10.18.10
Posted in Deception, Microsoft, Security, Windows at 3:48 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz
Summary: A survey of security news and an analysis of Microsoft spin, namely how the company diverts attention away from its failures and portrays itself as a security leader
YESTERDAY we caught up with 3 weeks of Microsoft (in)security news, adding to our record more evidence to show what we had argued earlier this month. While the former Microsoft executives who now run Juniper Networks help protect Windows from those many vulnerabilities (some of which are hidden), there is no denying of the fact that Windows vulnerabilities are on the rise [1, 2]. To highlight bits from the news, vulnerabilities multiply fast and they are found by the dozens:
VUPEN Security Discovers Critical Vulnerabilities in Microsoft Software
VUPEN Security, the world leader in vulnerability research and analysis, today announced that the VUPEN Vulnerability Research Team (VRT) has been working with Microsoft for six months to address twenty-one vulnerabilities discovered by VUPEN in major Microsoft software.
Also in the news:
• Windows full of holes, ready for Microsoft patch
In case you were wondering, the previous record was 34 in late 2009, which makes the number 49 seem even bigger. You have to wonder if we are getting better or worse about this security thing.
• Microsoft Issues Biggest Fix Ever For Windows, Explorer, Office
• Microsoft releases security patches for Windows, IE, Office
• Microsoft will roll out a whopper load of patches
• Microsoft Preps Record Security Patch Tuesday
• Microsoft Patch Tuesday expected to set record
• Microsoft’s Biggest Patch Tuesday Ever — Better Update Your System, or Else
• Microsoft sets Patch Tuesday record, fixing 49 security holes
• Microsoft issues patches for a record 49 security holes
• Patch Tuesday brings record harvest of security fixes
As that last one puts it: “Many of these holes allow a remote takeover of your computer, in some cases after you do nothing wrong beside visit the wrong Web page. One such opening has frequently been exploited by the Stuxnet worm that’s been running around the world.”
Microsoft has only just done something about Stuxnet, which we wrote about in:
- Ralph Langner Says Windows Malware Possibly Designed to Derail Iran’s Nuclear Programme
- Windows Viruses Can be Politically Motivated Sometimes
- Who Needs Windows Back Doors When It’s So Insecure?
- Windows Insecurity Becomes a Political Issue
- Windows, Stuxnet, and Public Stoning
- Stuxnet Grows Beyond Siemens-Windows Infections
- Has BP Already Abandoned Windows?
- Reports: Apple to Charge for (Security) Updates
- Windows Viruses Can be Politically Motivated Sometimes
- New Flaw in Windows Facilitates More DDOS Attacks
- Siemens is Bad for Industry, Partly Due to Microsoft
- Microsoft Security Issues in The British Press, Vista and Vista 7 No Panacea
- Microsoft’s Negligence in Patching (Worst Amongst All Companies) to Blame for Stuxnet
- Microsoft Software: a Darwin Test for Incompetence
- Bad September for Microsoft Security, Symantec Buyout Rumours
- Microsoft Claims Credit for Failing in Security
- Many Windows Servers Being Abandoned; Minnesota Goes the Opposite Direction by Giving Microsoft Its Data
- Windows Users Still Under Attack From Stuxnet, Halo, and Zeus
Now, any sane person would say that Microsoft and almost nobody else is to blame for these vulnerabilities and should therefore be held accountable. But not when Microsoft’s spin machine occupies the news, though. Take the Bill Gates-funded Guardian [1, 2, 3, 4] for example. It serves as Microsoft’s platform right now by publishing “Microsoft Removed 6.5 Million Bots From Windows Machines In Q2″ and it’s the same propaganda the MSBBC published some days ago, having previously (just a week beforehand) given Microsoft's Charney the platform yet again. It’s rather astonishing that journalists are able to portray Microsoft as the “good guy” in this story by merely reciting reports from Microsoft. It’s an example of the failure of today’s journalism and it’s hard to tell just how much impact the former Microsoft UK executives who run the BBC or Bill Gates’ sponsorship of The Guardian have here. A few hours ago our reader told us that “Bill Gates on BBC breakfast news later.” Later this week we’ll write about that too.
“It’s rather astonishing that journalists are able to portray Microsoft as the “good guy” in this story by merely reciting reports from Microsoft.”Anyway, here is a rant about what Microsoft is trying to do here and here are a few more examples of the Microsoft spin [1, 2, 3]. So fake news is good news? It should not be the case. Either way, it’s clear that they portray Microsoft as the saviour, not the culprit, even though the problem itself was caused by Microsoft’s continued negligence [1, 2, 3]. Earlier this morning we gave an example of similar spin. Here is the same propaganda with a “Zeus” flavour [1, 2]. The latter says that “Zeus-created botnets, known as Zbots, control many millions of computers — mostly Windows XP machines — in almost 200 countries.” Okay, so why give Microsoft any credit? That’s just mastery of spin. We wrote about Zeus in posts such as [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7].
Watch out for the spin, some of which originates in the ‘Microsoft press’ (e.g. Kurt Mackie). As usual, Microsoft will just blame the users, even though zero-day flaws mean that any Windows computer can be hijacked even if it’s fully patched. As for those who patch early, they take other types of risks and this bit of news is why people are reluctant to patch:
On Tuesday, Microsoft released updates for both Microsoft Office 2004 and 2008 to correct some security vulnerabilities in the software, but a number of people are having difficulties opening some Excel spreadsheets in Office 2004 after the update.
As mentioned by CNET member and MacFixIt reader Kurt in the comments of our article announcing the update:
“After applying the update yesterday, some Excel documents refuse to open. For a fraction of a second the open progress bar shows up, then nothing happens.”
This problem has been echoed by numerous other Office users here at CNET as well as at the Office for Mac forums, and Microsoft’s Mac team is currently investigating the issue.
Yes, that’s why many people won’t patch, either. Even those whose machine is not fully patched can sometimes blame Microsoft’s poor quality of patches. █
Permalink
Send this to a friend
Posted in Apple, GNU/Linux, Hardware, Microsoft, Windows at 2:31 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz
Summary: Microsoft stores appear to be a failed experiment based on the observation that almost none are built anymore
OVER at Identi.ca/IRC there has been somewhat of a reminder of the fact that Microsoft no longer knows if it’s a services, software, marketing, patent litigation, or hardware company. It’s trying to be a little bit of anything as long as it has a chance of bringing some income, but by far the only significant sources of income are Windows and Office and these too are in jeopardy because revenue declines as a result of competition from GNU/Linux. Even Forbes acknowledges this right now:
Microsoft’s operating margins for the Windows operating system business have declined from an estimated 77% in 2006 to around 68% in 2009. We expect this margin decline to continue over our forecast period as netbooks and Windows sales in emerging markets account for a bigger share of Microsoft’s sales mix.
Economic theory of supply and demand says that the cost of Windows will gradually approach $0 in all cases. Microsoft knows that Windows can be copied within a framework of infinite abundance, which is why it must sell something which cannot be replicated, namely hardware. Last year Microsoft began ‘pulling an Apple’ by opening stores in an attempt to mimic Apple’s highly lucrative market. Microsoft’s problem is that, unlike Apple, it must compete against other stores which sell similar PCs, so the price will be driven down (contrariwise, Apple’s exploitative stores can fix the price). It’s hardly surprising that Microsoft stores are hardly being opened anymore. Some people forgot all about these stores (they vanished from news headlines), but this one article put two and two together, then asked if the Microsoft stores are an “Epic Fail”.
Have you been to a Microsoft store recently? If so, let us know what you saw. One of our contributors said that she was there last year and they gave her freebies. █
Permalink
Send this to a friend
Posted in Microsoft, Rumour at 2:06 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz
Summary: Unverified comments about internal problems at Microsoft, namely lack of activity
AT Techrights we are very references based on the sense that we try to provide a lot of references (preferably new ones) for all claims that are being made. But sometimes information arrives via IRC or word of mouth and that’s just harder to verify/validate, so we clearly make the separation.
Under what can only be classified as “word of mouth” we can say that there’s a class action coming against Microsoft Windows bundling. There’s no reason to assume everyone wants Windows anymore and to force everyone to buy Windows along with hardware is simply unreasonable. GNU/Linux has matured a great deal and people whom I put on a GNU/Linux-based operating system for the first time have zero problems with it. It does everything they expect and it is simple to use without prior experience. Increasingly I hear from people who explore GNU/Linux and migrated entire facilities to it. Even relatives of mine, who I never imagined would explore GNU/Linux, turn out to be using it without making much fuss about it. A lot of my family uses it and my brother, whose friend started working for Microsoft not so long ago, confessed that they hardly do any work there anymore. They just come to work to sit idly and he actually brags about it (which would be problematic had the name been given). Well, this is the type of arrogance that kills companies. It’s Hubris.
“Microsoft Employees Are More Bored Than Ever” says this new report from Business Insider. This one too quotes anonymous Microsoft employees.
Microsoft’s employees are more bored than ever, says the author of Mini-Microsoft, a message board/blog focused on the internal culture of Microsoft.
According to the anonymous author of Mini-Microsoft, “my circle of friends have hit a patch of corporate ennui like never before.”
They die out of boredom and this lies in complete agreement with what I have been hearing from my brother’s friend. He says they just come in, have drinks and chat, and maybe program for just a little while. Nonchalance kills their paymaster and it shows. This type of neglect may also leave angry customers hanging until more lawsuit land on Microsoft’s desk. There are interesting times to come. █
Permalink
Send this to a friend
Posted in Microsoft at 1:40 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz
Image from Pew Research Center
Summary: Microsoft rapidly slides into obscurity and Techrights explains how coverage will be affected
FOR THOSE who do not know, the way Techrights tracks Microsoft typically involves reading and studying Microsoft news over the weekend, usually on a Sunday afternoon. But Techrights has not done this since last month. Why? There is not a high enough volume of news. Microsoft grew somewhat irrelevant in news outlets. A few years ago Microsoft was by far the most talked about company in technology and now it fell behind companies like Facebook, based on this survey (watching the graph is a must). As Microsoft boosters put it:
When it comes to mainstream media outlets like newspapers, TV and radio news, it seems that no one cares much about Microsoft anymore, a new report from Pew Research Center has found. Everyone’s eye is on Apple instead. If they turn away from Cupertino, it’s mostly to write about Google, Twitter and Facebook.
Yes, even Facebook receives more coverage according to this survey. About a week ago Techrights stated that it would de-emphasise Microsoft coverage not because Microsoft is any less harmful or increasingly benign; it’s just because to software freedom, greater hurdles are beginning to develop and we need to recognise these hurdles. Fog Computing is a very scary phenomenon and software patents are no longer being pushed just by Microsoft; Apple is in certain aspects a lot worse than Microsoft even if historically it is not being recognised as such. Facebook is quite a disgusting company for all sorts of reasons, not just its software patents and general policy (Professor Eben Moglen has begun warning a lot of people about Facebook). In IRC we’ve been discussing the early days of the company and how the history is gradually being deleted; Facebook — like Microsoft — gained momentum through illegal activities, but a lot of people no longer know this or recognise this. More recently came all the PR nonsense from Mark, who had called his users “dumb fucks” in the early days when he is said to have illegally published people’s profiles on his site, pretending that they had subscribed to share this information. It should hardly be surprising that Facebook sympathises with Microsoft and sometimes gets compared to it. Facebook, which is now partly owned by Microsoft, has increasingly become an extension of Microsoft. To highlight some recent news, we have “Microsoft bolsters Facebook Docs sharing service” and “Microsoft initiates a campaign on Facebook with PC vs. Mac application” (with more examples in the wiki).
Microsoft Nick argues that “Microsoft conspicuously absent from new social media map” and if one considers the social media networks which Microsoft turns into subservient ones, then it’s a different picture altogether.
As if we needed further proof Microsoft isn’t a notable player in the emergent world of social media …
The third and newest version of The Conversation Prism, a map of today’s most influential online social tools, includes just one Microsoft product: Newsvine, which Microsoft subsidiary msnbc.com acquired in 2007. Like The Seattle Times’ Brier Dudley, I couldn’t spot any other Microsoft products in the Prism.
Well, msnbc.com is an interesting case and later on we are going to show how this network — along with other networks — was being ‘bought’ by Microsoft in order to lie (or to “spin”, putting it more mildly).
For those who worry about Microsoft, there is reason to worry no more. It’s like worrying about SCO and as we’ll show later in the week, Microsoft as a phenomenon is a greater threat than Microsoft itself. The company called Microsoft received many downgrades recently (most of them we’ve covered) and now there’s this smackdown from Barclays Capital, just shortly before the results come.
Barclays Capital cut its price target on shares of Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) by 6.7%.
“Citigroup Pessimistic on Microsoft” says this other new article’s headline and there is clearly turbulence with closures and layoffs (we covered nearly all of them last week). Microsoft is still shrinking, it only pretends to be growing sometimes (attributed to the art of PR).
“Microsoft is still shrinking, it only pretends to be growing sometimes (attributed to the art of PR).”As Microsoft is yesterday’s company (see the bar charts about media coverage), nobody can trust it anymore. Just watch what happened to “KIN” partners. Microsoft is a risky partner to have now. Well, even Verizon’s CEO rejects it in an insulting way [1, 2] and Newsweek predicts that Microsoft will oust its CEO (Ballmer) later this year. It would be symbolic, it would not actually save the company. When asked whether Vista Phone 7 [sic] failing would have Ballmer lose his job Ballmer jokingly responded as seen in this video. Groklaw framed this as “Ballmer Asked if His Job is Secure If Windows Phone 7 Bombs (video)” and Pamela Jones wrote: “Answer is, “I don’t know about that.” But a little bit as a joke. He’s “excited” about the launch and believes it’s a “market changer”.”
Well, half of departing Microsoft employees do not like Ballmer [1, 2] and huge Microsoft boosters like Harry McCracken lose faith in the company in general.
The next few months will be interesting, but Techrights will not cover Microsoft matters as much as it used to. There just isn’t much to cover, so it’s not necessary. █
Permalink
Send this to a friend
Posted in Asia, Microsoft at 12:47 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz
Summary: Months after Microsoft employees actively participated in shutting down political dissent there is another attempt to rewrite history
THE Russian spin [1, 2] we saw a couple of months back did not cover the misbehaviour of Microsoft in countries like Kyrgyzstan [1, 2], where Microsoft officials are said to have helped the authorities shut down opposition. The New York Times appears to have decided to carry some more Microsoft PR where, rather than provide information about Microsoft’s role in political suppression, there is just listing of a PR move:
Microsoft Moves to Help Nonprofits Avoid Piracy-Linked Crackdowns
[...]
But it is now extending the program to other countries: eight former Soviet republics — Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan — as well as China, Malaysia and Vietnam. Microsoft executives said they would consider adding more.
Nonsense. Where was the New York Times when less widely-read publications wrote about what Microsoft did in Kyrgyzstan for example? It’s clearly an attempt to bury shameful news, replacing it with PR. This type of PR spin needs to be highlighted because it was also promoted by the mobbyists and the Microsoft boosters whose goal is to portray Microsoft as a wonderful company. “Microsoft’s Legal Nihilism” is another new article from The Moscow Times which pretends that Microsoft is just a victim. Hogwash.
Few things can ignite Russian society as much as a noisy case of criminal prosecution for computer piracy. When the case involves huge, powerful Microsoft versus human rights activists, the inevitable result is a barrage of news stories that produce more heat than light. It also creates a widespread sense that the software leviathan has once again done something reprehensible, albeit legal.
Microsoft has not been passive in these types of crackdowns. According to Forbes for example, “Microsoft’s Kyrgyzstan agent assisted the Kyrgyz authorities in cracking down on dissenting media five days before last week’s uprising.”
Spot the PR which follows a blunder being exposed. The PR is supposed to replace the original news. █
Now you see him…
Now you don’t.
Permalink
Send this to a friend
10.17.10
Posted in News Roundup at 5:17 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz
Contents
-
You may think your day job is demanding, but it’s often nothing compared with providing tech support for the family. That’s where Linux comes in, says Jack Wallen.
The problem with working in IT is that when we go home, our job often continues. Sometimes, keeping our children’s computers running can be a bigger challenge than sorting out the adults at work.
But if you install Linux at home, you can avoid the headaches. That’s because sound reasons exist for migrating young users from other operating systems.
-
Audiocasts/Shows
-
Google
-
Google’s Chrome operating system may be ready in about a month’s time, since bug comments indicate the code reached Release Candidate status. The information is sure and says the operating system is almost finalized, its latest build being identified as near-ready 0.9.78.1. This is corroborating with a mention of a Google employee referring to a November 11th date when he was asked about a specific feature of Chrome.
-
Kernel Space
-
Applications
-
Basenji is a tool which indexes your removable media such as CDs/DVDs and USB sticks and keeps a history of the data on each media you add to its database so you can later easily search / browse for something on your CDs/DVDs or USB sticks without actually plugging them into your computer.
-
Instructionals/Technical
-
Games
-
Thanks to readers who pointed out that Frictional Games has posted an analysis of Amnesia: The Dark Descent’s sales after one month…
-
Many of the questions center around PC (Windows) vs. Console focus and development; the problems and arguments mirror those that surround Linux gaming: it’s difficult to exclusively support a smaller audience in today’s market.
-
Desktop Environments
-
K Desktop Environment/KDE SC)
-
It’s been 11 days since the Qt announcement of new gesture support, and I wanted to blog about it right away… but alas, now will have to do. The folks at Qt have been working on multi-touch support for a while now. They blogged about gestures, multi-touch, Mac support, Windows support, and then at UDS in Brussels (May 2010), they shared their 4.8 plans for multi-touch with the Ubuntu community.
Until recently, there has been no MT stack for Linux. The great news is that the folks at Qt are very interested in getting Qt to work with uTouch. Stephen Bregma has been working on the GEIS API that toolkits will have the option of taking advantage of, and we were delighted to hear from Zeno and Denis that the Qt API they have envisioned and planned is very similar to GEIS, and should make for an excellent match. They are going to be talking with the community about this at UDS two weeks from now, in fact 
-
I wrote a few days ago about Kubuntu on Netbooks. After a few days of experimentation and discovery, I’m going to continue and expand that topic to the KDE Netbook Desktop in general. This is likely to be pretty long, so if you want to either bail out or get a cup of coffee before you get in too far, now is the time…
I first installed the KDE Netbook Desktop (via Kubuntu 10.10) on my Samsung N150 Plus. I assumed that it would not be terribly interesting or useful on my HP 2133 Mini-Note netbooks, because of the limited graphic support for the VIA Chrome9 graphic controller. That assumption was also based on the fact that the Ubuntu Netbook Edition, with the new Unity desktop, would not even install on the Mini-Note. However, after seeing how NDE Netbook worked on the Samsung (and basically being blown away by it), and seeing how it handles and configures desktop effects, I started to think that it might actually work pretty well on the Mini-Note despite the limited graphics. So I set out to investigate the possibilities…
-
GNOME Desktop
-
In an effort to get better organized, I’ve put together a page listing the goals of the gnome-keyring and seahorse projects. It’s all broken down into tasks, plans, and what’s already done.
-
-
Some time ago a user on Gentoo Forums has pointed out that gecko-mediaplayer plugin does not load in www-client/chromium. It turns out there is a compatibility issue that leads to a browser hang, so upstream just blacklisted the plugin (based on file name). The browser has a hardcoded list of plugins that it will not load at all.
-
Debian Family
-
Just some little (unfinished) concept mockup. Seeing that much of it still ends up as a “text box with syntax highlighting” it’d probably make sense to implement it as a gedit plugin.
-
I’ve noticed an odd pattern of behaviour in Iceweasel (the unbranded version of Mozilla Firefox that comes with Debian) on Debian Squeeze. It randomly pops up a dialog box telling you that it has to restart Iceweasel to remove or update an addon, and gives you a choice of “restart” or “cancel”. What it does not do is tell you what the offending addon actually is, or what it’s about to do.
-
Canonical/Ubuntu
-
-
I’ve written before about my deep skepticism regarding the true motives of Canonical, Ltd.’s advocacy and demand of for-profit corporate copyright assignment without promises to adhere to copyleft. I’ve often asked Canonical employees, including Jono Bacon, Amanda Brock, Jane Silber, and Mark Shuttleworth himself to explain (a) why exactly they demand copyright assignment on their projects, rather than merely having contributors agree to the GNU GPL formally (like projects such as Linux do), and (b) why, having received a contributor’s copyright assignment, Canonical, Ltd. refuses to promise to keep the software copylefted and never proprietarize it (as FSF has always done in assignments). When I ask these questions of Canonical, Ltd. employees, they invariably artfully change the subject.
-
Dual screen users can now benefit from the beauty of Maverick’s default wallpaper thanks to the following dedicated dual-screen version by Kyle Baker.
-
Launchpad has always advertised that we auto-expire inactive incomplete bugs, but we haven’t done this for awhile now. Some developers are using their own launchpadlib scripts which set bug tasks to the EXPIRED status based on the same criteria that Launchpad will use.
-
So my laptop was crapping out. The wifi wasn’t working. It was getting absurdly slow. I tried running Vista’s recovery and it ran into some sort of infinite loop during the process. I have SATA hard drives so I needed a floppy to load XP. Obviously, I don’t have a floppy drive and I didn’t really want to buy a USB floppy.
So I downloaded and installed Ubuntu 10.10 and I must say, Linux has come a long way.
-
-
Phones
-
Android
-
-
We’ve been following the Angry Birds obsession for awhile now and after showcasing an early APK, the Android Game finally launched yesterday. The response was so spectacular that downloaders actually crashed the GetJar servers.
-
-
-
-
-
Has open source reached a tipping point? A new survey has found many organisations are planning to invest more in it, as more perceived benefits are understood beyond the obvious cost advantage over proprietary software.
Accenture’s survey of 300 large organisations in the private and public sector across the US, UK and Ireland has found many committing to clear strategies and policies for open source software (OSS) development.
-
Web Browsers
-
With Internet Explorer 9 being acclaimed as the fastest ever browser client from Microsoft, DaniWeb decided to put it to the test against Chrome, Firefox, Opera and Safari and see just how quick it really is in a real world test of web browsing speed.
[...]
And so, without any further ado, the results of the Great DaniWeb Browser Speed Shoot-Out are:
1. Chrome (37/50)
2. Safari (35/50)
3. Opera (34/50)
4. IE9 (23/50)
5. Firefox (21/50)
-
Mozilla
-
So we’ve probably all seen the mock-ups for Firefox 4.0 by now, but has any of it been implemented? In the Windows version, yes. On the GNU+Linux version, partially. And it looks like it’s going to stay that way. I’m going to show you what’s different in the current development version (nightly 4.0b8pre) from 3.6.
-
Oracle
-
Which brings me to IBM. In the good old days everyone knew that Sun defined Java, while BEA and IBM made money from it. These days not so much. But if IBM’s can’t influence the JCP as much as it would like it can now play divide and rule. I expect to see IBM giving Eclipse and OSGi a concerted push over the next couple of years.
Google is another Java player. It bought Instantiations and is giving away the product. Search company becomes IDE supplier. Weird. But then Instantiations had built some slick tools for building Google Web Toolkit apps. GWT- what’s that? Oh nothing much – just a technology which brings Java and Javascript together in a development model. How many awful Java front end technologies have we seen over the years? Java ServerFaces and so on. Well GWT is a much cleaner approach to application development, and suits web apps – thus Google’s interest. Then we have Google AppEngine- a place to run Java apps. Java in the cloud? So far Google has made all the running in Platform as a Service thinking and delivery.
EMC VMWare SpringSource is another major center of gravity for Java leadership. SpringSource CEO Rod Johnson after all is the guy that found a way to make JEE not so painful to develop. With his ambition and technical skill, and EMC’s heft- and of course Paul Maritz in the picture- there is now way Oracle will have Java leadership all to itself. It speaks volumes that Rod didn’t even bother to attend Java One this year- then, neither did the RedMonks.
I’d really like to know your thoughts on the the idea of a multipolar Java world. Who is going to be China?
My biggest issues is that Oracle seems to think benign neglect will work in the Java world. It won’t. And when your salesmen start denying that your app servers run OSGi, when they do, then you have a problem.
-
After Oracle acquired SUN Microsystem, some leading members of the OpenOffice.org community forked OpenOffice.org as LibreOffice. They also set up The Document Foundation to continue the independent works of the OpenOffice.org community.
However, Oracle is not taking their move well. They want the founders of The Documents Foundation to leave the OpenOffice.org council. According to Oracle, their works with The Documents Foundation and LibreOffice will conflict with that of OpenOffice.org.
-
“In an unprecedented move with respect to other forks, Oracle asked the founders of the Document Foundation and LibreOffice to leave the OpenOffice.org Community Council. Apparently there is a conflict of interest, which concerns the Oracle employees.”
-
Openness/Sharing
-
-
-
Open Data
-
The ArXiv preprint archive for research articles in physics, mathematics, computer science and related disciplines was initiated by Paul Ginsparg in 1991. ArXiv enables the rapid dissemination of research articles prior to peer review, and it quickly became very successful in this. ArXiv has not made the peer-reviewed journal obsolete, but rather provides a service that traditional journals – and that also includes Open Access journals – can’t provide. By 1998, more than 90% of all peer-reviewed papers published in high-energy physics first appeared on ArXiv. Nature Precedings was started in 2007 to provide similar services for research in biology, medicine (except clinical trials), chemistry and earth sciences. In addition, many preprints are also hosted in institutional repositories.
-
Open Access/Content
-
Programming
-
Summing up
Advantages
* great built in concurrency support
* strong native datatypes
* functional
* it’s a lisp
* on the jvm + natural interoperability with java
Disadvantages
* on the jvm
* it’s a lisp
* not that fast
* not very beginner friendly
-
-
-
For many people, Romeo Knight was the defacto musician on the scene. Now, approximately 20 years after I was introduced to the Amiga computer and subsequently Linux, I find myself conducting a Q&A with a person who influenced my computing decisions so many years ago.
-
So instead of having to import the media it will be offered to explore the media and choose from there what you want to use. So it cuts out the file chooser dialog altogether. Also you should be allowed to move things to trash inside of the program.
All this can be done with tracker to get the mimetypes for each of the file types I know but id like to have the file system organisation done in the background anyway and have the applications just looking at the directory lists to get the files for use in the program. So im not for any file explorers like nautilus or even search and other stuff to find files. The applications should do that job for the user and cut out the middle man.
-
Science
-
The 1980 eruption of Mt. St. Helens, which began with a series of small earthquakes in mid-March and peaked with a cataclysmic flank collapse, avalanche, and explosion on May 18, was not the largest nor longest-lasting eruption in the mountain’s recent history. But as the first eruption in the continental United States during the era of modern scientific observation, it was uniquely significant.
-
Health/Nutrition
-
What is Brazil going to do with its new influence? The short and obvious answer is: Brazil is going to pursue the national self-interest of Brazil, just like every other country does. If we asked every Brazilian candidate for federal office, do you think that Brazil should pursue its interests? I would expect them all to say yes.
But how shall Brazil define the national self-interest that it pursues? Shall it define that national self-interest narrowly, or broadly? Here you have a real debate.
For example, a few months ago there was a spirited debate in Brazil about Brazil’s role in international diplomacy concerning Iran’s nuclear program. Some politicians and voices in the Brazilian media said: Why is Brazil messing around with this? Brazil should mind its own business. This reflected what the U.S. government and much of the U.S. media were saying: Why is Brazil interfering in our turf?
But the Brazilian government said: We are minding our own business. If some people in the U.S. government want to use war, the threat of war, or sanctions to prevent Iran from enriching uranium, that’s Brazil’s business, because Brazil enriches uranium, and therefore, it is in the interest of Brazil to defend the right of Iran to enrich uranium. By defending Iran’s rights, Brazil was defending its own. As President Lula said, “When we look at Iran, we see ourselves.”
I give this example of a dispute over how broadly Brazil should perceive the self-interest that it pursues because it’s an example that one could easily know about from watching the news or reading the newspaper. Regardless of what one thinks about Iran’s nuclear program, this example shows there is a serious dispute, in Brazil and in the world, about how Brazil should perceive its self-interest, narrowly or broadly.
But there is another very important example which one rarely sees discussed unless one is looking for it, and that is the dispute between countries like Brazil and countries like the United States over what national laws and policies a country like Brazil should have regarding intellectual property claims, in particular, regarding the intellectual property claims of corporations headquartered in the United States and Europe.
The US and Europe have worked to institutionalize globally a particular set of rules and expectations regarding intellectual property claims. This is a fairly recent phenomenon. Twenty years ago, establishing rules regarding intellectual property claims was largely considered a national affair.
But in 1994, when the World Trade Organization was created, the US and other developed countries successfully added something called the TRIPS agreement to the founding rules of the WTO. The TRIPS agreement extended to developing countries in the WTO strong protections for the intellectual property claims of corporations based in the US and Western Europe. The promise of the WTO for developing countries was that it would guarantee their access to sell in the markets of the rich countries. So, essentially the US and Europe used the leverage of access to their markets to impose a global set of rules on the treatment of intellectual property claims.
It’s important to understand that the addition of the TRIPS agreement to the WTO had nothing to do with the classical theory of “free trade.” There is a longstanding, spirited debate about the theory of free trade, and whether the grand claims that have been made about how removing restrictions on international commerce would promote economic growth were oversold. But the TRIPS agreement has nothing to do with the principles of free trade.
-
Defence/Police/Aggression
-
-
This is how the U.S. government and American media jointly disseminate propaganda: in the immediate wake of some newsworthy War on Terror event, U.S. Government officials (usually anonymous) make wild and reckless — though unverifiable — claims. The U.S. media mindlessly trumpets them around the world without question or challenge. Those claims become consecrated as widely accepted fact. And then weeks, months or years later, those claims get quietly exposed as being utter falsehoods, by which point it does not matter, because the goal is already well-achieved: the falsehoods are ingrained as accepted truth.
I’ve documented how this process works in the context of American air attacks (it’s immediately celebrated that we Killed the Evil Targeted Terrorist Leader [who invariably turns out to be alive and then allegedly killed again in the next air strike], while the dead are always, by definition, “militants”); with covered-up American war crimes, with the Jessica Lynch and Pat Tillman frauds — the same process was also evident with the Israeli attack on the flotilla — and now we find a quite vivid illustration of this deceitful process in the context of WikiLeaks’ release of Afghanistan war documents…
-
Environment/Energy/Wildlife
-
Plus his must-see interview by Glenn Beck who says, “I think there are too many stupid people”
-
Finance
-
A fifth day of protests in France against proposed pension reforms brought 825,000 people on to the streets, police said, although unions put the figure at 2.5m to 3m.
-
Hundreds of thousands of home foreclosure lawsuits have focused judicial scrutiny on the Mortgage Electronic Registration System (“MERS”). This Article updates and expands upon an earlier piece by exploring the implications of state Supreme Court decisions holding that MERS is not a mortgagee in security agreements that list it as such. In particular this Article looks at: (1) the consequences on land title records of recording mortgages in the name of a purported mortgagee that is not actually mortgagee as a matter of law; (2) whether a security agreement that fails to name an actual mortgagee can successfully convey a property interest; and (3) whether county governments may be entitled to reimbursement of recording fees avoided through the use of false statements associated with the MERS system. This Article concludes with a discussion of steps needed to rebuild trustworthy real property ownership records.
-
Obama last week tapped Tom Donilon as National Security Advisor. What’s Donilon’s resume?
-
PR/AstroTurf/Lobbying
-
-
The group’s rapid creation – and its narrow funding base – illustrates how one or two wealthy donors can have a dramatic impact on political races, particularly in the wake of recent court rulings that have swept away many traditional spending limits. The situation also underscores how the precise motivations and goals of many independent groups can remain stubbornly opaque, even when disclosure is required.
The Concerned Taxpayers, which lists a Capitol Hill townhouse as its address, has spent $450,000 on television advertising targeting just two lawmakers: Reps. Peter A. DeFazio (D-Ore.) and Frank M. Kratovil Jr. (D-Md.).
When the group began targeting DeFazio several weeks ago, both he and his GOP opponent, tea party favorite Art Robinson, said they were unfamiliar with the group and were surprised by the ads.
-
Censorship/Privacy/Civil Rights
-
An Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench has issued a precedent setting ruling that relates to Facebook comments and, specifically, whether the Charter of Rights and Freedoms can apply to universities. In the case of Pridgen v. University of Calgary, the court ruled that the post-secondary institution violated two students’ Charter rights when it sanctioned them for posting critical comments about a professor on Facebook. The students were found by the University to have committed non-academic misconduct and were placed on probation as a result of their Facebook comments. They applied for judicial review to set aside that decision on various grounds, including that their right to free expression under the Charter. The University argued before the court that the students had committed acts of defamation on Facebook.
-
The argument for reform of the 1986 law is that it hasn’t kept up with technological advances, meaning that there’s legal confusion over the privacy of our emails, smart phones, text messages, and social networking communications, and that some parts of the law are out of date — leading, for example, to no warrant being needed for police to read your emails after they are 180 days old. The argument against reform is that increasing privacy protections will make it harder for police to track down cyber criminals — the boys in blue most often bring up the specter of child pornographers.
-
“Webcamgate,” the Lower Merion School District soap opera about two teens and two school-issued laptops that spied on them, was never supposed to be about money.
But that’s exactly what brought the whole screwy saga to a close yesterday – a boatload of money.
The district’s Board of School Directors voted unanimously to pay $610,000 to settle lawsuits filed by the families of Harriton High sophomore Blake Robbins and Lower Merion High graduate Jalil Hasan, both of whom were unknowingly photographed scores of times at home by webcams on Apple MacBooks.
-
Internet/Net Neutrality/DRM
-
UPDATE: That was fast. People familiar with the situation say that News Corp. is changing tactics and will turn on access to Fox.com and Fox programming on Hulu for Cablevision’s customers. This could take a “few hours” to roll out across the Cablevision footprint, I’m told.
-
Netflix, the popular online movie rental service, launched in Canada last month, providing consumers with the option to download an unlimited number of movies and television shows for a flat monthly fee. While the Netflix debut was marred by an ill-advised public relations stunt that involved actors masquerading as excited consumers, my weekly technology law column (Toronto Star version, homepage version) notes that the long delays in migrating the service north once again raised questions over why popular online services rarely view Canada as a priority destination.
-
-
Intellectual Monopolies
-
As part of the ongoing slaughter of any institute or company that defends copyright, Anonymous has now taken down the website of the UK Intellectual Property Office. The website of the Government body has been unresponsive for nearly a day after the ‘Operation Payback” attack started yesterday afternoon.
-
Copyrights
-
-
At a time when Google is negotiating with television, movie, and music producers for the recently launched GoogleTV and an upcoming digital music service, the company has been sending mixed messages about how much help it will provide in removing links to pirated songs from its search index.
-
Given the facts as I know them, I’m with EFF on this one. The Ohio Democratic Party’s use of clip was strictly non-commercial: to make a political point about Kasich’s ad. And the clips they used were very short — just long enough to demonstrate that the “steelworker” really wasn’t. Arginate’s action will have the unfortunate effect of keeping the video off YouTube at the height of the campaign. YouTube can re-post the video at any time; yes, it would lose the DMCA safe harbor as to this video, but it doesn’t need any safe harbor given that the Ohio Democratic Party’s inclusion of the clip is almost certainly a non-infringing fair use. YouTube has taken such a step before; it should do so again.
[...]
Copyright battle in Ohio Gov. race over use of clip to expose ‘steelworker’ as actor
ThistleWeb: The Digital Prism Screencast – Start
Credit: TinyOgg
Permalink
Send this to a friend
Posted in Microsoft at 12:44 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz
Photo by Robert Scoble, former Microsoft AstroTurfer (“Evangelist”)
Summary: Microsoft is still a business partner of O’Reilly and people can make their opinion on this heard by simply avoiding O’Reilly
O‘Reilly’s lip service to Microsoft is a subject that we covered here before [1, 2, 3], even weeks ago. We are disappointed to say that O’Reilly is proudly helping to spread Microsoft’s gospel, which only puts shackles on people and rewards a company with a long criminal record. O’Reilly should be shamed of itself, but there’s money on the table, so why would they care?
I hereby remove my subscriptions to O’Reilly Web sites and encourage others to do the same. There are companies and publishers much more deserving of readership. While O’Reilly is abandoning its UNIX/Linux/Free software focus, Packt Publishing is apparently gaining such focus. Give money to companies that respect people’s freedom and better protect social justice. █
“In the last several days Microsoft has shown that despite claims of acquiring a newly found respect for open principles and technology, developers should be cautious in believing promises made by this “new” Microsoft. [...] There is one other fact clear from this case. Microsoft does not appear to be a leopard capable of changing its spots. Maybe it’s time developers go on a diet from Microsoft and get the FAT out of their products.”
–Jim Zemlin, Linux Foundation Executive Director, 2009
Permalink
Send this to a friend
Posted in Microsoft, Rumour, Search at 12:31 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz
Summary: Why Microsoft will not manage to grab yet another Internet giant, not any time soon anyway
CONSOLIDATION sounds like a nice word, but usually it means removal of choice and that’s not necessarily a good thing. Microsoft has already eliminated the second search engine in all sorts of nefarious ways. Microsoft never bought Yahoo! It just achieved a sort of hijack from the inside. The company is now run by many former executives of Microsoft.
Well, one reader from Brazil told us about reports like this one yesterday:
AOL Inc. and several private-equity firms are exploring making an offer to buy Yahoo Inc., according to people familiar with the matter, devising a bold plan to marry two big Internet brands facing steep challenges.
Considering rumours/speculations that turned out to be false regarding Adobe takeover, Nokia takeover, and even AOL [1, 2, 3], it’s probably a case of boy crying “Wolf!”
Microsoft cannot afford to buy anything significant anymore (it would require borrowing more money), so for anything significant to happen here is unlikely unless the takeover is indirect. As Cringely put it:
If you think AOL actually intends to buy Yahoo, you are wrong. That story hit the press this week but it’s a ruse to motivate Google exactly as I explained a few days ago. AOL has neither the money nor the motivation to buy Yahoo, which is analogous to a bus company buying a poorly-managed airline. AOL just wants to make Google jealous.
In other Yahoo! news, it’s harmed by Google’s Instant despite revamp attempts. Is Yahoo! still developing a search engine? Why bother anymore? Won’t Microsoft just devour the whole thing?
To Microsoft, Yahoo! is just a tool now, just like SCO was once a tool. Now it’s just dead:
SCO’s stock is now back up to 7 cents, up from 2 cents or maybe less — I don’t track it closely — and 7 is where it’s been hovering most of the time for the last few months. Do people really make money from these little dips and surges? What a life that must be. That is actually a fraction of a penny higher than the stock sold for on the day SCO filed for bankruptcy. Go figure.
There’s a long list of companies that ended up as corpses outside Microsoft’s lair. Which one will Microsoft exploit next? █
“On the same day that CA blasted SCO, Open Source evangelist Eric Raymond revealed a leaked email from SCO’s strategic consultant Mike Anderer to their management. The email details how, surprise surprise, Microsoft has arranged virtually all of SCO’s financing, hiding behind intermediaries like Baystar Capital.”
–Bruce Perens
Permalink
Send this to a friend
« Previous Page — « Previous entries « Previous Page · Next Page » Next entries » — Next Page »
