(ℹ) Join us now at the IRC channel | ䷉ Find the plain text version at this address.
schestowitz__ | https://twitter.com/Muskoka10293846/status/1389214849499029505 | May 04 00:54 |
---|---|---|
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@Muskoka10293846: @schestowitz https://t.co/E4GNHX1YEP sign this | May 04 00:54 | |
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-Could not resolve host: change.org; Unknown error ( status 0 @ https://change.org/stopbillc-10 ) | May 04 00:54 | |
schestowitz__ | https://twitter.com/crystalshen6/status/1389036548583272450 | May 04 00:54 |
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@crystalshen6: FUD aka Fear, Uncertainty, & Doubt https://t.co/Bma7lndrp9 | May 04 00:54 | |
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-Could not resolve host: t.co; Unknown error ( status 0 @ https://t.co/Bma7lndrp9 ) | May 04 00:54 | |
schestowitz__ | > Dear Roy | May 04 01:23 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:23 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:23 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:23 |
schestowitz__ | > I would like to share some thoughts regarding the suspension of your | May 04 01:23 |
schestowitz__ | > account and to send also some of my lecture slides on defamation. | May 04 01:23 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:23 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:23 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:23 |
schestowitz__ | > a) Ofcom | May 04 01:23 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:23 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:23 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:23 |
schestowitz__ | > I tried initially to check the issue of suspension through the | May 04 01:23 |
schestowitz__ | > communications regulator, Ofcom. It appears that they do not have | May 04 01:23 |
schestowitz__ | > jurisdiction to deal with US-based social media. There is currently a | May 04 01:23 |
schestowitz__ | > white paper for a new legislative bill, i.e. online harms, which will | May 04 01:23 |
schestowitz__ | > give some powers to Ofcom. This is a work in process and in any case, it | May 04 01:23 |
schestowitz__ | > does not deal much with protection of freedom of speech. There are some | May 04 01:23 |
schestowitz__ | > organisations set up by mainstream media that care about free speech but | May 04 01:23 |
schestowitz__ | > they usually deal with corporate media that are their members. Again, | May 04 01:23 |
schestowitz__ | > they do no have any regulatory powers regarding Twitter, Facebook, etc. | May 04 01:23 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:23 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:23 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:23 |
schestowitz__ | > b) Jurisdiction | May 04 01:23 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:23 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:23 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:23 |
schestowitz__ | > Twitter is a US-based corporation and they only have one base in Europe, | May 04 01:23 |
schestowitz__ | > which is Dublin. The person to whom I sent the email about your | May 04 01:23 |
schestowitz__ | > suspension is based in Dublin. | May 04 01:23 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:23 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:23 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:23 |
schestowitz__ | > In terms of building a network, you may find useful to expand your | May 04 01:23 |
schestowitz__ | > collaboration with persons who are based in Ireland, as most of US | May 04 01:23 |
schestowitz__ | > corporations in the social media sector are based there. | May 04 01:24 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:24 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:24 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:24 |
schestowitz__ | > c) Twitter responses | May 04 01:24 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:24 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:24 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:24 |
schestowitz__ | > In my understanding regarding the suspension of your Twitter account, it | May 04 01:24 |
schestowitz__ | > seems that Twitter may have received various complaints regarding your | May 04 01:24 |
schestowitz__ | > tweets. And they try to respond through various ways. But if they | May 04 01:24 |
schestowitz__ | > receive supporting emails, they seem to understand that there is more to | May 04 01:24 |
schestowitz__ | > it and they do not want to take sides, hence, the reinstatement of your | May 04 01:24 |
schestowitz__ | > account. | May 04 01:24 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:24 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:24 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:24 |
schestowitz__ | > So, in continuation from the previous point about Ireland and | May 04 01:24 |
schestowitz__ | > networking, it will be good to have or plan for such a supportive network. | May 04 01:24 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:24 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:24 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:24 |
schestowitz__ | > d) Legal actions (defamation) | May 04 01:24 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:24 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:24 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:24 |
schestowitz__ | > The courts are at the disposal of those who have complaints regarding | May 04 01:24 |
schestowitz__ | > defamatory statements. In this respect, you may need to know some basic | May 04 01:24 |
*rianne__ has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) | May 04 01:24 | |
schestowitz__ | > things about liability in Torts regarding defamation. | May 04 01:24 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:24 |
*liberty_box has quit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds) | May 04 01:24 | |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:24 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:24 |
schestowitz__ | > I am sending notes from two of my lectures that I gave in the previous year. | May 04 01:24 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:24 |
schestowitz__ | > The main points are: | May 04 01:24 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:24 |
schestowitz__ | > to have an action in defamation, three elements need to be established. | May 04 01:24 |
schestowitz__ | > The first element (the statement is defamatory) is now subjected to a | May 04 01:24 |
schestowitz__ | > new threshold (‘serious harm’, see slide 15), which allows more room for | May 04 01:24 |
schestowitz__ | > fair criticism and free speech. | May 04 01:24 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:25 |
schestowitz__ | > But even where a statement is defamatory and meets the three conditions, | May 04 01:25 |
schestowitz__ | > no action can be sustained if a defence is applicable: | May 04 01:25 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:25 |
schestowitz__ | > e.g. the statement is defamatory (e.g. statement says that person B is a | May 04 01:25 |
schestowitz__ | > known thief) but a defence applies (i.e. there is evidence showing the | May 04 01:25 |
schestowitz__ | > statement is true). There are various defences: truth, honest opinion, | May 04 01:25 |
schestowitz__ | > public interest, etc.). | May 04 01:25 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:25 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:25 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:25 |
schestowitz__ | > The slides I am sending cover the basic for undergraduate students. One | May 04 01:25 |
schestowitz__ | > of the things that are not covered in the slides concern Defamation | May 04 01:25 |
schestowitz__ | > (Operators of Websites) Regulations 2013 issued under section 5 of the | May 04 01:25 |
schestowitz__ | > Defamation Act 2013. They cover the liability of web operators. For | May 04 01:25 |
schestowitz__ | > this, there is a useful explanatory note, here: | May 04 01:25 |
schestowitz__ | > https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2013/9780111104620/pdfs/ukdsiem_9780111104620_en.pdf | May 04 01:25 |
schestowitz__ | > <https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2013/9780111104620/pdfs/ukdsiem_9780111104620_en.pdf> | May 04 01:25 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:25 |
schestowitz__ | > https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/269139/defamation-faqs.pdf | May 04 01:25 |
schestowitz__ | > <https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/269139/defamation-faqs.pdf> | May 04 01:25 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:25 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:25 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:25 |
schestowitz__ | > The main points of the Defamation Act 2013 are highlighted also in a | May 04 01:25 |
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-Could not resolve host: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk; Unknown error ( status 0 @ https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/269139/defamation-faqs.pdf ) | May 04 01:25 | |
schestowitz__ | > relevant note, here: | May 04 01:25 |
schestowitz__ | > https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN06801/SN06801.pdf | May 04 01:25 |
schestowitz__ | > <https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN06801/SN06801.pdf> | May 04 01:25 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:25 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:25 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:25 |
schestowitz__ | > I think it will be good to check the slides and see the basic elements | May 04 01:25 |
schestowitz__ | > of liability for defamation and the applicable defences. Beyond the | May 04 01:25 |
schestowitz__ | > framework of law and the scope of freedom of expression, you may also | May 04 01:25 |
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-Resolving timed out after 10518 milliseconds ( status 0 @ https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN06801/SN06801.pdf ) | May 04 01:25 | |
schestowitz__ | > need to think strategically about how to frame certain expressions. Even | May 04 01:25 |
schestowitz__ | > if a tweet may not be actionable (e.g. because harm is not likely to be | May 04 01:25 |
schestowitz__ | > serious or the statement is based on true facts), it is still possible | May 04 01:25 |
schestowitz__ | > to appreciate the choice of your expression in order increase its | May 04 01:25 |
schestowitz__ | > objectivity and wider impact. As you communicate various statements and | May 04 01:25 |
schestowitz__ | > information in the public arena, you may find useful to have a general | May 04 01:25 |
schestowitz__ | > understanding of relevant legal issues in order to plan your work | May 04 01:26 |
schestowitz__ | > accordingly. | May 04 01:26 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:26 |
*rianne__ (~rianne@host81-154-169-167.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #boycottnovell | May 04 01:26 | |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:26 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:26 |
schestowitz__ | > As I said in my previous email, I am glad you are back on Twitter with | May 04 01:26 |
schestowitz__ | > your personal account, hopefully, you can have the same interactions you | May 04 01:26 |
schestowitz__ | > have had in the past and use Twitter (which is very good platform for | May 04 01:26 |
schestowitz__ | > political commentary) constructively, as part of your research and activism. | May 04 01:26 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:26 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:26 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:26 |
schestowitz__ | > Best regards | May 04 01:26 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:26 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:26 |
schestowitz__ | > PS: | May 04 01:26 |
schestowitz__ | > | May 04 01:26 |
schestowitz__ | > The margins are not always maintained in my lecture slides, as this is | May 04 01:26 |
schestowitz__ | > often the result of transferring files from various operating systems | May 04 01:26 |
schestowitz__ | > (e.g. Umbundu, Microsoft PPT). | May 04 01:26 |
schestowitz__ | > I would like to share some thoughts regarding the suspension of your | May 04 01:26 |
schestowitz__ | > account and to send also some of my lecture slides on defamation. | May 04 01:26 |
schestowitz__ | I am going to study those slides. | May 04 01:26 |
schestowitz__ | Overall, centralisation and consolidation is harmful to free speech. It has long been the case, but many people didn't heed the warning. | May 04 01:26 |
schestowitz__ | In my case, it seems COVID patents were at the root of the decision to suspend and then ban. | May 04 01:26 |
*liberty_box (~liberty@host81-154-169-167.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #boycottnovell | May 04 01:27 | |
Techrights-sec | yes, the distraction is probably more about epstein | May 04 04:54 |
Techrights-sec | https://nitter.cc/weaponizedword1/status/1389438614212423680#m | May 04 05:54 |
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-Could not resolve host: nitter.cc; Unknown error ( status 0 @ https://nitter.cc/weaponizedword1/status/1389438614212423680#m ) | May 04 05:54 | |
Techrights-sec | https://nitter.cc/MattLoita/status/1389438920711188483#m | May 04 05:54 |
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-nitter.cc | Cumberdick Bandersnatch (@MattLoita): "techrights.org/2020/08/21/zo…" | nitter | May 04 05:54 | |
Techrights-sec | https://nitter.cc/weaponizedword1/status/1389438614212423680#m | May 04 05:54 |
schestowitz__ | https://twitter.com/MattLoita/status/1389438920711188483 | May 04 05:56 |
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@MattLoita: @ShakenJack https://t.co/utMyTEdHx1 | May 04 05:56 | |
schestowitz__ | https://twitter.com/weaponizedword1/status/1389438614212423680 | May 04 05:56 |
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-Could not resolve host: t.co; Unknown error ( status 0 @ https://t.co/utMyTEdHx1 ) | May 04 05:56 | |
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@weaponizedword1: In honor of Bill and Melinda Gates getting divorced and becoming Fences.... Huge indexed Gates Foundation Critique… https://t.co/Bxb0k7lRmG | May 04 05:56 | |
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-Could not resolve host: t.co; Unknown error ( status 0 @ https://t.co/Bxb0k7lRmG ) | May 04 05:56 | |
schestowitz__ | https://twitter.com/gypster2004/status/1389423374909194240 | May 04 05:56 |
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@gypster2004: Found something here https://t.co/Mu5OQ9MFTL | May 04 05:56 | |
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-Could not resolve host: t.co; Unknown error ( status 0 @ https://t.co/Mu5OQ9MFTL ) | May 04 05:57 | |
schestowitz__ | https://twitter.com/gypster2004/status/1389423135741685762 | May 04 05:57 |
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-Unexpected response | May 04 05:57 | |
schestowitz__ | https://twitter.com/AManYouLove_T/status/1389325998618025985 | May 04 05:57 |
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@AManYouLove_T: https://t.co/mfREUA34HR | May 04 05:57 | |
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-Could not resolve host: techrights.org; Unknown error ( status 0 @ https://techrights.org/2010/06/14/bill-gates-and-haiti-gmo/ ) | May 04 05:57 | |
schestowitz__ | ~/Git/Desktop-Utils$ git push | May 04 06:23 |
schestowitz__ | Enumerating objects: 7, done. | May 04 06:23 |
schestowitz__ | Counting objects: 100% (7/7), done. | May 04 06:23 |
schestowitz__ | Delta compression using up to 4 threads | May 04 06:23 |
schestowitz__ | Compressing objects: 100% (4/4), done. | May 04 06:23 |
schestowitz__ | Writing objects: 100% (4/4), 602 bytes | 602.00 KiB/s, done. | May 04 06:23 |
schestowitz__ | Total 4 (delta 3), reused 0 (delta 0) | May 04 06:23 |
schestowitz__ | To ssh://git-tr/home/git/tr-git/ | May 04 06:23 |
schestowitz__ | 6557c8d..d39e13d master -> master | May 04 06:23 |
schestowitz__ | I have been spending looooooooads of time yesterday getting something done which was long overdue: 1) re-encoding for better compression. 2) intro/outro 3) labeling of video. | May 04 06:24 |
schestowitz__ | I've just put that whole lot in the script, so hopefully it'll be fast to work with, I might even do all the codec stuff on another machine to offload the CPU loads, esp. for long videos | May 04 06:25 |
Techrights-sec | https://nitter.cc/IsabelVillalon1/status/1389455618772250627#m | May 04 07:30 |
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-nitter.cc | Isabel Villalon (@IsabelVillalon1): "So ein wenig Hintergrundmaterial anlässlich der Scheidung des Plutarchen Bill Gates... Interessant auch die Verbindung zum Pädophilenring des Mr Epstein. http://techrights.org/wiki/Gates_Foundation_Critique" | nitter | May 04 07:30 | |
schestowitz__ | "I just stumbled upon your articles on the EPO and how it has been misbehaving," one reader told me a few days ago. "I found them very interesting as I myself am at the moment writing an essay about the EPC and EPO and how animal welfare is being completely ignored/ patents granted by examiners who have no clue about animal welfare." | May 04 07:55 |
schestowitz__ | May 04 07:55 | |
schestowitz__ | I am told by EPO insiders that "almost all" EPO examiners read Techrights. Would you be willing to have your work/essays reproduced in Techrights? My wife and I are proponents of animal rights and donate to conservation. Raising awareness is a gateway towards societal reform and legislation. | May 04 07:55 |
Techrights-sec | ok, I'll look at the new scripts | May 04 08:38 |
schestowitz__ | they are still work in progress as I want to avoid video editors (waste of time), so if you commit a change let me know (to avoid conflicting alterations) | May 04 08:38 |
*liberty_box has quit (Ping timeout: 265 seconds) | May 04 08:49 | |
*rianne__ has quit (Ping timeout: 265 seconds) | May 04 08:49 | |
*rianne__ (~rianne@host81-154-169-167.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #boycottnovell | May 04 08:50 | |
*liberty_box (~liberty@host81-154-169-167.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #boycottnovell | May 04 08:50 | |
-NickServ-acer-box______!~acer-box@2a00:23c4:c3aa:7d01:9ed2:1eff:feb6:a8e1 has just authenticated as you (schestowitz) | May 04 10:00 | |
*acer-box______ (~acer-box@unaffiliated/schestowitz) has joined #boycottnovell | May 04 10:00 | |
*ChanServ gives channel operator status to acer-box______ | May 04 10:00 | |
*acer-box____ has quit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) | May 04 10:01 | |
schestowitz__ | https://twitter.com/NormanTShenley/status/1389494672666636291 | May 04 10:26 |
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@NormanTShenley: @G3MM420 Sympathy vote? Or visit from the authorities? (again) https://t.co/xl9qRPpXss | May 04 10:26 | |
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-Resolving timed out after 10518 milliseconds ( status 0 @ https://techrights.org/2020/08/21/zoophilia-gates-estate/ ) | May 04 10:26 | |
Techrights-sec | https://nitter.cc/RedHatEMEA/status/1389526973450424322#m | May 04 11:34 |
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-nitter.cc | Red Hat EMEA (@RedHatEMEA): "Want the benefits of containers without the management? Join us for a sneak peek of the new #Azure #RedHat #OpenShift features planned for 2021 at 15:00 CET on May 18 ➡️ https://red.ht/3b07tKL" | nitter | May 04 11:34 | |
Techrights-sec | by the way, as far as licenses go, some countries do not respect or have | May 04 13:20 |
Techrights-sec | a public domain so a CC license of some kind is better. With software | May 04 13:20 |
Techrights-sec | one of the GPL-compatible Fee Software licenses would be appropriate. | May 04 13:20 |
schestowitz__ | right, but they're not as widely adopted. for the show jingles and video intro/outro I checked we're fine with the licence terms. For photos I typically use what was once an Hungarian site but later died (not due to COVID, MinceR ;- )) but due to a takeover of some kind: https://www.freeimages.com/ | May 04 13:21 |
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-www.freeimages.com | Explore over 300,000 free stock photos and royalty free images - FreeImages.com | May 04 13:21 | |
Techrights-sec | https://nitter.cc/zoobab/status/1389569048791375877#m | May 04 15:03 |
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-nitter.cc | zoobab "NO Software Patents" (@zoobab): "UPC is the next Kangaroo court." | nitter | May 04 15:03 | |
Techrights-sec | https://nitter.cc/barf_captain/status/1389553636011819013#m | May 04 15:04 |
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-nitter.cc | Dr Captain Barf, PhD 😏 (@barf_captain): "techrights.org/2020/08/21/zo…" | nitter | May 04 15:04 | |
Techrights-sec | https://nitter.cc/unamsenelmundo2/status/1389670082209619968#m | May 04 20:57 |
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-Could not resolve host: nitter.cc; Unknown error ( status 0 @ https://nitter.cc/unamsenelmundo2/status/1389670082209619968#m ) | May 04 20:57 | |
Techrights-sec | https://nitter.cc/kaddourkardio/status/1389684068783173638#m | May 04 22:17 |
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-nitter.cc | Kaddour Kardio (@kaddourkardio): "Mahrez is on fire !" | nitter | May 04 22:17 | |
schestowitz__ | https://twitter.com/redhog_org/status/1389694140183683078 | May 04 22:56 |
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-Unexpected response | May 04 22:56 | |
schestowitz__ | https://twitter.com/kaddourkardio/status/1389684068783173638 | May 04 22:57 |
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@kaddourkardio: @schestowitz Mahrez is on fire ! | May 04 22:57 | |
schestowitz__ | https://twitter.com/shaggysnod/status/1389665854829256707 | May 04 22:57 |
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@shaggysnod: @SemprePhi @schestowitz Throw her back. We need to preserve the few ancient monsters we have left. 🦕 | May 04 22:57 | |
schestowitz__ | https://twitter.com/cheezburgrmania/status/1389607488773836800 | May 04 22:58 |
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@cheezburgrmania: @PierreMenard @schestowitz "...the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation's involvement in the partnership between the U… https://t.co/huCsq2IuHh | May 04 22:58 | |
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@cheezburgrmania: @PierreMenard @schestowitz "...the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation's involvement in the partnership between the U… https://t.co/huCsq2IuHh | May 04 22:58 | |
schestowitz__ | " | May 04 22:58 |
schestowitz__ | @schestowitz | May 04 22:58 |
schestowitz__ | "...the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation's involvement in the partnership between the University Oxford and AstraZeneca prevented the vaccine from having an open distribution model." | May 04 22:58 |
schestowitz__ | " | May 04 22:58 |
schestowitz__ | https://twitter.com/Flavia0847/status/1389596201255940100 | May 04 22:58 |
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@Flavia0847: @schestowitz Those were the days before the Military discovered its "warrior ethos" and was used by Big Business to… https://t.co/CL4no9w0L3 | May 04 22:58 | |
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@Flavia0847: @schestowitz Those were the days before the Military discovered its "warrior ethos" and was used by Big Business to… https://t.co/CL4no9w0L3 | May 04 22:58 | |
schestowitz__ | "Those were the days before the Military discovered its "warrior ethos" and was used by Big Business to take the nation for another ride." | May 04 22:58 |
schestowitz__ | https://twitter.com/zoobab/status/1389569048791375877 | May 04 22:58 |
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-Unexpected response | May 04 22:58 | |
schestowitz__ | https://twitter.com/SemprePhi/status/1389536893092646912 | May 04 22:59 |
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-@SemprePhi: @schestowitz Attn: @shaggysnod | May 04 22:59 | |
schestowitz__ | https://twitter.com/dawnbazely/status/1389535202955907074 | May 04 22:59 |
-TechrightsBN/#boycottnovell-Unexpected response | May 04 22:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py
2.6 | ䷉ find the plain text version at this address.