windows 7 in 2 minutes”
Two researchers yesterday won $10,000 each at the Pwn2Own hacking contest by bypassing important security measures of Windows 7.
Both Peter Vreugdenhil of the Netherlands and a German researcher who would only identify himself by the first name Nils found ways to disable DEP (data execution prevention) and ASLR (address space layout randomization), which are two of Windows 7′s most vaunted anti-exploit features. Each contestant faced down the fully-patched 64-bit version of Windows 7 and came out a winner.
“Hacker Bypasses Windows 7 Anti-Exploit Features In IE 8 Hack,” reports Dark Reading, a Web site which is focused on security issues.
A Dutch researcher won $10,000 in the Pwn2Own hacking contest this week for hacking Internet Explorer 8 on a Windows 7 machine — bypassing built-in anti-exploit features in the operating system.
From Microsoft sites comes a bit of spin and it’s worth noting that Apple’s proprietary products got cracked too.
Miller used one of the flaws he found by dumb fuzzing yesterday to exploit Safari on a MacBook Pro, walking off with the notebook, $10,000 and a free trip to Las Vegas this summer to the DefCon hacking conference.
Here is an interview with Miller and a summary from The Inquirer that says: “Apple and Microsoft get trashed by hackers again”
Some months ago we wrote about Microsoft entering Telstra [1, 2], so the following new item is also worth mentioning.
Telstra Corporation director of security services, Andy Solterback, has responded to claims by Microsoft that it has largely fixed security problems.
It is now being claimed the Internet attacks which are mostly caused by Windows zombies hit Seattle the most.
Seattle is top, according to the report, for cyberattacks and potential infections and online behaviour that can lead to cybercrime, like online shops, online banks and wi-fi.
It is rather interesting that Windows zombies go right back where they came from. █
Permalink
Send this to a friend
Posted in Google, Microsoft at 4:09 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz
Summary: More money to be spent on Google, at the expense of Microsoft, which in turn lobbies the government so that it serves its corporate overlords
OUR position on Google was recently described in this post. Free software does not need to personify or rely on corporations as though they are inherently committed to Free software, but while some corporations perceive Free software as an enabler and a friend, others viciously attack it and try to make it illegal. This is why the following news story about Microsoft being dumped for Google in a very large company is probably good news (but not as good as a company moving to Free software).
It wasn’t broken, but he fixed it anyway. After launching an initial pilot, Manesh Patel, senior vice president and CIO at global contract manufacturer Sanmina-SCI Corp., ramped up quickly to move more than 16,000 users onto Google Apps for e-mail, calendaring and contacts — and he began turning off the company’s Microsoft Exchange infrastructure.
This only comes to show that Microsoft is being ditched. The company from Redmond often pitches for this weird delusion that it is gaining, despite the fact that in many areas its market share diminishes and it has an effect on the bottom line [1, 2, 3, 4] (profits decline in almost every area of operation despite some economic recovery and layoffs that reduce expenses). Microsoft is even killing many products and some divisions.
According to this new report, Microsoft is now putting an end to “Select”.
Microsoft will phase out its popular Select volume licensing plan in favor of its “Select Plus” program, which the company claims is a simpler option. Others say Select Plus will mean smaller discounts for buyers who truly worked the system and who could wangle bigger discounts from Select than other volume programs, including Microsoft Enterprise Agreements.
“Select is the funnest [sic] program to deal with because there are ways to game the system to get more than you’re entitled to,” said analyst Paul DeGroot with Directions on Microsoft, a Kirkland, Wash.-based consulting firm.
DeGroot makes a living from praise of Microsoft [1, 2], but he also admitted that “there’s a lot of Linux out there — much more than Microsoft generally signals publicly.” DeGroot is even based near the homes of Microsoft’s chiefs, so we always take his words of analysis with a grain of salt. He is essentially a Microsoft booster. So anyway, the above shows that Microsoft resorts to a form of price hiking, which usually indicates that the company is in immediately need for more revenue. Google’s business model is proving very challenging to Microsoft and according to this news report, Google even challenges Microsoft when it comes to lobbying.
In 2009, Microsoft spent $6.72 million on lobbying, including $1.69 million in the fourth quarter. But the world’s largest software maker spent 24 percent less on lobbying last year than it did in 2008 when its lobbying expenses totaled $8.9 million.
As we have explained many times before, there are undisclosed activities and amounts that are not accounted for in these “official” figures. Gates-hired lobbyists, for example, may not count as Microsoft lobbying, but they have a similar effect and agenda. Anyway, the report above is titled “Google’s lobbying machine still cranking in 4Q” and we insist that lobbying by anyone is a bad thing [1, 2] because it subverts democracy and harms people’s freedom. In a later post we’ll debate Microsoft’s latest attack on people’s freedom in China. █
“Did you know that there are more than 34,750 registered lobbyists in Washington, D.C., for just 435 representatives and 100 senators? That’s 64 lobbyists for each congressperson.”
–CIO.com
Permalink
Send this to a friend
Posted in Free/Libre Software, FSF, Microsoft, Mono, Novell at 3:22 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz
Summary: News about the FSF, Mono, Novell, Microsoft and the attempted move by some of the latter to embrace “open core” at the expense of Free software
IN a new blog post, Bradley M. Kuhn from the SFLC announces that he will be getting back to the FSF.
Finally, I was glad to meet (or meet again) so many FSF supporters at LibrePlanet, and I deeply hope that I can serve our shared goal well in this additional role.
Some of the discussion that came later was interesting. Kuhn announced in Identica that he “was elected to !fsf Board of Directors [...] Glad to have official role w/ FSF again”. Many people congratulated him. One person, Gerard Braad, talked to him about .NET/Mono developers and said that “@migueldeicaza responded on twitter http://twitter.com/migueldeicaza (but the @bkuhn on twitter is not bradley on identica)” (de Icaza does not use Identica).
“…most of the .NET developers out there who have no sense of what FOSS means.”
–Gerard BraadHe added [1, 2] some observations such as “what I meant with ‘they’ is most of the .NET developers out there who have no sense of what FOSS means. There are many!”
It is probably worse than that because those developers tend to dislike Free software. Take de Icaza for example. He is spitting in everybody’s well or biting the hand that once fed him (and gave him an award). As Kuhn puts it, “Miguel’s merely saying !fsf ‘s criticisms are “crap” isn’t responsive. Doesn’t say why we shouldn’t worry about the issues raised.”
Meanwhile we’ve found this new post titled “MojoPortal on SLES 11 with Mono Extension”
MojoPortal (http://www.mojoportal.com) is an open source, cross-platform*, content management system (CMS) using ASP.NET as the web development language. Its intended for personal and commercial use and license under the Common Public License 1.0. You can read more on the motivations of the author here.
Novell’s Sandy, one of the notable sources of Mono at GNOME (Tomboy for starters), looks for more developers. Mono is like "open core" and speaking of which, our suspicion that Canonical’s new COO had something to do with an ODF FUD spreader and software patents lobbyist [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] from Gartner coming to OSBC may get some credence from this new post which says: “Last week at OSBC I attended an interesting discussion between Matt Asay and Gartner’s Brian Prentice, much of which was spent discussing the relative merits of open core and pure open source business strategies.”
What are they doing to “open source” at OSBC [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]? Novell was there too. █
Permalink
Send this to a friend
Posted in America, Asia, Bill Gates, Deception, Microsoft at 2:50 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz
Summary: Microsoft is seeding its software and prepares people for the use of Microsoft tools alone
MICROSOFT is in a fragile state, so it wants to ensure that American states become even more dependent on Microsoft. The monopolist is trying to suck up all of the nation’s medical data (previously discussed in [1, 2]), and that of other countries too. Microsoft even hired lobbyists to achieve that. But another strategic area is one that revolves around indoctrinating people so that they only use Microsoft software. Microsoft even describes this indoctrination process as though it is charity. We previously showed how Microsoft did this in Georgia [1, 2] and now we find this in the news.
Microsoft Elevate America, a public-private partnership providing free technology training to Georgia’s displaced workers, has distributed more than 16,000 computer training vouchers and more are available to those seeking updated computer skills.
These are not computer skills; they are Microsoft skills and they are designed to extend Microsoft’s range of influence. Microsoft does the same thing to Californians [1, 2] after a deal which was signed at the beginning of the month and it continues to be covered. It is the same in Michigan [1, 2, 3] where Microsoft indoctrination is offered as a job precursor [1, 2]. We call this “American EDGI” because it is similar to EDGI. Here is another victim of this programme.
Microsoft does offer the certification for a fee, but California is one of 13 states currently offering free vouchers. WIB has received 4,173 vouchers for Tulare County residents.
New York too is falling prey to it now.
As part of its “Elevate America” program, Microsoft is coming to New York State to offer thousands of New Yorkers free computer training.
It’s not “computer training”, it’s Microsoft training and it helps Microsoft become stronger. Politicians fail to see it and people do not assess the cost of lock-in. New York is making a mistake as it would be better off teaching people how to use Free software and teach their peers the same skills.
To Microsoft, all the above is simply an investment. It’s not a donation. First they get people dependent on their products and later they start ‘punishing’ them to force them to pay whatever money they have. The irony is that we see Microsoft shedding crocodile tears [1, 2, 3] while it is raiding and suing those very same people at a later date. Here is the news from Dubai.
Microsoft Gulf has announced that Dubai-based computer reseller Storm Computers has agreed to an out-of-court civil settlement, following a raid on the store a few months earlier.
For those who do not know, Microsoft indoctrinates children in Dubai and tries to characterise this as a donation. Bill Gates has been personally involved in these deals as he is the expert when it comes to portraying business as “philanthropy”. The above shows that it’s merely a harmful investment that puts people in prison or empties their pockets. Those same people whom Microsoft pretends to help it is only going to criminalise; as this new post shows, Microsoft lies by using the word “stealing”, which the author of the “Microsoft Windows” blog simply does not understand (or was brainwashed to repeat senselessly). When Microsoft gives Microsoft software to children, then in many cases it merely turns those children into future infringers whom it can then extort (as it so often does).
Lastly, as usual, Microsoft in Jordan continues to embrace those children, who will later depend on counterfeited software in the country (as it’s commonplace). Microsoft brought the Live@Edu scam to local students. The monopolist from another country is dumping on them so as to get them addicted and later subjugated or convicted (for counterfeiting). It is all rather simple to see and it takes great levels of denial not to see it. █
“They’ll get sort of addicted, and then we’ll somehow figure out how to collect sometime in the next decade.”
–Bill Gates
Permalink
Send this to a friend
Posted in IRC Logs at 1:51 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz
Read the log
Enter the IRC channel now
To use your own IRC client, join channel #boycottnovell in FreeNode.
Permalink
Send this to a friend
03.26.10
Posted in Apple, Deception, Marketing, Microsoft at 7:54 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz
Summary: Shattering yet again the myth of Microsoft as an innovator, using the past week’s news alone
AS we wrote in our previous post, Windows Mobile is in shambles and Microsoft watcher Joe Wilcox rightly says that “Windows Phone 7 Series imitates Apple’s iPhone in the worst ways” (it’s actually his headline, which we agree with).
For years, people have accused Microsoft of being an imitator, rather than innovator. Finally there is evidence: The ways Windows Phone 7 Series imitates the very worst of Apple’s iPhone. Unless there is the strangest of coincidences — like two students having the same wrong answers on a high school history test — Microsoft is imitating Apple, using the same strategy to make the same mistakes. It’s either imitation or incompetence, and out of fairness I assume the former.
Windows Phone 7 is also being quite harshly criticised in the Philippines.
If rumours are to be believed, the Windows Phone 7 will not support multi-tasking, at least for third party applications, no removable storage, no copy-cut-and-paste and will have an application store that will only feature Microsoft approved apps. Does this sound familiar? It is just as if Microsoft used a 3D scanner and a 3D printer to create the exact same device from the fruit company.
[...]
I am waiting for consumers to criticize this new OS from Microsoft – the same way they criticized the iPhone. Android lovers will still find their OS to be “superior” because of its third-party background app support.
Microsoft fails quite badly when it tries to sell something other than just software; it fails not just in technical terms but in business terms too. The monopoly abuser uses these toys to lure young people, but that’s about it. Not many buyers accept hardware from Microsoft. “Microsoft Surface is vapourware” is the title of this post, which turns out to be more like a Microsoft advertisement. Surface never sold in a sizable number, so it’s a business failure. Microsoft is removing negative technical reviews of the Surface, so it’s not so easy to find them.
The best known example of Microsoft failures in hardware is probably Xbox/Xbox360, which had Microsoft lose billions of dollars. It is still being mocked by both Nintendo and Sony this week, with quotes that shed light on Microsoft merely imitating again.
Damning with faint praise Tretton said that Natal was a “pretty big idea” and if punters really want to play with a camera they might like to buy a $99 PS2 and play some of the great technology “we invented eight years ago.”
Microsoft has already admitted that Windows Mobile too (now renamed to escape its bad reputation) is an attempt to copy other companies’ products. Microsoft is still not innovating, it’s just observing what others do and then markets its copycats mercilessly. History can be rewritten later when the victims die and cannot defend themselves (or preserve the true story). █
“I went to the garbage cans at the Computer Science Center and I fished out listings of their operating systems.”
–Bill Gates
Permalink
Send this to a friend
« Previous Page — « Previous entries « Previous Page · Next Page » Next entries » — Next Page »
