05.15.21

Gemini version available ♊︎

The EPO’s War on Justice and Assault on the Law — Part 8: The Radical Student “Brotherhood”

Posted in Europe, Law, Patents at 11:14 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Previously in this series:

Per Wirtén, Andreas Miller and Alf Håkan Bengtsson
Per Wirtén, Andreas Miller and Alf Håkan Bengtsson – what would these former student radicals make of Josefsson’s abandonment of the libertarian left-wing principles that he once claimed to espouse?

Summary: The latest part in this series explores the roots of Judge Josefsson; that can help explain how Benoît Battistelli constructed his stacked EPO ‘court’, which he and António Campinos basically control to rubber-stamp whatever illegal practices they engage in (in pursuit of money and power, at the expense of the law)

During his student days in Sweden, Carl Josefsson was associated with a group of left-wing libertarian “intellectuals” including Per Wirtén, Andreas Miller and Alf Håkan Bengtsson.

Wirtén, Bengtsson and Miller – subsequently pursued relatively prominent careers in journalism. Miller is now the chairman of Ledarna, which is an idiosyncratically Swedish institution: a trade union for managers!

“Miller is now the chairman of Ledarna, which is an idiosyncratically Swedish institution: a trade union for managers!”According to Swedish sources, the members of this group, including Josefsson – were affiliated to the “Social Democrats for Faith and Solidarity”, a branch of the Swedish Social Democratic Party with a distinctly religious tinge of Lutheranism, and more commonly known as “Broderskapsrörelsen” (“Brotherhood Movement”).

Josefsson’s closest “brother” in this group was Per Wirtén.

“Josefsson’s closest “brother” in this group was Per Wirtén.”Wirtén’s journalistic career began as the editor of a pro-Palestinian student newsletter “Palestinian Front”. In the late 1980s, together with Josefsson, he started a radical youth magazine called “800 degrees”, which was published under the sponsorship of the “Brotherhood Movement”. The magazine’s title came from a protest song by the Swedish punk band Ebba Grön.

Later on, one evening in the early 1990s, Wirtén and Josefsson met with Andreas Miller in Stockholm’s famous Café Opera and the trio started talking about setting up a new progressive magazine.

At a second meeting which took place in the Pelikan Restaurant in the Södermalm district of Stockholm, Alf Håkan Bengtsson was also invited to attend.

Café Opera and the Pelikan Restaurant in Stockholm
Café Opera and the Pelikan Restaurant in Stockholm – favourite haunts of Josefsson and his student friends.

These discussions ultimately led to the setting-up of a new magazine containing reports, interviews and essays on politics and culture from a libertarian left-wing perspective.

The magazine first appeared in 1993 under the name “Politikens, kulturens & idéernas arena”. In 2003 the name was shortened to “Arena” and in 2017 the magazine switched to online-only format.

“Arena” is published by Arenagruppen, a non-profit association which describes itself as “the leading progressive platform for public debates in Sweden”. Arenagruppen operates as a non-partisan left-wing think-tank, publisher and interface for various political, civil, academic and trade unionist actors. The CEO of Arenagruppen is one of the founders of the Arena magazine, Alf Håkan Bengtsson.

“The CEO of Arenagruppen is one of the founders of the Arena magazine, Alf Håkan Bengtsson.”According to its website, Arenagruppen aims “to promote a public debate characterized by breadth and diversity”:

“We strive for different voices to be heard. Conversation, dialogue and mutual respect are the basis of a viable democracy. We have a strong belief in the possibilities of democracy. Democracy is a way of making decisions about our common affairs but also an ideal. Hierarchical and authoritarian ideas are in opposition to our view of democracy. Structures and values ​​that hinder the free development of human beings should be criticized.”

Per Wirtén was editor-in-chief of the “Arena” magazine until 2010. Since then he has operated as a freelance journalist and author, amongst other things writing for the Swedish daily newspapers Expressen, Sydsvenskan, and the website DagensArena.

“In 2017 Eva Wirtén was awarded an Advanced Investigator Grant from The European Research Council for the project ‘Patents as Scientific Information, 1895-2020 (PASSIM).”In his personal blog, Wirtén has occasionally given a plug to articles by Carl Josefsson to whom he refers as “my old buddy” (“min gamla kompis”).

For example, in 2014, Wirtén praised a piece by Josefsson which had appeared in the Svenska Dagbladet:

“His article is about the difficult relationship between legal interpretation and democracy. […] Calle [Josefsson] lays it out clearly. The law can not be legitimized by any natural rights but only through democratic discussions and decision-making processes. The rule of law and self-determination are the two fundamental foundations of democracy and cannot be separated.”

In 2015, under the heading “Lawyers seize power” Wirtén plugged another article by Josefsson which had been published in the Svensk Juristtidning.

“We cannot stand idly by in the face of the lawyers’ claims to power. It is time to wake up. We need to learn more about the relationship between democracy and law. […] We can start by reading an article in Svensk Juristtidning (1/2015) in which Carl Josefsson writes both educationally and polemically. Almost 25 years ago, he was one of the initiators of the Arena magazine and is now a member of the Court of Appeal. […] Josefsson refers to the German legal philosopher Jürgen Habermas, who argues that the role of the courts is not to guard the boundaries of politics (the liberal tradition) but to enable democracy by broadening its conditions. […]

Law is thus not above democracy, but should be immersed in the cascades of debate, quarrel and chatter that we perceive as the lifeblood of democracy.”

“They sound like the kind of people who might be interested in the governance of international IP offices.”Per Wirtén’s wife, Eva Hemmungs Wirtén, is Professor of Mediated Culture at Linköping University, Sweden. She describes herself as “an interdisciplinary scholar with a broad set of research interests, ranging from book history to the history of information and patents” and has authored a number of books on intellectual property topics, including a history of intellectual property rights [sic] and regulations entitled “No Trespassing: Authorship, Intellectual Property Rights, and the Boundaries of Globalization” (2004).

“No Trespassing” surveys the landscape of IP law in general, and copyright law in particular, and investigates how IP law has become the handmaiden of a greedy and rapacious transnational capitalism.

Carl Josefsson gets a mention in the preface to “No Trespassing” as one of “those persons who have carefully read and commented on the manuscript in its various stages of completion”.

In 2017 Eva Wirtén was awarded an Advanced Investigator Grant from The European Research Council for the project ‘Patents as Scientific Information, 1895-2020 (PASSIM).

She is a frequent contributor to academic journals and some of her publications can be found on ResearchGate.

In “How Patents Became Documents, or Dreaming of Technoscientific Order” (2019; local copy [PDF]) she makes the following critical observations about the international patent system:

“Indeed, one wonders whether Eva Wirtén has ever broached the topic with her husband’s old buddy, “Calle” Josefsson.”“Perhaps more so than any other intellectual property, patents have come to epitomize an intellectual property regime gone berserk. Given controversies surrounding the relative success or failure of the current intellectual property regime, for many patents now symbolize the dark underbelly of an ongoing and dangerous commodification of knowledge in research and science …”.

In “Out of Sight and Out of Mind” (2020; local copy [PDF]) she presents a critique of “the cultural hegemony of intellectual property”. Referring to the “[t]he hair-raising absurdities of an ever-expanding intellectual property regime … [that] appear to have no boundaries, moral or otherwise” she explains how intellectual property rights [sic] “within the larger context of globalization … produce a very specific, unequal ordering of the global cultural and political economy”.

Eva Wirtén is an executive director of the International Society for the History and Theory of Intellectual Property (ISHTIP). ISHTIP is an academic group which “promotes and supports scholarly investigation of the national histories of patent, copyright, and “related” rights; the diverse “roads not taken” in the evolution of these legal structures; contemporary countertrends; and the laws and norms that have been devised in non European cultures around the world to manage intellectual production and exchange”.

“On the contrary, the only things Josefsson seems to be concerned about these days are production figures and “timeliness”.”According to its website, ISHTIP “works to promote, coordinate, and disseminate critical inquiry into IP”, and its aims are “to re-frame – to broaden and deepen – current IP debate”.

They sound like the kind of people who might be interested in the governance of international IP offices. Indeed, one wonders whether Eva Wirtén has ever broached the topic with her husband’s old buddy, “Calle” Josefsson.

That seems like a rather remote possibility because Josefsson himself seems to have decisively cast off the outer veneer of radicalism and “social democracy” which he cultivated in his student days.

Since he took over the helm at the Boards of Appeal there hasn’t been much sign of “the cascades of debate, quarrel and chatter that we perceive as the lifeblood of democracy”.

“One is left to wonder what his former “brothers” – Per Wirtén, Andreas Miller and Alf Håkan Bengtsson – would make of “Calle” and his abandonment of the libertarian left-wing principles that he once claimed to espouse?”On the contrary, the only things Josefsson seems to be concerned about these days are production figures and “timeliness”.

One is left to wonder what his former “brothers” – Per Wirtén, Andreas Miller and Alf Håkan Bengtsson – would make of “Calle” and his abandonment of the libertarian left-wing principles that he once claimed to espouse?

In the next part we will take a closer look at how “social democracy” has fared at the EPO’s Boards of Appeal since Josefsson took up his position in Haar in March 2017.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. Links 16/05/2022: FreeBSD 13.1 and Inkscape 1.2 Released

    Links for the day



  2. Archiving Latest Posts in Geminispace (Like a Dated Web Directory But for Gemini)

    Earlier today we saw several more people crossing over from the World Wide Web to Gemini; we're trying to make a decent aggregator and archive for the rapidly-expanding Geminispace, which will soon have 2,500 capsules that are known to Lupa alone



  3. Microsoft Vidal Does Not Want to Listen (USPTO is Just for Megacorporations)

    Microsoft Vidal knows her real bosses. They’re international corporations (multinationals like Microsoft), not American people.



  4. Links 16/05/2022: China Advances on GNU/Linux and Maui 2.1.2 is Out

    Links for the day



  5. Jim Zemlin: Chief Revenue Officer in 'Linux' Seat-Selling Foundation

    Board seats in the Linux Foundation are basically a product on sale, based internal documents



  6. Reminder: Linux Foundation's Last IRS Filing is Very Old (Same Year the CFO Left)

    People really need to ask the Linux Foundation, directly, why its filings are years behind; this seems like a sensitive subject



  7. Linux Foundation Does Not Speak for GNU/Linux Users

    There's a serious problem in the "Linux" world as the so-called 'Linux' Foundation claims to speak for us (the GNU/Linux community) while in fact speaking against us (on the payroll of those looking to extinguish us)



  8. IBM's Lennart Poettering on Breaking Software for Pseudo Novelty

    Recently-uploaded ELCE 2011 clip shows a panel with Linus Torvalds, Alan Cox, Thomas Gleixner, Paul McKenney, and Lennart Poettering (relevant to novelty or perceived novelty that mostly degrades the experience of longtime users, e.g. Wayland and systemd)



  9. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, May 15, 2022

    IRC logs for Sunday, May 15, 2022



  10. Links 15/05/2022: Linux 5.18 RC7 and Calls for More Mass Surveillance

    Links for the day



  11. Audio: Mark Shuttleworth Marketed to Young Males, With Sexy Pictures

    The Web is rotting away, old links become broken links within months or years, so I’ve decided to encode a 3-minute segment of the whole as Ogg



  12. What a Difference Half a Decade Makes (When Linux Foundation is 'Having Fun')

    Media shaming campaigns may have taken their toll on the founder of Linux, who is now bossed by someone who rejects Linux and is married to a Microsoft booster. Like Richard Stallman under FSF guidance (and conditions for return, mostly for fear of further media assaults and attack dogs), he has become a more publicity-shy and private person. The Linux Foundation has in effect reduced the founder of what it’s called after (Linux) into a weekly release manager and mascot, whose brand it is gradually diluting/cheapening.



  13. Links 15/05/2022: GNU libiconv 1.17

    Links for the day



  14. [Meme] Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court (UPC) Cannot Be Reconciled With the Law

    Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court (UPC)? Impossible. But Team UPC counts on an endless torrent of fake news managing to convince you (and more importantly politicians) otherwise.



  15. Even Team Battistelli is Sometimes Admitting -- Out in Public! -- That Unified Patent Court (UPC) is Neither Legal Nor Desirable

    Daniel X. Thomas and other people who are “too old to punish” (consequences to their career profoundly minimised owing to seniority) are among those who push back against the Unitary Patent or Unified Patent Court (UPC); any sane person — not a career-climbing litigation zealot — can identify the pertinent facts and realise that what’s going on here is an injustice of unprecedented proportions in the patent discipline



  16. [Meme] Common Sense at EPO

    The European examiners who deal with patents prefer a system that works for science, for Europe, not for foreign megacorporations that amass millions of low-quality patents and weaponise these to discourage competition



  17. Patent Granting at the EPO Has Collapsed by 24% Owing to Much-Needed Industrial Action

    Seeing that the EPO’s management routinely violates the law and even the very legal basis of the EPO’s existence (it is a monopoly in Europe; no body has the authority to compete against it), the EPO’s examiners have embarked on a ‘Work-to-Rule’ campaign — working in compliance with the rules as defined 49 years ago and revised over the decades — and the European Patent Convention (EPC) takes priority over unlawful demands from middle and upper management; this is proving highly effective so far and it will carry on until demands are met, i.e. until the law is obeyed and staff is treated with respect/dignity



  18. [Meme] Milan is a Suburb in London

    As long as Italy is not the UK and London means London “proper” (not the French town called London) the UPCA is invalid and no matter how much Team UPC (and its puppets in EPO management) may plead, this whole system is bound to implode



  19. The Latest Propaganda Tactics of Team UPC: Pretending Unified Patent Court Already Exists and Unitary Patents Are Default When If Fact None Even Exists

    8 years ago Benoît Battistelli said that the UPC was imminent; now, after 4 years of António Campinos, it’s still not here and Team UPC speculators say it won’t happen this year, either; just like the EPO constantly lies (both to the public and to its very own staff) Team UPC continues to lie to itself (self-delusion) and to us; both also routinely break the law, engage in deliberate violations of longstanding conventions, and scrap constitutions, which in turn becomes a breaking point for the EU’s credibility and the legal profession



  20. Links 15/05/2022: More Azure Shutdowns and Windows Security Blunders Aplenty

    Links for the day



  21. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, May 14, 2022

    IRC logs for Saturday, May 14, 2022



  22. Links 15/05/2022: Pika Backup 0.4

    Links for the day



  23. Changes in the Site and the Capsule

    A 10-minute explanation of what we've been up to lately and what's changing; hopefully I'll have a lot more free time in months to come and we'll be able to produce about a dozen posts per day



  24. Links 14/05/2022: Alt Linux 10.0 Released

    Links for the day



  25. Links 14/05/2022: Builder GTK 4 Porting and Raspberry Pi Matrix Dashboard

    Links for the day



  26. Elon Musk is Right About Twitter Faking Its Importance and Using Doctored, Manipulated 'Stats' (or Bots) to Boost Valuation Based on Lies

    Today’s empirical proof that Twitter is totally faking its relevance and reach/influence, based on “Analytics” of my long-inactive account; the SEC will once again — quite likely as usual — let Musk get away with it, killing a company for personal gain as a temporary shareholder who amassed a ton of free publicity (he paid nothing at all and sent the company into a death spiral, pretty much in the same way Microsoft and Icahn did Yahoo! or Microsoft and Elop did Nokia)



  27. Who Brings Home the Bacon (Revenue), Sheela or James (Jim)?

    Sheela (yes, wife of the nontechnical Linux Foundation chief, who equates Microsoft critics with people who kick puppies) has a history working with several companies that are closely connected to Microsoft (not just Bakkt); can that be reconciled as not a conflict of interest?



  28. The 'Original' Linus Torvalds on Self-Hosting

    The fast-aging founder of Linux spoke as shown above (2005); so much has changed since then…



  29. IRC Proceedings: Friday, May 13, 2022

    IRC logs for Friday, May 13, 2022



  30. Links 13/05/2022: NetworkManager 1.38 and Pseudo-Security

    Links for the day


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts