EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

10.25.17

IP Kat Admits It Was Its Own Choice to Censor (Delete) Many Comments About the European Patent Office

Posted in Europe, Patents at 11:20 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

USF to Campinos

Summary: The European Patent Office (EPO) can only be mentioned in a positive way/context in IP Kat, as Battistelli and his cronies may celebrate deletion of comments critical of them

THE subject many people speak of at the EPO this week is censorship. Freedom of expression is a pretty fundamental right.

“The censorship was deliberate and not a technical error.”SUEPO has just published the above letter from USF, which long ago started observing the abuses at the EPO. The corresponding page is in French and the image was published in PDF form by SUEPO. We are keeping a copy of it just in case.

“This latest commentary from IP Kat merely helps show (or reinforce the perception) that EPO controls the media.”As a reminder to our readers, the EPO has already threatened publishers, blogs, politicians and much more. Even SUEPO’s Web site got censored (using threats). That was 2 years ago; it may have happened again since then. The EPO is a lunatic bully, a perfect embodiment of its “king”, so insecure with inferiority complex.

Yesterday, someone wrote to a brave blogger (who did not hide behind a pseudonym like IP Kat bloggers): “Thorsten, it is indeed still possible that there is an “innocent” explanation. However, let me say that it is becoming increasingly hard to believe in such a version of events. I mean, are we to understand that it is merely coincidence that “technical” problems only affect one post, which post just happens to be on a topic previously affected by a moratorium on reporting?”

This was said in relation to censorship at IP Kat — a subject we wrote a number of posts about earlier this week. It turns out that we were right. At around 10AM today “Merpel” (whoever uses that name right now) admitted that this was not an accident. The censorship was deliberate and not a technical error. Here is how this was justified: “On all posts relating to the European Patent Office, however, the right to post pseudonymously has been abused in recent times. On Merpel’s post welcoming the new president of the EPO, the situation got out of hand. The overwhelming majority of comments were purely libellous ad hominem attacks on a man that has not even taken office. This led the IPKat team to decide to remove all comments on said post (IPKat did not receive any legal threats).”

By admitting that the blog did not receive legal threats (which the EPO does issue sometimes) it basically says that its censorship wasn’t the fault of EPO management. When “Merpel” uses the words “purely libellous ad hominem attacks” it basically uses the same vague accusations made by EPO management (they censor Techrights using such vague accusations, without even providing a single example of libel).

“The technical issues aside, there are many human rights issues. Why does the media barely cover these?”All sorts of politicians and horrible people have negative things written about them. A functioning society needs that. Would IP Kat deem that too “libellous ad hominem attacks”? Can IP Kat not see that what goes on at the EPO merits harsh words?

This latest commentary from IP Kat merely helps show (or reinforce the perception) that EPO controls the media. Watch how effective it really is. Remember that IP Kat used to harshly criticise the EPO until the EPO blocked the blog (for a day); that’s when self-censorship started.

The EPO is a truly authoritarian regime whose very existence at the heart of Europe harms everything around it. It poisons the media, too.

“That’s classic self-censorship and they publicly admitted it.”“Presumably,” said this comment earlier today, “the EPO’s current obsession with assignments requiring proof of the right of the signatory to bind the relevant party will also be applied to assignments of priority.”

The technical issues aside, there are many human rights issues. Why does the media barely cover these?

Earlier on Mark Schweizer from IP Kat wrote about the EPO. But nowadays when the blog IP Kat writes about the EPO’s Board of Appeal it’s about a ruling; it has said nothing about its exile to Haar (weeks ago). Here is what Schweizer wrote:

This is quite important – the EPC’s substantive requirements for a valid transfer, namely that the right of priority as such be assigned, cannot be circumvented by the argument that the applicable national does not foresee an independent priority right. Whether this is correct is certainly open to question.

In sum, T 1201/14 provides an excellent summary of the EPO’s case law on the transfer of priority rights, but does not clarify which national law applies to the transfer of the priority right. It should make practitioners acutely aware that the EPC, despite appearances to the contrary, does contain substantive requirements for the transfer which apply irrespective of the applicable national law.

Maybe Schweizer could also remark on Battistelli’s gross departure from the EPC, which no longer seems to matter. But no… IP Kat already announced earlier this year that it would, as a matter of principle, abstain from commenting on such matters. That’s classic self-censorship and they publicly admitted it.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

A Single Comment

  1. john said,

    October 26, 2017 at 2:44 am

    Gravatar

    The ipkat article reads (cite):
    “The overwhelming majority of comments were purely libellous ad hominem attacks on a man that has not even taken office.”
    The man who has not even taken office can only be Campinos. I don’t remember any particular comments about Campinos in the comments, do you?

What Else is New


  1. We Don't Know Who Will Run the Free Software Foundation, But We Know Who Will Run the GNU Project

    Software Freedom is under a heavy and perhaps unprecedented attack; some people out there are paid by the attackers to celebrate this attack and defame people (cheering for corporate takeover under the blanket of “Open Source”), but the founder of the Free software movement remains alive, well, and very much active



  2. New EPO Meme: Who Wants to Make Billions From a 'Public' Monopoly?

    What was supposed to be a cash-balanced patent office became a money-making monster that fakes ‘crises’ to attack hard-working examiners



  3. EmacsConf Without Richard Stallman

    Now that emacs is being 'rebranded' this kind of meme seems apt



  4. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, October 17, 2019

    IRC logs for Thursday, October 17, 2019



  5. Guest Article: In the Absence of Richard Stallman OEM Source Software ('Open Source') is Trying to Hijack Even Emacs

    "Now they have to create some fictional history. No need to worry."



  6. Guest Article: Techies Should Not Dictate the Free Software Movement

    "We should start a second phase of the Free software movement that's making good software and putting users at the center."



  7. Links 17/10/2019: Ubuntu Turns 15, New Codename Revealed, Ubuntu 19.10 is Out

    Links for the day



  8. Free as in Free Speech (Restrictions May Apply)

    When limits of speech are not safety-related rules but political correctness or conformism



  9. There Won't be Patent Justice Until Patent Trolling Becomes Completely and Totally Extinct

    SLAPP-like behaviour and extortion/blackmail tactics using patent monopolies are a stain on the patent system; it's time to adopt measures to stop these things once and for all, bearing in mind they're inherently antithetical to the goal/s of the patent system and therefore discourage public support for this whole system



  10. EPO Staff Union and Staff Representatives Ought to Demand EPO Stops Bullying Publishers and Censoring Their Sites

    An often neglected if not forgotten aspect of EPO tyranny is the war on information itself; EPO management continues to show hostility towards journalism and disdain for true information



  11. Bribes, Lies, Fundamental Violations of the Law and Cover-Up: This is Today's European Patent Office

    It has gotten extremely difficult to hold the conspirators accountable for turning Europe’s patent office into a ‘printing machine’ of the litigation industry and amassing vast amounts of money (to be passed to private, for-profit companies)



  12. The Free Software Foundation (FSF) Lost Almost Half (3 Out of 8) Board Members in Only One Month

    As the old saying goes, a picture (or screenshot) is worth a thousand words



  13. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, October 16, 2019

    IRC logs for Wednesday, October 16, 2019



  14. Startpage and System1 Abuse Your Privacy Under the Guise of 'Privacy One Group'

    Startpage has sold out and may have also sold data it retained about its users to a privacy-hostile company whose entire business model is surveillance



  15. Links 16/10/2019: Halo Privacy, Ubuntu Release Imminent

    Links for the day



  16. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, October 15, 2019

    IRC logs for Tuesday, October 15, 2019



  17. No, Microsoft is Not an 'Open Source Company' But a Lying Company

    The world’s biggest proprietary software companies want to be seen as “open”; what else is new?



  18. Meme: Setting the Record Straight

    Stallman never defended Epstein. He had called him “Serial Rapist”. It’s Bill Gates who defended Epstein and possibly participated in the same acts.



  19. EPO Staff Resolution Against Neoliberal Policies of António Campinos

    “After Campinos announced 17 financial measures,” a source told us, “staff gathered at multiple sites last week for general assemblies. The meeting halls were crowded. The resolution was passed unanimously and without abstentions.”



  20. Satya Nadella is a Distraction From Microsoft's Real Leadership and Abuses

    "I’m merely wondering if his image and accolades that we’re incessantly bombarded with by the press actually reflect his accomplishments or if they’re being aggrandized."



  21. Raw: EPO Comes Under Fire for Lowering Patent Quality Under the Orwellian Guise of “Collaborative Quality Improvements” (CQI)

    Stephen Rowan, the President’s (António Campinos) chosen VP who promotes the notorious “Collaborative Quality Improvements” (CQI) initiative/pilot, faces heat from the CSC, the Central Staff Committee of the EPO



  22. Making The Most of The Fourth Age of Free Software

    "For better or for worse, we can be certain the Free Software Foundation will never be the same."



  23. FSF is Not for Free Speech Anymore

    The FSF gave orders to silence people



  24. Links 16/10/2019: Plasma 5.17.0, Project Trident Moves to GNU/Linux, NuTyX 11.2

    Links for the day



  25. ...So This GNU/Linux User Goes to a Pub With Swapnil and Jim

    It's hard to promote GNU/Linux when you don't even use it



  26. How to THRIVE, in Uncertain Times for Free Software

    "The guidelines are barely about conduct anyway, they are more about process guidelines for "what to do with your autonomy" in the context of a larger group where participation is completely voluntary and each individual consents to participate."



  27. When They Run Out of Things to Patent They'll Patent Nature Itself...

    The absolutely ridiculous patent bar (ridiculously low) at today’s EPO means that legal certainty associated with European Patents is at an all-time low; patents get granted for the sake of granting more patents each year



  28. EPO Boards of Appeal Need Courage and Structural Disruption to Halt Software Patents in Europe

    Forces or lobbyists for software patents try to come up with tricks and lies by which to cheat the EPC and enshrine illegal software patents; sadly, moreover, EPO judges lack the necessary independence by which to shape caselaw against such practices



  29. Professor Dr. Maximilian Haedicke on Lack of Separation of Powers at the EPO (Which Dooms UPC)

    Team UPC (“empire of lies”) is catching up with reality; no matter how hard media has attempted to not cover EPO scandals (after the EPO paid and threatened many publishers that tried), it remains very much apparent that EPOnia is like a theocracy that cannot be trusted with anything



  30. As Expected, the Bill Gates Propaganda Machine is Trying to Throw/Put Everyone off the Scent of Jeffery Epstein's 'Incestuous' Ties With Gates

    Media ownership up on display; it's amplifying false claims for a whole month, whereas truth/correct information gets buried before a weekend is over


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts