OpenDocument Format in Indonesia and OOXML in Court

Posted in Asia, Courtroom, Microsoft, Open XML, OpenDocument, Patents at 2:14 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz


Summary: OpenDocument Format (ODF) keeps spreading while OOXML shows patent complications

Somebody called ruslinux (in Twitter) writes: “Berita baik untuk semua pengguna program perkantoran, pemerintah akui OpenDocument Format sbg standar nasioal dg No. SNI ISO/IEC 26300:2011″

“Which I take to mean that ODF now approved as a national standard in Indonesia,” says Rob Weir from IBM.

We wrote about this (or something similar) last year after we explained what Microsoft had been doing in Indonesia. This helped in providing some background.

The i4i case is back in the news, showing OOXML’s legal problems. For those who cannot recall, Microsoft and its friends (like Alex Brown) lied about the patent status of OOXML in order to push it past ISO. It’s a good thing that nations do not adopt OOXML. The case is still ongoing (many appeals) and OOXML suffers as a result. In another case, Microsoft is appealing a decision regarding its abusive behaviour which Pogson explains as follows:

Duh… It’s not “double recovery”. The conspirators conspired to set up their criminal organization that way. Make them pay for it. That’s a judgment to be made in penalty phase, what portion of the overcharging was due to M$. Pathetic… criminals protected by the legal system.

When consumers complain they are told the competition does not protect them but businesses in competition. When businesses sue, they are kicked out because they did not buy direct from M$.

That’s just Microsoft bending the law.

Losing the Battle Against Software Patents?

Posted in Patents at 1:49 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz


Summary: Signs that the bullies are gradually getting their way by removing small players from the market, using patent thickets

TO ANYBODY who is a programmer, software patents are a curse. It does not matter if one develops Free software or proprietary software, patents are not for the developers, they are for the managers and their lawyers. They are for corporations and those who wage their wars for them. Just watch what Walker is doing right now [1, 2, 3, 4, 5], suing the entire world like Traul Allen, a billionaire, did. Jim Besse spoke about “the Future of Software Patents” a few days ago:

Yesterday James Bessen spoke at Stanford University on “The Future of Software Patents.” Over a decade has passed since US court decisions opened the way for wholesale patenting of software, including patents on finance and methods of doing business. Mr. Bessen looks at what the effect has been on software innovators. He looks at the empirical evidence on how software startup firms use patents and on why firms now face a much greater risk of software patent lawsuits. Exploring the causes behind these trends, he discusses how recent court decisions and legislative proposals might affect the rapid growth in litigation.

Those software startup firms soon discover that to say software patents are a good thing is simply a myth. It is the type of myth which gets spread by patent lawyers and propaganda from lobbyists of companies like Microsoft. The president of the FFII, one of the most active campaigners against software patents worldwide, warns that “Travaux preperatoires of the EPC published by the EPO, many references to software patents” and he also warns about “New Zealand software patents through the backdoor: EU approach is protecting embedded software” (this comes from this patent lawyers’ hive which we wrote about before). It sometimes seems like we, developers, are outnumbered by vocal lawyers. Not enough developers seem to be taking a stance against software patents; instead there is reliance on volunteers. Large companies like Google are not doing enough — if anything at all — to defend the interests of such developers. Roberto Galoppini claims that “Groklaw gave up with software patents”, which is probably not entirely true. Here is what he wrote the other day:

Few days after my blog post about OSI’s possible future, OSI wrote a second statement on the CPTN transaction, somehow reaffirming my concerns about a maybe too narrowed view on software patents. Now that even Groklaw gave up with software patents – rightly in my opinion – leaving it to IT giants and patent-trolls, will OSI fight software patents as a whole?

Here is another new article about the bid for Nortel’s patent portfolio and some background about CPTN:

Until and unless developers start getting involved in the software patents, bogus ‘IP experts’ and fake ‘developers’ (who only pretend to be that) will steer policy, bamboozle politicians, and continue to make life a lot more miserable for SMBs. This is not just a political and technical issue, it is also a class issue. It is the use of law to distort the market.

« Previous Page « Previous Page Next entries »

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channels: Come and chat with us in real time

New to This Site? Here Are Some Introductory Resources




Samba logo

We support

End software patents


GNU project


EFF bloggers

Comcast is Blocktastic? SavetheInternet.com

Recent Posts