EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

01.25.18

A European Unitary Patent-Like System (e.g. UPC) is Not Compatible With Law; Expect it to Rot Away at the German Federal Constitutional Court

Posted in Europe, Law, Patents at 2:52 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

If the Rule of Law means anything, the UPC will never resurface again (in any form whatsoever)

5 marble columns

Summary: The “community” a.k.a. “EU” a.k.a. “unitary” patent system is collapsing and there’s no sign that the matter will be settled any time soon

THE EPO won’t see the UPC coming to fruition. Battistelli certainly won’t. What we believe most likely to happen is, they’ll rename it (yet again), change the vision somewhat, then reattempt. Time will tell…

It’s quite interesting to see just to what degree Techrights impacts UPC coverage. A few hours after we complained that Bristows had been deliberately ignoring this departure of Jo Johnson (weeks ago!) it finally decided to write a blog post about it and say: “The UK IPO has confirmed that Sam Gyimah is now the Minister responsible for IP.”

“What we believe most likely to happen is, they’ll rename it (yet again), change the vision somewhat, then reattempt.”This has been confirmed for quite a while now. Bristows just chose to overlook all that because it’s very detrimental to and negative if not fatal for UPC progress/prospects. As one can expect, the blog post is amazing spin. Bristows can apparently read minds (never mind if it always got it wrong on UPC, for several consecutive years); it pretends to know everything about Gyimah’s intentions; as if Gyimah will just do something Johnson spoke about back in 2016 (when everything was very different). Don’t fall for it…

So what is the real news? Well, let’s research and see what Team UPC and domain experts are saying. It’s about Germany — the focal point at the moment.

“I have read the entire complaint which circulates in the Internet,” one person said. They brag about being able to read the constitutional complaint.

“Bristows just chose to overlook all that because it’s very detrimental to and negative if not fatal for UPC progress/prospects.”There is also a ‘non-update’ update from JUVE’s editor. “This may be of any interest as well,” he wrote. “Statement from @BVerfG: Neither a date for the oral hearing nor for a judgement is known yet.” That’s basically a non-news. The news is that there’s no news.

Anton Horn added: “Update on the status of the pending German constitutional complaint regarding the planned…”

The update is, well… no update. In the world of journalism there are all sorts of terms for that thing (turning a non-event into an actual event worth reporting on). This was soon mentioned by Team UPC (mostly just repeating what Juve reported, adding the pro-UPC talking points). “I would welcome your comments,” said the person who calls me a "troll" for opposing the UPC and calls readers of Kluwer "idiots" while he deletes their comments.

Alexander Esslinger‏ (a.k.a. “patently German”) said: “An early judgement on the complaint against the ratification of the #UPC before the German Federal Constitutional Court @BVerfG is not in sight…”

Yes. this is our understanding as well.

“Well, the EPO is a cash cow to Germany; the UPC in its current form would be too.”Thomas Adam (a.k.a. “UPC tracker”)‏ wrote a bunch of useful tweets, including this one which notes, “of the 27 invited institutions and associations only 7 filed amicus curiae briefs on UPC constitutional complaint, including the German government and the EPO. Same applies to the Federal Bar Association (BRAK; as a member, one wonders what they have said).”

JUVE’s editor responded to him by saying: “Interesting as well that neither house in German parliament nor the federal states hosting the four German local divisions submitted a amicus brief. Sign they do not differ from the government’s opinion.”

Well, the EPO is a cash cow to Germany; the UPC in its current form would be too. But the constitutional complaint is about law, not about money motives. Greed in its own right does not bypass laws and constitutions. Unless of course we wish to accept lawlessness…

“Greed in its own right does not bypass laws and constitutions. Unless of course we wish to accept lawlessness…”The way we interpret the above (three quarters of parties not filing a submission with an opinion) is, a lot of pro-UPC parties have given up. They perceive a submission to be a waste of time (and money; they charge a lot for hourly work). This whole effort might not matter now. The boat has already left and the UPC is neglected. It’s worse than stuck. It's likely dead.

Thomas Adam has looked at another submission and said: “UPC constitutional complaint DE: Submission of German IP association GRUR limited to „specific patent law-related“ Q‘s (p3 at top) and while pro-UPC no explicit statement as to merits of complaint. (Plus typo in quote from ECJ C-146/13 on p27). http://www.grur.org/uploads/tx_gstatement/20 [] GRUR submits (p2 bottom) that a clear majority of members had been in favour of UPC/UP, controversial discussions w/in GRUR notwithstanding. As for language of proceedings, states that already now parties often cannot rely on their mother tongue, eg in EPO opposition. [] GRUR: Question of whether EPO granting procedure entirely kosher not an issue of EU law but entirely unrelated and UPCA does not lead to that procedure being integrated in EU law (p27 w reference to ECJ C-146/13, n30). [] Also, most technical literature as well as specialist terminology were in English (p25). Language of EPO proceedings also decisive in interpreting patent claims (Art 70 EPC).”

“The UPC is not compatible with law.”We have chosen to emphasise (above) the part about the language because of the following remarks. One UPC critic from Spain said that “Spain signed up to the EPC because it was as a precondition for entering into the European Community in 1986. It is not clear what would obtain Spain joining the UPCA.”

Spain opposes the UPC for various reasons including language. And mind the response to this: “EPO is a patent office, and national patent offices can translate the EPO patent. UPC is a court, the language of proceedings cannot be in a language that people do not understand. J.J. v. the Netherlands(27 March 1998), para 43; Albert and Le Compte v Belgium, (1983) 5 EHRR 533…”

So that seals it. The UPC is not compatible with law. It’s one among several issues apparently raised in the complaint.

“It’s the habitual misinformation we see from IAM, which has just bashed Spain (yet again) for rejecting the UPC.”It’s worth noting that IAM, which was paid by the EPO’s PR firm for UPC promotion, has just published this promotion of an upcoming event (IPBC Europe) in which it says “emergence of the Unified Patent Court will be crucial for European companies going forward.”

A lie such as this is typical. It’s the habitual misinformation we see from IAM, which has just bashed Spain (yet again) for rejecting the UPC. That’s the context of the remarks above.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. When the Monopolists and the Patent Litigation Industry Hijack the News They Control the Narrative

    Money buys perception and litigation firms have certainly 'bought' the media coverage, which fails to convey the issue at stake and instead paints a rational court decision as tragedy for "innovation" (by "innovation" they mean monopolies on nature and on life)



  2. Links 25/1/2020: OPNsense 20.1 RC1 and DXVK 1.5.2

    Links for the day



  3. The Linux Kernel is No Longer Free Software?

    Gardiner Bryant, the creator of The Linux Gamer as well as The Off Topical Podcast, reacts to our articles about DRM in Linux (he even pronounced my name correctly)



  4. Sometimes Proprietary Software is Proprietary (Secret) Simply Because It is Not Good and Obfuscation Helps Hide Just How Ugly It Is

    Why nonfree (or proprietary) software generally fails to catch up with Free/libre software — at least on technical grounds — and then makes up for it with marketing and FUD offensives (discrediting perfectly-functioning things, based on their perceived cost)



  5. IRC Proceedings: Friday, January 24, 2020

    IRC logs for Friday, January 24, 2020



  6. Links 24/1/2020: GNU/Linux in Russia and More New Openings

    Links for the day



  7. When EPO Press Coverage Boils Down to Lobbying, Press Releases, EPO Lies, and Bribery

    Any attempts to properly assess and explain what happens in Europe's patent landscape are being drowned out by EPO-bribed and law firms-connected media; to make matters worse, the EPO's bribes have expanded to academia, so even scholarly work in this domain is corrupted by money of special interest groups



  8. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, January 23, 2020

    IRC logs for Thursday, January 23, 2020



  9. Links 23/1/2020: Qubes OS 4.0.3, EasyOS 2.2.5, GhostBSD 20.01

    Links for the day



  10. Passion of the Microsoft

    A rough timeline of Microsoft’s interactions with Linux and the Linux Foundation since 2015



  11. The Patent Microcosm is Really Panicking as European Patents on Life and Other Spurious Junk (Invalid Patents) Are Successfully Rejected

    European Patents (EPs) may be revoked en masse if what we're seeing is the gradual emergence of 'European Mayo' (and maybe soon 'European Alice')



  12. Distractions From Microsoft's Gigantic Tax Evasion and Contribution to Denial of Climate Science

    Microsoft (connected to oil companies) wants us to think of it as a "green" company; not only does it contribute to climate denial but it also evades tax, which is a serious crime that costs tens of billions of dollars (the public pays this money instead)



  13. Confirmation: System1/Startpage Offered Pay to People Who Pushed for (Re)Listing in Privacy Directories

    The debate is now settled; those arguing in favour of listing Startpage as privacy-respecting are in fact secretly 'compensated' by Startpage (in other words, they're Startpage 'shills')



  14. Vandana Shiva: “Bill Gates is Continuing the Work of Monsanto”

    A recent interview on what Bill Gates is really up to in that sham ‘charity’ of his



  15. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, January 22, 2020

    IRC logs for Wednesday, January 22, 2020



  16. Extending Linux With DRM, Azure and exFAT

    An insufficiently 'conservative' Linux ceases to be freedom-respecting



  17. Linux Foundation (LF) Now Dominated by Lots of Microsoft People and LF Chiefs Join Microsoft in Smearing GPL/Copyleft

    We continue to see additional evidence which serves towards reinforcing our view that the so-called 'Linux' Foundation is actually hostile towards many things that are associated with Linux (unlike those looking to exploit/hijack Linux for proprietary ends)



  18. Links 22/1/2020: Wayland 1.18 Alpha, ODF 1.3 Approved

    Links for the day



  19. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, January 21, 2020

    IRC logs for Tuesday, January 21, 2020



  20. Poor Excuses for Granting Poor (and Often Illegal/Invalid) Patents

    A quick look at some of the latest examples of software patents advocacy (not by actual software professionals, obviously) and why it's deeply misguided (or guided solely by greedy law firms)



  21. A Simple Plan For a Universal Free Software Community

    "For software to be free as in freedom, we need more people to care personally about software freedom."



  22. Links 21/1/2020: Wine 5.0 and Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Beta

    Links for the day



  23. Startpage/System1 Almost Definitely Pay for People to Lie About Their Surveillance

    A longterm investigation suggests that there are forces in the debate that aren't objective and are being super evasive and dodgy; this typically happens only when somebody has much to hide



  24. The Internet is an Appalling Medium for News and It Has Only Gotten Worse

    Something ought to change in the way people gather and assess news; at the moment — as proper journalism runs out of steam (and budget) — things only deteriorate and quality suffers; this rapidly exacerbates as people come to rely on — and then relay — hearsay, not fact-checked bodies of work



  25. Media Reactions to the EPO Coming to Grips With Fake Patents That It Granted (Spoiler: the Media is Controlled by Lawyers of Monopolists and EPO Partners)

    Appalling quality of reporting and truly awful bias in the media, primarily owing to the fact that it is dominated/manned not by actual reporters but the firms looking to patent life itself; they use their lawyers and operatives who are literally funded by these lawyers (wearing "journalist" badges to mislead)



  26. Links 21/1/2020: EarlyOOM Fedora Decision and AMD Zen 3 Microcode

    Links for the day



  27. IRC Proceedings: Monday, January 20, 2020

    IRC logs for Monday, January 20, 2020



  28. Links 20/1/2020: MNT Reform, Linux 5.5 RC7, KMyMoney 5.0.8

    Links for the day



  29. Mansion of Pedophilia – Addendum: Accessing and Assessing Court Documents

    How anyone out there can do the job the media failed to do (after an apparently unprecedented arrest at the home of Bill Gates)



  30. Mansion of Pedophilia – Addendum: Progress on Police Request

    9 updates from the police department of Seattle but still nothing material/concrete, only promises and major delays


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts