READERS ought to remember that the campaign to oust Dr. Richard Stallman (first from MIT, then FSF; they tried GNU also) happened at a critical and meaningful time (a few days after 9/11, which is perhaps why some people call the event or the whole episode "Free software 9/11"). As we noted several times before, it happened not too long after media had picked up the scent of Gates connections to Epstein in relation to MIT -- a connection confirmed by the very top officials/key people at MIT. The request for police records connected to arrest for pedophilia (Bill Gates' employee at his home) was made one day before the media started attacking Richard Stallman. We aren't saying it's 'proof' of a cover-up or diversion attempt; but it's a possibility. No doubt as soon as the media made the MIT scandals all about Stallman nobody really paid attention to Gates anymore. Only a month or so later when the New York Times published this piece entitled "Bill Gates Met With Jeffrey Epstein Many Times, Despite His Past" the former (and original) subject came back to life. But it was published on a weekend, lowering the impact at the time. Days before the media campaign to oust Stallman I had warned him (by E-mail) that there was an attempt brewing to apparently shift focus from a Gates scandal... to him. He sort of belittled my warning but acknowledged that Gates had more connections and power (over the media) than him.

"No doubt as soon as the media made the MIT scandals all about Stallman nobody really paid attention to Gates anymore."The subject keeps coming up again and again in Techrights; the 'book' -- so to speak -- isn't closed. In fact, we're now speaking to someone who may be writing a book on this subject. With the police becoming more cooperative there may be a lot of new material to cover. There's also a UPC book on the way; we were invited to compose parts of it. If something materialises, we'll publish an update. ⬆