Techrights logo

IRC: #techbytes @ Techrights IRC Network: Monday, June 02, 2025

(ℹ) Join us now at the IRC channel | ䷉ Find the plain text version at this address (HTTP) or in Gemini (how to use Gemini) with a full GemText version.

*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytesJun 02 03:31
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytesJun 02 03:45
schestowitz[TR2]https://www.thelayoff.com/t/1jwfr49jwJun 02 03:56
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes- ( status 403 @ https://www.thelayoff.com/t/1jwfr49jw )Jun 02 03:56
schestowitz[TR2]""Jun 02 03:56
schestowitz[TR2]https://www.deccanherald.com/amp/story/business%2Fcompanies%2Fai-effect-ibm-lays-off-8000-employees-of-hr-departments-worldwide-3562326Jun 02 03:56
schestowitz[TR2]Wow, 8000 inhuman resources. Bye bye you an-s holes.Jun 02 03:56
schestowitz[TR2]11 hours ago by AnonymousJun 02 03:56
schestowitz[TR2]| 4 reactions (+4/-0) | ReplyJun 02 03:56
schestowitz[TR2]Post ID: @n0+1jwfr49jwJun 02 03:56
schestowitz[TR2] +8 Jun 02 03:56
schestowitz[TR2]IBM fu---d me right up the a-s and then said I was so old it didn't even get any pleasure from it. I feel so damn useless.Jun 02 03:56
schestowitz[TR2]1 day ago by AnonymousJun 02 03:56
schestowitz[TR2]| 8 reactions (+8/-0) | ReplyJun 02 03:56
schestowitz[TR2]Post ID: @je+1jwfr49jwJun 02 03:56
schestowitz[TR2] +6 Jun 02 03:56
schestowitz[TR2]I get laid most days, and enjoy it very time!Jun 02 03:56
schestowitz[TR2]I will still get laid after I get laid off, so that is good!Jun 02 03:56
schestowitz[TR2]Fu-k IBM!Jun 02 03:56
schestowitz[TR2]1 day ago by AnonymousJun 02 03:56
schestowitz[TR2]| 6 reactions (+6/-0) | ReplyJun 02 03:56
schestowitz[TR2]Post ID: @hq+1jwfr49jwJun 02 03:56
schestowitz[TR2] +5 Jun 02 03:56
schestowitz[TR2]EMEA, PIPed, which is the RA strategy for the region as we are not ‘at will’ employees. Interested to know if others have been PIPed.Jun 02 03:56
schestowitz[TR2]"Jun 02 03:56
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-www.deccanherald.com | IBM Layoffs: IBM to cut 8000 jobs globally amid AI shiftJun 02 03:56
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytesJun 02 04:45
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytesJun 02 04:49
schestowitz[TR2]apparently the ballots have been counted but Poland is not yet releasing Jun 02 05:49
schestowitz[TR2]the results.  There has been a *lot* of election interference there soJun 02 05:49
schestowitz[TR2]it is likely that the Kremlin's candidate will come out ahead if theJun 02 05:49
schestowitz[TR2]results are not going to be cancelled.  But they'd still have to addressJun 02 05:49
schestowitz[TR2]the Kremlin's campaigns via the grip that social control media has on the  Jun 02 05:49
schestowitz[TR2]populace.Jun 02 05:49
schestowitz[TR2]  << quotewJun 02 05:49
*liberty_box (~liberty@jcfiaarnjjqje.irc) has joined #techbytesJun 02 06:24
*rianne (~rianne@jcfiaarnjjqje.irc) has joined #techbytesJun 02 06:24
*rianne (~rianne@freenode-v3a.5o5.hl01nn.IP) has joined #techbytesJun 02 06:24
schestowitz[TR2]x https://www.macworld.com/article/2791968/would-you-rather-pay-for-microsoft-365-forever-or-buy-microsoft-office-once.htmlJun 02 07:17
schestowitz[TR2]# m$ fears open formats and the vendor independence which they enableJun 02 07:17
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-Would you rather pay for Microsoft 365 forever or buy Microsoft Office once? | MacworldJun 02 07:17
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytesJun 02 07:35
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytesJun 02 07:39
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytesJun 02 07:55
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytesJun 02 08:03
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytesJun 02 08:24
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytesJun 02 09:07
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytesJun 02 10:52
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytesJun 02 10:53
schestowitz[TR2]Re: Not coreutilsJun 02 13:14
schestowitz[TR2]> This appeared in a recent message of mine to the libreplanet list:Jun 02 13:14
schestowitz[TR2]What article title would be most suitable, in your opinion?Jun 02 13:14
schestowitz[TR2]>    for i in *.png; do pngtopam $i | pnmtojpeg >`basename $i .png`.jpg; doneJun 02 13:14
schestowitz[TR2]> Jun 02 13:14
schestowitz[TR2]> Thank you for sharing the article with your readers.Jun 02 13:14
schestowitz[TR2]My pleasure. When we ran in the park 2 hours ago we mentioned you because we saw akita dog. Jun 02 13:14
schestowitz[TR2]:)Jun 02 13:14
schestowitz[TR2]> I wonder whether the title was appropriate.Jun 02 13:14
schestowitz[TR2]Maybe not, it can be changed, but maybe too late to make a difference.Jun 02 13:14
schestowitz[TR2]> This for ... do ... done construct (=the framework) is Unix shell.Jun 02 13:14
schestowitz[TR2]> Most users would execute within a bash session but other shells work too.Jun 02 13:14
schestowitz[TR2]> It is possible to run this as a shell script.Jun 02 13:14
schestowitz[TR2]> Jun 02 13:14
schestowitz[TR2]>    for i in *Jun 02 13:14
schestowitz[TR2]>    doJun 02 13:14
schestowitz[TR2]>     ...Jun 02 13:14
schestowitz[TR2]>    doneJun 02 13:14
schestowitz[TR2]> Jun 02 13:14
schestowitz[TR2]> ` ... ` is also a shell construct.Jun 02 13:14
schestowitz[TR2]> Jun 02 13:14
schestowitz[TR2]>   | and > are also shell features.Jun 02 13:14
schestowitz[TR2]> Jun 02 13:14
schestowitz[TR2]> The following are Netpbm utilities (image format converters):Jun 02 13:14
schestowitz[TR2]> Jun 02 13:14
schestowitz[TR2]>    pngtopamJun 02 13:14
schestowitz[TR2]>    pnmtojpegJun 02 13:14
schestowitz[TR2]I always use convert in loops, from imagemagick.Jun 02 13:14
schestowitz[TR2]> The basename utility is from GNU coreutils.Jun 02 13:14
schestowitz[TR2]> (It gives you the file name with the suffix removed.)Jun 02 13:14
schestowitz[TR2]> Jun 02 13:14
schestowitz[TR2]> I'd say that shell is most important.Jun 02 13:14
schestowitz[TR2]> Jun 02 13:14
schestowitz[TR2]> If you want to read a book about this, I recommend "The UNIXJun 02 13:14
schestowitz[TR2]> Programming Environment" by Brian Kernigham and Rob Pike.Jun 02 13:14
schestowitz[TR2]> Jun 02 13:14
schestowitz[TR2]> The following article is a short digest:Jun 02 13:14
schestowitz[TR2]> Jun 02 13:14
schestowitz[TR2]> https://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/manual/html_node/Opening-the-software-toolbox.htmlJun 02 13:14
schestowitz[TR2]I am accustomed to Bash (the GNU one). It's universal enough that decades later "old" scripts still work.Jun 02 13:14
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-Connection timeout after 10000 ms ( status 0 @ https://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/manual/html_node/Opening-the-software-toolbox.html )Jun 02 13:16
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytesJun 02 14:25
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytesJun 02 14:46
*itech (~itech@mpngdb44f6kf4.irc) has joined #techbytesJun 02 17:18
schestowitz[TR2]https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libreplanet-discuss/2025-06/msg00000.htmlJun 02 18:15
schestowitz[TR2]">  > In addition, and perhaps more importantly, there is an acute shortageJun 02 18:15
schestowitz[TR2]>  > of makefiles to use as study material.Jun 02 18:15
schestowitz[TR2] Jun 02 18:15
schestowitz[TR2]>  I was surprised when reading this when it is well known that there areJun 02 18:15
schestowitz[TR2]>  so many Make files very easy to find. Did you try searching softwareJun 02 18:15
schestowitz[TR2]>  repositories?Jun 02 18:15
schestowitz[TR2]Yes.  I looked through more than 100 source packages.Jun 02 18:15
schestowitz[TR2]Most packages come with Makefile.am and Makefile.in which are used toJun 02 18:15
schestowitz[TR2]generate the makefile.  The machine-generated makefile is not easy toJun 02 18:15
schestowitz[TR2]analyze.Jun 02 18:15
schestowitz[TR2]This is a list of the source packages of major OS components:Jun 02 18:15
schestowitz[TR2]https://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter03/packages.htmlJun 02 18:15
schestowitz[TR2]If you want more you can examine packages in this site:Jun 02 18:15
schestowitz[TR2]https://ftp2.osuosl.org/pub/blfs/conglomeration/Jun 02 18:15
schestowitz[TR2]I think it is possible that I disagree with Mr. Jean Louis because IJun 02 18:15
schestowitz[TR2]do not regard Makefile.am and Makefile.in true makefiles.  I also believeJun 02 18:15
schestowitz[TR2]that the machine-generated makefiles are not ideal for study.Jun 02 18:15
schestowitz[TR2]As seen above I have been looking for makefiles to use as study material."Jun 02 18:15
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-lists.gnu.org | Re: Make's place in the operating systemJun 02 18:15
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-www.linuxfromscratch.org | 3.2. All PackagesJun 02 18:16
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-ftp2.osuosl.org | Jun 02 18:16
*itech has quit (connection closed)Jun 02 19:33
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytesJun 02 19:39
*itech (~itech@xy8f3cfvrmnvi.irc) has joined #techbytesJun 02 19:53
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytesJun 02 20:50
*GNUmoon2 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)Jun 02 23:06
*GNUmoon2 (~GNUmoon@kxs4izj2yaf86.irc) has joined #techbytesJun 02 23:09
*itech has quit (connection closed)Jun 02 23:47

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.6 | ䷉ find the plain text version at this address (HTTP) or in Gemini (how to use Gemini) with a full GemText version.