Techrights logo

IRC: #techbytes @ Techrights IRC Network: Sunday, April 07, 2024

(ℹ) Join us now at the IRC channel | ䷉ Find the plain text version at this address (HTTP) or in Gemini (how to use Gemini) with a full GemText version.

*parsifal (~parsifal@uuar9r28yasyu.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 07 00:48
*SaphirJD has quit (connection closed)Apr 07 02:17
schestowitz  <li>Apr 07 06:03
schestowitz                                            <h5><a href="https://pointieststick.com/2024/04/05/this-week-in-kde-real-modifier-only-shortcuts-and-cropping-in-spectacle/">This week in KDE: real modifier-only shortcuts and cropping in Spectacle</a></h5>Apr 07 06:03
schestowitz                                            <blockquote>Apr 07 06:03
schestowitz                                                <p>For years KWin has offered modifier-only shortcut handling via an obscure and undocumented method of editing the kwinrc file. Well, no more: in Plasma 6.1, KDE’s shortcut choosers will accept lone modifier keys natively! This makes it much easier to, for example, re-bind what the Meta key does: now you can easily make it open Overview, KRunner, or anything else simply by assigning it Apr 07 06:03
schestowitzdirectly to that something else. This work required expensive re-plumbing throughout KDE’s software stack and was undertaken by Yifan Zhu, closing multiple Bugzilla tickets in the process—some fairly old. Thanks a lot, Yifan! (Link 1, link 2, link 3, link 4, link 5, and link 6) </p>Apr 07 06:03
schestowitz                                                <p> But that’s not all! Though bug-fixing is eternal, we’ve largely gotten over the hump for Plasma 6.0, and I’ve noticed that features and UI improvement have occupied more of people’s attention recently. So let’s start with a much-requested one… </p>Apr 07 06:03
schestowitz                                            </blockquote>Apr 07 06:03
schestowitz                                        </li>Apr 07 06:03
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pointieststick.com | This week in KDE: real modifier-only shortcuts and cropping in Spectacle – Adventures in Linux and KDEApr 07 06:03
*psydroid2 (~psydroid@u8ftxtfux23wk.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 07 09:11
*parsifal has quit (Quit: Leaving)Apr 07 12:37
*SaphirJD (~SaphirJD@ujrjmymbebpjn.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 07 13:53
*SaphirJD has quit (Quit: Leaving)Apr 07 16:17
*jacobk (~quassel@ish78f9gpswn6.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 07 16:57
*SaphirJD (~SaphirJD@9iz9c2tcvthrn.irc) has joined #techbytesApr 07 17:21
schestowitz"DOJ's Apple case could raise threat of malicious apps"Apr 07 17:55
schestowitzx https://www.axios.com/2024/04/05/apples-app-store-antitrust-malwareApr 07 17:55
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes- ( status 403 @ https://www.axios.com/2024/04/05/apples-app-store-antitrust-malware )Apr 07 17:55
*jacobk has quit (Quit: http://quassel-irc.org - Chat comfortably. Anywhere.)Apr 07 18:51
schestowitzhttp://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2024/03/discrepancies-in-description-should-be.html?showComment=1712333072248#c5251972008425331261Apr 07 20:17
schestowitz"I think the old adage can be very easily amended to resolve any perceived tension between the novelty-infringement test and the doctrine of equivalents:<br /><br />- that what comes after and infringes must, if coming before, destroy novelty;<br />- that what comes after and infringes by virtue only of the doctrine of equivalents must, if coming before, destroy inventive step. <br /><br />Ta da! I fixed it. <br /><br />There is a minorApr 07 20:17
schestowitz flaw: this does not account for secret prior art (Art 54(3)/S2(3)) which is not citable for inventive step. As secret art, there is no justification for taking this into account when interpreting the scope of the claim, whether under a strict, literal interpretation or under the doctrine of equivalents. Accordingly, an equivalent disclosed in secret prior art is susceptible of being held to be an infringement under the doctrine of equiApr 07 20:17
schestowitzvalents. The applicant of that secret prior art would need to (and could) avail themselves of the secret prior use defence to infringement.<br /><br />Who would have thought that the legislator already provided us with all of the means necessary to prevent old technology from being injuncted by a patentee?"Apr 07 20:17
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-ipkitten.blogspot.com | Discrepancies in the description should be amended in line with the claims, but do not affect interpretation of the claims (T 0447/22) - The IPKatApr 07 20:17
*psydroid2 has quit (Quit: KVIrc 5.0.0 Aria http://www.kvirc.net/)Apr 07 21:52
*SaphirJD has quit (connection closed)Apr 07 21:55

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.6 | ䷉ find the plain text version at this address (HTTP) or in Gemini (how to use Gemini) with a full GemText version.