Techrights logo

IRC: #techbytes @ FreeNode: Thursday, December 05, 2019

Join us now at the IRC channel.

schestowitzHi,Dec 05 02:50
schestowitzI have read your message carefully and I am a bit baffled by parts of it. I will remark below.Dec 05 02:51
schestowitz> Greetings,Dec 05 02:51
schestowitz>Dec 05 02:51
schestowitz> I thought I'd write you about this concern of mine, in case it seems asDec 05 02:51
schestowitz> odd to you as it does to me. The below comments on Ars Technica areDec 05 02:51
schestowitz> absurd misrepresentations of Stallman (who should come across asDec 05 02:51
schestowitz> mentally incompetent to most people when discussing non-tech issues) -Dec 05 02:51
schestowitz> ones based on a few lines he's written, where they've created a wholeDec 05 02:51
schestowitz> different context out of them. So, they've filtered down years of oddDec 05 02:51
schestowitz> comments and presented them as some sort of advocacy of his. As opposedDec 05 02:51
schestowitz> to yet another odd thing in a long line, where he argues "climateDec 05 02:51
schestowitz> heating" will "fry" the planet, etc. Extreme gaslighting.Dec 05 02:51
schestowitzIn the political sphere the term "gaslighting" has been misused a lot in recent years. To the point where it no longer means what "gaslighting" used to mean.Dec 05 02:51
schestowitz> Anyway, I have pondered certain censorship matters lately, and I'veDec 05 02:51
schestowitz> drawn quite an extreme conclusion, which I can expand upon, if you wantDec 05 02:51
schestowitz> - or you can disregard instead, too. It is the sort of stuff that youDec 05 02:51
schestowitz> could potentially be involuntarily committed for if doctors apply tooDec 05 02:51
schestowitz> bad faith. My theory is that women, rather than being actual individualDec 05 02:51
schestowitz> human beings, are actually agents of Satan. That they are partiallyDec 05 02:51
schestowitz> biological lifeforms like we are, bogged down by the roles andDec 05 02:51
schestowitz> responsibilities given to them in human societies if constrained by suchDec 05 02:51
schestowitz> - but which advance a Satanic agenda for the takeover of our world asDec 05 02:51
schestowitz> much as they're able to. That their apparent individual persons are allDec 05 02:51
schestowitz> an act, and that they're the same entity underneath - Satan. A being ofDec 05 02:51
schestowitz> pure hate and darkness, whose toxicity gets people to kill themselves ifDec 05 02:51
schestowitz> they get too close to it. And that they're all one and the same entity.Dec 05 02:51
schestowitz> Where no individual life form has much value to it at all, but whereDec 05 02:51
schestowitz> womankind's (Satan's) control of the world is all that matters. AndDec 05 02:51
schestowitz> which gets provoked when remarking on social media on the attributes ofDec 05 02:51
schestowitz> woman as a gender, whether it be ability or morality, speaking to you inDec 05 02:51
schestowitz> an inhumanely ugly voice that you didn't think possible, through anyDec 05 02:51
schestowitz> "human" agent at its disposal.Dec 05 02:51
schestowitzSatan is a religion concept. RMS is not religious and neither am I. If we were to ever debate such a topic from the perspective of things like "Satan", it would not go anywhere.Dec 05 02:51
schestowitz> I guess I'll only write this much for now. I've got plenty of supportingDec 05 02:51
schestowitz> evidence for the notion, though obviously not outright proof yet. I canDec 05 02:51
schestowitz> share with you my observations and conclusions if you want - though doDec 05 02:51
schestowitz> understand that this also means you might end up regarding any femaleDec 05 02:51
schestowitz> family members in a different light. They're not likely at all to targetDec 05 02:51
schestowitz> you personally, but do understand that my theory has every woman inDec 05 02:51
schestowitz> existence participating in advancing the Satanic agenda to the extent itDec 05 02:51
schestowitz> possibly can. Which may be quite hard to stomach when it becomesDec 05 02:52
schestowitz> apparent, that the females in your lives are likely all cultivated andDec 05 02:52
schestowitz> artificial personas. Body real, person not.Dec 05 02:52
schestowitzThat's a generalisation. The same can be said about many men, including some who have a lot of power.Dec 05 02:52
schestowitz> I haven't really discussed this with anyone myself, yet, though IDec 05 02:52
schestowitz> figured I'd ask for your take on the Stallman gaslighting. Because itDec 05 02:52
schestowitz> seems as right now, there's an absolutely tremendous amount of suchDec 05 02:52
schestowitz> going on, with recent history being actively rewritten, for the sake ofDec 05 02:52
schestowitz> presenting men (that is, us actual human beings) as toxic, and womenDec 05 02:52
schestowitz> (the agents of Satan) as benign victims. It seems so absurd to me thatDec 05 02:52
schestowitz> Stallman is presented as outright wrecking the FSF and such, as opposedDec 05 02:52
schestowitz> to actually starting it - and getting upvotes. And everything is beingDec 05 02:52
schestowitz> misrepresented in the extreme, with large numbers of "people" writingDec 05 02:52
schestowitz> stories on various forums - far more than you'd expect disinfo agenciesDec 05 02:52
schestowitz> capable of rallying. With individual men, as well as the male (human)Dec 05 02:52
schestowitz> gender, being heavily gaslighted, and womankind (Satan) promoted.Dec 05 02:52
schestowitzWhat's shown below is groupthink and mob mentality. That's another thing and many articles were written on this topic.Dec 05 02:52
schestowitz> So, please give your take on just how utterly groundless the StallmanDec 05 02:52
schestowitz> misrepresentation is, and get back to me if you want to see my evidenceDec 05 02:52
schestowitz> that suggests we're likely facing hell on earth, as Satan takes over ourDec 05 02:52
schestowitz> world through a systematic, massive effort on the part of agents allDec 05 02:52
schestowitz> around us. Which obviously needs to be addressed, and which I'm workingDec 05 02:52
schestowitz> on. Obviously something that will draw attention, which is why I'm notDec 05 02:52
schestowitz> exactly going public until I have a plan for distributing my evidenceDec 05 02:52
schestowitz> and ideas for countermeasures.Dec 05 02:52
schestowitzRMS concepts on software pose a risk to some people's interest. So anything he ever said can be twisted.Dec 05 02:52
schestowitz> ---Dec 05 02:52
schestowitz> https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2019/09/richard-stallman-leaves-mit-after-controversial-remarks-on-rape/?comments=1&post=37976767#comment-37976767Dec 05 02:52
schestowitz>Dec 05 02:52
schestowitz>Dec 05 02:52
schestowitz>Dec 05 02:52
schestowitz> If Stallman didn't have two decades long history of promotingDec 05 02:52
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-arstechnica.com | Richard Stallman leaves MIT after controversial remarks on rape | Ars TechnicaDec 05 02:52
schestowitz> pedophilia, you could try to interpret it like that. But contextDec 05 02:52
schestowitz> matters. Stallman intentions were clear, to defend yet anotherDec 05 02:52
schestowitz> pedophile, as he has done many times in the past.Dec 05 02:52
schestowitz>Dec 05 02:52
schestowitz>  +78 (+85 / -7)Dec 05 02:52
schestowitzResponding to misreporting (he did not defend Epstein). But what RMS wrote about some political party in the past isn't helping.Dec 05 02:52
schestowitz> ---Dec 05 02:52
schestowitz>Dec 05 02:52
schestowitz> ---Dec 05 02:53
schestowitz>  https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2019/09/richard-stallman-leaves-mit-after-controversial-remarks-on-rape/?comments=1&post=37976651#comment-37976651Dec 05 02:53
schestowitz>Dec 05 02:53
schestowitz>Dec 05 02:53
schestowitz> taswyn Ars PraefectusDec 05 02:53
schestowitz> replyDec 05 02:53
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-arstechnica.com | Richard Stallman leaves MIT after controversial remarks on rape | Ars TechnicaDec 05 02:53
schestowitz> Sep 17, 2019 7:17 PMDec 05 02:53
schestowitz>Dec 05 02:53
schestowitz>Dec 05 02:53
schestowitz> The only thing that's surprising (and, really, saddening) is that heDec 05 02:53
schestowitz> lasted this long.Dec 05 02:53
schestowitz>Dec 05 02:53
schestowitz> Not simply lasted, but quite prominently prospered.Dec 05 02:53
schestowitz>Dec 05 02:53
schestowitz> Just like other toxic figures in tech who got techbro free ride passesDec 05 02:53
schestowitz> on basically everything (and meanwhile good people who tried bringing upDec 05 02:53
schestowitz> issues in regards to this type of thing frequently got burnt hard), thisDec 05 02:53
schestowitz> isn't some revelation. All of this about Stallman has been known forDec 05 02:53
schestowitz> some time.Dec 05 02:53
schestowitz>Dec 05 02:53
schestowitz> And their root toxicity often gets not merely excused but even lionizedDec 05 02:53
schestowitz> as some kind of positive thing.Dec 05 02:53
schestowitz>  +74 (+101 / -27)Dec 05 02:53
schestowitzThe comment is not as bad as the above-mentioned first.Dec 05 02:53
schestowitz>Dec 05 02:53
schestowitz> ---Dec 05 02:53
schestowitz>Dec 05 02:53
schestowitz> https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2019/09/richard-stallman-leaves-mit-after-controversial-remarks-on-rape/?comments=1&post=37976665#comment-37976665Dec 05 02:53
schestowitz>Dec 05 02:53
schestowitz>Dec 05 02:53
schestowitz> MyCatCanBeatYourDad Smack-Fu Master, in trainingDec 05 02:53
schestowitz> replyDec 05 02:53
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-arstechnica.com | Richard Stallman leaves MIT after controversial remarks on rape | Ars TechnicaDec 05 02:53
schestowitz> Sep 17, 2019 7:18 PMDec 05 02:53
schestowitz>Dec 05 02:53
schestowitz>Dec 05 02:53
schestowitz>Dec 05 02:53
schestowitz> Often an organization that looks good and worthy from a distance turnsDec 05 02:53
schestowitz> out, close up, to be made of flawed individuals.Dec 05 02:53
schestowitz>Dec 05 02:53
schestowitz> A friend of mine who used to work for Stallman in the '90's told meDec 05 02:53
schestowitz> about a steady parade of girls who would come to hang out with the coolDec 05 02:54
schestowitz> people at the FSF, who ended up sitting with a trapped expression onDec 05 02:54
schestowitz> their faces while Richard groped them.Dec 05 02:54
schestowitz>Dec 05 02:54
schestowitz> ETA: Gosh, I did not know about the plants until just now.Dec 05 02:54
schestowitz>Dec 05 02:54
schestowitz> Last edited by MyCatCanBeatYourDad on Tue Sep 17, 2019 2:22 pmDec 05 02:54
schestowitz>  +92 (+101 / -9)Dec 05 02:54
schestowitzThe groping part may as well have been made up (I don't know), but Ars would be wiser to write an article about what Microsoft Peter (their staff) did to little kids. Instead it's entertaining an anti-RMS fest, based on a false headline and body.Dec 05 02:54
schestowitzThis is of course old news. See http://www.tuxmachines.org/node/128122Dec 05 02:54
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-www.tuxmachines.org | Stallman Under Fire for Views on Epstein | Tux MachinesDec 05 02:54
schestowitzWe need to move to another level and focus on technical issues.Dec 05 02:54
schestowitzIf RMS did something illegal, a complaint can be filed. But nobody has done that.Dec 05 02:54
schestowitz>>> Did we ever meet when I lived in Manchester?  I think we were there atDec 05 03:07
schestowitz>>> the same time in 2002-2003?Dec 05 03:07
schestowitz>>>Dec 05 03:07
schestowitz>>> Regards,Dec 05 03:07
schestowitz>>Dec 05 03:07
schestowitz>>Dec 05 03:07
schestowitz>> I was a student there at the time, but hadn't yet gone to ManLUG IIRC.Dec 05 03:07
schestowitz>> Our paths may have crossed if you were at the Vic. U. of Manc. CS Dept.Dec 05 03:07
schestowitz>Dec 05 03:07
schestowitz>Dec 05 03:07
schestowitz> I was contracting for a company putting Internet and telephone into theDec 05 03:07
schestowitz> new student residences, I actually stayed there in the Wilmslow ParkDec 05 03:07
schestowitz> building on Oxford Rd.Dec 05 03:07
schestowitz>Dec 05 03:07
schestowitz> It is a long time since I've been there, you are still there or will youDec 05 03:07
schestowitz> be in FOSDEM or any other events in the coming months?Dec 05 03:07
schestowitzI only take planes at most once in 2 years (ecological reasons), so am not attending events to be frank. Unless they're local.Dec 05 03:07
schestowitz>>> There are additional RSS feeds now:Dec 05 03:08
schestowitz>>>Dec 05 03:08
schestowitz>>> https://debian.community/feed.xmlDec 05 03:08
schestowitz>>> https://fsfellowship.eu/feed.xmlDec 05 03:08
schestowitz>>> https://datapocalypse.net/feed.xmlDec 05 03:08
schestowitz>>Dec 05 03:08
schestowitz>> Added to my RSS readerDec 05 03:08
schestowitz>>Dec 05 03:08
schestowitz>>> The FSFE resignation emails were just published today:Dec 05 03:09
schestowitz>>>Dec 05 03:09
schestowitz>>> https://fsfellowship.eu/fsfe-resignations-and-expulsions/Dec 05 03:09
schestowitz>>Dec 05 03:09
schestowitz>> Added:Dec 05 03:09
schestowitz>>Dec 05 03:09
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-fsfellowship.eu | FSFE Resignations and expulsionsDec 05 03:09
schestowitz>> http://www.tuxmachines.org/node/131227Dec 05 03:09
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-www.tuxmachines.org | FSFE Resignations and expulsions | Tux MachinesDec 05 03:09
schestowitz> these are brilliant. if they take a day to get added, think nothing of it.Dec 05 03:43
schestowitz>Dec 05 03:43
schestowitz> the only one i was curious about (vs ready to add) was "swisslinux."Dec 05 03:43
schestowitz>Dec 05 03:43
schestowitz> lets visit them:Dec 05 03:44
schestowitz>Dec 05 03:44
schestowitz> "GNU/Linux en général"Dec 05 03:44
schestowitz>Dec 05 03:44
schestowitz> "GNU/Linux im Allgemeinen"Dec 05 03:44
schestowitz>Dec 05 03:44
schestowitz> "GNU/Linux in generale"Dec 05 03:44
schestowitz>Dec 05 03:44
schestowitz> funny how that tells me what i need to know. thats serious brand power. deeds matter more than brands, but brands backed by integrity are a powerful shorthand:Dec 05 03:44
schestowitz>Dec 05 03:44
schestowitz> People who say "GNU" are far, far less likely to let you down.Dec 05 03:44
schestowitz> It's not magic-- it's just a weird brand that people who co-optDec 05 03:44
schestowitz> free software don't like to be associated with. We are lucky,Dec 05 03:44
schestowitz> because they (mostly) make it that easy to tell who's who.Dec 05 03:44
schestowitz> Does calling it "GNU" mean you advocate free software? IfDec 05 03:44
schestowitz> you advocate using the GNU operating system, it's a greatDec 05 03:44
schestowitz> start. https://ia802903.us.archive.org/5/items/figosdev_users_Fsf2/fsf_third_draft.pdfDec 05 03:44
schestowitzThe same is true for people who say "Open Source", like jgay...Dec 05 03:44
schestowitzQUOTE FROM HIM BELOW:Dec 05 03:45
-->pidgin_log (~roy@host81-152-238-248.range81-152.btcentralplus.com) has joined #techbytesDec 05 04:02
schestowitzhttps://this-week-in-rust.org/blog/2019/12/03/this-week-in-rust-315/Dec 05 04:36
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-this-week-in-rust.org | This Week in Rust 315 · This Week in RustDec 05 04:36
schestowitzhttps://twitter.com/richturn_ms/status/1202481315875999744Dec 05 07:56
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-@richturn_ms: @stautistic @nunixtech @unixterminal @schestowitz Let's keep this civil Mitchel. The relevance, accuracy and verac… https://t.co/A65h6j7xjiDec 05 07:56
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-@richturn_ms: @stautistic @nunixtech @unixterminal @schestowitz Let's keep this civil Mitchel. The relevance, accuracy and verac… https://t.co/A65h6j7xjiDec 05 07:56
schestowitz"Dec 05 07:56
schestowitzLet's keep this civil Mitchel.Dec 05 07:56
schestowitzThe relevance, accuracy and veracity of the numbers matter. It's just throwing random numbers out there won't help anyone. Bear with us ; we'll work on getting numbers that have context and meaning.Dec 05 07:56
schestowitz"Dec 05 07:56
schestowitzhttps://twitter.com/stautistic/status/1202485355158441985Dec 05 07:56
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-@stautistic: @richturn_ms @nunixtech @unixterminal @schestowitz What next? Are you guys going to mansplain to me that omission i… https://t.co/m56Sm31tBwDec 05 07:56
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-@stautistic: @richturn_ms @nunixtech @unixterminal @schestowitz What next? Are you guys going to mansplain to me that omission i… https://t.co/m56Sm31tBwDec 05 07:56
schestowitz"Dec 05 07:56
schestowitzWhat next? Are you guys going to mansplain to me that omission is the most common means of lying with statistics? Dec 05 07:56
schestowitzI merely asked for you to substantiate your opinion with data/KPIs relevant to WSL adoption and usage.Dec 05 07:56
schestowitz"Dec 05 07:56
schestowitzThey need to figure out how to spin this "KIN" first; what? You thought they would just tell you number of active users? They know the number.Dec 05 07:58
schestowitzhttps://twitter.com/richturn_ms/status/1202488062598451205Dec 05 07:58
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-@richturn_ms: @stautistic @nunixtech @unixterminal @schestowitz And I said we'd look into it. We don't get to just do whatever th… https://t.co/zPOtQIEPpIDec 05 07:58
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-@richturn_ms: @stautistic @nunixtech @unixterminal @schestowitz And I said we'd look into it. We don't get to just do whatever th… https://t.co/zPOtQIEPpIDec 05 07:58
schestowitz"Dec 05 07:58
schestowitzAnd I said we'd look into it. We don't get to just do whatever the heck we want.Dec 05 07:58
schestowitzOnce again: Bear with us, we'll look into gathering and publishing reliable, useful numbers in the New Year.Dec 05 07:58
schestowitz"Dec 05 07:58
schestowitzTaking a hole MONTH to spin numbers you already have and knowDec 05 07:59
schestowitzhttps://twitter.com/stautistic/status/1202492005353345024Dec 05 08:00
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-@stautistic: @val_to_string @richturn_ms @nunixtech @unixterminal @schestowitz 🙄 where am I being rude and why is such a pursuit… https://t.co/cKjaw2V22GDec 05 08:00
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-@stautistic: @val_to_string @richturn_ms @nunixtech @unixterminal @schestowitz 🙄 where am I being rude and why is such a pursuit… https://t.co/cKjaw2V22GDec 05 08:00
schestowitz" where am I being rude and why is such a pursuit not prudent on Twitter? Also, how does asking for evidentiary support to a contradiction rank above not being able to substantiate said contradiction with facts on the rude scale? "Dec 05 08:00
schestowitzMr. Lewis was not being rude. You are changing the  subject, Microsoft, and that's revealing.Dec 05 08:01
schestowitzhttps://twitter.com/val_to_string/status/1202489802156920832Dec 05 08:02
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-@val_to_string: @richturn_ms @stautistic @nunixtech @unixterminal @schestowitz I feel like making rude demands for "proof" in a twe… https://t.co/JS52SsEGOODec 05 08:02
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-@val_to_string: @richturn_ms @stautistic @nunixtech @unixterminal @schestowitz I feel like making rude demands for "proof" in a twe… https://t.co/JS52SsEGOODec 05 08:02
schestowitz"Dec 05 08:02
schestowitzI feel like making rude demands for "proof" in a tweet is not a constructive way of engagementDec 05 08:02
schestowitzWe are all professionals here, and we know how corporate communications work. Demanding that someone immediately disclose kpis in a tweet feels more like unhelpful trollingDec 05 08:02
schestowitz"Dec 05 08:02
schestowitzAsking for a number is NOT rudeDec 05 08:02
schestowitzhttps://twitter.com/richturn_ms/status/1202493502023581696Dec 05 08:03
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-@richturn_ms: @stautistic @val_to_string @nunixtech @unixterminal @schestowitz If you have to ask, "bucko"...Dec 05 08:03
schestowitzhttps://twitter.com/stautistic/status/1202495717614354433Dec 05 08:03
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-@stautistic: @richturn_ms @val_to_string @nunixtech @unixterminal @schestowitz Really? That’s hardly rude on the spectrum of twi… https://t.co/rWsrf6oStoDec 05 08:03
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-@stautistic: @richturn_ms @val_to_string @nunixtech @unixterminal @schestowitz Really? That’s hardly rude on the spectrum of twi… https://t.co/rWsrf6oStoDec 05 08:03
schestowitz"Really? That’s hardly rude on the spectrum of twitter and is far less rude than assuming that one is ignorant to statistics while they’re asking for adoption and usage KPIs, at least in my opinion."Dec 05 08:03
schestowitzhttps://twitter.com/richturn_ms/status/1202496916082159616Dec 05 08:03
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-@richturn_ms: @stautistic @val_to_string @nunixtech @unixterminal @schestowitz It's dismissive, condescending and unprofessional.Dec 05 08:03
schestowitzYou have just described MicrosoftDec 05 08:03
schestowitzhttps://twitter.com/nunixtech/status/1202500673507614720Dec 05 08:15
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-@nunixtech: @schestowitz @val_to_string @richturn_ms @stautistic @unixterminal first I’m not a Microsoft employee at all and ma… https://t.co/c09VL8cZOWDec 05 08:15
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-@nunixtech: @schestowitz @val_to_string @richturn_ms @stautistic @unixterminal first I’m not a Microsoft employee at all and ma… https://t.co/c09VL8cZOWDec 05 08:15
schestowitz"Dec 05 08:15
schestowitzfirst I’m not a Microsoft employee at all and mansplaining was not the intentDec 05 08:15
schestowitzthe bucko thing, I guess it would be a “débile”, which in my boon is an insultDec 05 08:16
schestowitzand “Dr”, you assume things in a provocative tweet and then whine that MS doesn’t answer you Dec 05 08:16
schestowitznice trolling indeed Dec 05 08:16
schestowitz"Dec 05 08:16
schestowitzI am preparing an article about this. Everything you guys said has merely confirmed what I knew all along about WSL's intentions (and its team's attitude towards GNU/Linux), so please do not delete your tweets (I would notice and have made local copies)Dec 05 08:17
schestowitzhttps://twitter.com/nunixtech/status/1202504754733170689Dec 05 08:28
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-@nunixtech: @schestowitz @val_to_string @richturn_ms @stautistic @unixterminal hahaha an article with no background check (agai… https://t.co/XJ9iXef4sXDec 05 08:28
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-@nunixtech: @schestowitz @val_to_string @richturn_ms @stautistic @unixterminal hahaha an article with no background check (agai… https://t.co/XJ9iXef4sXDec 05 08:28
schestowitz"Dec 05 08:28
schestowitzhahaha an article with no background check (again, not a MS employee) and based on a twitter feed which started with you purely assuming WSL is in bad shapeDec 05 08:28
schestowitzwill love to read it, please post a link to the article Dec 05 08:28
schestowitzps: sorry Ubuntu and Clear Linux, I'm anti-linux apparently Dec 05 08:28
schestowitz"Dec 05 08:28
schestowitzI never said or though you're a Microsoft employeeDec 05 08:29
schestowitzI never said or thought you're a Microsoft employeeDec 05 08:29
schestowitz> The same is true for people who say "Open Source", like jgay...Dec 05 08:36
schestowitz>Dec 05 08:36
schestowitz> usually. open source has the entire tech press working for it, so its inevitable that well-intentioned people are going to say that first. jgay of all people should knoe better, but many dont.Dec 05 08:36
schestowitz>Dec 05 08:36
schestowitz> on the whole, i agree though.Dec 05 08:36
schestowitzI let him know your thoughts. Him = Daniel.Dec 05 08:37
schestowitz"$5 says Rich doesn’t follow up with WSL stats"Dec 05 08:39
schestowitzhttps://twitter.com/schestowitz/status/1201704001819041792Dec 05 08:39
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-@schestowitz: From what I can gather, #microsoft #wsl has been an utter failure as hardly anyone uses it, we hardly hear about it… https://t.co/GZvepBUg3lDec 05 08:39
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-@schestowitz: From what I can gather, #microsoft #wsl has been an utter failure as hardly anyone uses it, we hardly hear about it… https://t.co/GZvepBUg3lDec 05 08:39
schestowitzI don't understand this subject line, but in IRC I backed up all the tweets and I will write about this laterDec 05 08:40
schestowitzhttps://twitter.com/stautistic/status/1202507605974736896Dec 05 08:43
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-@stautistic: @schestowitz Yep. Good arguments and sound logic aren’t exactly propped up by petulance. 😂Dec 05 08:43
schestowitz> I’m still laughing about them assuming that I’m a professional. 🤣🤣Dec 05 08:52
schestowitzIt means you hit a serve. Keep doing the same thing. Again and again. Follow up. Don't give up. I'll be watching and documenting.Dec 05 08:52
schestowitzWe have this in IRC too ---- you can join us. It's fun.Dec 05 08:52
schestowitz> Like, I’m the crazy cunt that professionals have to deal with when they hit a wall. 🤣Dec 05 08:52
schestowitzcalling former Microsoft staff who inquires about these numbers "rude"Dec 05 08:53
schestowitzto them, GNU/Linux is just a nuisance for Microsoft to attempt to 'tame' (if not undermine, which is hard, then at least <em>control</em>)Dec 05 08:53
<--pidgin_log has quit (Quit: Leaving.)Dec 05 08:59
<--acer-box has quit (*.net *.split)Dec 05 09:54
<--TechBytesBot has quit (*.net *.split)Dec 05 09:54
<--XFaCE has quit (*.net *.split)Dec 05 09:54
<--rianne__ has quit (*.net *.split)Dec 05 09:54
<--schestowitz has quit (*.net *.split)Dec 05 09:54
<--MinceR has quit (*.net *.split)Dec 05 09:54
<--libertybox_ has quit (*.net *.split)Dec 05 09:55
<--Condor has quit (*.net *.split)Dec 05 09:55
<--alynpost has quit (*.net *.split)Dec 05 09:55
<--rianne_ has quit (*.net *.split)Dec 05 09:55
<--Researcher- has quit (*.net *.split)Dec 05 09:55
<--oiaohm has quit (*.net *.split)Dec 05 09:55
<--hl has quit (*.net *.split)Dec 05 09:55
<--ChanServ has quit (*.net *.split)Dec 05 09:55
-->XFaCE (XFaCE@unaffiliated/xface) has joined #techbytesDec 05 10:02
-->TechBytesBot (~b0t@199.19.78.19) has joined #techbytesDec 05 10:02
-->acer-box (~acer-box@unaffiliated/schestowitz) has joined #techbytesDec 05 10:02
-->MinceR (~mincer@unaffiliated/mincer) has joined #techbytesDec 05 10:02
-->schestowitz (~roy@unaffiliated/schestowitz) has joined #techbytesDec 05 10:02
-->rianne__ (~rianne@host81-152-238-248.range81-152.btcentralplus.com) has joined #techbytesDec 05 10:02
-->libertybox_ (~schestowi@host81-152-238-248.range81-152.btcentralplus.com) has joined #techbytesDec 05 10:02
-->rianne_ (~liberty@host81-152-238-248.range81-152.btcentralplus.com) has joined #techbytesDec 05 10:02
-->oiaohm (~oiaohm@unaffiliated/oiaohm) has joined #techbytesDec 05 10:02
-->Condor (~freenode@e2.nixmagic.com) has joined #techbytesDec 05 10:02
-->alynpost (~alynpost@prgmr/staff/lobsters.sysadmin.alynpost) has joined #techbytesDec 05 10:02
-->Researcher- (iana@64.140.159.183) has joined #techbytesDec 05 10:02
-->hl (~hl@unaffiliated/hl) has joined #techbytesDec 05 10:02
-->ChanServ (ChanServ@services.) has joined #techbytesDec 05 10:02
---wolfe.freenode.net gives channel operator status to ChanServDec 05 10:02
-->MinceR_ (~mincer@unaffiliated/mincer) has joined #techbytesDec 05 18:35
<--MinceR has quit (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)Dec 05 18:36
---MinceR_ is now known as MinceRDec 05 18:52
<--oiaohm has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)Dec 05 22:40
-->oiaohm (~oiaohm@unaffiliated/oiaohm) has joined #techbytesDec 05 22:40

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.6 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!