●● IRC: #techbytes @ Techrights IRC Network: Friday, March 07, 2025 ●● ● Mar 07 [01:20] *x-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!) [01:23] *x-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@h5zkbfemmwig6.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Mar 07 [02:57] *x-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!) ● Mar 07 [03:02] *x-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@h5zkbfemmwig6.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Mar 07 [05:01] *rsheftel14358 (~rsheftel@freenode-ims.ilv.1cipql.IP) has joined #techbytes [05:02] *rsheftel1435 has quit (Ping timeout: 120 seconds) [05:02] *rsheftel14358 is now known as rsheftel1435 [05:26] *x-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!) [05:37] *x-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@h5zkbfemmwig6.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Mar 07 [06:37] *fantom has quit (Ping timeout: 120 seconds) [06:39] *fantom (~fantom@freenode-drv.aab.2jssns.IP) has joined #techbytes [06:44] schestowitz[TR2] From FSF board member [06:44] schestowitz[TR2] "All I know is from public announcements: there won't be a LibrePlanet [06:44] schestowitz[TR2] conference this year, but hopefully many FSF 40's celebrations around [06:44] schestowitz[TR2] the world. The LibrePlanet conference may be back next year." [06:44] *fantom has quit (Ping timeout: 120 seconds) [06:45] schestowitz[TR2] De : Bastian Best Beyond Best Practice [06:45] schestowitz[TR2] Date: ven. 7 mars 2025, 06:00 [06:45] schestowitz[TR2] Subject: Key Takeaways from the Patenting AI Masterclass [06:46] schestowitz[TR2] Artificial intelligence is reshaping whole industries, and with that comes a pressing question: how do we protect AI-driven innovations through patents? [06:46] schestowitz[TR2] Yesterday, I hosted the Patenting AI Masterclass, where we dove deep into the challenges and strategies of patenting artificial intelligence. It was an engaging session with patent professionals from law firms and industry patent departments, all eager to understand how to navigate this complex field. [06:46] schestowitz[TR2] Wait till the bubble of this buzzword bursts. [06:46] schestowitz[TR2] Remember "blackchain patents"? [06:47] schestowitz[TR2] " [06:47] schestowitz[TR2] So I can write it up as whats going on over at OSI. If youre interested and havent already written something up." ● Mar 07 [08:59] *fantom (~fantom@freenode-drv.aab.2jssns.IP) has joined #techbytes ● Mar 07 [09:02] *jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) [09:04] *jacobk (~quassel@syp65ggum2ibk.irc) has joined #techbytes [09:23] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes [09:40] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes [09:56] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes ● Mar 07 [10:23] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Mar 07 [13:32] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes [13:50] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Mar 07 [15:00] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes [15:04] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes [15:44] schestowitz[TR2]
  • [15:44] schestowitz[TR2]
    Immich 1.129 Photo and Video Backup Solution Released
    [15:44] schestowitz[TR2]
    [15:44] schestowitz[TR2]

    The main highlight is that videos in memories are now playable on the web, letting users relive special moments without leaving their browser. Additionally, the new shortcuts (L and Shift+L) to add assets to an album or shared album will undoubtedly streamline your workflow.

    [15:44] schestowitz[TR2]
    [15:44] schestowitz[TR2]
    • [15:44] schestowitz[TR2] [15:44] schestowitz[TR2]
  • [15:44] schestowitz[TR2]
    PipeWire 1.4 Delivers Broad MIDI2 and Bluetooth Improvements
    [15:44] schestowitz[TR2]
    [15:44] schestowitz[TR2]

    The PipeWire team has announced the release of PipeWire 1.4, which brings a host of new features and performance enhancements to this widely adopted Linux multimedia server that manages audio and video streams. This new version maintains API and ABI compatibility with all previous 1.2.x and 1.0.x releases.

    [15:44] schestowitz[TR2]
    [15:44] schestowitz[TR2]
    • [15:44] -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-linuxiac.com | Immich 1.129 Photo and Video Backup Solution Released [15:44] -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-linuxiac.com | PipeWire 1.4 Delivers Broad MIDI2 and Bluetooth Improvements [15:48] schestowitz[TR2]
  • [15:48] schestowitz[TR2]
    Tails 6.13 Released with Improved Wi-Fi Detection
    [15:48] schestowitz[TR2]
    [15:48] schestowitz[TR2]

    Among the most noteworthy additions is a new feature that helps detect problems with Wi-Fi hardware. In light of this, now, if Tails doesnt detect wireless hardware, youll see a clear warning message: No Wi-Fi hardware detected.

    [15:48] schestowitz[TR2]

    Transitioning to the updates under the hood, Tails 6.13 ships with Tor Browser 14.0.7 and updates the Tor client to 0.4.8.14. On top of that, this release also resolves a few pesky issues that users may have bumped into: [...]

    [15:48] schestowitz[TR2]
    [15:48] schestowitz[TR2]
    • [15:48] -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-linuxiac.com | Tails 6.13 Released with Improved Wi-Fi Detection ● Mar 07 [16:37] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes [16:54] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes [16:55] schestowitz[TR2] > Remember "blackchain patents"? [16:55] schestowitz[TR2] > [16:55] schestowitz[TR2] > [16:55] schestowitz[TR2] > The creator of the blockchain is a friend of mine. His name is in the [16:55] schestowitz[TR2] > bitcoin paper, it's a research of my university. A belgian cration! [16:55] schestowitz[TR2] It's not even a genius concept :) [16:55] schestowitz[TR2] That's what he says :-) [16:59] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes [16:59] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Mar 07 [17:44] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes ● Mar 07 [18:04] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes [18:27] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes [18:50] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Mar 07 [19:09] *liberty_box has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) [19:09] *rianne has quit (Ping timeout: 120 seconds) [19:12] *rianne_ has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) [19:14] *liberty_box (~liberty@jcfiaarnjjqje.irc) has joined #techbytes [19:16] *rianne_ (~rianne@jcfiaarnjjqje.irc) has joined #techbytes [19:18] *rianne (~rianne@freenode-v3a.5o5.hl01nn.IP) has joined #techbytes [19:20] *jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) [19:23] *jacobk (~quassel@syp65ggum2ibk.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Mar 07 [20:42] schestowitz[TR2] http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2025/02/the-description-of-patent-should-always.html?showComment=1741280617703#c4675047557594241844 [20:42] schestowitz[TR2] "Sure, let's see what happens in G 1/24.

    I have my doubts about whether the EBA will be bold enough to disrupt the current status quo. Nevertheless, it would be a shame if they passed up on what is a golden opportunity to bring some fully joined up thinking to this area of the law.

    My reference to "rough and ready" claim interpretation perhaps needs some further explanation.

    Firstly, there [20:42] schestowitz[TR2] can be no doubt that, by applying Art 69 and its Protocol, the national courts are interpreting the claims precisely in accordance with the EPC. On the other hand, and as illustrated by G 1/24, there are doubts over whether the same could be said for the EPO.

    Secondly, under current practice, the EPO and the national courts will sometimes arrive at different interpretations of the same claims of the same patent. [20:42] schestowitz[TR2] This is because, in contrast to the national courts, the EPO does not fully consider context provided by the description and drawings whereas national courts.

    Thus:
    potentially questionable legal basis + "non-contextual" analysis = "rough and ready" claim interpretation.

    This comment is not intended to cast aspersions on EPO examiners, who I am sure are very diligent in their c [20:42] schestowitz[TR2] laim interpretation analyses. It is merely to point out that the EPO's current approach to claim interpretation deliberately excludes a wealth of information (from the description and drawings) that must be considered by the national courts. It also reflects the fact that divergences between EPO and national court claim interpretations needlessly create problems for patent monopoly proprietors and the public alike.

    One last thing: did you have any thoughts on whether there is any reason why determining claim scope (as opposed to assessments based upon a claim scope so determined, i.e. assessments of infringement or patentability) cannot be conducted by the national courts and by the EPO using an identical approach? I am not sure whether there is any established EPO case law which directly addresses this point." [20:42] -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-ipkitten.blogspot.com | The description of a patent should "always" be used to interpret the claims (DexCom vs. Abbott, UPC_CFI_230/2023) - The IPKat ● Mar 07 [21:59] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes ● Mar 07 [22:09] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes