(ℹ) Join us now at the IRC channel | ䷉ Find the plain text version at this address (HTTP) or in Gemini (how to use Gemini) with a full GemText version.
*liberty_box (~liberty@suig26pxj59pi.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 08 00:56 | |
*liberty_box has quit (Quit: Leaving) | Jan 08 00:57 | |
*liberty_box (~liberty@suig26pxj59pi.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 08 00:57 | |
*psydroid4 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jan 08 00:57 | |
*liberty_box has quit (Quit: Leaving) | Jan 08 00:58 | |
*liberty_box (~liberty@suig26pxj59pi.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 08 00:58 | |
*liberty_box has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jan 08 01:35 | |
*liberty_box (~liberty@suig26pxj59pi.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 08 01:44 | |
*liberty_box has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jan 08 02:35 | |
*liberty_box (~liberty@suig26pxj59pi.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 08 02:42 | |
*SomeH4x0r has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jan 08 02:52 | |
*techrights_guest|36 (~4b14cb84@54n9xgft8g6u2.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 08 03:01 | |
*techrights_guest|36 has quit (Quit: Connection closed) | Jan 08 03:01 | |
*SomeH4x0r (~someh4xx@mii8cedt3f3mk.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 08 03:06 | |
*liberty_box has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jan 08 03:27 | |
*DaemonFC has quit (Quit: Leaving) | Jan 08 05:01 | |
*liberty_box (~liberty@suig26pxj59pi.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 08 06:55 | |
*SomeH4x0r has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jan 08 07:43 | |
*SomeH4x0r (~someh4xx@jtjgypu7nkkwy.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 08 07:45 | |
*u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!) | Jan 08 08:28 | |
*liberty_box has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jan 08 08:41 | |
*liberty_box (~liberty@suig26pxj59pi.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 08 08:44 | |
*tech_exorcist (~tech_exorcist@gbgr2jcp6yrt2.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 08 09:30 | |
*psydroid3 (~psydroid@cqggrmwgu7gji.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 08 09:38 | |
*liberty_box has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jan 08 09:50 | |
*liberty_box (~liberty@suig26pxj59pi.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 08 10:03 | |
*psydroid4 (~psydroid@cqggrmwgu7gji.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 08 10:21 | |
*Despatche has quit (Quit: Read error: Connection reset by deer) | Jan 08 10:35 | |
*liberty_box has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jan 08 10:41 | |
*liberty_box (~liberty@suig26pxj59pi.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 08 10:58 | |
*u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@6pxtd49npuduw.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 08 11:24 | |
*liberty_box has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jan 08 11:45 | |
*liberty_box (~liberty@suig26pxj59pi.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 08 12:16 | |
*liberty_box has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jan 08 12:36 | |
*liberty_box (~liberty@suig26pxj59pi.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 08 12:40 | |
*liberty_box has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jan 08 12:55 | |
*liberty_box (~liberty@suig26pxj59pi.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 08 13:19 | |
*tech_exorcist has quit (Quit: see you tomorrow or in 2 days) | Jan 08 13:23 | |
*SomeH4x0r has quit (connection closed) | Jan 08 13:44 | |
*SomeH4x0r (~someh4xx@qh6zykc985e64.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 08 13:44 | |
*liberty_box has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jan 08 14:36 | |
*liberty_box (~liberty@suig26pxj59pi.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 08 14:48 | |
*liberty_box has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jan 08 15:54 | |
*liberty_box (~liberty@suig26pxj59pi.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 08 15:58 | |
*liberty_box has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jan 08 16:29 | |
*liberty_box (~liberty@suig26pxj59pi.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 08 17:01 | |
*anontor has quit (connection closed) | Jan 08 17:50 | |
*anontor (~anontor@7ry7xfap2gwd6.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 08 17:50 | |
*DaemonFC (~daemonfc@669n4m4a364kn.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 08 18:05 | |
*DaemonFC has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jan 08 20:01 | |
*DaemonFC (~daemonfc@qt79e7z4qu5f6.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 08 20:40 | |
*u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!) | Jan 08 20:43 | |
*psydroid3 has quit (connection closed) | Jan 08 22:02 | |
schestowitz | > Hi both, just thinking out loud; | Jan 08 22:07 |
---|---|---|
schestowitz | > | Jan 08 22:07 |
schestowitz | > On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 12:23:52AM +0000, xxxxxx wrote: | Jan 08 22:07 |
schestowitz | >> xxxxx, | Jan 08 22:07 |
schestowitz | >> | Jan 08 22:07 |
schestowitz | >> I am still interested in publishing the article. When you ask if | Jan 08 22:07 |
schestowitz | >> both I and Roy are interested, I have to be clear that since search | Jan 08 22:07 |
schestowitz | >> engines penalized websites that have the same content as on other | Jan 08 22:07 |
schestowitz | >> websites, it would have to be either my site or Roy's site but not | Jan 08 22:07 |
schestowitz | >> both. I think you understand that, but I just want to be sure we | Jan 08 22:07 |
schestowitz | >> understand each other. | Jan 08 22:07 |
schestowitz | > Thanks CS, Okay, I'll split it off into different stand-alone articles | Jan 08 22:07 |
schestowitz | > in that case. For very different reasons I don't do that with | Jan 08 22:07 |
schestowitz | > mainstream outlets either, but it's not uncommon to pitch to a few | Jan 08 22:07 |
schestowitz | > friendly editors and see who bites. | Jan 08 22:07 |
schestowitz | > | Jan 08 22:07 |
schestowitz | > But this is a complete surprise to me. I had no idea that we'd reached | Jan 08 22:08 |
schestowitz | > a situation on the internet where there's a disincentive to widely | Jan 08 22:08 |
schestowitz | > disseminate and promote works. Things just get worse and worse. | Jan 08 22:08 |
schestowitz | > | Jan 08 22:08 |
schestowitz | >> Although I have a mirror of xxxxx's Guide on ZeroNet, I have | Jan 08 22:08 |
schestowitz | >> not been keeping it current (I think it is now about a year out of | Jan 08 22:08 |
schestowitz | >> date), so don't count on your article making it there any time | Jan 08 22:08 |
schestowitz | >> soon. I just haven't had the time to update it lately. | Jan 08 22:08 |
schestowitz | > Looking at Roy's setup I think he's built filters to automatically | Jan 08 22:08 |
schestowitz | > maintain a Gemini image. I've looked at this myself a lot - thinking | Jan 08 22:08 |
schestowitz | > about how a publisher easily maintains multiple presences from a book | Jan 08 22:08 |
schestowitz | > publishing POV (I have to keep a PDF, epub, and Postscript typeset | Jan 08 22:08 |
schestowitz | > versions in parallel). It comes down to what form you 'ingest' or | Jan 08 22:08 |
schestowitz | > write in. I use org-mode because it has many flexible back-ends. Some | Jan 08 22:08 |
schestowitz | > people go through Pandoc/Markdown. AFAIK Roy ingests simple HTML and | Jan 08 22:08 |
schestowitz | > uses html2gmi which creates nice gemeni markup. | Jan 08 22:08 |
schestowitz | > | Jan 08 22:08 |
schestowitz | > What you definitely want to avoid is hand-tweaking multiple markups. | Jan 08 22:08 |
schestowitz | > | Jan 08 22:08 |
schestowitz | >> As far as a list of sympathetic websites is concerned, do you mean | Jan 08 22:08 |
schestowitz | >> social media? The only list I have is the list of forums that I | Jan 08 22:08 |
schestowitz | >> have been maintaining here: | Jan 08 22:08 |
schestowitz | >> https://cheapskatesguide.org/articles/forum-list.html . | Jan 08 22:08 |
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes- ( status 403 @ https://cheapskatesguide.org/articles/forum-list.html ) | Jan 08 22:08 | |
schestowitz | > No. I have never been interested in social media myself. Maybe people | Jan 08 22:08 |
schestowitz | > repost stuff in Facebook/Twitter or whatever, but I have spent the | Jan 08 22:08 |
schestowitz | > past 10 years staying well away from all of it. | Jan 08 22:08 |
schestowitz | > | Jan 08 22:08 |
schestowitz | > Small-scale, personal relations with people who may repost to smaller | Jan 08 22:08 |
schestowitz | > forums and networks is exactly what I want to cultivate. | Jan 08 22:08 |
schestowitz | > | Jan 08 22:08 |
schestowitz | >> I regularly post links to my articles on the smaller forums on that | Jan 08 22:08 |
schestowitz | >> list that haven't banned me. I have also posted links to two (I | Jan 08 22:08 |
schestowitz | >> think) of your recent articles on Techrights on a ZeroNet forum, | Jan 08 22:08 |
schestowitz | >> but most of ZeroNet does not get much traffic. | Jan 08 22:08 |
schestowitz | > Thanks. What you are doing is awesome - beause in network theory you | Jan 08 22:08 |
schestowitz | > are acting like a bee... a very small number of cross-pollinators have | Jan 08 22:08 |
schestowitz | > a disproportionate influence by connecting parts of the small-web and | Jan 08 22:08 |
schestowitz | > distributed web together. I am confident this is _definitely_ what | Jan 08 22:08 |
schestowitz | > 'they' do not want. | Jan 08 22:08 |
schestowitz | > | Jan 08 22:08 |
schestowitz | >> I can't quantify well what I mean by "much". I don't know much | Jan 08 22:09 |
schestowitz | >> about other sympathetic websites. I guess I haven't really thought | Jan 08 22:09 |
schestowitz | >> about that question or been paying much attention to them, so I'm | Jan 08 22:09 |
schestowitz | >> not exactly sure how to respond there. | Jan 08 22:09 |
schestowitz | > Me neither. It's all new territory to me. I am still trying to make | Jan 08 22:09 |
schestowitz | > sense of Gemini space and ZeroNet. Last year I experimented with | Jan 08 22:09 |
schestowitz | > GNUNet and Gemini. I am willing to keep trying but my strategy as an | Jan 08 22:09 |
schestowitz | > author/researcher is to build/join real human networks of like-minded | Jan 08 22:09 |
schestowitz | > people and collect intel on what's working. The _last_ thing I would | Jan 08 22:09 |
schestowitz | > welcome is any precarious and risky presecnce within FB/Twitter/Google | Jan 08 22:09 |
schestowitz | > etc. There's actually a page in my book that says "please don't | Jan 08 22:09 |
schestowitz | > promote this on Facebook" :) | Jan 08 22:09 |
schestowitz | > | Jan 08 22:09 |
schestowitz | >> As far as sites like Hacker News being hostile to non-mainstream | Jan 08 22:09 |
schestowitz | >> information (like ewaste), you have to understand that many Hacker | Jan 08 22:09 |
schestowitz | >> News readers work for big tech. | Jan 08 22:09 |
schestowitz | > I guessed that but wasn't sure. It looks like a Silicon Valley boys | Jan 08 22:09 |
schestowitz | > club. | Jan 08 22:09 |
schestowitz | > | Jan 08 22:09 |
schestowitz | >> As I have unfortunately learned, all it apparently takes is a few | Jan 08 22:09 |
schestowitz | >> readers to complain and you can find yourself shadow banned. | Jan 08 22:09 |
schestowitz | > Sure, it's a clique, like many "communities" there's an invisible | Jan 08 22:09 |
schestowitz | > power dynamic with a small mob of enforcers. Once they _identify_ you | Jan 08 22:09 |
schestowitz | > the game is up. So I guess with places like that the strategy is to | Jan 08 22:09 |
schestowitz | > always be a new outsider and hope that 'submissions' get traction on | Jan 08 22:09 |
schestowitz | > their merit, | Jan 08 22:09 |
schestowitz | > | Jan 08 22:09 |
schestowitz | >> long-term platform on the Internet for expressing non-mainstream | Jan 08 22:09 |
schestowitz | >> ideas is to create one, e.g. a personal website. | Jan 08 22:09 |
schestowitz | > As far as 10 year projects go, that's possible. I've done it before. I | Jan 08 22:09 |
schestowitz | > ran xxxxxx between 2005 and 2016 as a hub for electronic music | Jan 08 22:09 |
schestowitz | > ideas in a language called Pure Data. Very niche but a surprisingly | Jan 08 22:09 |
schestowitz | > active and lovely community. | Jan 08 22:09 |
schestowitz | > | Jan 08 22:09 |
schestowitz | > This is a different phase of my life. With what's happening to the | Jan 08 22:09 |
schestowitz | > planet it's not about me or the old things any more. I want to focus | Jan 08 22:09 |
schestowitz | > on writing and understanding, so I am reaching out to people who have | Jan 08 22:09 |
schestowitz | > already built and can defend dissemination channels. | Jan 08 22:09 |
schestowitz | > | Jan 08 22:09 |
schestowitz | > Oddly, I have less trouble with the mainstream. The Times or BBC seem | Jan 08 22:09 |
schestowitz | > relatively warm to "radical" ideas about reshaping tech (probably | Jan 08 22:10 |
schestowitz | > because regulation aligns with their agenda - but that is not my | Jan 08 22:10 |
schestowitz | > schtick and actually I think most regulation will achieve very little) | Jan 08 22:10 |
schestowitz | > | Jan 08 22:10 |
schestowitz | > "Digital Veganism" is sort of a thing that mums and grans can get | Jan 08 22:10 |
schestowitz | > their heads around. | Jan 08 22:10 |
schestowitz | > | Jan 08 22:10 |
schestowitz | > all best, | Jan 08 22:10 |
*blitzed (~blitzed@xtgq85rp9r7je.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 08 23:21 |
Generated by irclog2html.py
2.6 | ䷉ find the plain text version at this address (HTTP) or in Gemini (how to use Gemini) with a full GemText version.