Posted in Site News at 1:34 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz
Summary: Request for help with daily “Links”
SEVERAL days ago we started to experiment with a modality of sorts that would enable us to produce more links and better links on a daily/bi-daily basis. Our community has grown recently and it is more eager than ever to share information with peers in the group. We have always accepted many links from readers via E-mail and IRC, but now we also try to merge some bits with commentary, which basically adds something to the links. If you have links you want added with some personal remarks to the daily “Links [DATE]” posts, please come to IRC or mail them directly to roy at schestowitz dot com. Thanks to Twitter for contributing many links recently. █
Linux is everywhere. From desktops to laptops, from tablets to mobiles, and from servers to garden sprinklers. Wait! Garden what? Yes, that’s right fellas, Linux-powered garden sprinklers do exist. Being a very customizable and open operating system, Linux has found itself being used in places even Linus Torvalds had never expected. Here are five such bizarre uses of the world’s most trusted operating system.
AUSTRALIAN oil and gas exploration company Santos has switched on a critical IT upgrade set to save more than $2.5 million by using open-source software and Linux-based systems.
A consolidation of hardware and software will see the company reduce its power consumption by 300,000KW hours a year.
This week, I finally got my new Lenovo ThinkPad X220, the latest and skinniest in the Lenovo X-series of fast, skinny, rugged, all-black, no-nonsense machines. This – my third X-series ThinkPad – is shaping up to be everything I expected from the line and more: it is slim, 2.5cm (1in), configured with its smallest battery and very light – 1.5kg (3lbs 4oz) or so; size up to the biggest battery and you get eight or nine hours of work at a mere 1.8kg; snap on the “Slice” battery, which snugly fits underneath the machine, fattening it up to 4cm, and the weight goes to 2.5 kg – but the Slice delivers about 24 hours of continuous operation without plugging in.
I haven’t yet taken the machine on the road, but 24 hours’ worth of battery means that I’ll be able to leave my mains adapter at home for the next all-day conference or travel day, which saves weight overall. It’s got a 64-bit, 2.7GHz Sandy Bridge processor, 8GB of RAM, and I’m about to slap in a 600GB Intel solid-state drive that’ll increase its speed and battery life even more.
“I can only imagine that Microsoft was concerned about not having an answer to Google Voice, and buying Skype is probably the most logical way to get a foot into that market,” said Hyperlogos blogger Martin Espinoza. “My hope is that they kill it off on non-Microsoft platforms, either deliberately or incompetently, and that what we end up with as a ubiquitous replacement is some kind of genuine SIP softphone.”
But rather than dwell on what we can’t control, I’ll instead look at what might be an opening for Skype alternatives should Microsoft pull the plug on the Linux version of the software.
Photo management software like digiKam can help you to process, organize, and manage your photos, but if your photographic workflow is built around RAW files, then you might consider a more specialized application like Rawstudio. This software darkroom offers a wide range of powerful tools for sorting and processing your digital negatives. Although Rawstudio is designed for serious amateurs and professional photographers alike, the application sports a slick and user-friendly interface which puts all the essential tools at your fingertips and makes it easy to get to grips with this powerful application.
LMDE stands for Linux Mint Debian Edition. Xfce, at one time, stood for the XForms Common Environment because the early editions of Xfce used XForms to create a common desktop environment.
The Xfce project originally began around the same time as another desktop environment project, KDE, around 1996. Xfce, in its early implementation, was similar to CDE, the Common Desktop Environment that was prevalent on UNIX workstations in the mid to late nineties. CDE was pretty ugly, and so were the early implementations of Xfce, but arguably Xfce worked better than CDE ever did, and Xfce became portable to a lot more systems.
Fedora 15, which is almost out, will have Gnome 3.0 as its default desktop and since it’s such a radical departure from the Gnome 2.x series, I thought I’d have a post that reminds us of how it used to be and what Gnome evolved to become. So here’s a two screen desktop:
It has been often said that if a person wants to learn about Red Hat they should install Red Hat, but if one wants to learn Linux they should install Slackware. I think there’s some truth to that, partly because Slackware largely avoids distro-specific tools and configurations, but also because it forces the users to educate themselves. One certainly can learn the nuts and bolts of Linux through Ubuntu, Fedora or openSUSE, but where those distributions provide a lot of hand holding, Slackware patiently sits to the side with its arms folded. As a teaching aid Slackware is hard to beat as it’s stable, has a clean implementation and encourages user involvement while offering sane defaults. Slackware will also be appealing to people who want their computer to do what they tell it to, no more, no less. I wouldn’t recommend it to users who aren’t interested in what’s going on “under the hood”; it’s a distro for expert users or for people who wish to become expert users. Whether you like Slackware will depend a lot on what you’re looking for in an operating system, but I’m happy to report 13.37 continues the project’s tradition of stable, clean computing.
How can you run a full range of current applications on older computers, netbooks, thin clients, and mobile devices? One way is to install a lightweight Linux like Puppy, Lubuntu, or Vector Light. Select the distro with the apps that meets your needs while matching your computer’s resources.
Puppy is worthy of your attention because it’s pushed its way into Distrowatch’s top ten most popular operating systems by merit alone. It doesn’t have a corporate sponsor or advertising budget. This article describes Puppy. Screenshots follow the article.
Jack Wallen revisits a Linux distribution he hadn’t touched in years, only to find himself pleasantly surprised. Do you have what it takes to install and administer a Slackware Linux distribution and get back in touch with your roots?
We showed the name “Mageia”. The visitors who came by were informed by our people at the booth and the text of a large poster. Questions were not so much about the technical side but rather in the area of who we are, what we are and (and not least) why we are. This was an initial introduction to the Germans and it was received nicely by those who asked. Something the German Mageia community can build upon during the time and the events to come.
[...]
A visitor came to our partner (MandrivaUser.de) with whom we shared the booth. He was presented with the current Beta of Mandriva 2011 and then he asked our helpers about their opinion about the new menu style. They expressed their rather negative opinion, then the visitor presented his business card – he was a representative of RosaLabs, the company who invented this new menu style!
Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal is probably *the* most controversial Ubuntu release to date. Tech Drive-in reviewed Ubuntu 11.04 few weeks ago and we felt that, even after accounting its share of bugs and rough edges, Natty Narwhal is not as bad a release as you think it is. But one thing is sure, a lot of genuine hard core Ubuntu users absolutely hate the latest Ubuntu release. Here are some of the responses we received from our readers through our feedback forms and comments on brand new Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal.
I’m falling out of love with Ubuntu, which is strange because it’s as good as it’s ever been. And no, this isn’t one of those blogs. I’m not going to proclaim that it’s now too mainstream, or soulless or any other such tosh. It’s not. In fact, it’s very brilliant in many of the ways that matter, just not the one that matters to me. It’s simply not the Ubuntu I’d hoped it would become.
So, I’ve had a couple of days to think about what I’ve said, talk it over with some folks and really work through some of the practical issues with maintaining a high standard in the community.
While I was at LGM I got into an interesting discussion about communities and how much they are like biological organisms. When the organism is doing well and all the parts are working on their own little jobs, the rest of the organism doesn’t have to pay much attention. But if something goes wrong then all sorts of attention is paid to the damage/infection.
It’s time for another important Ubuntu release cycle. The upcoming Ubuntu 11.10 codenamed Oneiric Ocelot won’t be bombarded with the kind of sweeping changes that its predecessor had to deal with. But in terms of the importance, Oneiric Ocelot might be an even bigger release. A quick peek into the important changes for upcoming Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot.
At UDS last week I took an action to write up a quick blog post that explains how UDS sponsorship works. This discussion was born out of the view that some people feel a little bent out of shape when they don’t get approved for UDS sponsorship. This is a common reaction at every UDS, but it really shouldn’t be. Firstly, UDS sponsorship is not an entitlement…there is no rule that says “if you are a great Ubuntu contributor then you get sponsored to UDS“, and likewise there is no rule that says “if you are a bad Ubuntu contributor (if such a thing exists) then you don’t get sponsored to UDS“.
This year’s Ubuntu Developer Summit was held at Budapest in Hungary. There were a lot of interesting developments regarding Ubuntu 11.10 “Oneiric Ocelot” which is scheduled for release in October 2011. In this article, we list the most important news from the Ubuntu Developer Summit Oneiric.
elementary OS has exactly the same problem like most Ubuntu forks. It aims for unique and special, without taking in regard the more important facets of usability and simplicity. You can be unique in any number of ways, but the computer usage is limited to humans staring at their screen, so you best make the smoothest and most pleasant experience of that.
Then, minimalism really hampers the overall use. Taking away from a distro that is already fairly optimized for general use creates huge problems in the long run, which cannot be offset by any number of tweaks or even applications. People have their basic, universal needs; icons, colors, wallpapers are secondary. The tradeoff is just not right. And lastly, people do not want to spend time administering their boxes.
Many computer users enjoy customizing their desktop to perfection. Personally I have spent hours playing with different icon sets, GTK themes, Enlightenment themes and E17 gadgets. Something most people like to do almost as much as tweaking their desktop is sharing those sexy screen shots with the world!
Enlightenment is so customizable we like to encourage this tweaking and sharing among Bodhi users. Seeing what other people have done with their desktop often gives new users ideas for their own. With this in mind, we have started running the Bodhi Linux “Desktop of the Week” contest. Each week in the news section of the Bodhi forums there is a thread started to let users vote on their favorite of five different desktops (new voting starts on Tuesdays).
If you know anything about my past — no, that’s not me on the Post Office walls across the country . . . honest — you’ll know that I was a resident at the San Francisco Zen Center in the early to mid ’90s where, among other things, I was trying to find enlightenment.
So I’m familiar with the Bodhi tree and with Bodhidharma. Good thing, too, because when trying Bodhi Linux, those leaves from the tree swirling around the screen could be a little disconcerting.
This seems a reasonable approach to me. XFCE4 has a lot of differences from GNOME but it is pretty simple. It also has the benefits of being well-supported and mature. This is a more sure option than hoping for a fork of GNOME 2.
She has her own Linux-based operating system called Luna OS. So anybody, especially the throng of app developers for tablets and smartphones, can easily write an app for her.
I prefer just using a projector with Gromit (permits writing in several colours and erasing using mouse) so this technology would be a change for me. Perhaps I don’t need the “extras”.
It was bad idea to change the hostname. sl4a mysteriously stopped working. sl4a is now single most important application on my android, because I use it to launch … shells into debian chroot. So now I’m stuck looking at “localhost”.
Vodaphone is a huge global mobile ISP. They are first or second ranked in market share in revenue or units sold. … Vodaphone has 130 million subscribers in India alone and 341 million globally. … They are going to have a house-brand smartphone running Android/Linux. For 90Euros it will sell well. … That means a huge increase in usage for Android/Linux over the next couple of years
What u need?
1.Android emulator for Linux from their site
2.Eclipse with java for Linux which is free
3.U should have jdk(java dev kit) installed in your computer
and some space for your workspace…..
Emulator is used in order to emulate the actual android phone. It helps in running programs before we run it in actual phone. In here I only asaid about the emulator. I included the picture so always look at the screen shots…
Since he left EchoStar (NSDQ: SATS), Slingbox inventor Blake Krikorian has been working on a home automation app, meshing his experiments with renovations on his own Bay Area home. After seven months in full beta, the first public result is live now in the Android Market. The $99 R2 Control for Crestron—yes, you read that right—literally turns most Android smartphones and tables in a fully-functional touch panel for the automation systems company. With it, residential and commercial users can manage nearly every Crestron system on the scene or remotely.
During a stay at Krikorian’s home late last year, I had a chance to use the Android app in progress and to watch him manage entertainment, lighting, security systems and more inside and out from smartphones and tablets. It wasn’t exactly as mind boggling as the first time I saw a Slingbox at work—home automation isn’t new and neither are home automation or building control apps—but the potential for a program that was usable, powerful and flexible was intriguing. Crestron already supports versions for iOS, MacOS and Windows; this is the first for Android.
I’ll still be working on it, just not doing articles. I want to finish the Comes v. Microsoft exhibit collection and fix some other loose strings, so the work stands the test of time and is truly useful to historians and lawyers.
I can’t do that and write articles every day. And I have a number of personal and other work projects that I shoved to the back burner in order to do Groklaw, and now that the emergency for Linux is handled, it’s time to prioritize in a more normal way. We won, the emergency is over, and I get to relax a bit now.
So that is part of it. But the most important consideration was this: I was born to write Groklaw, about SCO and the Linux kernel and copyright litigation. But the battlefield now has shifted to mobiles and patents. I thought seriously about that, and I recognized that I am not the right person to take the lead on that. I always hated patent law, and nothing I’ve seen in the last 8 years has altered my feelings. I hate software patents with a passion, I think they are destroying innovation in the US, and that they particularly threaten FOSS, the open development model being opposed to patents. I think software and patents need to get a divorce.
I consider that a serious enough matter that I thought modesty needed to inform me to stop, that others could fill the role and would if I did. Then when I announced I would stop, I was flooded with requests to find someone to continue, and I realized the community was right. It was irresponsible if I didn’t try to maintain the community, their skills, in one place. And happily, we found someone. I think Groklaw will end up more important than it’s been, actually, because Mark Webbink is lawyer, a FOSS lawyer, and a law professor. With him taking the lead, and his law students –and we hope eventually others at other law schools–joining the community, it can grow in the direction that is needed now. They can explain the law, and the community at Groklaw can help them understand the tech. It’s what Groklaw is for, what I dreamed it should be–a place where the two communities can teach each other, so they can together hopefully help judges to understand the tech so they can reach better decisions, ones based on technical realities. So this is organic, part of what Groklaw is supposed to be, just the next step.
Part of Groklaw’s success was realizing that we could contribute just as we are, without trying to be more than we were. But that means also remaining modest and aware of what we were not qualified to do. I always said the only legal advice I ever give is, Ask your lawyer. Well, now Groklaw is going to follow that advice and get a lawyer. It’s a natural progression. And it’s the right time, given Microsoft’s rather obvious strategy of using patents against GNU/Linux.
Groklaw began life in 2003 as the personal blog of Pamela Jones, better known as PJ. “At the start, I was just trying to learn how to use blogging software,” she has said. “I was startled to learn anyone was reading what I wrote… I started covering the McDonald’s ‘I’m fat and it’s your fault’ litigation and Martha Stewart and just whatever was in the news, just to have something to write about as I learned how blogging worked.”
The emergence of Groklaw coincided with The SCO Group’s decision to take legal action against IBM and the Linux community. PJ’s first article on the case, “SCO Falls Downstairs, Hitting its Head on Every Step”, appeared in May 2003.
More than half of all software purchases made over the next five years will be open source, according to half of all respondents in a significant survey released today.
Although 95 percent of the same survey’s 450 respondents believe that the “turbulent “ economy is good for open source software, avoiding vendor lock-in has supplanted lowered software cost as the chief reason for open source adoption.
These findings, included in the fifth annual Future of Open Source survey, conducted by North Bridge Venture Partners (NBVP) and 451Group, were made public today at the Open Source Business Conference. The venture capital firm invests in many open source firms including Acquia, which is highlighted in the report and at the conference.
The overall finding: open source has gone mainstream and is in high growth mode.
Lower software costs are still important (No. 2 on the list) but customers increasingly value open source because it protects them from traditional vendor lock-in (Oracle, for example) as well as emerging proprietary cloud providers such as Amazon, Google and Microsoft Azure.
The Ubuntu Developer Summit in Budapest was not the only European Linux event taking place last week. From Wednesday through Saturday was LinuxTag back in Berlin at their Messe Fairgrounds.
Due to the Canonical event colliding with this annual German Linux conference, I was only able to catch the tail end of the conference this year. While only there briefly, it was yet another great LinuxTag.
Mozilla may still be weeks away from automatically upgrading users of its aging Firefox 3.5 browser, but even without the benefit of those additional users its latest browser version continues to blast past Microsoft’s competing Internet Explorer 9 in usage.
In fact, early this month Firefox 4′s usage began to show a sharp increase while IE9 continued on a much more gradual climb, Mozilla’s Asa Dotzler pointed out on Sunday.
Mozilla is sticking to its new fast-track development cycle, with plans to release a beta version of Firefox 5 on Tuesday, May 17.
Meanwhile, the company is also working on phasing out Firefox 3.5.
Firefox 5 is currently in Mozilla’s Aurora channel, but will move to beta tomorrow. Aurora is a recently created channel that now comes between nightly builds and beta in order to “deliver features to users at various levels of quality and polish,” Mozilla said last month.
The LibreOffice developers at the Document Foundation have, for the last time, published an announcement on their main mailing list of a new beta version of LibreOffice. In future, beta releases and release candidates will only be announced on developer mailing lists and the announcements mailing list will only carry news of final and stable versions.
Open source software is defined by the open source licenses under which applications and code are made available. Have you ever wondered what the most popular open source licenses in use today are?
A new study from enterprise open source service provider OpenLogic, released today at the Open Source Business Conference (OSBC) reveals that the answer to what is the top open source license depends on how the question is asked.
When looked at from the perspective of total projects and the code under which they are licensed, 68.9 percent of open source software packages use the GPL. The Apache software license comes in second at 7.6 percent.
Adjusting the question to look at the top open source projects by download and what licenses they use, present a different view of the data. According to OpenLogic, measured by downloads the top open source license is the Apache License at 32.7 percent. The LGPL came in second at 21.0 percent and GPL is third at 14.4 percent.
A few days ago I wrote about GNU MediaGoblin, a project that looks to provide a federated media sharing solution so users can take control of their media and still share with friends. But the licensing for GNU MediaGoblin, the Affero GPLv3 (AGPLv3) seemed to irk a few commenters? Is the AGPL’s “one additional feature” too much for hobbyists?
The difference between the AGPL and traditional GPL is simple: The AGPL seeks to close a “loophole” that allows a company or organization to modify GPL’ed software and use it to provide a service — but without actually distributing changes. So a company can take a package like, say, WordPress and modify the software significantly to sell a service — but hold back changes because it’s not technically “distributing” or “propagating” the software. The AGPL goes a bit further and says that if the program is “intended to interact with users through a computer network” and if the version that you received gives users “the opportunity to request transmission to that user of the Program’s complete source code,” you have to maintain that functionality and distribute the modified version.
John Hayes, Britain’s “further education minister,” was just busted lifting parts of a speech almost verbatim from Wikipedia. It was probably a lesson to kids in how not to hide their blatant plagiarism?
The Hill Times is reporting there is speculation the government is considering splitting the Minister of Industry position into two – one to focus on innovation, science and technology and the other on the rest of the Industry portfolio. The move could be a great one – I discussed the value of a single point of leadership on digital issues in a column last year. Bringing together a ministerial portfolio involving digital issues, copyright, communications, and research innovation would provide a hefty agenda without vying for time given the demands of other sectors.
Ethical consumers are not as conscientious as they may believe to be, according to the results of an RSPCA commissioned poll. Of the 2,000 food shoppers questioned, more than half said they considered animal welfare when buying prime meat cuts such as steak or pork chops but only one in 10 cared about where their meat came from when purchasing sandwiches.
The whole event was a massive advertisement for the military. There were continual reminders of the Second World War – the commentators helpfully reminding us of “the young Princess Elizabeth mingling with the crowds on VE day”, etc, culminating with the flyover by a Lancaster bomber, a Spitfire and a Hurricane and then by modern war planes.
Bribespot has developed a geolocation app that is unfortunately useful. It allows users to note attempts at bribery by public officials and pin it to a location.
An international outfit headquartered in Estonia, it is unsurprising that the Baltic country responsible for Skype would lead the score sheet so far, with the rest spread around the world. But it is less than a month old so the data is not thick on the ground yet. In time, though, it has the potential to be a very interesting and useful tool for everyone from travelers to policy makers.
Censorship
New Jersey proposes to ban photography of minors and with it most public photography and anyone doing so will be smeared as a pervert. In Boston, I was told that I could not take pictures of buildings because they were “protected by copyright”. The rich and powerful do not want their misdeeds recorded.
The media industries, everyone agrees, are in the fight of their lives. These businesses rely for profitability on the controlled distribution of information goods whose individual copies have a marginal cost that keeps getting closer to zero.
But new media killer apps keep coming, and each of them challenges anew the ability of rights holders to maintain control. So far, Bit Torrent, cloud computing, YouTube, Limewire, Napster, and Google Books have each been vilified as the ultimate enemy…until the next one came along.
if “we the people” paid to have software developed, shouldn’t “we the people” get it? Currently, when “we the people” pay to develop software, we normally don’t get it, and that is senseless. It’s especially horrific in the research world. Often the government pays to develop software as part of research, but instead of releasing that software to everyone who paid for it (the taxpayers), it’s given exclusively to one organization. As a result, different researchers must constantly re-develop software to do further research. I think this absurd research strategy is starting to threaten U.S. competitiveness.
“re-investment” in anti-piracy programmes makes such actions self-fuelling: the money supposedly gained for those poor starving wretches, is actually used to fund the next action, which funds the next action, and so on.
“I’ve killed at least two Mac conferences. [...] by injecting Microsoft content into the conference, the conference got shut down. The guy who ran it said, why am I doing this?”
“There is such an overvaluation of technology stocks that it is absurd. I would include our stock in that category. It is bad for the long-term worth of the economy.”
–Steve Ballmer
Summary: Fat cat Microsoft taxes the economy for the enrichment of very few billionaires but pays no tax of its own
MICROSOFT has already led to the layoffs of many people, destruction of many companies, centralisation of power and wealth, and lack of opportunity in the market. In essence, Microsoft is a destructor, not a creator. One of the latest victims is Nokia and now that Skype is sold. Microsoft’s acquisition is structured to avoid US taxes (because of course, Microsoft does not pay tax). All that Microsoft is doing is collecting tax from each computer sold, even if the buyer gets it just to install GNU/Linux or BSD. But Microsoft’s greed is reaching risky new levels which may repel business customers. “Looks like big changes is coming in Microsoft,” writes to us one reader. “Good news!”
The reader links to this article from Microsoft booster Paul DeGroot [1, 2, 3], who writes about “Seven deadly sins” in “Microsoft software licensing” (that’s his headline). The opening paragraph goes like this:
Ten years ago this month, Microsoft introduced the most controversial licensing program in its history: an upgrade rights and maintenance add-on called Software Assurance (SA). The experience was so traumatic that Microsoft has undertaken no comparable licensing initiatives since then. After five major revisions to volume licensing in the decade before 2001, Microsoft has been stuck at Licensing 6.0. That’s too bad. The industry is different, Microsoft is different, and it’s long past time for a new look at Software Assurance.
Amid debt, Microsoft is already trying to find new types of tax it can collect and software patents seem to be the company’s key strategy at the moment. It’s essentially on a Microsoft tax on everything people buy, whether it’s from Microsoft or not. And some people still insist that Microsoft is good for the economy… █
Resumen: ¿Por qué vale la pena tratar las patentes como la principal barrera para la adopción del Software Libre?
MICROSOFT ya ha perdido la batalla por la superioridad técnica frente a sus competidores. Sin una ventaja legítima, todo lo que queda de Microsoft que hacer es luchar usando batallas legales, lo que es permitido por la quebrada legislación de patentes en su lugar. Nosotros, en Techrights hemos impulsado varias veces este punto. Después de cubrir el caso de Yahoo[http://techrights.org/2011/05/12/bedrock-swpats-loss/], Thomson Reuters ha procedido a cubrir los casos propios de Microsoft contra los trolls de patentes[http://newsandinsight.thomsonreuters.com/Legal/News/2011/05_-_May/Federal_Circuit_won_t_reconsider_patent_damages_decision/] (una situación bastante irónica teniendo en cuenta que el propio Microsoft se está convirtiendo en un troll de patentes como hemos demostrado en el pasado[http://techrights.org/2010/05/26/mpeg-cartel-and-microsoft-backlash/]). En este caso concreto, el troll es Uniloc [1[http://techrights.org/2007/06/07/gplv2-v3-to-gain-compatibility/], 2[http://techrights.org/2009/04/11/microsoft-patent-armament/], 3[http://techrights.org/2009/05/17/patents-roundup-microsoft-and-ambush/], 4[http://techrights.org/2009/10/01/patent-one-way-sword/], 5[http://techrights.org/2009/10/04/mishmash-software-patent-news/], 6[http://techrights.org/2010/03/29/microsoft-and-its-offshoots-vs-fs/], 7[http://techrights.org/2010/08/02/i4i-patent-case-and-scotus/], 8[http://techrights.org/2010/09/21/windows-botnets-thrive/], 9[http://techrights.org/2010/09/21/swpats-software-monopolies-vs-competition/], 10[http://techrights.org/2010/10/06/monsanto-and-uniloc/], 11[http://techrights.org/2010/11/16/proprietary-lobby-and-swpats/], 12[http://techrights.org/2011/01/18/i4i-and-uniloc-vs-msft/]]. Está claro que el caso no ha terminado todavía:
Un tribunal de apelaciones EE.UU. que se especializa en litigios de patentes, dijo el lunes que no se revisará una decisión de anular un método común de cálculo de los daños en los pleitos de patentes.
La Corte de Apelaciones de EE.UU. para el Circuito Federal había dicho en enero que Microsoft infringió una patente de Uniloc para prevenir la piratería de software, pero también lanzó el popular “regla de 25 por ciento”, lo que supone que a la empresa que conseciona licencias de una patente se le debe el 25 por ciento del valor del producto.
Uniloc EE.UU. y su empresa matriz con sede en Singapur originalmente presentó una demanda contra Microsoft en 2003, acusándolo de infringir una patente de Uniloc para evitar el uso sin licencia de su sistema operativo Windows XP y parte de su suite de Office de productos de software.
Mientras tanto, los sitios de GNU/Linux en la celebración de la noticia[http://lwn.net/Articles/443029/] de que Mark Webbink es el líder de Groklaw[http://techrights.org/2011/05/16/groklaw-2-0-introduced/] ahora. Sin perder tiempo, Webbink ya había abordado el caso Bedrock[http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2011051407561062], tras las noticias de Yahoo:
“Hubo una buena cantidad de crujir de dientes”, escribe, “sólo dos semanas atrás, cuando Google se encontró que ha infringido las patentes de las tecnologías de Bedrock Computer, Inc. en relación con el almacenamiento en caché en Linux. En cuanto a los juicios de patentes, el premio fue relativamente pequeña, sólo $ 5 millones. Pero aún así ha planteado cuestiones con respecto a otros desarrolladores y usuarios de Linux, muchos de los cuales estaban involucrados en demandas por infracción relacionados con las traídas por Bedrock.
“Bueno, he aquí que, en el mismo juzgado en el Distrito Este de Texas esta semana Bedrock perdido [PDF] en su demanda por infracción contra Yahoo (en relación NewsPick), otro de los acusados usando exactamente la misma tecnología, aunque sin ejecutar el código de Bedrock.”
Aunque el nombramiento Webbink parece haber sido una adición positiva, hay un inconveniente notable. Como nos temíamos, Groklaw parece ser cambiar el foco más estrecho en las patentes y perder de vista lo crucial, pero la zona crítica que es SCO. “Walterbyrd” nos ha dicho que “UnXis, Inc [,] hace reivindicaciones de poseer Las marcas de UNIX y UnixWare”. Cita[http://ttabvue.uspto.gov/ttabvue/v?pno=91122524&pty=OPP&eno=95]:
“RESPUESTA DEL SOLICITANTE EN APOYO DE SU PROPUESTA COMBINADO Y BREVE PARA REANUDAR LA OPOSICIÓN DE CONTINUAR Y PUESTA A CERO Y EXTENDER EL HORARIO [...] UnXis, Inc. (‘UnXis»), sucesor de SCO, ahora afirma que ellos y no, X/Open, legalmente es propietario de la UNIX y UnixWare marcas. SCO acaba de completar la venta de quiebra de UNIX …”
Afortunadamente, parece muy poco probable que cualquier cosa que no sea FUD (Miedo Incertidumbre y Duda), nunca saldrá de esta etapa. Groklaw ha hecho mucho para demostrar que SCO (o ETG o UnXis o lo que decide llamar a sí mismo) no tiene caso. Sin embargo, esperamos que Groklaw seguirá manteniendo un ojo en la SCO en el futuro. █
Resumen: Groklaw 2.0 será administrado por el profesor Webbink, que está afiliado con el Software Freedom Law Center
Pamela Jones se retira después de 8 largos años en Groklaw y le damos las gracias por todo el trabajo duro[http://techrights.org/2011/05/14/gracias-a-groklaw/]. He aquí su último mensaje[http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20110513165421803] (más probable) sobre SCO. Esto demuestra que incluso después de 8 años en la sala de SCO no ha muerto. Esta empresa es objetable aún contando los centavos y obtener un poco más que provienen de fuentes misteriosas. Pamela escribe:
Por lo tanto, vamos a ver. Eso es quince años, llevar a la …. wow. Blank Rome dice que se le debe un total de $ 652,612.55, si mis matemáticas son correctas, y que les gustaría ahora el 80% de las tasas y todos los gastos pagados, para un total de $ 523,695.85. Eso no es sin contar los proyectos de ley de Ocean Park. ¿Qué significa que SCO todavía dejó de pagar sus cuentas? Sólo Dios sabe, pero aquí están los últimos informes mensuales operativo SCO presentó a finales de febrero, cuando SCO Operaciones lista de 779.827 dólares en efectivo en el banco a finales de ese mes.
Estoy pensando después de la SCO paga Blank Rome y Ocean Park, lo que habrá de sobra para Yarro y LeapTide o cualquier otra persona? Sin todas las cifras, ¿quién puede decir, pero sospecho que esto podría explicar su repentina aparición en la escena. Estoy pensando que esto podría ser interesante.
Espere. ¿Quieres decir que … Yarro y la banda hizo todo esto para nada?
Esperamos poder interactuar con el profesor Webbink, cuya función será, aparentemente, para realizar un seguimiento de los casos de patentes y ofrecer un sólido análisis[http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20110515173831922]. Para citar último mensaje de Pamela:
Así que pensé acerca de quién sería la persona adecuada. Ahora que el campo de batalla se ha desplazado SCO de atacando a Linux a Microsoft usando patentes en contra de ella y de los servidores a los móviles, me di cuenta de que Groklaw necesita un abogado en el timón. Así que le pedí a Mark Webbink si llevaría a cabo en este papel, y estoy encantado de decir que él ha aceptado. Él es el nuevo editor de Groklaw a partir de hoy. Mark era asesor general de Red Hat, como usted sabe, y él está en el tablero del Software Freedom Law Center. También es profesor de derecho, que lo voy a explicar es una pieza vital de lo que él ha planeado. Mark es un profesor visitante en la New York Law School, donde dirige el Centro de Innovaciones de Patentes, supervisa la Peer Para proyectar la patente se ejecutan con la Oficina de Patentes y Marcas de EE.UU., ha estado activo en la búsqueda de la reforma del sistema de patentes de EE.UU., y enseña de licencia de patentes . Además, Mark es un asociado principal conferencia en la Universidad de Duke Facultad de Derecho, donde enseña de propiedad intelectual (patentes, derechos de autor, marcas registradas y secretos comerciales) de concesión de licencias. Mark tiene acceso a los estudiantes de derecho en las facultades de derecho y muchos otros. Además, Mark se ha mantenido interesado e involucrado en el Software Libre y de Código Abierto y relacionado con cuestiones de propiedad intelectual y es autor del capítulo sobre el derecho tecnología de EE.UU. incluyó en un libro que pronto será puesto a dispisición del público, acerca de derecho del Software de Código Libre y Abierto.
¿Qué hay de SCO?
Profesor Webbink está en contra de las patentes de software[http://techrights.org/2007/10/21/webbink-software-patents-ip/] y no es amigo de Novell[http://techrights.org/2007/05/05/mark-webbink-on-trust-oracle-and-novell/]. Con el ya fallecido Novell subiendo algunos videos[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zayZDaISjvQ&feature=youtube_gdata] y OpenSUSE lanzando apenas posts[http://news.opensuse.org/2011/05/14/opensuse-weekly-news-issue-175-is-out/], queda por ver lo que realmente va a pasar en el caso SCO/Novell. █
Summary: Why patents are worth treating as the principal barrier to Free software adoption
MICROSOFT has already lost the battle for technical superiority over its competitors. Without a legitimate advantage, all that is left for Microsoft to do is to struggle using legal battles enabled by broken patent legislation instead. We at Techrights have repeatedly driven this point home. After covering the Yahoo! case, Thomson Reuters has proceeded to cover Microsoft’s own cases against patent trolls (a rather ironic situation considering Microsoft itself is increasingly becoming a patent troll as we have demonstrated in the past). In this specific case, the troll is Uniloc [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12]. It’s clear the case is not quite over yet:
A U.S. appeals court that specializes in patent disputes said on Monday that it would not review a decision to toss out a common method of calculating damages in patent lawsuits.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit had said in January that Microsoft infringed a Uniloc patent to prevent software piracy but also tossed out the popular “25 percent rule,” which assumes that the company licensing a patent is due 25 percent of the value of the product.
Uniloc USA and its Singapore-based parent originally filed suit against Microsoft in 2003, accusing it of infringing a Uniloc patent to prevent unlicensed use of its Windows XP operating system and parts of its Office suite of software products.
“There was a good deal of gnashing of teeth,” he writes, “just two weeks ago when Google was found to have infringed the patents of Bedrock Computer Technologies, Inc. with respect to caching in Linux. In terms of patent judgments, the award was relatively small, just $5 million. But it still raised issues with respect to other developers and users of Linux, many of whom were engaged in related infringement suits brought by Bedrock.
“Well, lo and behold, in the same court in the Eastern District of Texas this week Bedrock lost [PDF] on its infringement claim against Yahoo (related NewsPick), another defendant using exactly the same technology, albeit without executing the Bedrock code.”
Though Webbink’s appointment seems to have been a positive addition, there is a notable downside. As we feared, Groklaw seems to be switching focus more narrowly onto on patents and losing sight of the niche but critical area that is SCO. “Walterbyrd” has told us that “UnXis, Inc[,] Claims to Own The UNIX and UnixWare Trademarks”. He quotes:
“APPLICANT’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF HIS COMBINED MOTION AND BRIEF TO RESUME OPPOSITION PROCEEDING AND RESET AND EXTEND THE SCHEDULE [...]UnXis, Inc. (‘UnXis’) SCO’s successor, now states it, not X/Open, lawfully owns the UNIX and UnixWare trademarks. SCO just completed the bankruptcy sale of its UNIX…”
Fortunately, it seems extremely unlikely that anything other than FUD will ever come out of this development. Groklaw has done so much to show that SCO (or TSG or UnXis or whatever it chooses to call itself) has no case. We do hope that Groklaw will continue to keep an eye on SCO in the future though. █
