EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

07.04.19

Ethiopian Media Gamed by EPO Management, Just Like European Media

Posted in Africa, Deception, Europe, Patents at 9:57 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

The PR operations go unabated and stretch as far as Africa (and almost/partly a former colony of Portugal)

Portuguese Empire and Ethiopia

Summary: Independence of the press is nearly dead; moreover, the EPO’s longstanding habit of bribing and manipulating the media is no longer limited or confined because the sole goal is silencing their critics (by censorship, ‘googlebombing’, legal threats, and retaliatory tactics)

SO THEN… it’s Independence Day.

Independence cannot be overrated. But only if it’s real, not merely perceived (or some words in paper, maybe a press release from a lying department). Independence is a simple concept; without it, there’s a form of coercion or imperialism — two terms Ethiopians no doubt can grok (because of their history). Then there’s the EPO itself.

“Are the judges at the temporary location in Haar independent? Hell no!”Are the judges at the temporary location in Haar independent? Hell no! Some stuff may be “new”, but nothing about independence, which for over a year (under the ‘new’ management) the EPO failed to restore. Nevertheless, Kilburn & Strode LLP (large law firm that’s very close to the EPO) chose to write about “Boards of appeal new rules” (article just published by Gwilym Roberts and Jamie Atkins). It’s behind a paywall.

Let us keep you up to date.

But only if you pay for access. And even then it’s unlikely they’ll say anything about the loss of independence. Law firms almost never talk about it because when the boards are afraid of the Office they’re more likely to support patent maximalism. Obviously…

SUEPO has just belatedly cited “Lawyers urge EPO for quality as new plan branded propaganda” (some time yesterday in the afternoon). This article was mentioned in Techrights some days ago; we argued that judges, examiners, stakeholders (applicants, lawyers) and the public all accept that patent quality is declining. This, in turn, becomes a growing threat to Europe, but who’s going to stop it? The EPO is accountable to nobody. The Office is controlling the Council and the appeal boards — a complete reversal of what was intended by EPC authors. Moments ago the EPO wrote: “Our Boards of Appeal and key decisions conference is now fully booked…”

Some would argue that these decisions are null/void/invalid due to lack of independence. Caselaw ‘fixed’ by means of tacit intimidation?

“…judges, examiners, stakeholders (applicants, lawyers) and the public all accept that patent quality is declining. This, in turn, becomes a growing threat to Europe, but who’s going to stop it? The EPO is accountable to nobody.”Last night “The Convention watchdog” wrote this comment: “The provision of Art. 53a EPC is in no way special for the European patent System. It corresponds to Art. 4 quater of the Paris Convention and it is identical to Art. 27 (2) of the TRIPs Agreement. It is intended to cover situations in which inventions made in one country may be exploited only for export purposes.” (More context in the page/thread)

The EPC does not matter to the EPO; there’s a state of lawlessness which we last wrote about less than a day ago (EPC ‘hacked’). Based on this new press release, there are more genetic patents being granted at the European Patent Office (EPO), Can we already ask questions like, “when is breathing going to be patented“?

“The EPC does not matter to the EPO; there’s a state of lawlessness…”The media, which we still try to contact sometimes, still refuses to cover any of these issues. Its silence is a form of complicity. What does the media say about the EPO? It usually just copies what the EPO tells it to publish. It’s appalling. It’s not journalism and even weeks later we still see puff pieces about the media ‘festival’ of the EPO, naming António Campinos as though he’s a science expert (Battistelli was a judge there, awarding a Frenchman for European software patents).

Again we say, where on Earth are investigative journalists as opposed to PR puppets and think tanks? If they don’t actually analyse or fact-check anything, then they’re merely English writers who can rephrase press releases that are sent their way. They’re pawns of PR agencies if not PR agents themselves. It does more harm than good because they characterise themselves as “news”. That’s misleading.

“If they don’t actually analyse or fact-check anything, then they’re merely English writers who can rephrase press releases that are sent their way.”Addis Standard, which covered 'Teffgate' some months ago, has instead just become this megaphone of the EPO. Was it paid by the EPO’s PR firms? Is the EPO’s budget playing the media of Ethiopia (what’s left of it and in English) in order to bury a major patent scandal? Over the years we’ve shown several cases wherein the EPO passed money/gifts to large publishers. They don’t call it a bribe because they disguise the exchange of favours. It’s about this Ethiopian photo ops (published earlier this week) and it was further amplified by IPPro Magazine’s Rebecca Delaney, who wrote about/perpetuated EPO PR, not refuting any of it (the article’s titled is “EPO expands Australia PPH programme,” but much of it is about the other press release of the EPO). This is very much similar to what JUVE did earlier this week, with an article that’s about 80% just copy-pasting or parroting statements from Campinos and the EPO’s press office/press release. What happened to JUVE? And here’s some of the text from Delaney:

The European Patent Office (EPO) will extend its Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) pilot programme with IP Australia to increase the speed and efficiency…

[...]

António Campinos, president of the EPO, commented: “I am very pleased to launch this wide-reaching cooperation programme with Ethiopia, one of Africa’s most dynamic economies.”

A borderline Portuguese colony with one patent in 10 years (at the EPO at least)! Calling it a “dynamic economies” is one of these jargons of management, like calling the EPO “agile” and poor nations “developing”. Campinos is just flattering them after ‘Teffgate’ — a scandal that caused the government of a very poor nation to spend a lot of money in court (to squash a fake European Patent on behalf of Ethiopian farmers).

What “EPO” is known to Ethiopians as would be the drug that’s sometimes abused by long-distance runners, especially there. That’s what “EPO” really means to most Ethiopians. Now when they look up things related to ‘Teffgate’ they’ll find wonderful ‘journalism’ such as this:

He [Campinos] added: “The purpose of ensuring efficient and high-quality patent examination is ultimately to foster innovation and economic development, and support bilateral trade and investment between Ethiopia and Europe.”

So European journalism about the EPO has become more or less just a Campinos ‘copypasta’. Wonderful.

08.09.18

Propaganda Sites of Patent Trolls and Litigators Have Quit Trying to Appear Impartial or Having Integrity

Posted in Africa, Deception, Marketing, Patents at 2:20 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

The lobbying groups for patent trolls try to appear like diverse professionals, but they’re actually paid marketing/PR fronts

Mixed team

Summary: The lobbying groups of patent trolls (which receive money from such trolls) carry on meddling in policy and altering perception that drives policy; we present some new examples

THE EPO has long used IAM as a propaganda front. As for the USPTO, its connections to Watchtroll have always been worrying (e.g. former USPTO officials who now profit from lawsuits).

“They are basically a megaphone of trolls with misleading/promotional headlines (also big — if not imaginary — sums of money).”Christal Sheppard will work for the world's most awful patent troll, based on this press release that Watchtroll published the day before yesterday (we presume paid PR, based on the labeling) and Finjan, another patent troll, nowadays pays IAM. In return, IAM continues to write puff pieces for this disgusting Microsoft-connected troll; the troll even gets keynotes/speaking positions from IAM. Such is the nature of these publications/blogs. They are basically a megaphone of trolls with misleading/promotional headlines (also big — if not imaginary — sums of money). As a reminder, IAM is not a news site, but Google treats it as one nonetheless. Case of point is this week’s blog post that says:

There was little surprise in the numbers that Finjan recently announced for the second quarter. Revenue for the first half of the year soared to $82.3 million, an increase of more than 200% year-on-year. This was thanks in large part to the company’s settlement with Symantec, but also helped by additional agreements with Carbon Black and Trend Micro. Net income for the half year also saw a correspondingly large jump to $36.3 million, an increase of almost 177% as the business generated $65 million.

The whole thing reads like an ad for the troll; they’re talking about patent blackmail and they try to make a case for sponsoring this troll (as Microsoft did). Joff Wild, IAM’s chief editor, is already preparing the next lobbying event. He’s raising money from patent trolls. This lobbying group of patent trolls says that “Just a week after the US mid-term elections, the 4th Patent Law and Policy event couldn’t be more timely” (pressure group in action, timing events to impact policies). Quoting Wild:

With two of those decisions – Oil States and SAS Institute – involving the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, we will have two panels focused on post-issuance reviews – including how stakeholders should change their PTAB strategies in light of SAS.

If all of that isn’t enough we will also be asking a panel of experts to weigh in on the thorny issue of standard essential patents and what exactly constitutes FRAND. Given that the Trump administration has changed tack, markedly, on that issue there will be much to discuss.

They will try to attract to this event officials and people who might report on it, reaching the eyes and ears of politicians. Days ago we published "Agenda and Lies From Watchtroll Make It Into the Bill of Rohrabacher, the “Inventor Protection Act”"; well, guess what Watchtroll published only hours ago; it’s like they’re think tanks that help their sponsors craft bills/legislation, pushing these in their events based on lies. There needs to be a more coordinated response to these front groups, which are disguised as sources of news. Watchtroll and IAM do appear among search results and IAM seems to be paying extra money to reach more feeds. We know where that money comes from.

10.01.17

Battistelli’s Club Med at the EPO – Part V: Portugal’s “Golden Visa” Scheme for Angolan Nationals

Posted in Africa, Europe, Patents at 6:35 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Money

Summary: Some new revelations about Portugal’s “Golden Visa” scheme — a subject which has been circulating in the news in recent weeks

TODAY we continue the series about the EPO, Portugal, and Angola. In part 1 we highlighted an upcoming EPO deal, in part 2 we explained how that relates to French/Portuguese EPO leadership, and in parts 3 and 4 we wrote about corruption in Angola and possibly its patent office, respectively. We remind readers that the father of the likely next EPO President was born in Angola.

Today, in part 5, we deal with something fresh from the news.


Here are some links to recent articles about Portugal’s “Golden Visa” scheme which a Portuguese MEP has described as “another very dangerous avenue to import additional corruption and criminality into the EU”.

The recent revelations expose the way in which the scheme is being used by allegedly corrupt individuals from countries with close links to Portugal including Brazil and Angola.

This article from 12 days ago says: “Euro MP Ana Gomes has been a vociferous opponent of the scheme – championed by former deputy prime minister Paulo Portas – since its inception.

“She told the BBC back in 2014 that it potentially opened the doors to “all sorts of corrupt even criminal organisations… and it might be another very dangerous avenue to import additional corruption and criminality into the EU”.”

Another article from around the same time is calling it “Portugal’s golden visas” (in the headline). Angola is mentioned as follows: “Others named in the document are relatives of the Angolan vice-president, Manuel Vicente, who until 2012 was the chief executive of the country’s state energy firm, Sonangol. Vicente, once tipped to be the next Angolan president, this year faced allegations that he tried to bribe a Portuguese magistrate in order to suppress an investigation into corruption at Sonangol.”

We wrote a lot about Sonangol in previous parts.

“Leaked list of Golden Visa applicants released” is another detailed article about this. Here are some portions from it:

The documents focus on Latin American and Angolan nationals who have received a Golden Visa after buying a property in Portugal for €500,000 or more in exchange for permanent residency.

[...]

As for Angolan applicants, Portugal long has been used as a convenient laundry for stolen money with Angolan vice-president, Manuel Vicente, and family members receiving Golden Visas.

Vincente, who until 2012 was the chief executive of the country’s oil company, Sonangol, faces jail time after bribing a Portuguese magistrate in order to drop an investigation into his property purchases.

[...]

Other recipients of Golden Visas named in the leaked documents include:

[...]

João Manuel Inglês is an Angolan colonel and aide to Gen Manuel Helder Vieira Dias, better known as Kopelipa, head of the Angolan military and one of the most powerful figures in Angola. Inglês, who was accused in a US class action lawsuit of being a figurehead for Kopelipa and two other Angolan ruling figures, applied for a Portuguese golden visa in 2013. He did not respond to requests for comment.

Pedro Sebastião Teta, the Angolan secretary of state for IT, applied for a golden visa in 2013. The following year he was reported to own 30% of a company called Impulso Angola, which was awarded a contract by the government to map the country’s mineral resources. He did not respond to requests for comment.

Sebastião Gaspar Martins, the executive director of Sonangol’s Brazilian arm, sought a Portuguese golden visa in 2014. He has been cited as a possible successor to Vicente as vice-president. Martins declined to comment on the golden visa.

Some of these names may become more relevant to us in the future.

09.30.17

Battistelli’s Club Med at the EPO – Part IV: The Angolan Patent Office (IAPI) Seems Almost Defunct

Posted in Africa, Europe, Patents at 10:28 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Angola and the Portuguese “laundromat” explained further

IAPI domain

Summary: IAPI, the Angolan authority in charge of patents, turns out to be what we in the UK call “dodgy as Hell” (or worse words than “Hell”)

THE EPO is getting closer to Angola (see part 1) — a country which António Campinos and Benoît Battistelli are connected to (see part 2). Angola is widely known for corruption (see part 3) and today we wish to expand on that, offer some more links, and tie things together with an explanation that relates to the later/future parts (where EPO is revisited).

“From these reports it seems clear that very little moves in the Angolan economy without the clique around the Dos Santos family claiming a slice of the action.”For further information, in case the previous parts were not already read, see parts 2 and 3 in particular. In parts 6 and 7 we shall deal again with António Campinos and Benoît Battistelli. The relevance will become more obvious.


Over the last few years, Forbes has published a number of interesting reports about corruption in Angola. Several different writers in there covered it in 2013, 2014 [1, 2], and 2016. This article is a month old.

“What kind of government office uses a Microsoft Hotmail account in 2017?”From these reports it seems clear that very little moves in the Angolan economy without the clique around the Dos Santos family claiming a slice of the action. Unfortunately, there is no information available about how well (or not) the system of intellectual property protection functions in Angola.

The official website of the IAPI seems to be permanently down. To make matters worse, when we last checked the site it looked like a hijacked (squatted) .gov domain. “Thank you for visiting the Bargain Auto Finance webpa:e” [sic] is what the page says. It goes on: “Bargain Auto Finance was established because of a love for cars and a desire to give the consumer a peace of mind buying experience. Our team of fully qualified Finance and Insurance Managers will negotiate terms on your behalf giving you a secure process. Bargain Auto Finance offer a variety of financing or refinancing options.”

Sounds like one of these notorious scams. What does that do in iapi.gov.ao? It’s definitely not some very temporary mistake or accident. It has been like this for a number of days (at least, based on our checks over the past week).

“There is no website listed in the WIPO database entry for Angola,” a reader told us. That’s true. “The “Bargain Auto Finance” website seems to belong to a South African company,” the reader noted (bargainfinance.co.za), so something very dodgy is definitely going on here. “The e-mail address for the Angolan Intellectual Property Institute listed in the WIPO database entry is a hotmail.com address. Also the WIPO entry seems to be out of date because the current Director of the IAPI is Mr Dário Camati,” the reader concluded. WIPO says: “Title and name of head; Director General: Ms. Ana Paula da Costa Pereira Migel (E-mail address paulabolivar8@hotmail.com).”

“It could be interesting to find out more about how the proposed “validation agreement” with the EPO is going to operate.”What kind of government office uses a Microsoft Hotmail account in 2017? And with account name/alias paulabolivar8? “No idea what is going on here,” our reader said.

Their Facebook page seems to be completely empty. Not that a government office should be operating through Facebook either way…

It could be interesting to find out more about how the proposed “validation agreement” with the EPO is going to operate.

These “validation agreements” typically involve the payment of an initial validation fee of a few hundred Euros to the EPO. The initial fee is shared out between the EPO and the national IP Office of the validation state based on a proportion set down in the validation agreement.

“Given what is generally known about the rampant levels of corruption in Angola, it would not be surprising if foreign investors encountered a system of patent protection that was not very effective at safeguarding their rights or that some additional “financial incentives” would be required in order to get a result in their favour.”Thereafter the patent proprietor pays annual renewal fees to the national IP Office of the validation state based on the amounts laid down under national law.

Depending on the level of uptake, such a scheme could could potentially generate a handy revenue stream for the Angolan government. It would be interesting to follow the subsequent money trail and see how much of that would be likely to end up in the pockets of the ruling clique.

Another issue confronting foreign patent proprietors opting for validation in Angola would be the question of how effective the system of patent protection is and whether or not patent proprietors can actually enforce their rights, for example via the courts.

Given what is generally known about the rampant levels of corruption in Angola, it would not be surprising if foreign investors encountered a system of patent protection that was not very effective at safeguarding their rights or that some additional “financial incentives” would be required in order to get a result in their favour.

09.29.17

Battistelli’s Club Med at the EPO – Part III: Angola and the Portuguese “Laundromat”

Posted in Africa, Europe, Patents at 9:13 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Coat of arms of AngolaSummary: This part looks at allegations that the former colony Angola is exporting corruption back to Portugal

THE EPO is about to sign some more papers with Angola (see part 1), one African country which both António Campinos and Benoît Battistelli are connected to (see part 2).

Before we say more about the Angolan connection (to the EPO, Portugal and France) we wish to introduce readers to this background information.


As many people will already know, Angola is a former Portuguese colony.

“Before we say more about the Angolan connection (to the EPO, Portugal and France) we wish to introduce readers to this background information.”After it became independent in November 1975 the country was plagued by a long period of civil war which continued with some interludes until 2002. The civil war was essentially a power struggle between two former liberation movements, the People’s Movement for the Liberation of Angola (MPLA) and the National Union for the Total Independence of Angola (UNITA). The conflict served as a surrogate battleground for the Cold War and it was characterised by large-scale direct and indirect international involvement by the Soviet Union and Cuba (on the side of the MPLA) and South Africa and the United States (on the side of UNITA).

As reported by the New York Times in June 2017, a reconstruction and oil boom following the civil war presented the politically-connected with a golden opportunity for self-enrichment. In an economy driven by President José Eduardo dos Santos (of the MPLA), his inner circle of family and allies have amassed extraordinary wealth. (c/f Angola’s Corrupt Building Boom: ‘Like Opening a Window and Throwing Out Money’)

In August 2017 the political situation in Angola got some coverage in the international media due to the elections being held there.

Transparency International took advantage of the occasion to issue a statement with the headline “Elections in Angola: time to tackle corruption”.

According to Transparency International: “Corruption has for too long enriched a small ruling elite while more than two thirds of the country’s population live in poverty. Angola is the archetype of a captured state. It scores only 18 and ranks 164 out of 176 on the 2016 Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index indicating rampant corruption.”

The theme of corruption in Angola was explored further by the New York Times in an article with the headline “Portugal Dominated Angola for Centuries. Now the Roles Are Reversed” which was published shortly before the August elections.

“After it became independent in November 1975 the country was plagued by a long period of civil war which continued with some interludes until 2002.”This New York Times article described how the former colony whose elite are being enriched by oil revenues is now exporting corruption back to the colonial motherland.

The article quotes Ana Gomes, a Member of the European Parliament from Portugal’s governing Socialist Party: “In Angola, they call Portugal the laundromat. It’s because it is.”

According to the New York Times: “Angola is often listed as one of the world’s most corrupt nations. And Portugal has been singled out for its laxness in reining in money laundering and bribery, particularly in its dealings with Angolans, according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the research and policy organization of the world’s richest countries.”

Relations between Portugal and Angola have been strained recently by the indictment of Angola’s Vice-President, Manuel Vicente, in February 2017. Vicente is a protégé and close associate of the controversial Angolan President José Eduardo Dos Santo who has ruled the country since 1979. Vicente first came to prominence following his appointment as CEO of Sonangol, the parastatal oil and gas company which has been used by Dos Santos over the decades to further his own political and business interests and those of his family.

Reports of interest:

A statement from the Prosecutor General’s office in Lisbon said that Manuel Vicente paid a bribe of €760,000 ($810,000) to a Portuguese prosecutor who was investigating previous allegations of corruption against him. The Vice-President was accused of, among other things, laundering money by buying apartments in the “Angolans’ building” on the coast of Cascais. He has denied the allegations.

“Relations between Portugal and Angola have been strained recently by the indictment of Angola’s Vice-President…”In a separate development it was reported in July 2017 that three lawyers and four people including a former board member of the Portuguese national airline TAP had been charged with illegal activities related to an “Angolan money laundering scam” involving and Angolan company Sonair which is a subsidiary of Sonangol.

The National Airline in Portugal is accused of a corruption scheme with officials from Angolan Public Oil Company Sonangol. That was the headline of an article from this summer.

Top TAP director accused in Angola money laundering scam. That’s another report from around the same time.

The current CEO of Sonangol is Ms. Isabel Dos Santos, daughter of the President, who was appointed to this position in 2016.

In 2012, Dos Santos was ranked by Forbes as one of “the five worst leaders in Africa”.

“In a separate development it was reported in July 2017 that three lawyers and four people including a former board member of the Portuguese national airline TAP had been charged with illegal activities related to an “Angolan money laundering scam” involving and Angolan company Sonair which is a subsidiary of Sonangol.”Forbes had this to say about Dos Santos: “To his discredit, José Eduardo has always run his government like it’s his personal, privately-owned investment holding company. His cousin serves as the Angola’s vice president, and his daughter, Isabel Dos Santos is arguably the wealthiest woman in the country.”

The local media in Angola has described his presidency as “the epicentre of corruption”.

09.28.17

Battistelli’s Club Med at the EPO – Part II: António Campinos, Benoît Battistelli and the Angolan Connection

Posted in Africa, Europe, Patents at 1:56 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

UIMP Campinos

Summary: Background information about the recent trend towards “validation agreements” with non-European developing countries

A FEW hours ago the EPO retweeted this Adams & Adams tweet which says: “During its annual Africa IP Network Week, the firm co-hosted the Africa Patent Examination Summit with @EPOorg.”

“During Battistelli’s term of office the EPO has been busy concluding so-called “validation agreements” with developing countries outside of Europe.”Now is therefore a good time to continue our series (see part 1) about Battistelli’s ‘Club Med’ at the EPO.

The research team has been exploring some possible connections which were suggested by the EPO’s recent “validation agreements” with developing countries such as Angola (but not limited to it). The following text is focused on the EPO validation agreement with Angola, whose background will probably be explained in future posts (beyond this series).


During Battistelli’s term of office the EPO has been busy concluding so-called “validation agreements” with developing countries outside of Europe. The “patent industry” has praised these efforts as an example of “thinking outside the confines of the continental map” and has touted them as “a game changer for European patent applicants”.

“By a strange coincidence most of the validation agreements so far have been with former French colonies or protectorates such as Morocco, Tunisia, Cambodia and Laos.”The stated objectives of these agreements are to enhance the technical capacities of national patent offices and improve their ability to raise patent awareness among national innovators.

By a strange coincidence most of the validation agreements so far have been with former French colonies or protectorates such as Morocco, Tunisia, Cambodia and Laos.

More recently it has been noticed that Battistelli appears to be intent on expanding the scope of his global mission.

“Shortly afterwards, Mr. Camati travelled to Lisbon where he paid a visit to the Portuguese National Intellectual Property (INPI) and was received by the INPI Director-General, Mrs. Leonor Trindade, who is reputed to be a loyal supporter of Battestelli on the EPO’s Administrative Council.”In May 2017 a bilateral co-operation agreement was signed with Angola (epo.org link) when the Director-General of the Institute of Industrial Property of Angola (IAPI), Mr Dário Camati, visited the EPO headquarters in Munich.

Shortly afterwards, Mr. Camati travelled to Lisbon where he paid a visit to the Portuguese National Intellectual Property (INPI) and was received by the INPI Director-General, Mrs. Leonor Trindade, who is reputed to be a loyal supporter of Battestelli on the EPO’s Administrative Council.

Further research into these matters and into Angolan-Portuguese connections and domestic Portuguese politics has led to a number of interesting insights. Part III will be published soon.

09.24.17

Battistelli’s Club Med at the EPO – Part I: EPO Validation Agreement With Angola

Posted in Africa, Europe, Patents at 10:23 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

From Friday:

Angola EPO

Summary: A series contemplating Benoît Battistelli’s sudden interest in Angola, a country with no European Patents but plenty of connections to António Campinos

TODAY, on a Sunday, we begin a long new series about the EPO. The timing seems perfect.

The minutes of the June 2017 meeting of the EPO Administrative Council confirm that Battistelli has been authorised to open negotiations on a validation agreement with Angola (dated Friday). It’s the favourite day for the EPO to dump some words (e.g. in the intranet) or formal documents it prefers not to get noticed. There are already internal jokes about those Friday ‘spills’… always check what’s being buried and where/why.

“There are already internal jokes about those Friday ‘spills’… always check what’s being buried and where/why.”The EPO’s new relationship with Angola is rather predictable; we wrote about the photo-ops before. Why Angola? It is not, after all, a former French colony. An HTML version of the validation agreement concluded with Tunisia in 2012 is now available for future comparisons. Remember that Angola is a former colony of Portugal and António Campinos is set up (or groomed) to become Battistelli’s successor, as we noted yesterday. Campinos is a dual French/Portugese national and his father, Joaquim Jorge de Pinho Campinos, was born in Lobito (Angola).

Does Angola really matter for the EPO? The numbers (of lack thereof) speak for themselves:

Angola EPO, no patents

It’s not hard to see why it’s tempting to suspect a political aspect to all of this. Prepare for some rather embarrassing things (for António Campinos and Benoît Battistelli) to be shown over the coming weeks.

06.11.17

No More Battistelli Photo Ops With Michelle Lee as EPO Allies Run Out, Countries Without European Patents Pursued Instead

Posted in Africa, Europe, Patents at 3:21 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

EPO in Angola

Summary: Desperate for some sense of legitimacy, Battistelli travels far and obtains ‘trophies’ from countries that are irrelevant to the EPO while his few remaining allies quit their jobs

THE EPO is running out of allies. It’s running out of allies pretty fast as it’s widely recognised that it’s run by a bunch of crooks. No person in this field has overlooked all the negative media coverage. Nobody. People have noticed just how few high-level officials even pose for photos with Benoît Battistelli these days. It’s not a coincidence. The same is true (to some degree) about the US President…

“People have noticed just how few high-level officials even pose for photos with Benoît Battistelli these days.”Battistelli’s allies mostly come from countries that are notorious for human rights violations, e.g. China the other day (promoted in Twitter via this and that). In some ways, the EPO is becoming SIPO and is mimicking Chinese (infamously low) standards for patenting. This isn’t what Europe needs; it’s what Europe needs to compete with.

More interesting, however, was this tweet from the USPTO (June 1st), headed at the time by a Director of Chinese descent. Mr. Klutz, the clown who facilitates the authoritarian regime of Battistelli, is in there (in the photos) and the USPTO wrote: “Commemorating 10 years of cooperation, @EPOorg, @JPO_JPN, @KIPOworld_en, SIPO, and #USPTO sign the IP5 Joint Statement today, June 1.”

“In some ways, the EPO is becoming SIPO and is mimicking Chinese (infamously low) standards for patenting.”Well, here we can see Michelle Lee touching Battistelli’s hands. It will be the last time. Here is the corresponding puff piece from the EPO (warning: epo.org link) and Battistelli’s immature brag in his ‘blog’. (warning: epo.org link)

What he probably did not know at the time is that Lee was about to leave. Days later she did. Abruptly even.

“We shall see if the Trump administration puts an utterly corrupt man like Rader in charge of the USPTO.”We first found out about it when a reader mailed us USPTO director Michelle Lee has resigned without warning. It correctly noted (as we did at the time) that “[i]n April, more than 50 companies, including Facebook and Cisco, sent a letter to President Trump asking him to keep Lee on board, believing the office would apply stricter standards to technology and software patents under her leadership.”

It didn’t take long for this news to spread [1, 2] through the mainstream media and many cited the above report (the first we saw). “According to Arstechnica.com,” one site said a few days ago, “major technology companies asked President Trump to keep Michelle Lee on board, believing the former Google executive would applying stricter standards to technology and software patents under her leadership.”

“As the number of applications from the US declines (the EPO tried to hide it) we can expect the EPO to become more like China and appeal to the Chinese, not the Americans.”Indeed, this departure wasn’t expected. The media makes it seem as though it was her decision to step down, albeit she was possibly pushed out. We shall see if the Trump administration puts an utterly corrupt man like Rader in charge of the USPTO. The USPTO had a good leader, but she is moving on. It’s the EPO that should oust/drive out the head, not the USPTO. We believe, based on our heavy coverage on the matter (over a dozen articles about it), that Lee was pushed out by thugs who started a witch-hunt against her. MIP says that “USPTO associate solicitor Joseph Matal has taken over her duties” and Lee’s foes (and supporters of the corrupt Rader as her successor) say “an acting successor has not been named. However, Commissioner for Patents Drew Hirshfeld was being touted by some DC observers as the likely choice, given that current deputy Director Anthony Scardino doesn’t have a background in IP.”

So… not Rader. What a relief.

These foes of Lee also said: “The battle to succeed Lee will be unlike anything we’ve seen before at the USPTO. The stakes are very high. [] The USPTO director can change rules relating to PTAB & rework examination guidelines. BigTech will be desperate to ensure neither happens.”

The LA Times covered it as follows:

America’s top patent and trademark official has abruptly resigned from her post.

Michelle Lee, who has been director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for more than two years, submitted a letter of resignation Tuesday afternoon.

“I am confident that the leadership team in place will serve you well during this transition,” Lee wrote in an agency-wide memo to staff.

How does that matter to the EPO? Simple. As the number of applications from the US declines (the EPO tried to hide it) we can expect the EPO to become more like China and appeal to the Chinese, not the Americans. The EPO is stretching and leaning to the bottom.

“Angola received not a even a single European Patent last year, but Benoît Battistelli and Klutz do a business trip to Angola.”Benoît Battistelli, for example, goes to a photo ops expedition in Angola. Yes, that’s right. Angola! Which Battistelli's old 'boss', Nicolas Sarkozy, also strategically visited. All one needs to know is that Angola is totally irrelevant to the EPO (no patents granted) and this EPO puff piece (warning: epo.org link) about the visit demonstrates nothing but a waste of money on Battistelli and his bodyguards (Klutz is there too). When will Benoît Battistelli and his right-hand man Klutz go to Zimbabwe for ‘recognition’ from Mugabe? He too enjoys an above-the-law status. Maybe they can share some experiences about how to crush people…

Angola received not a even a single European Patent last year, but Benoît Battistelli and Klutz do a business trip to Angola. That says a lot, does it not? Might as well be a trip for leisure, disguised as “for business”… there are safaris in Angola.

The irony should not be missed. In relation to the two terror attacks in England, Battistelli has of course not missed the opportunity for political exploitation. Here is the exploitation of Manchester and the exploitation of London (warning: two epo.org links). Again, in relation to terror, the EPO says it “believes in an open and inclusive society based on the fundamental principles of freedom, equality and justice.”

“They, Team Battistelli, are once again milking tragedy (with many human victims) to disseminate patently false characterisations of themselves.”Liars.

It takes quite some nerve to say that. They also said: “As an international organisation, we believe in an open and inclusive society based on the fundamental principles of freedom, equality, justice and tolerance. Such attacks will never be able to destroy these principles.”

That makes just about as much sense as Mugabe saying it. It’s beyond laughable. It is deeply offensive. They, Team Battistelli, are once again milking tragedy (with many human victims) to disseminate patently false characterisations of themselves.

« Previous entries Next Page » Next Page »

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channels: Come and chat with us in real time

New to This Site? Here Are Some Introductory Resources

No

Mono

ODF

Samba logo






We support

End software patents

GPLv3

GNU project

BLAG

EFF bloggers

Comcast is Blocktastic? SavetheInternet.com



Recent Posts