Posted in Antitrust, GNU/Linux, Google, Microsoft, Patents at 2:28 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz
“…Microsoft wished to promote SCO and its pending lawsuit against IBM and the Linux operating system. But Microsoft did not want to be seen as attacking IBM or Linux.”
–Larry Goldfarb, BayStar, key investor in SCO approached by Microsoft
Up-to-date screenshot of the homepage of the patent troll Microsoft is feeding
Summary: Microsoft’s Mosaid scheme against Android is reportedly seen by antitrust regulators, who are likely to step in
OVER THE years Microsoft has spawned several patent trolls, including the world’s biggest. It also tried to pass patents to patent trolls, but it got caught [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. Microsoft is still a disgusting company that cannot compete and instead punches below the belt, just as it always has (there is a clearly documented history of it). Having hijacked Nokia (essentially a takeover, according to a Nokia manager), Microsoft now turns Nokia into a trolling powerhouse. Having faced probes over CPTN and Nortel patents, Microsoft may now be dealing with yet another probe for feeding an anti-Android patent troll [1, 2]. Well, it was very clear all along:
Mosaid Technology Inc.’s recent acquisition of key cellular patents could spark antitrust investigations in Canada and the United States, a U.S. newspaper has suggested.
The New York Post said Friday that the Ottawa patentlicensing firm is being used by Nokia Oyj and Microsoft Corp. as a vehicle to launch a deluge of litigation against Google Inc. and its massively popular Android operating system.
Mosaid said Friday it has no knowledge of any probes.
The Post, citing unnamed sources “close to Google,” said Mosaid’s acquisition of more than 2,000 cellular patents from Nokia earlier this month, with no cash up front and an agreement to make payments through future licensing deals, was a manoeuvre orchestrated by Microsoft and Nokia to attack Android.
“Mosaid can sue Android supporters for patent infringement without being counter-sued as it does not make any products,” according to one of the sources. “With Mosaid bringing the lawsuits, Microsoft and Nokia could also be shielded from accusations of anti-competitive behaviour.”
“Nokia and Microsoft patents were bundled into a Luxembourg-based holding company called Core Wireless Licensing,” notes Benjamin Henrion based on the article above. Another dodgy transaction like Novell's takeover? This is the topic one should speak about on Software Freedom Day, agreed Henrion, who also linked to this new page, “Dyson Says Patent System Flawed, `Trolling’ Bad Practice”.
James Dyson, founder of Dyson Ltd., talks about the patent system. Dyson also discusses innovation and his approach to design. He speaks with Cory Johnson on Bloomberg Television’s “Bloomberg West.”
The real problem is software patents, not just patent trolls. This is why Google ought to have chosen a strategy other than deterrence with patents, which is ineffective against patent trolls. Let us see how the antitrust investigation — if any — goes. █
Permalink
Send this to a friend
Posted in Cablegate, Europe, Patents at 2:27 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz
Summary: A couple more transmissions between embassies/consulates regarding “SENSITIVE” details from Brussels
According to the more recent Cablegate cables, harmonising patent laws — a process now known as “Community Patent” or “EU Patent” — is rather abrasive as a whole. Countries in Europe would benefit almost in no shape or form from it. Politicians worry that people will find out who benefits from this, mostly patent lawyers and multinationals to be specific.
To quote the cable from the Government of Italy (GOI), as it was posted yesterday morning, “THE GOI, MOREOVER, DOES NOT/NOT SUPPORT THE CREATION OF A SEPARATE GROUP TO PURSUE PATENT HARMONIZATION DISCUSSIONS. PRIGIONI NOTED THAT, IN THE GOI VIEW, THE CREATION OF A SEPARATE GROUP WOULD CREATE THE IMPRESSION OF A DEAL BEING STRUCK BEHIND CLOSED DOORS, POTENTIALLY UNDERMINING THE LEGITIMACY OF AN AGREEMENT. HE PROPOSED INSTEAD THAT BILATERAL EXCHANGES BE USED TO SUPPLEMENT STANDING COMMITTEE DISCUSSIONS.”
In the following latest two cables from Brussels (2009), cable 1 states in ¶3 that: “Speaking at the post-Social Summit press conference, Dutch PM/European Council chair Balkenende said participants all agreed that “if we want a social Europe we need a strong economy in Europe.” Commission President Prodi underlined the need to actually implement the Lisbon agenda. With a reference to the persisting deadlock on the draft legislation concerning the Community patent, Prodi stated: “If we continue to decide by unanimity, the Lisbon agenda has no chance of being implemented.” Prodi also called for Member State budgets to reflect the commitments taken under the Lisbon strategy. Balkenende and Prodi underlined the role of social dialogue as being “at the heart of the European Social model.”
“Politicians worry that people will find out who benefits from this, mostly patent lawyers and multinationals to be specific.”The “Lisbon strategy” need not depend on the so-called ‘Community’ patent (a euphemism), which would only increase the aftermath of lawsuits. Cable 2 says in ¶4: “The Communication cites a number of problems for the shortcomings. It notes barriers to ICT business growth, wherein sub-optimal conditions for SME access to markets, innovation and finance, plus excessive regulatory burdens, prevent SMEs from expanding and growing their market shares more rapidly. The Communication highlights how fragmentation of EU ICT markets is also a key limiting factor for SME growth and innovation. The EU’s failure to achieve a real internal market in telecoms, and to standardize ICT regulation and IPR regimes, limit the ability of firms to grow rapidly. The Communication calls for creation of a Community patent to help remedy this situation. The lack of collaboration between public procurement authorities and those overseeing R&D and innovation results in many missed opportunities for innovative products to flourish.”
The logic here is very flawed. What they are trying to insinuate is that in order for businesses to thrive in Europe they might need a broader market like that in the United States. But to suggest that SMEs suing or threatening more competitors in more parts of Europe would somehow spur innovation is to ignore all the good academic studies (including empirical evidence) from the US — ones that suggest patents have only harmed innovation and continue to do so. The sacred cow which is patents is simply the wrong thing to blame here and to portray it as a gateway to success is simply to spin or lie for an agenda. Here are the two cables in question:
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 BRUSSELS 004741
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR DRL/IL
DOL FOR ILAB
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL [External Political Relations], ELAB [Labor Sector Affairs],
ECON [Economic Conditions], EUN [European Union], USEU BRUSSELS
SUBJECT: EU SOCIAL SUMMIT RENEWS COMMITMENT TO
LISBON STRATEGY; LABOR AND EMPLOYERS SPLIT ON
PRIORITIES
¶1. SUMMARY. EU-level organizations of labor and
employers at a pre-European Council meeting with EU
leaders on November 4 reaffirmed their commitment to
the "Lisbon strategy" for turning the EU into the
most competitive economy by the year 2010. The
employers and unions not surprisingly continue to
have different priorities for reactivating the
Lisbon agenda. END SUMMARY.
¶2. The European Council meeting was preceded on
November 4 by a "Tripartite Social Summit," in which
the EU Troika (Dutch Presidency, Luxembourg, UK and
European Commission) as well as representative
organizations of the "social partners" (labor,
employers, "cadres" and employees) reviewed the
Lisbon strategy for turning the EU into the most
competitive economy by the year 2010. The Social
Summit heard a presentation by former Dutch PM Wim
Kok of the report drawn up by his high-level panel
on the progress of the Lisbon Strategy. The report
takes a gloomy view on progress made over the past
four years. It explains the EU's disappointing
delivery by the overloaded agenda, poor coordination
and conflicting priorities, and blames the lack of
political will by the Member States. In order to
ensure that Member States take up their
responsibilities, the Kok report calls for a process-
redesign along three lines: "more coherence and
consistency between policies and participants,
improving the process for delivery by involving
national parliaments and social partners, and
clearer communication on objectives and
achievements." The report rejects proposals for the
2010 Lisbon target to be lifted. It also states
that the EU should not become a "copy-paste" of the
US.
¶3. Speaking at the post-Social Summit press
conference, Dutch PM/European Council chair
Balkenende said participants all agreed that "if we
want a social Europe we need a strong economy in
Europe." Commission President Prodi underlined the
need to actually implement the Lisbon agenda. With
a reference to the persisting deadlock on the draft
legislation concerning the Community patent, Prodi
stated: "If we continue to decide by unanimity, the
Lisbon agenda has no chance of being implemented."
Prodi also called for Member State budgets to
reflect the commitments taken under the Lisbon
strategy. Balkenende and Prodi underlined the role
of social dialogue as being "at the heart of the
European Social model."
¶4. The President of the European Employers'
Federation (UNICE), Jurgen Strube, opined that the
sense of urgency with the Lisbon agenda must be
translated into implementation but called for the
focus to be on competitiveness: "All (Lisbon)
objectives are interrelated but it's important to
focus on the key drivers: competitiveness and
economic growth. ETUC Secretary-General John Monks
said his organization (the European Trade Union
Confederation) supported the Kok report as a
"realistic" and "balanced" document, adding: "We
know there are choices to be made, but the route is
not the same as in the U.S. What concerns us are
the "delocalisations" (out-sourcing), working time
related issues, etc. There is an agenda there."
¶5. A statement released by the Dutch Presidency
said the parties "reaffirmed their commitment to the
Lisbon agenda" as "the most effective means by which
to fulfill" the EU's economic and social objectives
"and thereby underpin the role of social dialogue in
European governance," adding: "All parties agreed on
the need to add a new impetus to the implementation
of the Lisbon strategy in order to bring about a
balanced economic, social and environmental renewal
in the EU." The contribution of social partners was
"essential in unleashing the potential for economic
and employment growth by finding the balance between
flexibility and security." Balkenende and Prodi
were said to have "expressed their readiness to
continue the debate and stated that they were
looking forward to a substantial joint contribution
from the social partners with commitments relating
to their area of competence in the context of the
Mid-Term review of the Lisbon strategy next spring."
¶6. COMMENT. Just like the members of the Kok panel
were said to be divided on the remedies to the
problems of the EU economy, the employers and unions
not surprisingly continue to have conflicting
demands on priorities to be addressed in the context
of their "social dialogue" at the service of the
Lisbon strategy: the employers are calling for
further liberalization, the removal of obstacles to
cross-border provision of services, and for research
policy to be tweaked toward boosting
competitiveness. In contrast, the ETUC calls for
stronger social cohesion "as an essential part of
Europe's competitive advantage" and insists that the
Lisbon process should not amount to deregulation,
weakening worker rights and protection, and cutbacks
in living and social standards.
SCHNABEL
VZCZCXRO5173
PP RUEHAG RUEHDF RUEHIK RUEHLZ RUEHROV RUEHSR
DE RUEHBS #0399/01 0790718
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 200718Z MAR 09
FM USEU BRUSSELS
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAFCC/FCC WASHDC PRIORITY
INFO RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 BRUSSELS 000399
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
FCC FOR WEISLER
DOC FOR ITA, NTIA - ALEXANDER, MAC - DEFALCO
STATE FOR EUR/ERA, EB/CIP, EB/IPE
PLEASE PASS TO USTR
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECPS [Communications and Postal Systems],
ECIN [Economic Integration and Cooperation],
EINV [Foreign Investments], EINT [Economic and Commercial Internet],
ETRD [Foreign Trade], ECON [Economic Conditions], EUN [European Union]
SUBJECT: EU SEEKS TO DOUBLE ICT RESEARCH AND INNOVATION FUNDING
¶1. (SBU) SUMMARY. The European Commission released a March 13
Communication calling for doubling funding for information and
communication technology (ICT) research and innovation and other
steps to boost ICT in Europe. "A Strategy for ICT R&D and
Innovation in Europe: Raising the Game" emphasizes that ICT provides
vital tools to promote economic recovery and address long-term
aging, environmental and energy concerns and lays out plans to make
the EU the world leader in ICT development by 2020. The Commission
notes that the EU lags the U.S. and Japan in the proportion of R&D
devoted to ICT and the economic value generated by ICT. The report
cites regulatory barriers to ICT business growth, fragmented
markets, disjointed R&D efforts and inadequate funding for the
shortcomings. The Commission calls specifically for doubling ICT
R&D investment by 2020, to be matched by member states. The
Communication also calls upon EU institutions and Member States to
coordinate efforts to overcome fragmentation of ICT R&D efforts and
markets, to raise the number of ICT "poles of excellence," and to
set the right conditions to grow new innovative ICT businesses
across Europe. The new strategy forms part of preparations for an
EU research and innovation plan as called for by the December
European Council, and underpins EU efforts to promote greater
emphasis on R&D and innovation as a critical factor to speed
recovery from the global economic crisis. END SUMMARY.
COMMISSION PROPOSES ICT RESEARCH AND INNOVATION STRATEGY
--------------------------------------------- --------
¶2. (U) The European Commission released a Communication on March 13
calling for doubling funding for information and communication
technologies (ICT) research and innovation and other steps to boost
the ICT sector in Europe. The report follows upon a public
consultation, launched in September 2008, on an EU research and
innovation strategy for ICT, and responds to the December 2008
European Council call for an EU plan for innovation and research.
The Communication, "A Strategy for ICT R&D and Innovation in Europe:
Raising the Game," stresses the importance of deepening, rather than
cutting R&D support during the current economic crisis, and lays out
plans to make the EU the world leader in ICT development and use by
2020. The Communication underlines that Member States, EU
institutions and industry must pool resources and better coordinate
ICT research and innovation efforts to reach this goal.
EU LAGS OTHERS IN ICT RESEARCH
------------------------------
¶3. (U) The Communication notes that in the EU, ICT represents 34
percent of the two trillion euro global ICT market, accounts for 12
million jobs and generates six percent of EU GDP. ICT R&D accounts
for a quarter of all private R&D spending, a third of all R&D
employment, and fifth of all patents in the EU. Nevertheless, the
EU ICT business sector spends less than half as much as its U.S.
counterpart on R&D spending. The EU also lags other OECD members in
the proportion of R&D devoted to ICT, who on average devote more
than 30 percent of total R&D to ICT. The Communication notes a
growing deficit of ICT skilled workers across the EU, resulting in
"several hundreds of thousands" of unfilled jobs. Value added by
the EU ICT sector is only 23 pecent of total value added, which
lags the U.S., Japan and advanced economies.
¶4. (U) The Communication cites a number of problems for the
shortcomings. It notes barriers to ICT business growth, wherein
sub-optimal conditions for SME access to markets, innovation and
finance, plus excessive regulatory burdens, prevent SMEs from
expanding and growing their market shares more rapidly. The
Communication highlights how fragmentation of EU ICT markets is also
a key limiting factor for SME growth and innovation. The EU's
failure to achieve a real internal market in telecoms, and to
standardize ICT regulation and IPR regimes, limit the ability of
firms to grow rapidly. The Communication calls for creation of a
Community patent to help remedy this situation. The lack of
collaboration between public procurement authorities and those
overseeing R&D and innovation results in many missed opportunities
for innovative products to flourish.
¶5. (U) In addition, the Communication outlines how Europe's ICT R&D
landscape remains fragmented, despite new efforts under the seventh
EU Framework Program for R&D (FP7). Member State ministries
continue to develop R&D, innovation and education policies in
isolation, without adequate cross-ministerial consultation. The
plethora of varied EU, Member State and intergovernmental R&D
funding mechanisms also lead to confusion for innovators.
THE SOLUTIONS - GREATER AND MORE COORDINATED ICT R&D INVESTMENT
--------------------------------------------- -------
BRUSSELS 00000399 002 OF 003
¶6. (U) In response to these shortcomings, the Commission says Europe
"needs to raise its game." The Commission calls for a systematic
ICT R&D strategy that mobilizes resources and stakeholders along
three paths: raising public and private ICT research and innovation;
prioritizing ICT research and innovation into key areas and reducing
fragmentation; and facilitating the emergence of new public and
private markets of ICT-based innovations.
¶7. (U) In specific terms, the Commission calls for doubling ICT R&D
investment by 2020, beginning with a boost in EU-level spending
under FP7 from 1.1 billion Euros in 2010 to 1.7 billion in 2013, to
be matched by Member States. This could be accompanied by direction
of additional regional/cohesion funding toward ICT innovation and
research. The Commission urges Member States to develop more
public-private partnerships, to boost public procurement of
innovative ICT products, and to explore pre-commercial procurement.
OVERCOMING FRAGMENTATION
------------------------
¶8. (U) The Communication calls for a series of actions to better
coordinate its R&D and innovation policies and specialize its
resources. It urges Member States to work with EU institutions to
develop shared strategies and policies, to enhance the dialogue
within the National ICT Research Directors Forum and to work more
closely with ICT advisory groups. The Commission commits to
strengthen stakeholder groups and use instruments such as the ICT
Knowledge and Innovation Communities (KICs) to bring industries,
entrepreneurs and academics together. Member States and regions are
urged to redouble efforts to develop knowledge-based innovation
clusters, and increase sharing of R&D infrastructures for sectors
that require large investments, such as nanotechnology and
high-performance computing.
FACILITATING MARKETS FOR INNOVATION
-----------------------------------
¶9. (U) The Communication discusses ways to facilitate the emergence
of markets for innovation, so that the EU can "produce and
commercialize the equivalent of its share in the global ICT market."
The Commission calls for both general policy measures and targeted
procurement as means to create more favorable conditions for EU-wide
innovation markets. Member States and regions should promote closer
collaboration between innovation users and producers across the
public sector. Governments should ensure interoperability and work
harder to promote common standards, and the Commission will work to
revise the ICT standardization process.
¶10. (U) Also, the Commission plans to support a series of
substantial pilot projects to deploy innovation ICT products and
develop new pan-European ICT-based service infrastructures. Among
these may be projects to focus on innovative ICT solutions for
sustainable healthcare or for energy efficiency, as well as an
effort to develop an electronic identity management (eID)
infrastructure, to increase the trustworthiness of e-government and
e-commerce services.
¶11. (U) Finally, the Communication calls for simplification and
streamlining of R&D administrative procedures, to cut red tape and
allow for greater flexibility in program procedures. The Commission
notes it will expand international cooperation on the largest-scale
ICT challenges, such as the Future Internet and quantum computing.
CONCLUSION AND COMMENT
----------------------
¶12. (U) The Commission's new proposed ICT R&D and innovation
strategy projects that if fully adopted, by 2020 the EU will have:
doubled its private and public investment in ICT R&D, doubled
venture capital investment in high growth ICT SMEs, developed an
additional five ICT poles of world-class excellence, to make ICT
research careers more attractive to bridge the current skills gap;
grown new innovative ICT businesses so that one third of all ICT R&D
business expense comes from new firms; and ensured that the EU ICT
sector supplies at least the equivalent of its share in the global
market.
¶13. (SBU) The proposed strategy is part of a larger series of EU
initiatives to boost the EU's innovative capacity across sectors.
These were triggered by the seminal 2005 Aho report detailing the
EU's R&D and innovation shortcomings. The new ICT strategy is
designed to build on the EU i2010 ICT policy framework, the
broad-based EU innovation strategy and ICT-related initiatives under
the European Research Area framework. The effort will need approval
by the European Council, which is likely. It is unclear whether
BRUSSELS 00000399 003 OF 003
this and other EU innovation promotion initiatives will allow the EU
to overcome the persistent innovation gap remaining versus the U.S.,
and in any case, will take time to show measurable results.
MURRAY
If there are any Cablegate areas we should explore more urgently, please leave a comment. █
Permalink
Send this to a friend
Content is available under CC-BY-SA