background image
Proctor the Court considered a patent on a process for separating fats and oils, and 
held that the process was not restricted to any particular apparatus.  The Court held that 
a process is an independent category of invention, and stated: 
That a patent can be granted for a process, there can be no doubt.  The 
patent law is not confined to new machines and new compositions of 
matter, but extends to any new and useful art or manufacture. 
 
102 U.S. at 722; see also Corning v. Burden, 56 U.S. (15 How.) 252, 268 (1853) (“It is 
for the discovery or invention of some practical method or means of producing a 
beneficial result or effect, that a patent is granted, and not for the result or effect itself.”)  
The difference between a process and the other categories of patent-eligible subject 
matter does not deprive process inventions of the independent status accorded by 
statute, by precedent, and by logic, all of which negate the court’s new rule that a 
process must be tied to a particular machine or must transform physical matter. 
The majority also relies on O’Reilly v. Morse, citing the Court’s rejection of 
Morse’s Claim 8 for “the use of the motive power of the electro or galvanic current, 
which I call electromagnetism, however developed, for making or printing intelligible 
characters, signs or letters at any distances . . . .”  The Court explained: 
In fine he claims an exclusive right to use a manner and process which he 
has not described and indeed had not invented, and therefore could not 
describe when he obtained his patent.  The Court is of the opinion that the 
claim is too broad, and not warranted by law. 
 
56 U.S. (15 How.) at 113.  However, the claims that were directed to the communication 
system that was described by Morse were held patentable, although no machine, 
transformation, or manufacture was required.  See Morse’s Claim 5 (“The system of 
signs, consisting of dots and spaces, and horizontal lines, for numerals, letters, words, 
or sentences, substantially as herein set forth and illustrated, for telegraphic 
2007-1130 
 
14