EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

10.30.17

Irregularities at the EPO and UPC (Unitary Patent) Dodgy Dealings Should Draw Ire

Posted in Europe, Patents at 4:20 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

UPC boat

Summary: The seriousness of the situation at the EPO ought to attract hard-hitting media coverage but does not; to make matters worse, voices of insiders and critics are being silenced

NOTHING is normal at the EPO. In just a few years it managed to turn from one of Europe’s most reputable institutions into a source of shame and a liability. There’s complicity enabling this also outside the EPO and we are currently investigating the alleged role of Belgium [1, 2]. Expect to hear more about it because it’s a subject of growing controversy even inside the EPO. Remember that Battistelli controls access to billions of euros, even without proper checks and balances. It’s enticing to suck up to him and he is alleged to have ‘bought’ votes of small countries (using money which wasn’t even his).

Comments about EPO scandals are locatable, but they have become harder to find due to censorship. The “line between expressing concern about the EPO’s governance and making ad hominen [sic] attacks,” says this new comment, has become the basis for censorship. But by “attacks” they typically mean the naming of people. As if one cannot even name individuals anymore. Here is this comment which IP Kat was ‘kind’ enough to approve:

Obviously there is a dividing line between expressing concern about the EPO’s governance and making ad hominen [sic] attacks. I can certainly understand that Merpel is concerned to prevent one spilling over into the other, and I think you do too.

The separate issue you raise is that the IPKat is no longer posting about the governance issues, which means there is less opportunity for others to express their concern. That might be regrettable, since the IPKat would be a much better forum for legitimate debate than a certain other website, precisely because Merpel filters out unreasonable comments and ad hominen [sic] attacks.

However, before complaining that the IPKat is no longer concerned, have you considered that the blog’s panel of contributors changes over time, and that each contributor tends to post on topics that happen to interest them? The lack of posts about EPO governance may simply be due to changes in personnel, rather than a deliberate policy of discouraging debate.

As the next comment put it, “should the purpose not be to post on topics to interest the readers?”

The next one said: “If it were a commercial concern such as a newspaper or magazine, and the contributors were being paid to write stuff to attract readers, then yes maybe. But it’s not.”

Too much speculation about IP Kat has given them the benefit of the doubt, first by attributing the censorship (they prefer the euphemism “moderation”) to a technical glitch and now the change of authorship. It’s nice and rather convenient to think that the silence is purely interests-related, but the real explanation for the silence is different, however, as it followed an embargo against the blog.

Thankfully, there are still some places where criticism of the EPO is tolerated and EPO insiders are quoting this new comment [1, 2, 3] which says:

Have a look at the structure proposed for reorganisation of DG1 and DG2:

https://www.epo.org/modules/epoweb/acdocument/epoweb2/261/en/CA-65-17_en.pdf

I understand that this new structure is being implemented. The trouble is that it tramples all over the EPC, which clearly requires the individual “in control of” DG1 to be independent (at least from a hiring, firing and disciplinary perspective) from the President of the EPO. Under the new structure, the “independent” VP1 will be left with only symbolic powers, with new COOs reporting directly to the President (and being hired / fired / disciplined by him) and taking over almost all of the substantive powers previously afforded to VP1.

So, in short, this is yet another example of the EPO’s executive (presumably with the full knowledge / complicity of the AC) effectively ignoring the provisions of the EPC. Regardless of what one thinks about the constitutional complaints, these kind of developments could take those complaints to a completely new level. That is, if the AC has proven itself to be incapable of ensuring that the EPO operates in accordance with the EPC, then it becomes an established fact that there is a “democratic deficit” that requires urgent action.

No names mentioned here, but it’s clear who it’s all about. Days ago a French politician, Claudine Lepage, named the main culprit (who brought many French cronies with him). SUEPO has just published this English translation (there is another one for German readers) and we have highlighted in yellow some of the important bits, not the talking points ‘shipped in’ by Battistelli (basically a bundle of lies):

Written question on the social policy at the European Patent Office

Posted on 27 October 2017 by admin

I submitted a written question to the Minister of the Economy and Finances with regard to the social policy adopted at the European Patent Office.

The reply which I have just received from Bruno Lemaire, given what is at stake and the social context which prevails at the EPO, is more than deceptive.

In order, in company with other members of Parliament, to be able to keep track accurately the situation at the EPO, I feel obliged to respond to certain arguments put forward by the Minister.

The EPO has never been in deficit, and has always been self-financing, and the plan for the transformation of the organization adopted in 2013 was therefore never an obligation.

With regard to the social dialogue which the Minister refers to, every observer is well aware that this is reduced to the minimum, and that, on the contrary, the social malaise is a permanent feature within this international organization.

I am therefore calling upon the French Government to take note in full of the situation at the EPO, and to take all steps necessary to put an end to this social conflict, which, apart from the fact that it is seriously detrimental to the image of France, is also posing a risk to the health of the staff.

Read below the reply from the Minister, as well as my question:

Reply by the Minister of the Economy and Finances:

The European Patent Office (EPO), created by the European Patent Convention (EPC) of 5 October 1973, is an intergovernmental organization which has been in operation since 1977, which employs a staff of close on 7000 people coming from 30 different countries. In order to ensure the financial viability of the EPO in the long term, a plan for the transformation of the organization has been adopted, and in 2013 the Administrative Council introduced changes into the statutes relating to the staff of the EPO, imposed on the whole of the social structure (pensions, remunerations, social services, right to strike), in consultation with the staff representatives. These reforms allowed for the financial situation of the Office to be redressed within a few years, despite some specific organizational constraints which are inherent in respect of the international organization status of the EPO, and an establishment culture which is essentially fragmented, given that it has five establishments in four different countries. The reforms have nevertheless engendered social conflicts, accentuated by the legal status specific to international organizations. Following proceedings initiated before local courts, on 20 January 2017 the Supreme Court of the Netherlands overturned the ruling by the Court of Appeal of The Hague, and confirmed the legal immunity of the EPO. Being aware of these difficulties, France has consistently supported, within the Administrative Council of the EPO, the initiatives aimed at improving the situation and the social dialogue within theorganization, such as the launching of the social audit undertaken in 2016, or the resolution adopted in March 2016, inviting the President of the EPO to present to the Administrative Council a project for reviewing the staff statutes, making provision for disciplinary procedures to be reviewed and amended, as well as the directives relating to enquiries. On 28 and 29 June 2017 the Administrative Council accordingly adopted into the staff statutes new guarantees aimed at ensuring the independence and impartiality of procedures (enquiries, disciplinary measures, internal appeal), as well as the rights of defence (the right to remain silence or to be assisted by an advocate in particular).

Question by Claudine Lepage:

Ms. Claudine Lepage draws the attention of the Minister of the Economy and Finances to the situation at the European Patent Office (EPO). This intergovernmental organization and its 7 000 staff members, highly qualified persons recruited form 38 Member States, unquestionably makes a major contribution to innovation, competitiveness, and economic growth in Europe. For a number of years, however, the authoritarian and arbitrary social policy of this Office has been incurring major difficulties, in particular with regard to the respecting of the fundamental rights of the individual and the violation of social law. It must also be emphasised that four suicides in 32 months are a deplorable occurrence among the staff. Moreover, the
Court of Appeal of The Hague, to which recourse was made by staff representatives, in February 2015 condemned the social policy pursued by the EPO, ruling it contrary to fundamental rights. The French President of the Office nevertheless refuses to act on this decision, on the pretext that the Office enjoys a status of immunity. This management approach, which is highly open to criticism, is having a direct impact on the reputation of France among international institutions, and she therefore wishes to know whether provisions are going to be adopted in order to remedy this situation, which has gone on too long and which threatens the very future of the institution, at the moment at which, after thirty years of negotiation, agreement has been reached with regard to a Unitary European Patent, the issue of which will be entrusted to the EPO.

An open debate about what goes on at the EPO — without fear of retribution — is necessary if not imperative for things to improve. As we shall show in our next post, things are still getting worse.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 22/8/2019: KDE ISO Image Writer, GNU Parallel ‘Jesper Svarre’

    Links for the day



  2. Guarding and Rescuing the FSF Titanic: A Free (as in Freedom) Library, and Federation of Advocates

    "This library is not just for cultural works, but also for software."



  3. Linux Foundation's Linux.com in 2019: Zero Articles (Nothing Original) and a Terrible, Rookie New Design

    Linux.com has become a curated syndicator of news (edited by one single Microsoft proponent); the site has also eliminated its traditional design in favour of something only 'hipsters' can appreciate



  4. Managing IP as Team UPC's Megaphone and Lobbying Front

    Managing IP is lying on behalf of Team UPC yet again; the site's long history promoting the UPC hasn't ended even when prospects of the UPC are slim to none



  5. No More Rights for EPO Staff?

    The oppression and the crackdown on labour rights in Europe's second-largest institution has deepened to the point where staff is paid as little as is legally possible



  6. Links 22/8/2019: GNOME 3.33.91, Systemd 243 RC2, Cockpit 201, Ubuntu Touch OTA-10, FreeIPMI 1.6.4

    Links for the day



  7. Some Patent Attorneys Dislike Techrights Not Because It's Wrong But Because Software Patents Are Wrong (and Sometimes Illegal)

    Odd rants which misuse common law and ignore alleged Fair Use (and misinterpretation of copyright law, for censorship purposes) would have people believe that we're wrong; but it's more likely that the person in question is jealous, insecure, or offended by our stance on patent scope, which is very much rooted in the law itself (and the views widely held by software developers globally)



  8. Guarding and Rescuing the FSF Titanic: Distro-libre and feature-schema

    "Every time a distro does not suit a user's purposes, and it is less work to adapt the distro on one's own than to affect the distro in any other way, a distro is born."



  9. Links 21/8/2019: Dell's XPS 13, Mesa 19.2 RC1, Librem Update

    Links for the day



  10. Links 21/8/2019: Open Source POWER, Alpine 3.10.2, Netrunner 19.08

    Links for the day



  11. Edward as a Nodder to Team UPC Kool-Aid

    Bristows LLP is at it again and it's getting pathetic, not just dishonest as usual



  12. Guest Post: António Campinos' European Patent Office Redefines Modern Slavery in the Heart of Europe in 2019

    The European Patent Office’s (EPO) President António Campinos — like his predecessor Battistelli — emulates Chinese labour practices



  13. Guarding and Rescuing the FSF Titanic: There is More Than One Iceberg Ahead

    "This strategy is not far from when Microsoft talked about "de-commoditizing protocols" in the late 90s, as part of their plans to control, dominate, and end Open Source and Free software."



  14. EPO Cannot Handle Patent Justice With a Backlog of About 10,000 Cases at the Boards of Appeal

    The EPO's long war on judges and on the law has proven to be costly; it's difficult to pretend that the EPO functions like a first-world legal framework



  15. The European Patent Office Increases Surveillance: Can't Get Food Without Being Spied on

    The infamous "War on Cash" has been 'won' at Europe's second-largest institution, where people's diet can now be monitored and indefinitely retained on the system



  16. To GNU/Linux, the Operating System, GAFAM (Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon, Microsoft) is Not the Threat. Microsoft is.

    Don't let Microsoft get away with its bogus narration; GNU/Linux is primarily under attack from Microsoft, whereas Software Freedom in general is under attack from many directions



  17. The Free Software Foundation (FSF) Has the Full Support of Techrights

    Our support for the FSF is strong enough that we want to occasionally suggest improvements; there are growing frictions designed to isolate the FSF and cause self-restraint/censorship



  18. Why We Support Phoronix (Whereas Some Others Do Not)

    Some people try to characterise Michael Larabel as the 'bad boy' of Linux even though Michael is probably the hardest working Linux journalist out there



  19. Guarding and Rescuing the FSF Titanic: The Simplest Ways that AI will Change Computing

    "AI is already used to help kill people. We should be cautious, and know that the best rules we come up with (like no doing magic outside the school grounds) won't be followed all the time."



  20. Links 20/8/2019: DragonFlyBSD Developing DSynth

    Links for the day



  21. Guarding and Rescuing the FSF Titanic: Narcissism in The Community

    "Narcissists are drawn to intelligent people. They take great pleasure in attacking, controlling and defeating intelligent people because it makes them feel smarter and more important."



  22. Breaking the Law Has Become the Norm at the European Patent Office

    The European Patent Office’s ongoing practice of destroying critics/whistleblowers and crushing unions, judges, examiners etc. — as well as threats and bribery of the media — ultimately mean a perpetual state of lawlessness that, if it prevails, will let patent trolls raid the European economy and stall innovation



  23. Links 20/8/2019: KMyMoney 5.0.6, Kdenlive 19.08

    Links for the day



  24. Guarding and Rescuing the FSF Titanic: Free Software in Education

    "If everyone learns to code, then everyone gains some understanding of how to code in other languages."



  25. Links 19/8/2019: Another Linux 5.3 RC, OpenSUSE's Richard Brown Steps Down, Slackware Creates Patreon Page, Qt 6 Initiated

    Links for the day



  26. Speaking Truth to Monopolies (or How to Write Guest Posts in Techrights)

    We need to have more articles tackling the passage of all power — especially when it comes to software — to few large monopolies that disregard human rights or actively participate in their abolishment in the digital realm



  27. Guarding and Rescuing the FSF Titanic: Free as in Speech

    "While a new breed of so-called anarchists campaign against expression that even the state allows, people are also foolishly overplaying the relevance of the state to free speech issues -- as if it's not a freedom issue when a project is increasingly thought-policed, because the thought-policing isn't on a state level."



  28. Toxic Culture at Microsoft

    Racism, intolerance, sexism and bullying are rampant at Microsoft; but Microsoft would rather deflect/divert/sidetrack to Google and so-called 'GAFA'



  29. Guarding and Rescuing the FSF Titanic: Introduction

    "The FSF isn't just threatened, it will hit a large iceberg in the future that changes it permanently."



  30. Linux Journal and Linux.com Should Have Been Kept Going

    There's apparently no good explanation for the effective shutdown of Linux Journal and Linux.com; London Trust Media Holdings (LTMH), owner of Linux Journal, saw numbers improving and the Linux Foundation, steward of Linux.com, is loaded with money


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts