12.12.21
Posted in Europe, Law, Patents at 6:51 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz
Video download link | md5sum 600ddae90b6814d6078b98ec29373613
Summary: Susanne Sivborg has made the false assumption that regulations for strikes are needed; However, Sivborg was no fan of Team Battistelli and she only abstained when she voted on the illegal “Strike Regulations” 8.5 years ago
THE REGIME at EPOnia is desperate to hide the degree of abuse and corruption. It’s therefore making it very hard for staff to unionise or to exercise rights of unions (no, the yellow union tactics haven’t worked); failing that, it resorts to outright illegal measures.
“There’s no need to regulate them and it’s a misguided assumption which ought to be rejected.”Speaking for myself, as a person who on numerous occasions over the years confronted employers (at great personal risk), I totally understand why EPO staff wants to strike and needs to occasionally go on strike. The worst situation is, managers of companies start to feel invincible and wrongly assume that staff will follow instructions uncritically, unquestionably, irrespective of morality, ethics etc.
The bosses of the EPO ought not be a bunch of politicians and crooked/failed diplomats. Scientists ought to be in charge of an inherently technical institution.
It’s a bit sad if national delegates, including some who themselves used to be patent examiners (not only Susanne Sivborg but also Bruno Cinquantini), fail to grasp the importance of protest rights, which can escalate/turn into strikes. There’s no need to regulate them and it’s a misguided assumption which ought to be rejected. I myself went on a half-day strike last month and also confronted bosses on a number of issues in recent years, even weeks ago. Workers who just blindly “follow orders” aren’t good workers; they’re just convenient (to those in power). In the realm of science, opinionated and outspoken critics are necessary for true scientific debates, challenging injustices, false orthodoxies, and constantly challenging decisions that are indefensible. That’s why ILO-AT will continue to receive many appeals, which it’s unable to fulfill within a reasonable amount of time. The EPO is already collapsing across a number of dimensions (like scabs), but publishers are bribed by EPO management to pretend everything is OK.
On a technical note, now that there’s a very high-profile security bug we should mention that the EPO’s Web site, which is already poorly maintained, is at risk; you can in theory make the site go crazy (internal server errors) by crafting particular requests (not that we would do it). We’ll spare the technical, pertinent details to avoid potential sabotage (I’ve not tried this personally), but let’s just say that the EPO’s brain drain affects not only patent examination. We have been saying for many years already that their IT department lacks talent and it’s getting worse over time. This is how institutions perish. They lose the very people who make up those institutions. It typically starts with bad leadership, which repels, expels, or unwittingly drives out the most talented workers. █
Permalink
Send this to a friend
Posted in Europe, Patents at 6:31 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz
Series parts:
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part I: Let the Sunshine In!
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part II: A “Unanimous” Endorsement?
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part III: Three Missing Votes
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part IV: The Founding States
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part V: Germany Says “Ja”
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part VI: A Distinct Lack of Dutch Courage
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part VII: Luxembourgish Laxity
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part VIII: Perfidious Albion and Pusillanimous Hibernia
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part IX: More Holes Than Swiss Cheese
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part X: Introducing the Controversial Christian Bock
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XI: “General Bock” – Battistelli’s Swiss Apprentice?
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XII: The French Connection
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XIII: Battistelli’s Iberian Facilitators – Spain
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XIV: Battistelli’s Iberian Facilitators – Portugal
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XV: Et Tu Felix Austria…
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XVI: The Demise of the Austrian Double-Dipper
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XVII: The Non-Monolithic Nordic Bloc
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XVIII: Helsinki’s Accord
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part IXX: The Baltic States
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XX: The Visegrád Group
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXI: The Balkan League – The Doyen and His “Protégée”
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXII: The Balkan League – North Macedonia and Albania
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXIII: The Balkan League – Bulgaria
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXIV: The Balkan League – Romania
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXV: The Balkan League – Fresh Blood or Same Old, Same Old?
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXVI: A Trojan Horse on the Budget and Finance Committee
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXVII: Cypriot Complicity
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXVIII: Benoît and António’s Loyal “Habibi”
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part IXXX: The EPOnian Micro-States – Monaco and Malta
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXX: San Marino and the Perfidious Betrayal of Liberty
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXXI: The Abstentionists
- The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXXII: “Plucky Little Belgium”?
- YOU ARE HERE ☞ Swedish Scepticism

Head of the Swedish EPO delegation, Susanne Ås Sivborg. [PDF]
Summary: Benoît Battistelli‘s unlawful “Strike Regulations” did not receive Sweden’s blessing
Like the Belgians, the Swedish delegation also abstained from voting in favour of Battistelli’s “Strike Regulations” in June 2013.
At the time in question, the Swedish delegation was headed by Susanne Ås Sivborg, Director General of the Swedish Patent and Registration Office (PRV).
Sivborg graduated from the Swedish Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) with a degree in civil engineering in 1983.
“In 2009/2010 Sivborg was candidate for the position of President of the European Patent Office…”Between September 1985 and March 1991 she worked as an examiner at the EPO in Munich. She then returned to Sweden where she worked in the private sector with various companies such as AstraZeneca and Electrolux before taking over as head of the PRV in September 2008.
In 2009/2010 Sivborg was candidate for the position of President of the European Patent Office, but she was outmanoeuvred by the alpha-male Battistelli and his Danish accomplice Jesper Kongstad.
During her time on the EPO’s Administrative Council, Sivborg crossed swords with Team Battistelli on a number of occasions and she deplored the deterioration of the social climate at the institution where she had started her career.
“During her time on the EPO’s Administrative Council, Sivborg crossed swords with Team Battistelli on a number of occasions and she deplored the deterioration of the social climate at the institution where she had started her career.”Nevertheless, for the most part Sivborg stopped well short of any outspoken condemnation of Battistelli’s maladministration.
As can be seen from the minutes of the 136th meeting [PDF]
of the EPO’s Administrative Council, Sivborg’s criticism of the proposed “Strike Regulations” was very muted indeed.
The Swedish position is minuted under point no. 114 as follows:
“The Swedish delegation referred to its comments on CA/56/13. It was the Council’s duty and responsibility to ensure a balance between management and staff and an efficient and good functioning of the Organisation. The Council also had to ensure that the Organisation fulfilled international conventions, such as the Human Rights Convention. It, too, had been astonished to find that the Office had no legal framework in relation to strikes yet. The Office’s proposal included several good and necessary amendments to the Service Regulations. There were some problems with the detailed wording.”
The impression given here is that the only problems that the Swedish delegation saw with the proposal were some minor issues related to the “detailed wording”.
“…at least Susanne Sivborg had the good grace not to cast a vote in favour of such a manifestly flawed proposal.”That falls well short of what one could reasonably expect from the representative of a country like Sweden, which is highly-developed and has a strong democratic tradition.
But at least Susanne Sivborg had the good grace not to cast a vote in favour of such a manifestly flawed proposal.
In the next part we shall turn our attention to the delegation representing Sweden’s Scandinavian neighbour, Norway. █
Permalink
Send this to a friend
Posted in Site News at 6:02 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz
Video download link | md5sum 49ffae346384c0dc5ff427fdd28ccdf0
Summary: We’ve reached out to ask people who had experience with doctors that label people autistic; here’s what we learned and here’s what an EPO publication says
THIS post concerns a very sensitive subject, so I’ve decided to do this in the form of a video (harder to take out of context) and quote somebody from IRC. It’s a subject which affects him personally.
“Diagnosing a mental patient is such a, well, almost pseudo-science that the doctors frequently don’t agree with each other,” said the person. “But it seems to be trendy to sort of “identify” as autistic now. Even if that’s not the case. Seems like they don’t want to be labeled mentally ill now because that implies disability, and it very well can be one.”
To avoid taking this out of context, please see prior articles we wrote about this, including guest posts by people with autism, e.g.: (there’s lots more)
“Unfortunately,” the person told us, “in today’s employment marketplace, there’s usually more candidates than openings, and if you can turn yourself into a diversity quota filler instead of a potential problem, that’s a nice rebranding. People with autism disorder (which a psychiatrist said he suspected of me at one point), I think, just need to be approached differently. What you get are people who are incredibly good at like one thing or two at the expense of all else. [Richard] Stallman might be a good example of that. He’s brilliant on the subject of computers and the software that runs them, but the guy is a slob that presents in a socially unacceptable manner that I can see would be off-putting to many people.
“Humorously, you see this going on with a lot of psychiatrists too. When I was in an inpatient psychiatric facility for a couple of weeks decades ago, mom came in and pointed to a man shuffling around in a cheap, dated, worn-out suit who didn’t seem to be all there. She said, “Look at that poor man. I wonder if he’ll ever be okay.” I said, “That’s one of the doctors.”. They diagnosed me (that time) with a borderline personality type and implied that being “homosexual” was a mental illness. Like, I remember them specifically asking if I was attracted to men. And I didn’t like how the question sounded, so I said “No, eww.” because I realized there’d probably be some punishment if I said yes. In my patient file, they noted “Patient agrees that he is a normal heterosexual male.”.
He is openly gay, but “homosexual” was seen by the doctors as an abnormality. This is in the United States. “For context, too,” he added, “this happened in 2001 even though the DSM delisted homosexuality as a mental illness in the US in 1977, if I recall correctly. Psychiatry isn’t just borderline pseudo-science, it’s also heavily politicized. Not just in the US. It gets used to discredit people. The whole reason why many people with mental illness are resentful of the whole practice is because it gets used as a weapon against them. No other field of medicine, except maybe the Coronavirus vaccine, operates this way. When they’re taking you in there and holding you down and saying the state commands you to take something you don’t want? Bitter spouses who are suing for child custody? “He’s mentally ill. I have all his files.” Having a bad day? Your psychiatrist might have to report it to the government and then you lose your Second Amendment rights. Antipsychotic drugs are also getting a relabeling as “mood stabilizers”. Honestly, people like me need them. It’s hardly perfect, but it’s what we have. So you guys get to spend a little time in our world. But I see them whacking up kids on major antipsychotics because they had mild seasonal depression or something. It’s like “going after a fly with a nuclear warhead” type stuff. It’s sick. They did this with Ritalin when I was a child. To me, even. Ritalin is like, the opposite of an antipsychotic. So when it caused me to behave even more strangely, they punished me more. It goes back and forth every time you see a doctor throughout your life, almost, unless you tell them what the last one said. Starting from scratch, you’ll be diagnosed with a new thing about every 10 years. They’ve hit me with ADHD, borderline personality type, major depression, social anxiety disorder, bipolar II, and bipolar I. In that order. And the drugs for each one of those can seriously mess you up if they diagnose you incorrectly.”
“They prescribed all kinds of shit,” he told, “including off-label Neurontin (Gabapentin) which there was later a major lawsuit over that the drug company was openly bribing corrupt psychiatrists to do. Big lawsuit, big settlement. I tried all sorts of ways to protest my stay there, including not eating, not taking my meds. Finally I pretended to take them and spit them out when I got back into my room, and they agreed that I was “compliant” and let me go. The court ordered me to continue taking the Neurontin, so I filled it and dumped it in the trash.”
Here is what the new publication (from the video above) says:

06.12.2021
su21013mp – 0.2.1/4.4
Patent Examination: A job for autistic people?
Building a more diverse and inclusive workplace has become a higher priority among large companies willing to reshape their workforce. For the EPO, D&I has also become a convenient white-washing communication exercise for an organization which has breached fundamental rights. Last week, in a newsletter1 sent to DG1 staff, management tackled the topic of neurodiversity and autism. This paper provides some comments.
DG1 D&I newsletter
In a mass-email sent to the DG1 sectors ICT and M&M, the Chief Operating Officer invited staff to take knowledge of the DG1 D&I Newsletter Issue of November 2021. This latest issue tackles the topic of neurodiversity. Neurodiversity refers to variation in the human brain regarding sociability, learning, attention, mood and other mental functions in a non-pathological sense. The word neurodiversity is attributed to Judy Singer, a social scientist who has described herself as “likely somewhere on the autistic spectrum”2.
On page 3 of the newsletter, the reader can find this:

This passage suggests that the integration of autistic people into the workforce is perceived as essentially beneficial for productivity purposes without taking into account whether it is beneficial for the person itself and how the person feels about it in the long-term.
Which requirements for autistic people?
An estimated 60–80% of autistic people have motor signs that include poor muscle tone and poor motor planning3. It is questionable whether an autistic person benefits from a purely static computer work often causing Repetitive Strain Injury (RSI).
Autistic people can be characterised as having persistent deficits in social communication and interaction across multiple contexts4. It is questionable whether an autistic individual benefits from HR policies which aim at putting staff out of their comfort zone, constant changes in procedures and daily IT outage.
________
1 DG1 D&I Newsletter Issue November 2021
2 Neurodiversity: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neurodiversity
3 Autism – Other symptoms: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autism
4 Autism – Diagnosis: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autism
Autistic people have social impairments which make it difficult for them to have a relationship and build a family5. It is questionable whether an autistic person benefits from a lonely work which strongly reduces social contacts especially at a time when mandatory teleworking is the rule. Back in 2016, the press was already comparing teleworking with a hamster wheel6.
Conclusion
Consulting companies6 advise that the first step to build an inclusive workplace is to “Educate your leaders”. A DG1 newsletter fully taking into consideration the long-term requirements of autistic people would be a first step in the right direction.
SUEPO Munich
________
5 Autism – Social development: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autism
6 “Daheim im Hamsterrad” Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ), https://www.faz.net/aktuell/karriere-hochschule/buero-co/home-office-daheim-im-hamsterrad-14406049.html (01-09-2016)
7 “6 Steps for Building an Inclusive Workplace”, from the Society for Human Resource Management
(SHRM) (19-03-2018) https://www.shrm.org/hr-today/news/hr-magazine/0418/pages/6-steps-for-building-an-inclusive-workplace.aspx
Regarding the part which says “[a]n estimated 60–80% of autistic people have motor signs that include poor muscle tone and poor motor planning,” we’ve been told: “I agree with the last part, but not the part about poor muscle tone. Most autistic people are not violent or threatening, but there’s a sense of contemptuous disgust towards them, and so I’d say that if RMS [Richard Stallman] is autistic, then [Matthew Garret] is openly attacking a mentally disturbed person who can’t really help his behaviors. That is deplorable. RMS says some of the things he does because it just comes out unfiltered without any sense of concern about what a “reasonable” person reading it would think.
“HR policy of taking disciplinary action against people who troll employees with mental health issues would be helpful in combating that. Usually, the employers just don’t care that it happens because if there’s a hostile work environment, the victim is more likely to leave than sue, and if they sue, then they have a mountain to climb even if there are laws. Microsoft has a hostile work environment, has for decades, and imports more problems (Like the ones at Bungie and Bethesda and GitHub.). Abuse as motivation for the victim to work harder seems to be a goal sometimes too.”
We don’t know if the EPO actually bothered consulting people who are themselves affected. Instead, in the words of the union, “D&I has also become a convenient white-washing communication exercise for an organization which has breached fundamental rights.” Months ago they leveraged pinkwashing several times. Just shortly after the ILO-AT’s ruling on the "Strike Regulations", which will be the subject of the next 3 posts. █
Permalink
Send this to a friend