EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

10.25.17

IP Kat Admits It Was Its Own Choice to Censor (Delete) Many Comments About the European Patent Office

Posted in Europe, Patents at 11:20 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

USF to Campinos

Summary: The European Patent Office (EPO) can only be mentioned in a positive way/context in IP Kat, as Battistelli and his cronies may celebrate deletion of comments critical of them

THE subject many people speak of at the EPO this week is censorship. Freedom of expression is a pretty fundamental right.

“The censorship was deliberate and not a technical error.”SUEPO has just published the above letter from USF, which long ago started observing the abuses at the EPO. The corresponding page is in French and the image was published in PDF form by SUEPO. We are keeping a copy of it just in case.

“This latest commentary from IP Kat merely helps show (or reinforce the perception) that EPO controls the media.”As a reminder to our readers, the EPO has already threatened publishers, blogs, politicians and much more. Even SUEPO’s Web site got censored (using threats). That was 2 years ago; it may have happened again since then. The EPO is a lunatic bully, a perfect embodiment of its “king”, so insecure with inferiority complex.

Yesterday, someone wrote to a brave blogger (who did not hide behind a pseudonym like IP Kat bloggers): “Thorsten, it is indeed still possible that there is an “innocent” explanation. However, let me say that it is becoming increasingly hard to believe in such a version of events. I mean, are we to understand that it is merely coincidence that “technical” problems only affect one post, which post just happens to be on a topic previously affected by a moratorium on reporting?”

This was said in relation to censorship at IP Kat — a subject we wrote a number of posts about earlier this week. It turns out that we were right. At around 10AM today “Merpel” (whoever uses that name right now) admitted that this was not an accident. The censorship was deliberate and not a technical error. Here is how this was justified: “On all posts relating to the European Patent Office, however, the right to post pseudonymously has been abused in recent times. On Merpel’s post welcoming the new president of the EPO, the situation got out of hand. The overwhelming majority of comments were purely libellous ad hominem attacks on a man that has not even taken office. This led the IPKat team to decide to remove all comments on said post (IPKat did not receive any legal threats).”

By admitting that the blog did not receive legal threats (which the EPO does issue sometimes) it basically says that its censorship wasn’t the fault of EPO management. When “Merpel” uses the words “purely libellous ad hominem attacks” it basically uses the same vague accusations made by EPO management (they censor Techrights using such vague accusations, without even providing a single example of libel).

“The technical issues aside, there are many human rights issues. Why does the media barely cover these?”All sorts of politicians and horrible people have negative things written about them. A functioning society needs that. Would IP Kat deem that too “libellous ad hominem attacks”? Can IP Kat not see that what goes on at the EPO merits harsh words?

This latest commentary from IP Kat merely helps show (or reinforce the perception) that EPO controls the media. Watch how effective it really is. Remember that IP Kat used to harshly criticise the EPO until the EPO blocked the blog (for a day); that’s when self-censorship started.

The EPO is a truly authoritarian regime whose very existence at the heart of Europe harms everything around it. It poisons the media, too.

“That’s classic self-censorship and they publicly admitted it.”“Presumably,” said this comment earlier today, “the EPO’s current obsession with assignments requiring proof of the right of the signatory to bind the relevant party will also be applied to assignments of priority.”

The technical issues aside, there are many human rights issues. Why does the media barely cover these?

Earlier on Mark Schweizer from IP Kat wrote about the EPO. But nowadays when the blog IP Kat writes about the EPO’s Board of Appeal it’s about a ruling; it has said nothing about its exile to Haar (weeks ago). Here is what Schweizer wrote:

This is quite important – the EPC’s substantive requirements for a valid transfer, namely that the right of priority as such be assigned, cannot be circumvented by the argument that the applicable national does not foresee an independent priority right. Whether this is correct is certainly open to question.

In sum, T 1201/14 provides an excellent summary of the EPO’s case law on the transfer of priority rights, but does not clarify which national law applies to the transfer of the priority right. It should make practitioners acutely aware that the EPC, despite appearances to the contrary, does contain substantive requirements for the transfer which apply irrespective of the applicable national law.

Maybe Schweizer could also remark on Battistelli’s gross departure from the EPC, which no longer seems to matter. But no… IP Kat already announced earlier this year that it would, as a matter of principle, abstain from commenting on such matters. That’s classic self-censorship and they publicly admitted it.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

A Single Comment

  1. john said,

    October 26, 2017 at 2:44 am

    Gravatar

    The ipkat article reads (cite):
    “The overwhelming majority of comments were purely libellous ad hominem attacks on a man that has not even taken office.”
    The man who has not even taken office can only be Campinos. I don’t remember any particular comments about Campinos in the comments, do you?

What Else is New


  1. Links 2/6/2020: New Firefox Release (77), Debian-based MX Linux 19.2, KDevelop 5.5.2, GNU/Linux Growth on Desktops/Laptops

    Links for the day



  2. Techrights Can Figure Out Source Protection/Anonymisation Whilst Operating Very Transparently

    We're still quite radically transparent whilst at the same time enjoying 100% source protection record; we're also improving the software we use to publish more quickly and efficiently



  3. IRC Proceedings: Monday, June 01, 2020

    IRC logs for Monday, June 01, 2020



  4. This is How GNU Finally Dies

    "Brace for when GNU falls the way that OSI, FSF, FSFE, Mozilla, and the Linux Foundation did."



  5. Latest Microsoft Layoffs Spun as 'Innovation' (There's Always a Positive PR Angle)

    The public is expected to simply ignore the fact that Microsoft is laying off employees (again); instead we're expected to think it's all about Microsoft being very brilliant and innovative



  6. Microsoft Playing the Victim, Irrationally 'Hated' by Victims of Its Abuse

    We're meant to believe that those whom Microsoft bribes against are the opinionated 'haters' and Microsoft is a victim of 'hate'



  7. Links 1/6/2020: Linux 5.7, FOSSlife Born, LibreOffice 7.0 Beta1, Linux Mint 20 Making Early Promises

    Links for the day



  8. Linux Without Linus

    The Linux Foundation seems to be acting like Linus (Linux founder) is somewhat of a liability (forcing him to take a ‘break’ from his own project) while taking even the most notorious proposals from corporations, including those that called Linux a “cancer”



  9. What It Would Take for Linus Torvalds to Leave Linux Foundation Without the Linux Trademark and Without Linux

    It's nice to think that the founder of Linux can just take his project and walk away, moving elsewhere, i.e. away from the Microsoft-employed executives who now "boss" him; but it's not that simple anymore



  10. The Past Does Not Go Away, Except From Short-Term Memories

    People who are drunk on power and money (sometimes not even their own money) like to portray themselves as the very opposite of what they are; but in the age of the Internet it's difficult to make the general public simply forget the past and "move on..."



  11. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, May 31, 2020

    IRC logs for Sunday, May 31, 2020



  12. Links 1/6/2020: OpenMandriva Lx 4.1 2020.05, Linux Lite 5.0 Release, FreeBSD 11.4 RC2

    Links for the day



  13. It's a Common Mistake and Common Misconception/Error to Treat Microsoft as Just Another 'Large Company' (or 'Big Tech')

    What's wrong about Microsoft isn't its size; what's wrong with Microsoft is its behaviour, which isn't just illegal (crimes are the norm) but also hugely unethical



  14. Lessons of Michael Arrington (About Microsoft)

    Microsoft and Bill Gates have a long history bullying their critics; the quote above (or below) shows how even people who advertise with Microsoft are becoming the target of abuse



  15. 'Best' of Both Worlds: GNU/Linux Freedom + Malware With Keyloggers and DRM

    Running a Microsoft-controlled GNU/Linux instance under Vista 10 ("Windows Subsystem for Linux") in the age of virtual machines, dual boot and containers makes as much sense as chopping some carrots to go with the veal meal to appease vegetarian diners



  16. First They Bribe the Employer, Media Lynch Mobs May Follow

    The 'cancel culture' lynch mobs, which leverage social causes (or marginalised groups), remain a convenient means by which to oust one's political/business opposition; but money too is a massive contributing factor and the more one has of it, the easier it is to control media narrative and subversive focus



  17. Upcoming Series Teaser: The Bribery Operation of William Henry Gates III

    Bribery goes a very long way when it comes to the megalomaniac who pays the media to portray him as the world's most generous person



  18. Windows Ransomware Must Not be Unspeakable When People Die in Large Numbers Due to That (and Windows Has Intentional Back Doors)

    Loss of electronic patient records, ransom and downtime among the severe consequences of deploying Microsoft inside hospitals; yet the media rarely names the real culprit (manslaughter charges theoretically possible) and nobody gets punished except those who offer real solutions



  19. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, May 30, 2020

    IRC logs for Saturday, May 30, 2020



  20. Burning the House That Richard Stallman (RMS) Built: An Open Letter to GNU Maintainers Who Opposed RMS

    An open letter to people who petitioned RMS to step down and who outsource GNU projects to Microsoft (GitHub)



  21. Links 30/5/2020: Godot Editor Under Web Browsers, Alpine Linux 3.12.0 and EasyOS 2.3

    Links for the day



  22. EPO's Illegal Patents and Massive Corruption Go Unnoticed by Corporate Media and Sites That Cover Patent News

    Very major corruption scandals still emerge in Europe's second-largest institution and illegal patents get granted as well as promoted; somehow, perhaps miraculously, this no longer seems to bother anybody in the media (corruption and radical policies have been gradually 'normalised')



  23. Never Mind If GNU/Linux Works Better Inside Hospitals and Free Software Not Only Safer But Vastly More Efficient...

    With lives on the line one might expect hospitals to choose what's most secure and generally works best; but in practice there seems to be a leaning towards what bribes best



  24. Sick Alexander Ramsey is Using a Public Health Crisis to Lie About the Unitary Patent, Whose Fall Made Him Redundant and/or Obsolete

    Weaponised media continues to manufacture utterly ridiculous puff pieces for Team UPC, containing intentional lies from beginning to end



  25. IRC Proceedings: Friday, May 29, 2020

    IRC logs for Friday, May 29, 2020



  26. They Came, They Saw, He Died

    Microsoft is an inherently sociopathic company; today's story of AppGet is an important reminder that Microsoft has not changed and isn't changing (Maui is another week-old example of trademark-hijacking tactics by Microsoft)



  27. Microsoft-Connected CloudGuru Doesn't Care About GNU/Linux and Now It's Gradually Killing the BSD/Linux-Centric Jupiter Broadcasting (Bought by Linux Academy)

    Assuming Docker is being 'killed' by Microsoft (or at least hijacked to push Windows, Azure and so on) while the GitHub-hosted (Microsoft) CloudGuru, whose co-founder comes from Microsoft, ‘finishes the job’ with Linux Academy and its assets, it’s time to take stock of a pattern/trend that ruins the media too



  28. What Happened to Docker is a Cautionary Tale About the Not-So-New Microsoft

    It’s hardly shocking that Docker collapsed (mass-scale layoffs) after the company had gotten close to Microsoft and got rid of its very own founder (a Red Hat veteran) while the software is being killed off/co-opted by Microsoft (all over the news this week; we’ve omitted links by intention as it’s only puff pieces, no investigative journalism anywhere); we only ask one thing: is anyone paying attention and, if so, what are the lessons learned?



  29. If You Want to Support and Follow Us 'Properly', Really Simple Syndication (RSS) is Most Reliable and Robust to Censorship

    Our longstanding position on social control media (we reject it and don't participate in it) is only proven ever more justified now that the mere idea of fact-checking is seen as controversial if not illegal



  30. Links 29/5/2020: Genode OS 20.05 and FSF Video Conferencing Service

    Links for the day


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts