EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

12.23.17

Raw: How SUEPO Explained the EPO Situation Three Years Ago

Posted in Europe, Patents at 3:51 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

The EPO is connected to the Commission only when it suits Battistelli

EPO and European Commission

Summary: Message to the European Commission, urging for intervention within the EPO; A concise outline of the issues as they stood at the time (before many additional scandals and 0% approval rates for the President)

NEMESIS: SOCIAL CONFLICT AT THE EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE

The EPO

The European Patent Organisation was created in 1977 through the European Patent Convention (EPC). A diplomatic Conference of the Contracting States is responsible for any amendment to the Articles of EPC. Otherwise, the highest supervisory and legislative body is the Administrative Council, which consists of delegates of the member states who gather several times a year. The delegates are non-elected civil servants, typically from the national patent offices. The European Patent Office (EPO) is the executive body of the Organisation. Led by a President and Vice-Presidents appointed by the Administrative Council, the EPO comprises about 7000 staff members. It is the second-largest intergovernmental organisation in Europe after the European Commission.

Its tasks

The tasks of the EPO consist primarily in processing European patent applications and grant patents on behalf of the contracting states. As a designated authority, it also processes worldwide patent applications under the Patent Cooperation Treaty. The European Commission has further entrusted the EPO with the processing and granting of EU unitary patents, as well as keeping the registry and administering the renewal fees.

Its impact

The economic impact of the EPO cannot be underestimated. A study on behalf of the European Commission1 in 2004 estimated the actual and potential market for patents in eight European countries2 between 15 and 24 billion EUR. Moreover, it is estimated that the presence of the EPO in its host states generates about three jobs for each EPO staff member within the jurisdiction3. In contrast, the EPO does not generate any cost to the European taxpayer. It is fully self-financed through the processing fees of the applications and, above all, through the patent renewal fees, notwithstanding the fact that half of the renewal fees are distributed to the member states. The industrial landscape strongly depends on the patents as granted at the EPO.
________
1 ETD/2004/IM/E3/77; http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/indprop/docs/patent/studies/final_report_lot2_en.pdf
2 DE, DK, ES, FR, HU, IT, NL, UK; see Table 1 of ETD/2004/IM/E3/77
3 Louter P, van Eikeren P “The economic importance of the European Patent Office”, Oct. 2009


Its staff

The employees of the EPO are highly educated professionals from all of the 38 member states. They fall into two main categories: administrative and professional. Administrative staff is in charge of the formal side and record keeping. Aside from the necessary qualifications, they have to master at least two of the official languages of the EPO (EN/DE/FR). Aside from HR professionals and lawyers, the majority of the professional category consists of patent examiners. They all hold advanced degrees in science and engineering (MSc level of higher), and must be proficient in all three official languages of the EPO, in addition to their own language. They must be able to understand and report on complex technical and juridical texts in EN/FR/DE. The majority of staff, in particular examiners, have a good understanding of legal principles, since their job involves taking decisions that have legal effects (granting or refusing patents).

The remuneration package4 of the EPO staff is generous but is commensurate with their qualifications and the economic impact of their work. Their remuneration is exempt from national taxation (in order not to give host states and undue advantage over other contracting states) but is subject to an internal taxation, the proceeds of which go to defray the running costs of the EPO. This enables the EPO to use only a portion of the patent renewal fees for its operational costs, and the excess (currently, one half) thereof is distributed to the member states.

Reforms

The European Patent Convention is 40 years old. The EPO is set up according to principles of the international civil service, and some of the principles date back to the early 20th century. As early as 2007, the Administrative Council has mandated the Presidents of the EPO to develop and introduce a number of reforms. So far, most of them concern human resources management and working conditions. None address the issues of transparent governance and accountability of management. (For instance, the remuneration and ancillary benefits of the President is a well-guarded secret, as are the bonuses of the Vice-Presidents.) The working conditions laid down in the Service Regulations are not published; once the Administrative Council adopts new working conditions, they are implemented without any possibility for an independent instance to control thoroughly their compatibility with fundamental rights or with the generally accepted principles of law.

Controversial decisions

Staff is used and expects to be consulted in good faith about the nature and timing of any need to adapt social and technical matters that have an impact on their work. This is recognized by the fact that management is required to consult staff on such matters. In the past, staff representative were normally in a position to cooperate towards possible solutions. However, since 2007 staff has been consistently put before faits accomplis, with questionable reforms allegedly addressing undefined problems. Many of the changes introduced are perceived as being senseless and disruptive, and inconsistent with subsequent changes. This has caused widespread discontent.
________
4 which is comparable to all intergovernmental organisations


Repression of dissent

Even though the outcome was less than satisfactory, the EPO management must be credited for trying, between 2007 and 2010, to allay the concerns of staff by engaging in dialogue with the elected staff representatives, and with the staff union. This has changed dramatically under the current President5. Instead of dialog, he has chosen the path of systematically repressing any expression of dissent, not to speak of opposition.

Thus far, to silence any dissenting voice, the President6 has:

- Changed the rules to make it legally impossible to challenge internally a decision.
- Refused to recognize the staff unions7 as a legitimate social partner, in spite of the fact that the union SUEPO counts as it members nearly 50% of staff.
- Forbidden the staff representation to send mails to more than 50 staff members, thereby severely curtailing the possibility of communicating with staff.
- Inflicted disciplinary measures (reprimands) on staff representatives who defied the prohibition.
- Installed a filter blocking the delivery to staff of any mail originating from the Union (who has its own outside server).
- Refused to distribute Union publications through the internal mail.
- Subjected staff representation publications to censorship.
- Introduced “investigation guidelines”, under which any employee may be investigated without necessarily being told so. The investigation may be started at the instigation of even anonymous accusers. Colleagues may be interrogated and have a duty to cooperate, or they will be accused of professional misconduct. The person investigated is also obliged to “cooperate”, failing which (s)he will be liable to disciplinary measures for misconduct, and this means not being able to keep silent in order not to incriminate oneself. The person investigated cannot be assisted by legal counsel. There is no system in place to monitor the lawfulness and proportionality of the investigation.
- Proposed changes to the structure and functioning of the staff representation and of the statutory consultative bodies, which changes substantially reduce the role of staff
in the decision-making process on issues that affect them directly;
- Proposed changes in the way staff representatives are elected (until now, the electoral process was chosen and supervised by staff itself through general assemblies);
- Blocked an online opinion poll which the staff representation had organized to allow staff to voice an opinion about the proposed changes in staff representation structure and elections, and summarily suspended a colleague who advised the staff representation on how to carry out an online poll efficiently and securely;
- Changed the rules allowing for industrial actions (strikes): calling for a strike now requires a petition to the president, signed by at least 10% of all staff; following which the president himself decides whether the grievance is receivable and if so submits the matter to a vote, where 40% of all staff must participate to have a valid quorum. The Union is no longer authorized to call for industrial action independently, and to submit the matter to its own members only8;
________
5 Benoît Battistelli (FR) took up the position of President of the EPO in July 2010. A graduate of the French National School of Administration (ENA), he is the former General Director of the French Patent Office (INPI). Since taking up his duties in 2010, he has surrounded himself with no less than 5 former INPI colleagues, whom he has appointed to key positions within the EPO.
6 with the apparent complacency of the Administrative Council
7 the largest of which is SUEPO, active in all four establishments of the EPO (Munich, The Hague, Berlin and Vienna). A much smaller union, FFP-EPO, is active in The Hague
8 it has been pointed out that such measures are unprecedented in Europe, apart from Italy’s Carta del Lavoro (B. Mussolini, 1927) and Spain’s Fuero del Trabajo (F. Franco, 1938), of very sinister memory.

Morever, the current President has:

- Refused to carry out an enquiry for the possible causes of the suicide of a colleague in 2013, who took his life at the work place and during working hours.
- Demoted a staff representative for voicing, within the staff representation, concerns about a possible managerial responsibility for the suicide of another colleague in 2012. He demoted the employee in spite of the unanimous recommendation of the Disciplinary Board to stop the procedure for abuse of process and unfounded claims.
- Systematically refused to follow the recommendations of the Internal Appeals Committee (who analyses grievances of individual staff members), even when unanimously finding in favour of the claimant.
- Threatened employees with severe disciplinary sanctions for being prepared to testify, if so ordered by the Court, against the EPO in civil suits by third parties.

No effective access to justice

Staff is particularly aggrieved because it has no reasonable way to seek relief through judicial review:
- The internal dispute resolution process (the Internal Appeals Committee), and the external instance (the Administrative Tribunal of the International Labour Organisation) are reserved for individual grievances, once the alleged damage has occurred. Only in very exceptionally circumstances can a general decision, such as a decision modifying working conditions, be challenged before it is implemented.
- The staff union has no access to either the Internal Appeals Committee or to the ATILO. As a corporate body established under national law, the Union may have access to the domestic court, but the EPO shields itself behind its functional immunity from jurisdiction and execution.
- Even when staff members have access to the statutory dispute resolution process, it takes in average 3-5 years for a grievance to be assessed9 by the Internal Appeals
Committee, and if the grievance proceeds to the ATILO the claimant must count on a minimum of 3-4 years before the grievance is heard. All in all, with the current increasing backlog in the Internal Appeals Committee and at the ATILO, it is expected that grievances lodged after 2011 will not be adjudicated before roughly a decade.

The interest of the European Commission

With Regulation (EU) No 1257/ 2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2012, implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection10, there is an institutional link between the European Commission and the EPO. The European Commission intends to entrust a substantial part of its policy (the unitary patent) to an organisation that is not formally under the Commission’s authority. Thus, as a stakeholder, the Commission has a legitimate interest in monitoring what happens structurally within the EPO.
________
9 There is a backlog of some 700 cases in the Internal Appeals Committee; rather than increasing the manpower to face this backlog, Mr Battistelli has decreased it.
10 http://archive.epo.org/epo/pubs/oj013/02_13/02_1113.pdf


Of the 38 contracting states of the EPC, 25 are members of the European Union and have ratified Regulation (EU) No 1257/ 2012. Thus, the states that will participate in the Unitary Patent system have a clear majority in the Administrative Council of the EPO, yet so far their respective positions have been focused on their national interests rather than on Community ones. With the introduction of the Unitary Patent, the Commission has an interest in overseeing a common policy.

There is a serious problem of governance in the EPO. The opacity of its decision-making processes and the lack of accountability is anachronistic in Europe and in the 21st century, at a time when states require from their institutions and from each other financial transparency and accountability. While the EPO may still be a competitive employer (in terms of remuneration benefits), its internal human resources policies (in terms of interpersonal relationships) are antiquated and brutal.

Generally speaking, European society will not tolerate that some of its citizens are deprived of their fundamental rights only because they are employed by an intergovernmental organisation, or because they are well paid. This is true in particular when the member states of said organisation are, in their overwhelming majority, also members states of the European Union. Yet this is exactly what has happened.

The Administrative Council of the EPO, and thus vicariously the member states, are complacent at best, grossly negligent at worst. The Council has largely given the President carte blanche, without asking what the consequences would be or how he would use his powers. Structurally, the President of the EPO acts as accuser, investigator, judge and final arbiter on all matters; there is no separation of power guaranteeing a healthy system of checks and balances. The nearly absolute power the current President enjoys and the manner in which he uses it has been the source of particular concern and dismay11. Staff and their unions consider the limitations on the freedom of expression and freedom of associations (embodies in the right to strike), and the right to effective access to justice as a breach of their fundamental rights as European Citizens.

Now that the European Commission holds a solid majority in the Administrative Council of the EPO, and if it is serious about using and promoting the Unitary Patent as one of its important pillars to exercise its policy, it is high time it took a keen interest in what is happening at the EPO and insist that the house be put in order. By introducing proper policies through consultation and negotiation. Not through repression and intimidation.
____
11 Mr Battistelli has been reported in the press as being perceived as behaving like a “small African dictator” (Die Zeit, 20 March 2014)

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Looking for Explanations About Samsung's DeX and Other FOSS Initiatives Being Canned

    DeX was primarily a threat to the desktop/laptop monopoly of Microsoft, so its sudden abandonment — without even an explanation — continues to attract speculations



  2. EPO Will Need a Lot More Than Photo Ops and Hoax 'Studies' to Restore the Perception of Lawfulness

    Battistelli‘s illegal attacks on European Patent Office (EPO) judges have tarnished any impression that the EPO serves justice and the current regime torpedoes an assessment of these attacks; EPO workers understand that to follow guidelines from the management may be a breach of the EPC



  3. Links 21/10/2019: More on DeX, Disney DRM and Linux 5.4 RC4

    Links for the day



  4. GNU/Linux is Bigger Than Ever (Used More Than Ever Before), But Communication Means and Brands Have Changed

    The GNU/Linux market is alive and healthy; it's how we measure its health that ought to adapt because things are constantly changing, more rapidly in the realm of technology than anywhere else



  5. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, October 20, 2019

    IRC logs for Sunday, October 20, 2019



  6. Samsung Does Not Say Why It's Dropping DeX, But the ASUS EEE Story Might Offer Clues

    It's not at all outlandish or unreasonable to suggest that Microsoft used patents or bribes or kickbacks as incentives for Samsung to abandon GNU/Linux as a desktop platform



  7. EPO: It's Only Getting Worse

    Inhaling Seagull meme for EPO presidents



  8. It Has Begun: EPO Staff Protests Against António Campinos (Starting Wednesday)

    Wednesday marks the resumption of EPO protests; it’s happening for the first time under Campinos and only a year after he took Office. Even Battistelli, the notorious thug, lasted longer before such escalations/actions or — put another way — he did better than that (if one checks the timeline of his presidency)



  9. Links 20/10/2019: GNU/Linux at Penn Manor School District, Wine-Staging 4.18, Xfce 4.16 Development, FreeBSD 12.1 RC2

    Links for the day



  10. Guest Post: Understanding Autism for More Complete Inclusion

    "...assuming that autistic people are all the same isn't only technically wrong, it is misleading and leads to harmful and needless misunderstandings."



  11. Guest Post: Free Software Freedom is Not a Freedom of Choice

    The concept of "Freedom of Choice" and how the ruling class uses it to give a false impression of "Freedom"



  12. Guest Post: Free Software Developers and Pursuing 'Market Share'

    "The only people interested in software freedom are (almost always) free software developers. And users are interested in freedom to a very limited extent: the "free beer" side. Even many free software developers are only interested in the "free beer" part of free software."



  13. The Assertion That Microsoft Uses Communist Tactics Against GNU/Linux and Free/Libre Software

    A study of Taistoism might help understand how Free/libre software is being undermined



  14. European Patent Office and US Patent and Trademark Office Cranks Discovered Buzzwords, Stopped Worrying, Started Granting Patents They Know to be Fake

    The world's patent repositories are being saturated with loads of junk patents or patents that have no legal bearing but can still be leveraged for extortion purposes; the EPO is resorting to lies and artificially-elevated buzzwords to justify granting such fake (yet ruinous) patents



  15. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, October 19, 2019

    IRC logs for Saturday, October 19, 2019



  16. “The True Hypocrite is the One Who Ceases to Perceive His Deception, the One Who Lies With Sincerity,” Said André Paul Guillaume Gide (Nobel Prize in Literature)

    Lies flow like water in the realm of EPO and its publishers, whose sole role is dissemination of deliberate falsehoods, misnomers and misinformation



  17. The EPO Cannot Guard Fake European Patents From Scrutiny (in the Long Run)

    Legal certainty associated with newly-granted European Patents is already pretty low and as long as the EPO refuses to acknowledge that its courts (or boards) lack autonomy the EPO merely brushes a growing problem under the rug



  18. Links 19/10/2019: DeX Discontinued, DXVK 1.4.3 and Wine 4.18 Released

    Links for the day



  19. 'Corporate Linux' Will Not Protect Software Freedom

    The corporate model is inherently not compatible with software that users themselves fully control (or Software Freedom in general), so we must rely on another model of sovereignty over code and compiled code (binaries)



  20. IRC Proceedings: Friday, October 18, 2019

    IRC logs for Friday, October 18, 2019



  21. 26,000 Posts

    We want to thank those who help spread the word; it gives us moral support and morale.



  22. The Myth of 'Analysts'

    People with exaggerated roles (exaggerated by corporate media and corporations that control them) distort public perceptions about their clients; they're in effect just elevated marketing or Public Relations (PR) operatives



  23. The FSF Has Two Acting Presidents Now

    Alexandre Oliva, who acted as a sort of deputy of Richard Stallman in recent weeks, sheds some much-needed light on the current situation



  24. Should Anybody Dictate the Free Software Movement?

    "There's a great myth, as Jagadees reminds us, that advocacy doesn't produce software. That myth is corporate, and proper advocacy has at times produced the greatest software in the history of computing. If we want great Free software to continue, we need advocacy more than ever."



  25. Links 18/10/2019: More KDE Events and OpenBSD 6.6

    Links for the day



  26. We Don't Know Who Will Run the Free Software Foundation, But We Know Who Will Run the GNU Project

    Software Freedom is under a heavy and perhaps unprecedented attack; some people out there are paid by the attackers to celebrate this attack and defame people (cheering for corporate takeover under the blanket of “Open Source”), but the founder of the Free software movement remains alive, well, and very much active



  27. New EPO Meme: Who Wants to Make Billions From a 'Public' Monopoly?

    What was supposed to be a cash-balanced patent office became a money-making monster that fakes ‘crises’ to attack hard-working examiners



  28. EmacsConf Without Richard Stallman

    Now that emacs is being 'rebranded' this kind of meme seems apt



  29. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, October 17, 2019

    IRC logs for Thursday, October 17, 2019



  30. Guest Article: In the Absence of Richard Stallman OEM Source Software ('Open Source') is Trying to Hijack Even Emacs

    "Now they have to create some fictional history. No need to worry."


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts