EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

12.28.11

Cablegate: US Government Talks About Providing Free Software that Helps Chinese Netizens Overcome Filters

Posted in America, Free/Libre Software at 6:58 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Cablegate

Summary: A look at Free software in China based on cables that Wikileaks released about a year ago to selected journalists

According to the following Cablegate cable, “if the USG [US government] provided free software that helped Chinese netizens overcome filters, this might politicize the issue of Internet freedom and force the PRC government to react.”

It is interesting in the context that, in another Cablegate cable, it says that “China’s 11th Five-Year Plan (2006-2011) calls for the development of embedded software [and] open source software,” so here are the two cables in full:


VZCZCXRO6497
OO RUEHBC RUEHCN RUEHGH RUEHKUK RUEHTRO
DE RUEHBJ #0183/01 0250728
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 250728Z JAN 10
FM AMEMBASSY BEIJING
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 7730
INFO RUEHOO/CHINA POSTS COLLECTIVE IMMEDIATE
RUCNIRA/IRAN COLLECTIVE IMMEDIATE
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC IMMEDIATE

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 05 BEIJING 000183 

SIPDIS 

DEPT FOR S, P, D, EAP/CM, EEB, AND H
NSC FOR BADER, MEDEIROS, AND LOI 

E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/23/2030
TAGS: PREL [External Political Relations], PGOV [Internal Governmental Affairs], ECON [Economic Conditions], PHUM [Human Rights], EINV [Foreign Investments], CH [China (Mainland)]
SUBJECT: SECRETARY'S INTERNET FREEDOM SPEECH: CHINA REACTION 

Classified By: DCM Robert Goldberg fo Reasons: 1.4(B), (D). 

Summary
-------
¶1. (C) Secretary Clinton's January 21 speech on Internet
Freedom touched a nerve in China.   Official reaction was
negative, with harsh criticism coming from the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs in an official statement and from other parts
of the Chinese system through critical articles and
editorials in the official press.  Chinese Internet censors
were deployed in force to block online commentary and
coverage of the Secretary's speech, and as of January 24,
sites in the United States that carried transcripts of the
speech were inaccessible without VPN or other
firewall-evading software.  The few Chinese netizens and
bloggers who did manage to access the speech and then dared
write about it were generally supportive of the Secretary's
message.  Other Embassy contacts, including academic
USA-watchers and journalists, lamented that the Secretary's
speech would strengthen and embolden those in the Chinese
system who advocated greater control over the Internet in
China.  They expressed concern that Internet freedom would be
made into an "us vs. them" issue rather than a "right vs.
wrong" issue.  Contacts warned that Chinese officials see
U.S. efforts to promote Internet freedom as an attack,
repeatedly invoking the specter of "color revolution."  Some
contacts in the tech industry praised the speech as being
"spot on" in its coverage of U.S. firms' difficulty with the
Chinese business environment.  Contacts outside Beijing were
cautious with their comments.  Embassy and consulate officers
will continue to follow the reaction to the Secretary's
remarks in the weeks ahead to assess their continuing impact
on government, think tank, media, blogger and business
actions with regard to the Internet.  End Summary. 

Official Reaction Negative
--------------------------
¶2. (C) In a January 22 statement in reaction to the
Secretary's Internet freedom speech, Chinese Ministry of
Foreign Affairs spokesperson Ma Zhaoxu, said "we firmly
oppose such words and deeds, which are against the facts and
harmful to U.S.-China relations."  Ma's remarks followed a
January 21 press conference by Vice Foreign Minister He
Yafei's in which he did not refer to the Secretary's speech,
but urged the United States to refrain from
"over-interpreting" the Google case, saying it should not be
allowed to impact bilateral relations.  Ma's statement was
much more negative than initial unofficial comment from
working-level MFA officers the morning of January 22.  Asked
about the speech, MFA North American and Oceanian Affairs
Department U.S.A. Division Director An Gang told poloff that
the MFA noticed that specific Chinese cases or individuals
were not mentioned in the speech, and that "we are very happy
about that."  (Comment: the contrast between the "softer"
comments from the USA desk and the harder language from the
Spokesman several hours later suggests that the negative
reaction to the speech originated at higher levels in the
foreign policy hierarchy.) 

Media Reaction Dutifully Echoes MFA Criticism
---------------------------------------------
¶3. (SBU) Chinese media coverage of the Secretary's speech
widely quoted the MFA statement.  January 22 coverage
included assertions that the Secretary's call for
unrestricted access to the Internet could be regarded "as a
disguised attempt to impose U.S. values in the name of
democracy."  Articles in the nationalist daily Global Times
stated that the bulk of Internet comment originated in the
West, "loaded with aggressive rhetoric against other
countries," against which other countries cannot hope to
defend.  Beijing University Professor of Communications Hu
Yong, quoted in the 21st Century Business Herald, said the
Secretary's discussion of sharing technology to allow users
to circumvent Internet censorship meant that the "Google
incident is only the beginning of a rolling snowball." 

¶4.  (SBU) Most regional reporting in China emphasized that
Internet freedom has now become embedded as a new diplomatic
tool the U.S. foreign policy.  Shanghai's influential Wenhui
Daily ran a January 23 commentary calling Secretary Clinton's
remarks "arrogant, illogical, and full of political shows and
calculations," accusing her of having a "Cold War mentality."
Some Chinese outlets rebutted U.S. charges by praising
Chinese Internet practices.  January 22 televised news
programming reported on the benefits for Chinese users of
Chinese governmental supervision of the Internet.  Shanghai
TV January 22 broadcast programming which painted Chinese
online police in a positive light. 

BEIJING 00000183  002 OF 005 

Blogger Community: Those that Saw it, Liked it
--------------------------------------------- -
¶5. (SBU) Chinese netizens accessed the Secretary's speech and
shared reactions through rough real-time translations on
Twitter, blogs, and Google.  The range of opinions among the
self-selecting demographic of Chinese netizens, who had
circumvented  Chinese government blocks to blog and
participate in Twitter-based discussions, ranged from
supportive to skeptical, with the majority expressing
agreement with the principles outlined in the Secretary's
speech.  In general, Chinese netizen comments focused on
speculation about linkages between the Secretary's speech and
Google's announcement that it was considering withdrawing
from China. 

¶6. (SBU) Many netizen reactions echoed the statements by
blogger Lian Yue who tweeted that Secretary Clinton's speech
"clarified the relation between Internet freedom and business
prosperity, which gave better guidance for American companies
operating in China."   A Chinese blogger named Zhou Shugang
wrote that the speech was "certain to have a positive effect
and was welcomed by Chinese Internet users regarding the
censorship problem in China."  Others commented that the
speech was an indication that the United States was leading
the U.S.-China relationship in the right direction. 

¶7. (SBU) Some Chinese bloggers viewed the Secretary's speech
as "confrontational," but nonetheless inspiring to the
Chinese people.
- Chengcheng, a cartoonist-blogger, depicted Secretary
Clinton as Joan of Arc, with a widely distributed graphic of
"Hillary leads the people."  Another Chinese Twitter user
wrote, "What a historic speech( it is the launching of an
Internet war, the confrontation between democracy and
authoritarianism becoming public, and the beginning of a new
Cold War."
- Wen Yunchao, a blogger based in Guangzhou, similarly
characterized the speech as "a declaration of war from a free
nation to an autocracy. It might be as important as
Churchill's Iron Curtain Speech... I will wait with hope. The
direct mention of China also calls for a frank and honest
discussion between Hu Jintao and Wen Jiabao."
-Gadfly artist and blogger Ai Weiwei, attending a Mission
sponsored event in Beijing (see para 21), said the
Secretary's speech "showed the power of the Internet to the
world" and raised the U.S. Internet strategy to a new level.
¶8. (SBU) Some bloggers expressed skepticism.
- Novelist and blogger Yang Hengjun tweeted, "the U.S.
government has been talking about supporting world-wide
Internet freedom for ages, but it hasn't done much yet."
- Rao Jin, the founder of anti-CNN.com, a website critical of
western media reporting, doubted the sincerity of the United
States' commitment to the freedoms mentioned in Secretary
Clinton's speech due to competing commercial and national
security interests.
Chinese bloggers, regardless of their outlook, have widely
reported that Chinese web monitors have been aggressively
deleting posts and content related to the Secretary's speech. 

China Watchers: Speech Will Provoke the Authorities
--------------------------------------------- ------
¶9. (C) Other contacts analyzed the Secretary's speech the way
bloggers did, but were pessimistic about the effect of the
speech on Chinese authorities.  On January 22 Chen Jieren
(protect), nephew of Politburo Standing Committee member He
Guoqiang and editor of a Communist Youth League website, told
poloff that following the controversy generated by Google's
announcement, the issue of Internet freedom had been
discussed several times within the Politburo Standing
Committee which had agreed that the issue of Internet freedom
had supplanted traditional human rights issues as a new
"battleground" between the United States and China.  Although
he was not aware of any specific Standing Committee
decisions, Chen said that President Hu Jintao had provided
general guidance that the issue should not be allowed to
cause major disruptions to U.S.-China relations.
¶10. (C) On January 21, speaking before the Secretary's
speech, Yang Jisheng, Deputy Editor of the reform-oriented
political digest Yanhuang Qunqiu, told poloff that the
Communist Party viewed Internet freedom initiatives as a
direct challenge to its ability to maintain social and
political stability and, therefore, its legitimacy.  He said
that, in this context, the Party would resist international
pressure on the Google issue and would increase restrictions
on the Internet in the period leading up to the 18th Party
Congress in 2012.  He predicted that the Secretary's speech 

BEIJING 00000183  003 OF 005 

would be viewed as directed at the Communist Party and would
therefore generate uncertainty about U.S. intentions towards
China.
¶11. (C) On January 23, a prominent Tsinghua University media
and public opinion researcher pointed out that most Chinese
media reactions to the Secretary's speech had simply
republished the MFA statement and were not printing any
quotations from the speech itself.  Given the political
sensitivity of the speech and the Google case, this was the
only safe thing to do, he said.  Any perceived support for
the Secretary's speech in the press would "cross a red line"
with censors.  The researcher said the Chinese public had
mixed feelings about the speech and the Google issue.  While
many in China were dissatisfied with Internet censorship,
they also resented public criticism from U.S. officials, he
said, predicting that the speech would increase nationalist
sentiment in China.  Another contact, a journalist at a
Communist Youth League magazine, agreed that while it might
cause a nationalist response, the Secretary's message "needed
to be said."  He predicted that the Chinese government would
attempt to appeal to nationalism to counter the Secretary's
speech.  However, he noted that most current media commentary
critical of the speech, and Google, was not being written by
well known journalists, intellectuals or scholars whose
silence could be read as a show of support for the speech -
and for Google.
¶12. (C) Beijing University School of International Studies
Assistant Professor Yu Wanli, one of Beijing University's
better-known U.S.A. experts, told poloff January 23 that he
had been "disappointed and depressed" when he read the
Secretary's speech.  "Those who tried to control the Internet
more in China never had much support before," he said.  "Most
people believe information should be open, and the Internet
should be open.  The conservative, security people were the
minority and many people just laughed at them."  The
Secretary's speech, however, gave great new energy to the
"controllers" who could now plausibly argue that the United
States was explicitly using the Internet as a tool for regime
change.  "The Internet belongs to every country," he
complained; "we all can go there, we all can add to it, we
all can learn from it.  We Chinese were free there.  Now the
United States has claimed it for itself and so it will become
an ideological battlefield."  He asserted that, in the past,
the Chinese authorities had paid relatively little attention
to controlling the Internet, focusing only on the issues that
were the most urgent and letting most netizens alone.  "That
is finished now.  The Secretary's 'information curtain'
remark will give the authorities what they need to
'harmonize' the Internet for all Chinese citizens."
(Comment: 'harmonize' is an acidly sarcastic term in Chinese
to describe official deletion or blockage of Internet
content.  Yu is nearly always laid back and even-tempered.
His commentary on this issue was more emotional and bitter
than poloff has seen from him in dozens of encounters over
three years, even on extremely sensitive issues such as the
Xinjiang riots or the demonstrations abroad against the
Olympic torch relay in early 2008.) 

¶13. (C) Yuan Peng, Director of the Institute of American
Studies at the Ministry of State Security-affiliated China
Institutes of Contemporary International Relations (CICIR),
warned that Google's announcement had become a new irritant
to the bilateral relationship with the potential to be even
more dangerous than the Taiwan and Tibet issue.  Yuan said
that many Chinese citizens believed that Google's decision
was part of a coordinated public/private effort by the USG to
impose U.S. values on China, what he referred to as an
"E-color revolution."  As confirmation of this theory, Yuan
cited Secretary Clinton's January 7 "21st Century Statecraft"
dinner with several tech sector CEOs (including Google),
Google's donations to President Obama's presidential
campaign, and Secretary Clinton's January 21 speech on
Internet freedom. 

¶14. (C) CICIR researcher Guo Yongjun warned that there were
people in China and other countries such as Iran who might
see the "shadow of color revolution" in recent USG policies
promoting Internet freedom and 21st century e-diplomacy.  For
example, Iranians might perceive Washington's new initiatives
on Internet freedom or the advocacy of new technologies such
as Twitter to be "aggressive" or harboring ulterior motives,
such as promoting regime change, said Guo.  Informed Chinese
netizens already know how to circumvent the Great Firewall to
access Facebook and Twitter, Guo said, including by using
commercially available software.  He feared, however, that if
the USG provided free software that helped Chinese netizens
overcome filters, this might politicize the issue of Internet
freedom and force the PRC government to react.  One possible 

BEIJING 00000183  004 OF 005 

consequence, warned Guo, was that China might make it illegal
to download either U.S.-provided or commercially available
software that helped Internet surfers circumvent the Great
Firewall. 

¶15. (C) Professor Xu Jianguo of Beijing University's National
School of Development said January 22 that restricting the
Internet access of Chinese netizens would theoretically
hamper development of cutting edge industries, but was
skeptical this had happened in reality.  Professor Wu
Bingbing, also of Beijing University, said in the same
meeting that the problem was that China's leaders did not yet
feel comfortable with these new communications technologies
and thus preferred to proceed cautiously.  The Google issue
and Secretary Clinton's speech were likely to prompt them to
shift from a low-profile to a higher-profile response on
Internet freedom. 

IT Industry: Speech Accurately Portrayed Business Environment
--------------------------------------------- ---------------- 

¶16. (C) The president of a strategic international trade
consulting business in Beijing and chair of AmCham's working
group on export controls, called the Secretary's speech "spot
on, "directly capturing industry concerns about a business
climate that is getting worse on a "day-to-day basis."  He
applauded the Secretary's speech as a means of bringing the
Chinese to the table to address key concerns about the
business environment and said the decision taken by Google
was of enormous magnitude, indicating the depth of concern
over issues it is facing here.  As a result, he believes, the
Chinese government's failure to respond to its people's
opposition to censorship would embolden the netizen community
in its efforts to evade government controls. 

¶17. (C) Another high-tech industry consultant expressed
concern that the Secretary's speech would dampen the
U.S.-China business climate and drive it "to a new low."  The
consultant observed that "China has noticed that the NSA and
the Pentagon have dominated cyberspace policy for over a
year."  Key officials, academics, and military leaders,
according to this consultant, hold paranoid fears that the
U.S. would one day launch a "zero-day" attack on all of
China's critical infrastructure.  The Secretary's speech and
Google's recent actions, would amplify this belief. 

¶18. (C) Reaction in northern China, where Intel has a
multi-billion dollar manufacturing factory investment under
construction, however, has thus far been limited.  Intel's
Dalian-based General Manager told Congen Shenyang poloff that
the Secretary's speech had thus far not created a stir.
Intel's GM had in the past several days met with several
Dalian Vice Mayors, and reported Google and Internet freedom
issues had not been raised. 

¶19. (C) South China-based Internet portal contacts were
reluctant to talk with ConGenoffs about ongoing media
coverage of Google or broader internet freedom issues.  A
public relations manager from Netease initially refused to
comment, saying it was not appropriate for her to offer an
opinion on policy matters, but then guardedly reverted to
official-sounding comments about why Internet regulation is
important for the well-being of Chinese users and the
maintenance of a positive online environment. 

¶20. (C) A working-level official from the Guangzhou Municipal
Informatization (sic) Office went further in sharing
pro-government comments with ConGenoff, saying that Google is
a business and should restrict itself to business matters,
rather than venturing into political territory.  The official
said 2009 was a very strong year for internet companies in
China and that internet restrictions had not dampened
individual user's online experiences or companies' earnings. 

Mission Outreach on the Secretary's Speech
------------------------------------------
¶21. (C) January 22, Embassy Beijing and Consulates General
Shanghai, Guangzhou and Shenyang hosted a simultaneous
digital video conference viewing of the Secretary's speech
for dozens of local bloggers, with an additional 300 netizens
attending via the Internet.  Mission estimates indicate
Twitter communications and blog entries will reach a combined
audience of millions of persons.  Following the speech,
participating bloggers, who were generally supportive of the
Secretary's message, engaged in a lively discussion focused
on what specific measures the United States government could
take to promote Internet freedom in China and whether the
speech constituted a new direction for U.S. foreign policy on 

BEIJING 00000183  005 OF 005 

China.
HUNTSMAN

And the second cable:


VZCZCXRO5289
RR RUEHCN RUEHGH RUEHVC
DE RUEHGZ #0562/01 1350859
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 150859Z MAY 07
FM AMCONSUL GUANGZHOU
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 6057
INFO RUEHC/DEPT OF LABOR WASHDC
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC
RUEHOO/CHINA POSTS COLLECTIVE
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 0445
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
RUEKJCS/DIA WASHDC
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 GUANGZHOU 000562 

SIPDIS 

SIPDIS 

USPACOM FOR FPA
STATE FOR EAP/CM, EA/CIP, AND EB/CBA
STATE PASS USTR FOR STRATFORD, WINTER
USDOC FOR 4420/ITA/MAC/MCQUEEN 

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON [Economic Conditions], ETRD [Foreign Trade], EINT [Economic and Commercial Internet], TSPL [Science and Technology Policy], CH [China (Mainland)]
SUBJECT:  Guangzhou's Software Industry:  Perspectives from a
Software Park and a Software College 

¶1. (U) Summary:  The development of Guangdong Province's software
industry has been a key priority in recent years for China's
Ministries of Commerce, Information Industry, and Education, among
others.  Guangzhou has emerged as a focal point for the
establishment of the province's leading software parks and schools
of software engineering.  Tianhe Software Park, Guangzhou's first
and largest, boasts 1,203 enterprises and was recently designated by
the Ministry of Science and Technology as a "Software Industry
Export and Innovation Base" with a mandate to boost China's
participation in the international software export and out-sourcing
markets.  The South China University of Technology School of
Software Engineering ranks 15th out of China's 36 software schools,
and is one of only two such schools in Guangdong.  Both the Software
Park and the SCUT Software School maintain extensive ties to leading
Chinese companies as well as multinational companies.  End Summary. 

Overview of the Software Industry in China
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

¶2. (U)  According to Zhan Yanzun, Vice President of the China
Software Industry Base, Administrative Commission of Guangzhou,
Tianhe Software Park, the value of the domestic Chinese software
market is between RMB 100 billion to 150 billion (USD 13 - 19.5
billion) per year.  Currently, Beijing, Guangdong, and Shanghai are
the top three locations in the country in terms of the size of the
software industry.  China's 11th Five-Year Plan (2006-2011) calls
for the development of embedded software, open source software, and
middleware which are key focal points for Guangdong.  Zhan also
noted China's interest in pursuing overseas markets.  The National
Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) and the Ministry of
Commerce (MOFCOM) encourage domestic software companies to compete
in the international marketplace.  The Ministry of Science and
Technology (MOST) and MOFCOM have both recently sent delegations to
North America on market exploration trips.  According to Zhan, the
delegation's biggest target market is North America, followed by
Europe, and then Southeast Asia.  In the North American market,
Chinese government officials hope to set up representative offices
in San Francisco and New Jersey; they will be responsible for
collecting market information and carrying out marketing functions. 

The Making of Guangzhou's Top Software Park
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

¶3. (U)  Guangzhou Municipality boasts four software parks: the
Guangzhou Software Park, the Guangzhou Tianhe Software Park, the
Nansha District Software Park and the Huanghuagang Information Park.
 The Tianhe Software Park is the largest of the four in terms of
size (it is the largest among all 11 national-level software parks
in China, with a planned area of 12.25 square kilometers) and output
(70 percent of software output in Guangzhou).  Established in 1991,
it is also the oldest of the four.  In the last 16 years, Tianhe
Software Park has been named "National Hi-tech Zone" by the National
Commission of Science and Technology (or MOST), a "Software Industry
Export and Innovation Base" and "National Industry Base for Online
Games" by the NDRC and the Ministry of Information Industry (MII).
The Tianhe Software Park has 19 branch parks. 

¶4. (U)  By the end of 2006, according to Qiao Xizhong, Director of
Service Industries at Tianhe Software Park, there were 1,203
enterprises (290 were foreign-invested and the rest were domestic,
largely Guangdong local enterprises) in Tianhe Software Park,
employing about 50,000 persons, with a total annual output of RMB
25.3 billion (USD 3.3 billion).  Forty percent of the park's output
came from the telecom and value-added services, 25 percent from
financial services and the remainder from office automation (OA) and
business intelligence (BI).
-- The top three domestic enterprises in the park are Netease, which
had revenues of RMB 2.6 billion (USD 338 million) in 2006,
Digitalchina and Sinobest.
-- Other key enterprises, which have an annual output above RMB 120
million (USD 15.6 million), include ChinaWeal, Excellence, Asinfo,
Chuangxiang, and Keyou.
-- The top three foreign-invested enterprises are Ericsson from
Sweden, and two Hong Kong enterprises.
-- Other key foreign-invested enterprises include Trans Cosmos from
Japan and the RIB Group from Germany, both of which are engaged in
software outsourcing. 

GUANGZHOU 00000562  002 OF 003 

¶5. (U) Projects currently underway in the Park include:
-- the Internet Digital Center (IDC), which will house more than
3,000 servers.
-- the Southern R&D Center of China Mobile, which will cost RMB 1.7
billion (USD 221 million) in the first phase with a 490,000 square
meter work area,
-- a four-star hotel and apartment buildings for foreign staff,
namely project managers and technicians from countries such as
India, the United States, Germany, Japan, and Holland.
A road is also being built and this will cut travel time to ten
minutes between the software park and the Eastern Railway Station by
the end of this year. 

Encouraging the Growth of the Software Park and Industry
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

¶6. (U) Software Park Vice President Zhan noted that MOFCOM granted
the title "Software Exports and Innovation Base" to Guangzhou,
Nanjing, Hangzhou, Jinan and Chengdu in December 2006 to boost
China's participation in the international software market,
especially in software exports and outsourcing.  Zhan said 35
enterprises in the park are engaged in software outsourcing, and
that all are members of the park's Software Outsourcing
Association. 

¶7. (U) The Guangzhou Municipal Government released "No. 44 document"
in 2006 to attract investors to the software industry.  Incentives
offered to enterprises to settle in the park include house rental
subsidies, post-doctoral study subsidies, and income tax
preferential policies for top management members. 

Software Park Officials address IPR issues
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

¶8. (U)  Zhan said that IPR protection has been a focus of both the
Guangzhou and Tianhe District governments alike.  He also noted that
the Tianhe Software Park is a member of the Guangzhou IPR Protection
Team, which is headed by Vice Mayor Wang Xiaoling.  The Software
Park is involved in drafting and implementing the team's action
plans on IPR protection. 

The Human Resources Component of the Park
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

¶9. (U)  Zhan said Guangzhou's goal is to have 200,000 professionals
in the software and cartoon/animation industries by 2010.  Zhan
believed that there is a current shortage of high-end software
professionals in Guangzhou.  Enterprises in the park recruit both
new graduates and experienced workers, but company-specific training
is provided to both before they begin work.  Most enterprises
conduct training on their own, but Zhan said that enterprises will
likely utilize on on-site training center after completion.
Enterprises in the park last year recruited roughly 1,200 college
gradates from across China, with most coming from Guangdong.
According to Zhan, Sun Yat-sen University and the South China
University of Technology (SCUT) have excellent software schools so
they do not need to look far to recruit qualified graduates. 

South China University of Technology
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

¶10. (U) South China University of Technology (SCUT) was established
in 1952.  In 2003, SCUT ranked the 20th among the 570 universities
in China.  SCUT has been named a key university of China by the
Ministry of Education. The university is famous for engineering and
has 29 schools, 67 undergraduate programs, 177 master programs, and
75 doctoral programs.  SCUT has a state key laboratory, two national
engineering research centers, one "National Class A" architecture
design and research institute, and four key labs certified by the
Ministry of Education.  In 2005, SCUT professors published 2,326
papers in academic journals; in 2006, SCUT applied for and received
207 patents.  In 2006, SCUT won more than USD 43 million in funding
from the central and provincial governments. 

The Software Engineering College at SCUT
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

¶11. (U) China currently has 36 software engineering schools.  The
software school at SCUT was established in 2001 by MOE and the 

GUANGZHOU 00000562  003 OF 003 

Economy Development Planning Committee; it ranks 15th in China.  It
has been named one of the "National Pilot Schools for Software
Engineering".  The school includes master's programs for computer
software, theory, and software engineering, and also has an
undergraduate program in software engineering.  In 2006, the school
carried out 44 research projects and received RMB 7.78 million (USD
1 million) in government funding.  The school was awarded five
patents and registered 18 types of IPR in software.  According to
Deng Huifang, dean of the software school, MOE periodically
evaluates the schools' academic and research achievements and
decides if they measure up to established criteria.  At present,
Guangdong Province has only two national pilot schools of software
engineering, the other one at Sun Yat-Sen University.  With the
pilot school designation, SCUT can charge high tuition fees, which
are about 60 percent higher than other schools. 

¶12. (U) SCUT's School of Software Engineering currently has 30
full-time teachers and 46 part-time teachers.  Fifteen of the
teachers are from foreign countries.  Of the school's 1,475 students
are 1,132 undergraduate and 343 postgraduates.  Most of the students
are from Guangdong Province, the ratio of male students to female
students is 6:1.  Each year, the school graduates 300 with bachelor
degrees and 200 with a master's degree.  Most of the graduates
currently work in IT-related fields.  More than 70 per cent of the
graduates are working in private enterprises, and about two percent
are self employed.  About 96 percent of SCUT graduates found
employment rate in 2005 and 2006. 

Collaborating with Foreign Companies and Institutions
- - - - - - - - -   - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

¶13. (U) The School of Software Engineering of SCUT cooperates
extensively with multinational IT companies such as IBM China Ltd.,
Microsoft Asia Research Center, HP China Ltd., Intel China Ltd.,
Oracle Beijing, BEA, CISCO, and SUN.  The school currently has an
IBM mainframe education center, a Linux education training center,
eight labs which work jointly with the companies, three student
innovation studios and one student industrial practice center.
Companies like IBM and Microsoft not only provide funding and
equipment to the research centers, but also work with the centers to
design courses for the students.  To keep up with the development of
international software, the school also incorporates courses from
universities like North West University from U.S., York University
from U.K., SAP from Germany, and IIT from India. 

Guangdong's Software Exports
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

¶14. (U)  According to Deng, Guangdong's exports of software products
amounted to USD 1.9 billion in 2005, or 50 percent of the country's
total software industry exports, which stood at USD 3.8 billion.
Shenzhen, Guangzhou and Zhuhai are the top three cities in the
province in terms of software exports.  The major overseas markets
for Guangdong are Hong Kong, Japan, Southeast Asia, Taiwan, Europe,
and the U.S.  Guangdong currently has 1,181 software companies.
Guangdong has 14 of the top 100 software companies of China; six are
headquartered in Guangzhou, seven in Shenzhen, and one in Zhuhai.
These companies include Guangzhou GaoKe Communications Technology
Co., Ltd., Sinobest, Guangzhou Haige Communications Industry Group
Co. Ltd., and Guangzhou Ziguang North America Science and Technology
Ltd. 

GOLDBERG

That’s all from China for now.

Cablegate: US Government Implies Proprietary Software Leaves Digital Footprint

Posted in Cablegate, Free/Libre Software at 6:48 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Cablegate

Summary: Cable from Burma shows American diplomats who “would also like to assist in distributing USB sticks Internews has developed, which allow the activists to utilize open source software”

According to the following Cablegate cable, activists and antagonists (even subversives) are seen as beneficial to US embassies if they support the tenets of democracy (usually something subservient to the West), so the government supports foreign activists in Burma and says: “We would also like to assist in distributing USB sticks Internews has developed, which allow the activists to utilize open source software to launch programs, and enables them to use web browsers without leaving a digital footprint.”

They also say: “We will need considerably more assistance from Washington to facilitate communications by the activists with the outside world.”

Previously in Techrights we covered back doors and spy ‘features’ that exist in proprietary software such as Microsoft’s. Here we may have more incidental concordance courtesy of Cablegate:


VZCZCXRO8235
OO RUEHCHI RUEHDT RUEHHM RUEHNH RUEHTRO
DE RUEHGO #0181/01 0670922
ZNY SSSSS ZZH
O 070922Z MAR 08
FM AMEMBASSY RANGOON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 7276
INFO RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RUCNASE/ASEAN MEMBER COLLECTIVE
RUEHGG/UN SECURITY COUNCIL COLLECTIVE
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 0976
RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI 4529
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 8067
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO 5628
RUEHCHI/AMCONSUL CHIANG MAI 1444
RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 1392
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC

S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 02 RANGOON 000181 

SIPDIS 

SIPDIS 

DEPT FOR EAP/MLS, DRL, AND IO
PACOM FOR FPA 

E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/06/2018
TAGS: PGOV [Internal Governmental Affairs],QL, PHUM [Human Rights], BM [Burma]
SUBJECT: BURMA: SUPPORTING STRATEGIES FOR THE REFERENDUM 

REF: A. RANGOON 153
     B. RANGOON 145
     C. RANGOON 134
     D. CARL-YODER-COPE 10/15/2007 E-MAIL 

RANGOON 00000181  001.2 OF 002 

Classified By: P/E Chief Leslie Hayden for Reasons 1.4 (b) & (d) 

¶1.  (S/NF) Burma's pro-democracy opposition continues to
struggle to organize a coordinated effort to respond to the
upcoming constitutional referendum.  We expect the regime
will continue its severe restrictions on free speech and
association, making it impossible for the opposition to carry
out a widespread, public campaign.  Activists inside Burma
plan to carry out a "vote no" educational campaign via
word-of-mouth, and using posters, stickers, and T-shirts.
What would most help them succeed is funding for travel and
equipment such as memory sticks, MP3 players, and cell
phones.  We are confidant we could discreetly distribute
these items.  $200,000 in additional funding to this Embassy
would enable us to quickly assist the activists.  End summary. 

-------------
Reality Check
------------- 

¶1.  (C) Burma's fractured pro-democracy opposition continues
to grapple with how to address the regime's upcoming
constitutional referendum (Refs B and C).  The only group
that has outlined a concrete plan to us (and this includes
U.S.- funded exile groups on the Thai-Burma border) is 88
Generation Students.  NLD spokesman Nyan Win told us today
that the NLD still had not finalized a concrete plan for
their "vote no" campaign.  He anticipated they would have it
ready by next week.  Ethnic pro-democracy leaders inside
Burma told us last week that they had no concrete plan to
oppose the referendum either, even though most oppose the
referendum. 

¶2.  (C) In the lead-up to the referendum, we do not
anticipate the regime will loosen the tighter restrictions
imposed since the September protests.  We expect a massive
military and police presence as the date of the referendum
approaches to prevent any protests or civil unrest.
Activists are likely to be closely watched during this time.
Likewise, anyone attempting to approach polling stations to
conduct an exit poll not sanctioned by the regime is certain
to be arrested. 

¶3.  (C) Regardless of these restrictions, 88 Generation
activists who are not in prison, and remain in Burma, are
determined to go forward with their "vote no" campaign.  The
campaign will rely mostly on education via word-of-mouth.
They plan on using sympathetic monks to educate their
constituencies on why the constitution, in its present form,
is not a step forward for democracy in Burma.  Additionally,
they will dispatch members of their organization throughout
Burma to distribute educational materials by hand. 

--------------
What They Need
-------------- 

¶4.  (S/NF) 88 Generation has requested approximately $4,300
for "vote no" posters, $2,600 for stickers, and $2,000 for
its members to travel throughout Burma to coordinate with
their members in other states and divisions.  We can use the
Embassy print shop and copiers to assist them in making
flyers and pamphlets for their campaigns. 

¶5.  (S/NF) In addition, the opposition needs memory sticks
and MP3 players, which they intend to load with educational
material and distribute throughout the country.  The players
and memory sticks can be hidden and hand delivered from town
to town by the activists during their travels. 

¶6.  (S/NF) Cell phones in Burma are prohibitively expensive,
costing approximately $2,300 each.  Since many of their cell
phones were confiscated after the September protests, 

RANGOON 00000181  002.2 OF 002 

activists urgently need cell phones to facilitate
communication and coordination.  Their traditional suppliers
from Thailand have not been able to get them the equipment.
Since cameras are very dangerous to carry, the opposition
would like to procure cell phones with cameras so they can
discreetly take pictures of their campaigns and document
abuses by the regime during the referendum process. 

¶7.  (S/NF) Since September, internet communication has been
monitored much more closely by the regime, and Special Branch
Police confiscated many of the activists' computers.  Post
again recommends support for the wireless internet connection
we proposed last October (Ref D), to assist the activists in
communicating with pro-democracy groups inside and outside
Burma to organize a coordinated response to the referendum. 

¶8.  (S/NF) We would also like to assist in distributing USB
sticks Internews has developed, which allow the activists to
utilize open source software to launch programs, and enables
them to use web browsers without leaving a digital footprint.
 These would be invaluable tools for aiding their
communication with each other. 

¶9.  (S/NF) Comment:  The faster we can move this equipment
and money to the activists the better.  The regime plans on
holding its referendum in May, and their "vote yes" campaign
is already in full force.  A large, sophisticated, public
campaign will not happen in Burma: the regime shows every
intent of halting any sign of public opposition.  The Embassy
has gained experience in distributing small amounts of funds
without attracting additional regime scrutiny of the Embassy
or our recipients.  The activists need funds now to prepare
for a vote that could take place as early as two months from
now.  We estimate that $200,000 would enable us to assist the
activists with their equipment needs.  We will need
considerably more assistance from Washington to facilitate
communications by the activists with the outside world.  End
comment. 

VILLAROSA

Without ascending (or descending) to politics, the important point here is that Free software helps people’s freedom.

USPTO Ridiculed

Posted in Patents at 4:54 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Child's laughter

Summary: New posts about the US patent system, including examples of very bizarre patents

THE SOURCE of cynicism about society increasingly becomes the USPTO, which grants patents (monopolies) on things that make one wonder if it’s a hoax of not.

Here is a classic which was mentioned some days ago:

These were collected in the course of other research by Azeen Ghorayshi and put online as a slide show by Mother Jones magazine link here.

My favorite is #6 in the slides called “method of concealing partial baldness” patented on May 10, 1977. Here is the illustration for the patent which should have been denied on the grounds that it was already in wide use among the balding.

Zonker has becomes rather cynical as well and he helps debunk the idea that patents are indicative of innovation. To quote his new column:

A Deeply Flawed Infographic: Most “Innovative” Countries and Industries

[...]

Measuring an intangible like “most innovative” is tricky, at best. At worst, it’s a complete disaster, like measuring “most innovative” by using patents as a measure, like this infographic from Good and Column Five Media.

Here is another curious patent. “Anyone got a clue who might be behind this new patent?” That’s what was said by Evgeny Morozov, who found himself troubled by some patents. In another tweet he writes: “Missed this back in June: “Microsoft Patents ‘Legal Intercept’ Technology, Will Skype Have A Backdoor?”

How about this Orwellian patent?

“If you’re the giver or recipient of presents gift-wrapped by Amazon, you may want to take a gander at U.S. Patent No. 8,060,463, granted to Amazon last month for Mining of User Event Data to Identify Users with Common Interests. Among other things, Amazon explains the invention can be used to identify recipients of gifts as Christian or Jewish based on wrapping paper. From the patent: ‘The gift wrap used by such other users when purchasing gifts for this user, such as when the gift wrap evidences the user’s religion (in the case of Christmas or Hanukkah gift wrap, for example.)’”

“Wish PTO would give the gift of ending obvious patents,” said Tim O’Reilly. It seems like more and more people are getting the idea that the patent system is flawed. Acceptance of it is the first stage towards recovery. Previously, Mr. O’Reilly said: “We need some serious reform on software patents.”

Google Patents, Attacks on Android, and Calls for Apple and Microsoft Boycotts

Posted in Apple, Google, Microsoft, Patents at 4:39 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Lobster trap

Summary: The attacks on Android fuel a debate about the role of patents and also suggest that the USPTO fails to fulfil its role

THE US patent system has become the centre of attention for many who are looking to remove FOSS barriers. This system is increasingly perceived as undesirable by the American (as in US) public and we need to constantly show this to spread these realisations.

Google was recently granted a patent on driving, as we mentioned the other day. Here is what Against Monopoly has to say about it:

Matt notes that the world gains from this in terms of safety and efficiency. However he questions the patent grant on the grounds that another monopoly has been established by stealth. Fortunately, the patent will be worthless once the world switches to full time computer control of the car. But in the meantime, we will all pay in higher prices.

On the other hand, Google is mostly a victim of this system because its major operating system, which is based on Linux, came under attacks that Google never provoked for. There is good news on that front though:

In addition, there are patent attacks coming from Apple and Microsoft, which just like several other companies keep attacking the Internet with SOPA. Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols remarks on “Go Daddy’s SOPA Entanglement” and Muktware takes notice:

Go Daddy took a u-turn from its stand on SOPA as the Internet community started boycotting GoDaddy and companies started transferring domains to non-SOPA supporters. Muktware has also initiated the domian transfer from Godaddy to Gandi.net (Hacksheet has already been transferred).

Following our article calling for a boycott against Apple (it got Slashdotted and made the news) there is also a call from Mukware to boycott Apple and Microsoft for their SOPA support.

To quote the call: “Go Daddy burned their fingers when they decided to sell their soul to the devil. More than 21,0000 conscious users migrated to other services. Go Daddy changed its ‘stand’ the same day, which seems to be nothing more than PR strategy as Go Daddy ‘worked’ on crafting this act. If they oppose the act, they must run a campaign to ensure that SOPA is not passed. That’s what it means by ‘opposing’ the bill and not by secretly supporting it via PIPA and Protect IP. Go Daddy paid heavily as ‘informed’ and concerned Go Daddy users revolted and threatened to switch to other registrars.

“There are two monopolies which are endorsing SOPA, Apple and Microsoft.”
      –Muktware
“How about the other SOPA supporters? Will you be boycotting them? There are two monopolies which are endorsing SOPA, Apple and Microsoft. Apple has not said anything in support of SOPA. But, the company either way doesn’t care about anything beyond its own profits. Apple itself is a censor police where it runs its own version of SOPA. Microsoft, on the other hand, has been openly supporting such biils.”

Further down it says: “The ‘informed and concerned’ Internet community revolted against Go Daddy and brought it to its knees. Are you ready to boycott Microsoft and Apple?” Well, we at Techrights implicitly suggested this for quite some time. Novell too is in the boycott list. Those companies also spread FUD about Android. Tim Carmody wrote an article titled “There Is No Such Thing as Android, Only Android-Compatible”. In it he rebuts Microsoft talking points from its talking heads (like Bott) by explaining that “fragmentation” is actually compatibility. His conclusions: “Ultimately, though, I can’t decide if this is a real problem for Google and Android or potentially a huge advantage. In the short term, it’s been an advantage; It’s let the operating system, user base and developer community grow in a hurry. In the long term, though, it doesn’t seem like Google can continue to maintain tight control of the source code during development and promoting its latest and greatest developments, and then let just about anything go once it’s released while letting less-favored products drift away.

“Soon, we’ll have to sever those two questions — what’s good for Android, the family of broadly compatible devices, as well their users and developers, is bound to come into conflict with what’s good for Google, the search and software company who continue to develop Android and put it into the world.”

Here is an article on the patent war against Android. It’s from the Boston press and it says:

A patent lawsuit won last week by iPhone maker Apple Inc. represented a single victory in a global legal war, with giant corporations fighting for control of the technologies behind smartphones and computers, potentially resulting in less appealing devices or higher prices for consumers.

Technology firms like Google Inc., Samsung Corp., Microsoft Corp., and especially Apple – which is one of the most active combatants – are embroiled in about 100 patent lawsuits in at least 10 countries. The stakes are high: potential domination of the multibillion-dollar market for smartphones, tablet computers, and the software that runs them. One successful lawsuit could generate millions in patent licensing fees for the victor, or it could force a rival firm to modify the way its devices work – even removing features users treasure.

“Patents=nuclear weapons in arms race. Inhibiting innovation. Tech patents should be abolished-Only make sense in slow-moving industries,” wrote Vivek Wadhwa, an influential writer/academic who occasionally writes on the issue. Hopefully we are aproaching the points where public opinion will have the law overwritten in the US.

Cablegate Comes Back to Techrights

Posted in Cablegate at 4:07 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Comfort

Summary: Cablegate returns to Techrights in the interest of spreading the truth

OVER the next few days we are going to make an effort to catch up with cables that we know we missed — notably ones that relate to Free/open source software.

Going a few months back, Alan gave one example from Vietnam and another from Thailand:

I had a bit of a poke about in the newly released Wikileaks diplomatic cables archive looking for interesting stuff and came across a cable from the Chiang Mai Consulate that contains an allegation that the Microsoft Thailand Corporate Affairs Director was explicitly bad mouthing Open Source and being critical of Thailands Creative Economy policy of promoting the use of legal Open Source software instead of using unauthorised copies of proprietary software. The open source community generally doesn’t have this level of access into the heart of government, which is one thing that we have been working to fix in the UK with our friends at Open Forum Europe (who I work for part time). It really is important for the community to support organisations and individuals that can provide a credible voice at a high level and advocate for Open Standards, Free Software (yeah, approximately synonymous with Open Source) and a level playing field through the interoperability of systems and a lack of vendor lock in.

These cables are important because the media probably did not cover this at the time. We are trying to build a decent wiki page on the subject.

Attachmate Hardly Embraces Novell’s Products

Posted in Novell at 3:57 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Summary: Based on news we can find, Attachmate is doing just about nothing with Novell’s portfolio

NOVELL’S new identity will gradually change and some products will get abandoned altogether. This is the inevitable outcome of the company’s sale.

Attachmate, Novell’s buyer, is looking to expand in India:

Seattle-based Attachmate Corp. bought Novell for USD 2.2 billion. But that isn’t the only reason why the company has been in the limelight for quite sometime.

Based on some other articles that mention this company, there is no real sign of Novell products being part of the plan. As we stressed before, Attachmate is too passive and with the exception of articles like this one we hardly see anything of Novell mentioned. “According to a recent survey,” says the latter, “Risk of Insider Fraud, conducted by the Ponemon Institute and sponsored by Attachmate Corp., more organizations are paying attention to the risks posed by insiders.”

That’s a Novell thing rebranded “Attachmate”. That’s just about everything we found about this company in the news in the month of December.

Bill Gates Keeps Getting Richer and Gaining More Lobbying Power

Posted in Asia, Bill Gates at 3:33 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Euro

Summary: A roundup of Gates stories and what they teach us about the Gates Foundation

THE WORLD’S top lobbyist might in fact be Bill Gates, who operates under the umbrella of a foundation. He does not run a company per se, but he is making money in other ways without having to pay tax.

The Korean president is visiting him like he is a political figure (which he is, but the public never elected him), leaving the president susceptible to lobbying for patents and for power. As the Korean press put it a few months ago:

President Lee Myung-bak returned home Saturday from a trip to New York and Seattle that included speeches at the U.N. General Assembly and a high-level nuclear safety meeting, bilateral summits and a meeting with Microsoft founder Bill Gates.

And as Gates Keepers put it: “One wonders what Le Myung-bak’s electoral constituents think of him taking ‘global advice’ from a nonKorean college drop out code developer?”

This is “all irrelevant and say nothing,” claims Toby, “what he is, fundamentally, is a criminal sociopath.” Well, behind the scenes he is bullying employees, acts impolitely, and using the F word. Here is another example of it:

BE: I’d have to say they are Planners, top down. And it surprises me because Bill Gates is an entrepreneurial businessman and they tend to be Searchers. The one and only time I met Gates was at Davos several years ago. I figured he’d be friendly to my ideas but he seemed quite hostile. He came up to me and said, “What’s all this searching crap?” (chuckles)

It it is not Bill’s idea, then it is “crap”. This is how and why we see monopolisation in health science, for example. And for those who think that he is giving away his wealth (that’s the PR nonsense), here is a new reminder:

Bill Gates’ wealth increased by $5 billion to bring his net worth to $59 billion

And best of all, he does not pay tax because he is, one would believe, “giving away” money. The above article is very silly by the way and it confused correlation and causation” as Gates Keepers explains. Mr. Gates and his minions keep seeking celebrity endorsements for their campaigns (we provided many examples in the past). This PR effort recently hit a jackpot:

Moonshots and Mandela. Can’t lose with those images. Here is a talking head of Melinda from the Social Good Summit where hundreds of people were put in a room to listen to people talk about how good their programmes were. The audience was expected to tweet about it – manufactured consent for the networked generation.

In summary, the PR operation works. Bill Gates gets richer, the press says he is giving away, and he continues to receive access to the ears of world leaders, to whom he pushes an agenda for his investment. What a cruel trap. The media keeps playing along:

Another example can be found in the ongoing Education Nation series sponsored on a number of platforms by NBC. It’s endorsement of market-driven anti-public education policies are evident in its parading of the likes of Bill and Melinda Gates and their utterly anti-public, charter school, privatized and technocratic vision of education.

Where has the watchdog media gone? Need we rely on blogs for a sobering perspective? NBC should be recalled in the context of MSNBC, where MS is Microsoft.

Links – Microsoft, Big Publishers in decline, and Fools keep pushing for SOPA.

Posted in Site News at 3:10 pm by Guest Editorial Team

Reader’s Picks

  • Android Approved By Pentagon For DoD Usage, Major Setback For iPhone

    This article makes some great points but only software freedom will guard the user against Malware and there might not be any US cell phones that are free. It goes without saying that Blackberry should not be used either.

  • American corporate software can no longer be trusted for anything

    The discussions around SOPA have shown a very unfortunate side of United States policymaking — that its policymakers are not the slightest afraid of legislatively ordering American-run corporations to sabotage their customers in order to further United States foreign policy. … Free software is not a matter of money anymore, if it ever was. It’s a matter of freedom and sovereignty.

    No one should trust non free software but idiotic US laws can ruin intentional trust in US made free software as well. Free software has always been about sovereignty but the non free software companies have been more abusive and obvious lately and people are noticing. The USA Patriot act is a similar liability for US service providers. The author even doubts Android.

    Techrights covered US government abuse of trade policy for Microsoft’s benefit in leaked diplomatic cables. This should outrage other US software companies such as Red Hat, IBM and Google.

  • Debian GNU/Linux Testing

    The next release of Debian GNU/Linux is shaping up beautifully. … At the rate they are going, Wheezy could be released before “8″.

  • Google market cap is set to pass Microsoft’s soon.
  • Hardware

  • Anti-Trust

    • Microsoft monopoly in retreat everywhere:
      Walmart Sells Linux Online

      This marks the return of desktop gnu/linux to Walmart. Microsoft had bullied every piece of the supply chain back in 2006 to remove this competition and pulled similar tricks against netbooks everywhere. Back in April, GNU/Linux came back to Walmart as a tablet in April. Other stores, like Best Buy, are trying to sell $1,000 Windows laptops as if it were 1995 again.

    • Amazon messes with Android

      Just days ago we reported and confirmed that Amazon’s Kindle Fire prevented owners from visiting the Android Market in the Silk browser. The 7-inch tablet reportedly contains a hidden utility app called “MarketIntentProxy.apk” which can detect when the end-user is hunting for an app, and will force a re-direct to the Amazon Appstore installed on the device — literally hijacking the browser. Now days later, Kindle Fire customers are reporting that they suddenly have access to the Android Market via the Silk browser.

      No matter how good software is, the owners have unjust power over you if you are not using free software. When you do have software freedom, you need to be careful to use a good, community curated distribution. Companies with ties to big publishers will sell you out.

  • PR/AstroTurf/Lobbying

    • People in Glasshouses (With Windows) Shouldn’t Throw Stones

      Microsoft’s call for “droidrage” stories on Android comes across not just as a rather feeble attempt to divert people’s attention from Windows Phone’s abysmal showing in the smartphone market, but also as deeply hypocritical: if there is any platform that deserves a “rage” tag, it’s Windows, thanks to the tens of billions of dollars of harm it has inflicted on its users

      Most people love their Android phones and tablets, so Microsoft will have to write the rage stories themselves.

  • Censorship

  • Why “Safe Harbor” Laws Are Disastrous For Free Speech

    the “safe harbor” provisions have gradually shifted the environment to suppress free speech and expression in favor of the suppressing industries: the copyright industries. … The DMCA was, and is, an abomination. So is the habit of letting corporations guard our right to free speech. It must be unconditional, and it isn’t when there is any kind of intermediary liability. … corporations would rather err on the side of caution, preferring to throw a thousand users to the wolves in error than becoming liable for one shielded in error.

  • The lawmakers who brought you SOPA and other censorship bills

    anyone running against these folks would be missing out on a huge opportunity not to make the incumbent’s support of censoring the internet into a campaign issue.

    Many of the names are familiar from other legislative disasters.

  • The GoDaddy boycott was effective, so people should boycott other companies too.

    GoDaddy capitulating is a huge win, because it’s the first stone to come out of the wall. Now that GoDaddy has demonstrated that they were taking too much damage to continue with their support of SOPA, it empowers people to exert similar pressure on other companies, and it demonstrates to those companies that there are enough angry people out there that you need to listen up and pay attention.

    Keep migrating your domains and avoid things from the other bullies who would waste your money ruining the internet to preserve their position in the world.

  • Civil Rights

  • Internet/Net Neutrality

    • People say a lot of ill-informed things about Chrome, and mostly they don’t deserve a response, but …

      It’s very simple: the primary goal of Chrome is to make the web advance as much and as quickly as possible. That’s it. It’s completely irrelevant to this goal whether Chrome actually gains tons of users or whether instead the web advances because the other browser vendors step up their game and produce far better browsers. Either way the web gets better. … Google succeeds (and makes money) when the web succeeds and people use it more to do everything they need to do. … the whole “You’re funding a competitor!!!” angle is misguided. Google is funding a partner.

« Previous Page« Previous entries « Previous Page · Next Page » Next entries »Next Page »

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Chat iconIRC Channels: Come and chat with us in real time

New to This Site? Here Are Some Introductory Resources

No

Mono

ODF

Samba logo






We support

End software patents

GPLv3

GNU project

BLAG

EFF bloggers

Comcast is Blocktastic? SavetheInternet.com



Recent Posts