Insults and lies continue to dominate Microsoft's arguments against OpenDocument Format (ODF)
Summary: Some more disgusting flame and generally poor coverage from Microsoft apologists who hit the British press
THERE is a war of words between the Microsoft camp and the rest of the world or at least Britain, as we covered here before. The Register, which accepts payments from Microsoft, continues its provocative and very offensive coverage, summarised with: "Even if Microsoft bosses collectively whistled Always Look on the Bright Side of Life they'd still struggle to drown out people backing Cabinet Office proposals to adopt the Open Document Format as the official standard for UK.gov missives."
That's because everyone but Microsoft (and its partners) does not want or need OOXML, which is
all about crime. Can't
The Register get that?
"In the war of words," says the author, "it is 1-0 to the open source zealots."
This is journalism?! It's more like Microsoft lobbying and propaganda disguised as "reporting".
The whole article is full of insults. The author is "conflating program with format... dismissing the case for open standards as zealotry," writes iophk. "The Reg has been crap for years no end in sight" (there were Microsoft payments, whereupon the sceptical eye which
The Register once laid on Microsoft pretty much went away).
"Zealous about the right thing," said the headline of one
comment response. "Not "open source zealots", but "open data zealots"," stresses the commenter. Notice that ODF is not about FOSS; proprietary software can benefit from it also.
"Fred Flintstone" (pseudonym) wrote: "I rather object to the repeated use of the word "zealots" in the article, which seems to suggest the author has a bias.
"IMHO, choosing proper open formats has got ZERO to do with religion or beliefs, but everything with realistic value assessment."
There are much better comments in
this consultation (British readers, please log in and leave feedback). Microsoft's attack on ODF in this case is
paradoxical for the reasons put in this statement: "This isn't about switching to open source software, but to a format widely and well-supported by open source office formats [...] The government could continue to run Microsoft Office, but the preferred data format would be ODF. This makes Microsoft's argument seem to be rather shrill. Why on earth would changing the default format of released documents be a big deal?"
Red Hat's FOSS site
covered this subject, but at the same time it gave this
proxy of Microsoft a
platform in which to equate FOSS usage with "consuming" (similar to the idea of exploitation and so-called "freeloaders", which is how Microsoft's Outercurve staff refers to FOSS users in Red Hat's very own OpenSource.com).
Microsoft is rallying its British partners, urging them to bamboozle and pressure the British government to drop ODF as a requirement. Don't let Microsoft monopolise the voice of Brits. Don't let the company that committed crime pretend that we, the victims, as the bad people (just because we are rightly upset).
⬆
