(ℹ) Join us now at the IRC channel | ䷉ Find the plain text version at this address (HTTP) or in Gemini (how to use Gemini) with a full GemText version.
| *x-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!) | Mar 03 01:34 | |
| *x-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@h5zkbfemmwig6.irc) has joined #techbytes | Mar 03 01:39 | |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes | Mar 03 02:30 | |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes | Mar 03 02:38 | |
| schestowitz[TR2] | https://www.irishtimes.com/sport/soccer/new-money-gets-one-over-on-old-money-as-man-city-defy-uefa-1.4304081 | Mar 03 04:58 |
|---|---|---|
| schestowitz[TR2] | <li> | Mar 03 04:58 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | <h5><a href="https://thenewstack.io/ultramarine-linux-fedora-made-easy-and-beautiful-for-everyone/">Ultramarine Linux: Fedora Made Easy and Beautiful for Everyone</a></h5> | Mar 03 04:58 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | <blockquote> | Mar 03 04:58 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | <p>One such distribution is called Ultramarine Linux. This Fedora-based operating system is designed to provide an easy-to-use experience for those who are new to Linux, while also offering more advanced features to tempt power users away from their current desktop. </p> | Mar 03 04:58 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | <p> Ultramarine Linux differs from standard Fedora in several ways: [...] </p> | Mar 03 04:58 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | </blockquote> | Mar 03 04:58 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | </li> | Mar 03 04:58 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-www.irishtimes.com | New money gets one over on old money as Man City defy Uefa – The Irish Times | Mar 03 04:58 | |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-thenewstack.io | Ultramarine Linux: Fedora Made Easy and Beautiful for Everyone - The New Stack | Mar 03 04:58 | |
| *jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Mar 03 09:02 | |
| *jacobk (~quassel@syp65ggum2ibk.irc) has joined #techbytes | Mar 03 09:04 | |
| schestowitz[TR2] | <li> | Mar 03 09:11 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | <h5><a href="https://blog.zgp.org/two-open-source-stories/">two open source stories</a></h5> | Mar 03 09:11 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | <blockquote> | Mar 03 09:11 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | <p>First, I know that pretty much everyone is (understandably) freaking out about stuff that is getting worse, but I just wanted to share some good news in the form of an old-fashioned open-source success story. I’m a fairly boring person and developed most of my software habits in the late 1990s and early 2000s, so it’s pretty rare that I actually hit a bug. </p> | Mar 03 09:11 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | <p> But so far this blog has hit two: one browser compatibility issue and this one. The script for rebuilding when a file changes depends on the inotifywait utility, and it turned out that until recently it breaks when you ask it to watch more than 1024 files. </p> | Mar 03 09:11 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | </blockquote> | Mar 03 09:11 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | </li> | Mar 03 09:11 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-blog.zgp.org | two open source stories | Mar 03 09:11 | |
| schestowitz[TR2] | Re: Fwd: System claim ? Method claim? What's best in a software patent? | Mar 03 09:46 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | > | Mar 03 09:46 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | > De : *Bastian Best · Beyond Best Practice* <bastian@bestpatent.eu | Mar 03 09:46 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | > <mailto:bastian@bestpatent.eu>> | Mar 03 09:46 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | > Date: lun. 3 mars 2025, 07:51 | Mar 03 09:46 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | > Subject: System claim ? Method claim? What's best in a software patent? | Mar 03 09:46 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | What a clown he is. | Mar 03 09:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | Bad people gain more than good people.] | Mar 03 09:47 |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes | Mar 03 11:32 | |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes | Mar 03 11:48 | |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes | Mar 03 12:11 | |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes | Mar 03 12:21 | |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes | Mar 03 12:30 | |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes | Mar 03 12:41 | |
| *x-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!) | Mar 03 14:29 | |
| *x-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@h5zkbfemmwig6.irc) has joined #techbytes | Mar 03 14:30 | |
| schestowitz[TR2] | http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2025/02/the-description-of-patent-should-always.html?showComment=1740915283017#c626049233818705810 | Mar 03 15:47 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-ipkitten.blogspot.com | The description of a patent should "always" be used to interpret the claims (DexCom vs. Abbott, UPC_CFI_230/2023) - The IPKat | Mar 03 15:47 | |
| schestowitz[TR2] | :@ “Anonymous”<br /><br />You might not see anything in the EPC which obliges the EPO to interpret claims by using a different approach to that adopted by the national courts. I have a more differentiated view on this. <br /><br />In my opinion interpreting claims in a post grant infringement is different from interpreting when it comes to validity at the EPO. In infringement, the scope of protection may be different as this ha | Mar 03 15:48 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | s been enshrined in Art 69(1) and Art 1 of the Protocol. <br /><br />When looking at the very coherent line of case law of the EBA relating to “directly and unambiguously derivable”, cf. e.g. G 2/98 and G 2/10, it is indeed inevitable that what can be derived during infringement cannot be the same as when applying Art 69(1) and Art 1 of the Protocol. <br /><br />Some national courts, e.g. the German Federal Court claims to foll | Mar 03 15:48 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | ow the EBA’s case law, but does exactly the contrary when it comes to Art 123(2). There are enough decisions of the boards dismissing the various remedies proposed by the BGH to avoid revoking a patent monopoly in case of added matter. <br /><br />Improver and pemetrexed are two good examples of how the claims are interpreted by the EPO and by national courts. <br /><br />This has nothing to do with any "rough and ready" | Mar 03 15:48 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | ; approach to claim interpretation. The sound basis in law is the EPC and its interpretation by the EBA. In G 2/88, it held that Art 69(1) and Art 1 of the Protocol should be applied. In G 2/12, it came to the opposite conclusion.<br /><br />Let’s thus wait and see what will be said by the EBA in G 1/24. | Mar 03 15:48 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | [ | Mar 03 15:48 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | <li> | Mar 03 17:13 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | <h5><a href="https://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20250303#orbitiny"> Orbitiny 0.01</a></h5> | Mar 03 17:13 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | <blockquote> | Mar 03 17:13 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | <p>Orbitiny is a new indepedently developed desktop environment for Linux. It's built using Qt, the same development library used by KDE Plasma and LXQt. The project's website describes the desktop as follows: [...] </p> | Mar 03 17:13 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | </blockquote> | Mar 03 17:13 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | </li> | Mar 03 17:13 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes- ( status 403 @ https://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20250303#orbitiny ) | Mar 03 17:13 | |
| *fantom has quit (Ping timeout: 120 seconds) | Mar 03 21:10 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.6 | ䷉ find the plain text version at this address (HTTP) or in Gemini (how to use Gemini) with a full GemText version.