●● IRC: #techbytes @ Techrights IRC Network: Wednesday, September 03, 2025 ●● ● Sep 03 [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] https://www.generation-nt.com/actualites/microsoft-france-licenciement-rcc-ia-restructuration-2061819 [05:28] -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-www.generation-nt.com | Microsoft licencie 10% de ses effectifs en France malgr des rsultats records [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] https://www.thelayoff.com/t/1k456tdcz [05:28] -TechBytesBot/#techbytes- ( status 403 @ https://www.thelayoff.com/t/1k456tdcz ) [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] "https://www.ainvest.com/news/ibm-sees-india-future-quantum-computing-fostering-algorithm-research-startups-2508/ [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] "IBM Sees India's Future in Quantum Computing, Fostering Algorithm Research and Startups" [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] "India, IBM's second-largest community of learners, lags in application research but is partnering with IBM in its National Quantum Mission and regional initiatives to foster innovation." [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] KEYWORD: LAGS... "SECOND COMMUNITY OF LEARNERS LAGS IN APPLICATION RESEARCH" BUT HOPES IBM WILL MAKE THEM GET THERE. [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] (Second community of learners, whatever that is...) [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] 3 hours ago by Anonymous [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] | 3 reactions (+3/-0) | Reply [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] Post ID: @ca+1k456tdcz [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] +5 [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] @by [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] Japan (Japanese) is the country with most patents granted in the US, with almost 41,000 in 2023. [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] 5 hours ago by Anonymous [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] | 5 reactions (+5/-0) | Reply [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] Post ID: @bz+1k456tdcz [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] +8 [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] @bw [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] The person that posted the comment you replied to can't prove it, because it's not true. [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] Domestic vs. foreign filings: [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] Of the 1.76 million patent publications from Chinese inventors in 2024, an estimated 96% were filed only within China. This is because they cannot compete internationally from an inventions standard perspective. [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] Limited international reach: [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] Only a small fraction of Chinese patents are filed internationally via the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) or in countries like the U.S. For patents filed abroad, U.S.-based applicants file more applications (agregated) internationally than any other country. [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] A negligible portion of Chinese patents include filings in the U.S.. In 2024, only about 1% of Chinese patent filings were submitted to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Keywords is submitted, submitted and approved are two different things. [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] Also, they have increased international applications internationally, but in jurisdictions with less rigorous standards. [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] Plus this: [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] China is trying to increase their presence in global systems, particularly the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] PCT applications: [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] In 2024, Chinese inventors filed 70,160 PCT applications, leading the world for the fifth consecutive year. The number of PCT filings is still a small portion of China's total domestic volume. For comparison, the U.S. filed 54,087 PCT applications in 2024. But the US doesn't have to file in the same manner. Quantity is what China is going for internally, but with lower standards, while the US has stronger patent ideas and doesn't g [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] o for quantity. Let us remember that they have 4 times more people than the US. [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] As we know, applications are not the same as obtained patents. [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] The United States has won over 400 Nobel Prizes, significantly more than China's 8, as of late 2024 data. [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] By the way, they also do the same with copyrights. They make you file also in China, otherwise they blatantly COPY your copyrights. The same is true for India. [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] 5 hours ago by Anonymous [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] | 8 reactions (+8/-0) | Reply [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] Post ID: @by+1k456tdcz [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] +11 [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] @bs [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] PLUS - why do they need to send 600,000 students to study in US college and universities? [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] If they were so capable, they wouldn't have the need to study abroad, most particularly, in the US, acquire and steal knowledge from US educational institutions and as they are here as students, spy, grab more knowledge from whoever is employing them, etc. [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] 6 hours ago by Anonymous [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] | 11 reactions (+11/-0) | Reply [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] Post ID: @bx+1k456tdcz [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] +8 [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] @bv Chinese talk is cheap ! [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] Prove it. [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] 6 hours ago by Anonymous [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] | 8 reactions (+8/-0) | Reply [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] Post ID: @bw+1k456tdcz [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] -12 [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] @bs most patents from US actually from Chinese immigrants. So really most ideas come from Chinese. Plus, Americans too fat already. Automtion only make more fat. Become even more lazy. And we have much automation already, just not so many fat and lazy. [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] 6 hours ago by Anonymous [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] | 12 reactions (+0/-12) | Reply [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] Post ID: @bv+1k456tdcz [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] +8 [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] @bc [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] Just another smoke and mirrors project from India. But then, what else do you expect from a corrupt and rotten culture, which is now playing second fiddle to the rising Chinese dominance in the East ? Xi has a WINNING hand, but Modi is not WINNING ! [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] (Modi is a loser, just like Alvind, Krabanaugh, Rob the Slob and the Pipmunks) ! [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] 6 hours ago by Anonymous [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] | 8 reactions (+8/-0) | Reply [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] Post ID: @bt+1k456tdcz [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] +6 [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] @bh [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] China needs America more than they realize - they might have helped destroy manufacturing in the US in the last few decades, but necessity is the mother of invention. Americans are smarter and more innovative than the Chinese, not the other way around. Otherwise why would Chinese need to steal American patents and inventions as happens so often ? Do you hear of Americans coming to China to steal the Chinese inventions and patents ? [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] Why not ? That points to America having more innovative ideas and products. AI and automation is moving ahead in the US despite the fact that it will likely cause major economic upheaval as people lose jobs. [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] Do you think Xi Jingping would allow automation to displace millions of Chinese jobs in China ? He and the CCP would likely be history if they even approved such an idea. Communism is a dead ideology just like Mao. [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] 6 hours ago by Anonymous [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] | 6 reactions (+6/-0) | Reply [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] Post ID: @bs+1k456tdcz [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] +12 [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] @bh [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] You write like you are still in kindergarten. [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] You would be perfect for cheap labor, but training AI is beyond your gray material's ability. [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] 7 hours ago by Anonymous [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] | 12 reactions (+12/-0) | Reply [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] Post ID: @bk+1k456tdcz [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] +20 [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] @bh [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] No, China is not self-sufficient and relies heavily on international trade for key resources like food, energy, and advanced technology. [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] 7 hours ago by Anonymous [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] | 20 reactions (+20/-0) | Reply [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] Post ID: @bj+1k456tdcz [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] -24 [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] @b4 But I agree with @b3, Americans very funny. Maybe dont realize China can live without US but US needs China. We can make everything here. So maybe makes sense to move opperations here. Then later we outsource to cheap labor from US. But for unskilled only. Maybe things like training AI, something like that [05:28] schestowitz[TR2] " [05:28] -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-www.ainvest.com | IBM Sees India's Future in Quantum Computing, Fostering Algorithm Research and Startups ● Sep 03 [08:20] *psydroid3 (~psydroid@7h7y9yu8y5zjw.irc) has joined #techbytes [08:59] *psydroid3 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) ● Sep 03 [09:16] *psydroid3 (~psydroid@7h7y9yu8y5zjw.irc) has joined #techbytes [09:43] *psydroid3 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) ● Sep 03 [10:00] *psydroid3 (~psydroid@7h7y9yu8y5zjw.irc) has joined #techbytes [10:01] *psydroid3 has quit (Quit: KVIrc 5.2.6 Quasar http://www.kvirc.net/) ● Sep 03 [11:51] *psydroid3 (~psydroid@7h7y9yu8y5zjw.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Sep 03 [13:30] schestowitz[TR2]
[13:30] schestowitz[TR2][13:30] schestowitz[TR2]CrowdSec, a self-hosted open-source IDS/IPS security solution that protects servers, services, containers, and applications from malicious traffic, has just rolled out version 1.7.
[13:30] schestowitz[TR2]
[13:30] schestowitz[TR2][13:30] schestowitz[TR2]Thats exactly the opposite of how things happen by default in Emacs (and a few other editors), so it really didnt sit well with me. Obviously you can use dedicated commands to control the split behavior (e.g. :rightbelow split and :botright vsplit1), but if you want to permanently improve the defaults just add the following your .vimrc: [...]
[13:30] schestowitz[TR2]
[13:30] schestowitz[TR2][13:30] schestowitz[TR2]Emacs has several fantastic functions that offer you superpowers when it comes to text editing.
[13:30] schestowitz[TR2]Not all of these functions come with default key bindings.
[13:30] schestowitz[TR2]To make editing prose more efficient, I added a few key bindings for transposing sentences and paragraphs.
[13:30] schestowitz[TR2]
Mr Thomas, you have grossly misrepresented my position. However, that happens so frequently that it would almost certainly be a waste of my time pointing out the crucial points where my views diverge from how you have [15:37] schestowitz[TR2] presented them.
I will therefore keep my comment to one, brief point: there is no such thing in patent monopoly law as a "claimed definition". There are terms used in
Max, the problem is precisely that the EPO are applying their unique version of a "primacy of the claims" principle to post-grant proceedings. If this trend continues, it will inevitably lead to paten [15:37] schestowitz[TR2] ts being revoked by the EPO that would be (or have been) confirmed as valid by national courts and/or the UPC.
As originally envisaged, the purpose of the UPC was to
"First, argued the Patentee, there was an effect of convenience, whereby the claimed solid dispersion formulation allowed for more convenient dosing." As the first argument! Made me laugh and assume the attor [15:37] schestowitz[TR2] neys didn't believe the claims were inventive themselves. There could be something in the 2nd argument depending on the facts, but, with those facts, I doubt the skilled person
Dear Dr. Hughes,
I commented the decision in my blog, but I would like to come back on a comment of yours.
When you say that, making it up to the patentee to align the description and the claims could be read as supporting the case that mandatory description amendments should not be forced on patentees, given that legal certainty is provided by an est [15:37] schestowitz[TR2] ablished approach to