Bonum Certa Men Certa

Distortion of the Patent System Masked Behind Acronyms Like CAFC/PTAB and Foreign-Sounding Jargon Like Estoppel or Inter Partes Review (IPR)

It's no secret, some argue, that lawyers make it difficult to understand the law so that you'll always need them to 'help'

Estoppel
Reference: Estoppel at Wikipedia



Summary: A quick look at some recent decisions/developments from the higher/highest patent courts in the US and PTAB's judgments that help improve patent quality (and are therefore hated by the patent 'industry')

CAN one patent a GUI at the USPTO? The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) does not understand GUIs/software development [1, 2], so it recently defended a patent on a GUI, contrary to common sense. As somebody from Texas put it (Jonathan Szarzynski): "Nice Precedential win for Core Wireless at the CAFC. A precedential opinion that discusses 101 and eligibility, and finds that a user interface that speeds a user's navigation through various views and windows is patentable subject matter."

"The case involves Synopsys, which now owns the nefarious, Microsoft-connected Black Duck."This is a potentially dangerous decision. Cascading menus are nothing new and to uphold a patent on those would open the floodgates to all sorts of trivial lawsuits (like Apple's "slide to unlock").

Recently, CAFC also looked at the case of patent assignor Hsiun (mentioned here before). The case involves Synopsys, which now owns the nefarious, Microsoft-connected Black Duck. The case is about assignor estoppel and it was mentioned by Patently-O a few days ago. As a bit of background:

EVE-USA was founded by former employees of Mentor — the named inventors on Mentor’s emulation software patents. Initially Mentor licensed the patents to EVE for its use, but that license was terminated when Synopsys later acquired EVE. Mentor then sued Synopsys and won a $36 million jury verdict for infringement of its U.S. Patent No. 6,240,376. Following the Federal Circuit’s decision largely supporting the verdict, EVE/Synopsis have petitioned the Supreme Court for writ of certiorari asking two questions relating respectively to Assignor Estoppel and Apportionment of Damages.


The US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) will look into it. This means that briefs will likely be submitted by the patent microcosm and we know in whose favour. The patent microcosm generally wants patents to get more 'teeth' at SCOTUS. The other day it wrote about the WesternGeco case, arguing that "SCOTUS could make patents more valuable in WesternGeco case" (not about patent scope).

"The patent microcosm generally wants patents to get more 'teeth' at SCOTUS.""Can a patent holder collect lost-profit damages if infringement of a US patent occurs abroad? The US Supreme Court will decide in WesternGeco v Ion Geophysical," Managing IP wrote. This may have an impact on trade, e.g. with China.

Going back to CAFC, there's the Arthrex patent (8,821,541) which CAFC recently decided on. PTAB was supported by CAFC (as usual) and Dennis Crouch wrote about the estoppel (it's an edge case at CAFC). To quote:

The dispute in this case is about what should happen when a patentee disclaims its patent claims prior to an inter partes review institution decision. The Arthrex patent at issue is U.S. Patent No. 8,821,541 which covers a suture anchor — similar to a dry-wall anchor, but sticks into flesh.

After Smith & Nephew filed its IPR petition Arthrex disclaimed the challenged claims. PTO rules state that “No inter partes review will be instituted based on disclaimed claims.” 37 C.F.R. €§ 42.107(e). And, following the rule, the PTAB (acting pre-institution on in the shoes of the PTO director) terminated the petition without instituting the IPR.


Estoppel is becoming more of a 'thing' in relation to PTAB nowadays. Consider this post titled "The PTAB Estoppel Keeping Patent Prosecutors Awake at Night". Does the author, Scott McKeown, think that people who are bullied using patents don't lose sleep or stay awake at night? Anyway, here is what he said: "Patent prosecutors might consider PTAB estoppel a pure post-grant concern. That is, a litigation issue restricted to district courts after a failed PTAB challenge, or an issue raised in the context of a second-bite at the PTAB apple. But, PTAB estoppel can effect both failed petitioners and unsuccessful patent owners. Patent owner estoppel, often overlooked, is only now beginning to impact patent prosecution."

It's a fairly new thing in this context. Expect this to be increasingly used to defang PTAB petitions.

Dennis Crouch has just mentioned bizarre if not laughable patents that PTAB belatedly tossed out:

Ex Parte Barrego, APPEAL 2016-006527 (PTAB January 2018). Barrego’s claim is directed to a roofing underlay with a number of features including “a pattern having the appearance of a shingled roof printed on at least one surface of the underlayment.” Here, the PTAB affirmed the indefiniteness rejection — finding that “one of ordinary skill would [not] be able to determine definitely whether many particular underlayment patterns do or do not have the appearance of a shingled roof.”


"Unfortunately, the patent microcosm relies on legalese to keep technical people out of the discussion, thus uninvolved or apathetic."This is actually a good thing, but not for the patent microcosm. Watchtroll just continues its ritualistic attacks on the integrity of PTAB (in order to help patent trolls) and although it habitually publishes something worth reading (e.g. [1, 2]) the site is polluted with ads, press releases and even pure puff pieces (like this borderline marketing from Dan Ovanezian and Scott Breining); no depth, classic fluff. We have chosen to keep an eye on Watchtroll (especially because of its attacks on PTAB and CAFC judges), but we prefer not to entertain it too much.

Unfortunately, the patent microcosm relies on legalese to keep technical people out of the discussion, thus uninvolved or apathetic. This is a problem we have been mentioning for years. Sadly, we need to adopt some of their own (often misleading) terms. It has become essential for communication.

Recent Techrights' Posts

More Information About Public Talks That Richard Stallman Gave This Week in Europe
Two talks in Switzerland
SoylentNews Grows Up, Registers as a Business, Site Traffic Reportedly Grows
More people realise that social control media may in fact be a passing fad
 
Links 29/03/2024: Fentanylware (TikTok) Fines and UK High Court Makes It Seem OK to Assassinate People Wrongly (Falsely) Associated With "Russia"
Links for the day
Garden Season Starts Today
Outdoor time, officially...
Engadget is Still a Spamfarm, It's Just an Amazon Catalogue (SPAM/SEO), a Sea of Junk Disguised as "Articles" With Few 'Fillers' (Real Articles) in Between
Engadget writes for bots now, not for humans
Richard Stallman's Talks in Switzerland This Week
We need to put an end to 'cancer culture'; it's trying to kill people and it is even swatting people
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, March 28, 2024
IRC logs for Thursday, March 28, 2024
[Meme] EPO's New Ways of Working (NWoW), a.k.a. You Don't Even Get a Desk at Work and Cannot be Near Known Colleagues
Seems more like union-busting (divide and rule)
Hiding Microsoft's Culpability in Security Breaches and Other Major Blunders (in the United Kingdom, This May Mean You Can't Get Food)
Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) is vast
Giving back to the community
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
Links 28/03/2024: Sega, Nintendo, and Bell Layoffs
Links for the day
Open letter to the ACM regarding Codes of Conduct impersonating the Code of Ethics
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
With 9 Mentions of Azure In Its Latest Blog Post, Canonical is Again Promoting Microsoft and Intel Vendor Lock-in, Surveillance, Back Doors, Considerable Power Waste, and Defects That Cannot be Fixed
Microsoft did not even have to buy Canonical (for Canonical to act like it happened)
Links 28/03/2024: GAFAM Replacing Full-Time Workers With Interns Now
Links for the day
Consent & Debian's illegitimate constitution
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
The Time Our Server Host Died in a Car Accident
If Debian has internal problems, then they need to be illuminated and then tackled, at the very least in order to ensure we do not end up with "Deadian"
China's New 'IT' Rules Are a Massive Headache for Microsoft
On the issue of China we're neutral except when it comes to human rights issues
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, March 27, 2024
IRC logs for Wednesday, March 27, 2024
WeMakeFedora.org: harassment decision, victory for volunteers and Fedora Foundations
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
Links 27/03/2024: Terrorism Grows in Africa, Unemployment in Finland Rose Sharply in a Year, Chinese Aggression Escalates
Links for the day
Links 27/03/2024: Ericsson and Tencent Layoffs
Links for the day
Amid Online Reports of XBox Sales Collapsing, Mass Layoffs in More Teams, and Windows Making Things Worse (Admission of Losses, Rumours About XBox Canceled as a Hardware Unit)...
Windows has loads of issues, also as a gaming platform
Links 27/03/2024: BBC Resorts to CG Cruft, Akamai Blocking Blunders in Piracy Shield
Links for the day
Android Approaches 90% of the Operating Systems Market in Chad (Windows Down From 99.5% 15 Years Ago to Just 2.5% Right Now)
Windows is down to about 2% on the Web-connected client side as measured by statCounter
Sainsbury's: Let Them Eat Yoghurts (and Microsoft Downtimes When They Need Proper Food)
a social control media 'scandal' this week
IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, March 26, 2024
IRC logs for Tuesday, March 26, 2024
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
Windows/Client at Microsoft Falling Sharply (Well Over 10% Decline Every Quarter), So For His Next Trick the Ponzi in Chief Merges Units, Spices Everything Up With "AI"
Hiding the steep decline of Windows/Client at Microsoft?
Free technology in housing and construction
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
We Need Open Standards With Free Software Implementations, Not "Interoperability" Alone
Sadly we're confronting misguided managers and a bunch of clowns trying to herd us all - sometimes without consent - into "clown computing"
Microsoft's Collapse in the Web Server Space Continued This Month
Microsoft is the "2%", just like Windows in some countries