Bonum Certa Men Certa

Church of EPO: How Team Battistelli Engineered the Dismissal of People Not Sufficiently Loyal to Them - Part I

God Blatterstelli



Summary: A new series which looks back at how Battistelli stacked the deck not only by crushing oversight but also amassing instruments of coercion over staff, with various new pretexts for dismissal

AT THE end of last week we shared a single page from the EPO's CoC. There is a lot more to be said about it and this long post shall help the EPO with transparency that Battistelli loves so much to brag about (without actually doing anything to that effect).



Here is the page/leaf in full:

EPO CoC page



As a reminder, in the words of a reader, a lot of this relates to the union-busting activities we have been seeing since the end of 2015 (they truly intensified at that point but didn't start then). Here is what Battistelli et al pushed through to staff:

EPO on protecting staff



The above was a culmination of something that had been cooking for a while. Consider the full CoC:

Europaisches Patentamt European Patent Office Office européen des brevets

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR THE EPO




EPO’s PUBLIC SERVICE VALUES

- Respect for the individual - Integrity and accountability - Impartiality and objectivity - Compliance with the rules of law - Quality and professionalism




The European Patent Office’s public service values are a guide to behaviour which should promote the development of a culture of respect. The values are: respect for the individual; integrity and accountability; impartiality and objectivity; compliance with the rules of law; quality and professionalism.

These values, which are all of equal rank, guide our actions and underlie the EPO’s mission, which is to support innovation, competitiveness and economic growth across Europe through a commitment to high quality and efficient service delivered under the European Patent Convention (EPC).

These values apply to all persons working at and for the Office. Staff with managerial responsibilities are expected to promote these values by leadership and example.

This document does not create another legal framework and refers to the existing EPO regulations setting out the formal obligations of its staff. In the event of any conflict between the content of this code of conduct and formal obligations under the EPC or Service Regulations, then those obligations take precedence.

Confronted with an individual or collective breach of these values, all staff must be allowed to exercise freely and in good faith their right to draw attention to it without any fear of reprisal. They may in particular ask their line manager or Human Resources partner, or the responsible unit within Internal Audit and Oversight for advice. I undertake to respect our values and ensure that they are respected.

Benoît Battistelli

President




RESPECT FOR THE INDIVIDUAL

The services provided by the Office are the result of the work done by qualified and motivated staff members. The Office therefore recognises the individual value of each and every employee. Mutual respect, dignity, respect for human rights, nondiscrimination and the promotion of diversity are our guiding principles.

Our keywords

● DIGNITY ● NON-DISCRIMINATION ● TOLERANCE ● TRUST AND RELIABILITY ● LISTENING AND UNDERSTANDING ● POLITENESS ● OPENNESS ● DIALOGUE ● HEALTH ● SAFETY




Our approach

We share the international community’s commitment to respect human rights.

We strive to create a working environment marked by mutual respect.

Mutual respect, trust and the ability to listen are indispensable elements in our professional relations. Each individual’s abilities and talents deserve to be acknowledged.

We take the necessary steps to provide a safe and healthy working environment.

We seek to promote diversity and equal opportunities among employees.

We are committed to not allowing situations to arise which could be prejudicial to the dignity of our colleagues. We make every effort to prevent any form of discrimination or harassment.




INTEGRITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY

Integrity is an inalienable criterion for our professional conduct. It implies acting with responsibility, accountability, loyalty, discretion and common sense. We resist all forms of corruption.

Our keywords

● HONESTY ● LOYALTY ● FAIRNESS ● CONFIDENTIALITY ● EXAMPLE




Our approach

We act with honesty, responsibility and discretion.

We act with loyalty and solely in the interest of the Office. We perform our tasks under the authority of the President of the Office, except for the specific responsibilities or functions expressly laid down in the EPC or Service Regulations.

We respect the scope of our responsibilities and of the tasks entrusted to us. When delegating tasks, we remain accountable for their execution and results, and therefore managers exercise adequate supervision and control.

We respect the confidentiality of information: we do not disclose confidential information received in the course of our work to unauthorised persons, nor use it for our own benefit or to the detriment of the Office.

Our duty to do our work to the best of our abilities also implies an obligation to share with our colleagues the information necessary to perform their own duties.

We are committed to combating all types of fraud.

We are careful in our external communications and respect our duties of tact and discretion about the Office. In particular, we refrain from making any statement that could be detrimental to it.




IMPARTIALITY AND OBJECTIVITY

The Office and its staff must remain independent of all governments, authorities, organisations or persons outside the Organisation. Our conduct must be impartial and reflect that independence. We tackle situations which could impair our objectivity.

Our keywords

● INDEPENDENCE ● NEUTRALITY ● EQUAL TREATMENT ● IMMUNITY




Our approach

We seek to ensure that nothing which occurs under our responsibility is or could appear to be a direct or indirect act of preferential support for a political, economic, ideological or religious group.

We refrain from doing or saying anything that might call our impartiality and objectivity into question.

Our actions when taking decisions or leading projects are reasoned.

We need to be impartial and objective. We are aware of the risk of potential conflicts of interest, whether actual or apparent. Where possible, we avoid them; where not, we disclose and manage them.

Gifts or other favours might compromise our professional impartiality. Therefore we do not solicit any. And, without the President’s permission, we do not accept any either.




COMPLIANCE WITH THE RULES OF LAW

The Office has its own legal system, which must be respected.

The Office and its staff must also respect the applicable national laws of the country they are in and must meet their legal and financial obligations.

Our keywords

● LEGALITY ● JUSTICE ● RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS




Our approach

We respect both the letter and spirit of the Office’s rules and regulations.

We apply these rules and regulations fairly and in good faith.

We act with professionalism and a sense of social responsibility in observing the applicable laws, and respecting customs and traditions of the countries in which we work, contributing responsibly to the welfare of society.

Our privileges and immunities do not prevent us from complying with our obligations under applicable national laws.




QUALITY AND PROFESSIONALISM

The way each of us does our job is reflected in the Office’s overall performance. Our commitment to high quality and efficient public service is a contribution to innovation, competitiveness and economic growth in Europe.

Our keywords

● INNOVATION ● COMPETENCE ● PROFESSIONALISM ● TRAINING ● EXCELLENCE ● EFFICIENCY




Our approach

We give of our best to achieve our professional goals and to offer an efficient public service.

We work with colleagues in a spirit of teamwork and co-operation.

We manage the Office’s resources appropriately and efficiently, in line with the principles of economy and sound financial management.

We strive to maintain, adapt and develop skills within the Office. With the aim of ensuring sustainability, we act in a strategic and long-term perspective, not in our own immediate interests.

We do our best to reach highest international standards and best practice.



The above makes widely available what should have been publicly available all along. It helps accountability (for management, not only those who are managed by abusive management).

Later this week we are going to show how Battistelli essentially engineered the sacking of people whom he viewed as obstruction for his (and his corporate bosses') agenda. Stay tuned for more.

Recent Techrights' Posts

All the Latest 'Articles' in This Fake 'News' Site Are SPAM, LLM Slop, or Both (to Googlebomb CES)
These people destroy the Web
LLMs Destroy the Web Not Just by Filling It With Cruft and Chaff (Slop)
It'll destroy many sites or increase the cost of running them
Who Says Microsoft Is Actually Succeeding as a Business? (It's Faking a Lot)
Microsoft has been cooking the books for a long time
The Free Software Foundation (FSF) Turns 40 This Year, Now It Shows Possible Logos for the Special Event That Celebrates Sharing
FSF's options in a nutshell
President Biden Has Less Than a Fortnight Left to Pardon Julian Assange (Donald Trump's Regime Plotted to Assassinate Assange)
Don't try to lecture/explain/preach to people that exposing corruption, resisting corruption, and merely covering corruption is "bad" because crime "is everywhere"
 
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, January 07, 2025
IRC logs for Tuesday, January 07, 2025
Microsoft Has a Google Problem (and GNU/Linux Problem) in Sweden
Sweden likes Chromebooks, Web access data suggests
Less Than a Tenth of a Second
Look ma, static pages!
[Meme] The LLM Salesperson
LLMs are net liability (loss)
Links 06/01/2025: 10 Years Since Terrorism Against Satire in France
Links for the day
Gemini Links 07/01/2025: Praise of E-mail and App Store 'Invention'
Links for the day
[Meme] Removing Correct Information
publish what's true
From 92% to Less Than 25%: How Microsoft Lost Norway (and Still Loses What's Left)
just like in most countries
Matt Birchler: "This is why it’s important for people to own their presence on the web, especially when it comes to government agencies that need to communicate with people."
hours ago
Microsoft Continues to Attack Users' Choice
We're being herded into uniformity
Diversity of Views, Diversity of Sources
We want diversity, not monopoly
With 10 Days Left the Free Software Foundation (FSF) Looks to Raise Just Over $50,000 More
More than 10 days in Boston (eastern coast)
In Europe, Russia's Yandex About to Become Bigger Than Microsoft's Bing, Google Search Estimated to Have Grown Since the LLM Hype Began
Remember that Bing had many layoffs in the past 2 years, the corporate media barely reported on those
The Google Exodus That Wasn't
Search engines exist to serve their masters, not their users
Google (Blogger) is Already Disintegrating and It's a Reminder of the Great Dangers of Outsourcing Blogs to Companies (Including Automattic or WordPress.com)
Plus, Phoronix admits that using PHP - and not static pages - causes the Web site to be DDOSed, sort of
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Monday, January 06, 2025
IRC logs for Monday, January 06, 2025
Links 06/01/2025: Presidential Arrest and Kursk as Bargaining Card
Links for the day
BetaNews Has Basically Become a Spamfarm, All the Latest 'Articles' Are SPAM and LLM Slop
No kidding...
On BetaNews Latest Technology News: "We are moderately confident this text was [LLM Chatbot] generated"
The future of newsrooms or another site circling down the drain with spam, slop, or both?
Links 06/01/2025: Cyber Security in 2025 Still a Joke (Undermined by Authorities Themselves), US Layoffs 2025 Commence Today
Links for the day
Links 06/01/2025: Security Theatre and BBS Archives
Links for the day
[Meme] Don't Worry, They Say There's 7 Trillion Dollars Waiting at the Top
At whose expense? With whose consent?
Fedora Seems to be Dying of Neglect by IBM
IBM is doing to Fedora what it did to CentOS. It's still there, but only/mostly by name.
TRILLIONS! And TRILLIONS and TRILLIONS and TRILLIONS! Invest today!
If the mainstream media and national broadcasters know (and can see) it's a pyramid scheme, why aren't they calling it?
[Meme] A Corporate Wolf in Sheep Clothing
Will Apple "fans" pay attention? Will they even care?
British Police: Register a New Account With Unscrupulous American Companies (Microsoft and MElon X) to "Follow" Us
When authorities outsource to foreign social control media
Links 06/01/2025: Leftover General News and Dangers of US Debt Default
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Sunday, January 05, 2025
IRC logs for Sunday, January 05, 2025
Gemini Links 06/01/2025: End of Christmas, New Leaves and Fresh Starts
Links for the day