(ℹ) Join us now at the IRC channel | ䷉ Find the plain text version at this address.
| schestowitz__ | > That is a bug in Thunderbird. The key should work with all three | May 08 00:07 |
|---|---|---|
| schestowitz__ | > addresses but the primary ownership is already for GMX. | May 08 00:07 |
| schestowitz__ | tested again | May 08 00:07 |
| schestowitz__ | trying it another 10 times won't fix it | May 08 00:07 |
| schestowitz__ | for now I suppose we should use ytalk for important stuff | May 08 00:07 |
| schestowitz__ | maybe there's a fix in the making | May 08 00:07 |
| schestowitz__ | > I am trying to report a bug with a recent version of Thunderbird in | May 08 00:08 |
| schestowitz__ | > regards to OpenPGP keys. I notice that because I have not logged in for | May 08 00:08 |
| schestowitz__ | > a very long while my bugzilla account has been disabled. | May 08 00:08 |
| schestowitz__ | > | May 08 00:08 |
| schestowitz__ | > I have tried both the old password [1] and the password reset [2] | May 08 00:08 |
| schestowitz__ | > function. Both indicate that I should write to bmo-mods@mozilla.com so | May 08 00:08 |
| schestowitz__ | > please reactivate my account so that I may submit a bug report. | May 08 00:08 |
| schestowitz__ | BleepingComputer didn't want none.. | May 08 00:09 |
| schestowitz__ | https://twitter.com/stautistic/status/1389732745702633472?s=20 | May 08 00:09 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-@stautistic: @LawrenceAbrams @fwosar @demonslay335 @BleepinComputer Last time I checked, all ransomware attacks occur post-breac… https://t.co/YUPyFRgSuZ | May 08 00:09 | |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-Unexpected response | May 08 00:09 | |
| schestowitz__ | Re: Know anyone that does ransomware for a living? | May 08 00:10 |
| schestowitz__ | > I have a few questions for an article that I’m writing. | May 08 00:10 |
| schestowitz__ | I don't know any expert in that area, but I never met someone who was victim of it either, except hospitals. Windows of course.... | May 08 00:10 |
| schestowitz__ | https://www.linuxtoday.com/news/reader-update-our-twitter-feed-is-fixed.html | May 08 00:49 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-www.linuxtoday.com | Linux Today - READER UPDATE: Our Twitter Feed Is Fixed | May 08 00:49 | |
| schestowitz__ | " | May 08 00:49 |
| schestowitz__ | Good morning! Many thanks to Linux Today reader Colin H. for alerting us that our Twitter feed was running way behind in posting new headlines over in the House that Jack Dorsey Built. As of this morning, the responsible app setting has been sacked, and has been reset in an entirely different style at great expense and at the last minute. | May 08 00:49 |
| schestowitz__ | We've updated some settings here at Linux Today World Headquarters and our Twitter feed should begin showing current headlines within the next day or so. | May 08 00:49 |
| schestowitz__ | " | May 08 00:49 |
| schestowitz__ | LOL | May 08 00:49 |
| schestowitz__ | "Linux Today World Headquarters " | May 08 00:49 |
| MinceR | :) | May 08 00:52 |
| schestowitz__ | https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/248249/how-do-i-remove-the-chrx-partition-on-a-chromebook-running-crouton | May 08 03:02 |
| schestowitz__ | " | May 08 03:02 |
| schestowitz__ | I attempted to do what user76417 explained above; however, in order to use the Chromebook Recovery Utility, you must have a consistent WiFi connection, which I do not have. Here is another possible solution, one which allows you to manually set how much storage you want without any WiFi: | May 08 03:02 |
| schestowitz__ | Get into crosh(ctrl - alt - t), then into your shell by typing shell | May 08 03:03 |
| schestowitz__ | Type sudo fdisk -l - this lists your different partitions. Find the partition which you set aside for Gallium; it will be labeled as "ChromeOS root fs". Make sure the size matches up to the amount you gave Gallium! | May 08 03:03 |
| schestowitz__ | Type sudo fdisk /(wherever your partitions are stored) - my partitions were in /dev/sda/, though I believe this changes according to the different type of Chromebook you use. | May 08 03:03 |
| schestowitz__ | Type d. The system will ask you which partition you want to delete. Usually, Gallium is installed on partition 7, but that could also vary on different Chromebooks. | May 08 03:03 |
| schestowitz__ | Type d again. This time, delete where all of your files are. This is labeled as Microsoft basic data, and the file size will match up to the amount Chrome OS says you have (in the Files app). | May 08 03:03 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-unix.stackexchange.com | ubuntu - How do I remove the chrx partition on a chromebook running crouton? - Unix & Linux Stack Exchange | May 08 03:03 | |
| schestowitz__ | Type n. This time, you're going to recreate the Files partition you deleted. Unless you have a preference as to which sectors the Files app should take up, I just used the default sectors. | May 08 03:03 |
| schestowitz__ | Type t. This time, you need to rename the Files partition to what it was before because it automatically is named Linux Partition. Type "L" to list all the different types of partitions, and type in the number next to Microsoft basic data. | May 08 03:03 |
| schestowitz__ | Finally, type w, and reboot the system. This officially commits all of your changes. | May 08 03:03 |
| schestowitz__ | Chrome OS, at least for me, got angry that I tried to change the partitions, and told me that it was "fixing the system" for some time. However, afterwards, it worked, and I was able to restore all of my data without doing a factory reset. | May 08 03:03 |
| schestowitz__ | " | May 08 03:03 |
| schestowitz__ | <li> | May 08 07:34 |
| schestowitz__ | <h5><a href="https://www.techrepublic.com/article/how-to-deploy-samba-on-linux-as-an-active-directory-domain-controller/">How to deploy Samba on Linux as an Active Directory Domain Controller</a></h5> | May 08 07:34 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-Could not resolve host: www.techrepublic.com; Unknown error ( status 0 @ https://www.techrepublic.com/article/how-to-deploy-samba-on-linux-as-an-active-directory-domain-controller/%22%3ehow ) | May 08 07:34 | |
| schestowitz__ | <blockquote> | May 08 07:34 |
| schestowitz__ | <p>Active Directory (AD) is Microsoft's way of making it possible to create and apply policies to machines associated with a network. It's a tool widely used by businesses and network administrators everywhere. </p> | May 08 07:34 |
| schestowitz__ | <p> Microsoft's solution is not the only means to make this happen; the open source Samba makes it possible to deploy an Active Directory Domain Controller. With this controller, you can then create users, and even set policies. </p> | May 08 07:34 |
| schestowitz__ | <p> I will be writing a series of tutorials on this subject. In this first piece, we'll be deploying the Samba AD on an instance of Ubuntu Server 20.04. </p></blockquote></li> | May 08 07:34 |
| schestowitz__ | <li> | May 08 07:35 |
| schestowitz__ | <h5><a href="https://www.makeuseof.com/how-to-set-a-time-limit-on-linux-commands/">How to Set a Time Limit on Linux Commands</a></h5> | May 08 07:35 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-Could not resolve host: www.makeuseof.com; Unknown error ( status 0 @ https://www.makeuseof.com/how-to-set-a-time-limit-on-linux-commands/">How/ ) | May 08 07:35 | |
| schestowitz__ | <blockquote> | May 08 07:35 |
| schestowitz__ | <p> The timeout command is the first choice of many Linux users to add a time restriction to their commands. Since this tool is a part of the GNU Core Utilities package, it comes preinstalled on almost every Linux distribution. </p></blockquote></li> | May 08 07:35 |
| *SiliconBard (~SiliconBa@host86-167-57-250.range86-167.btcentralplus.com) has joined #techbytes | May 08 08:05 | |
| *rianne_ has quit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds) | May 08 09:14 | |
| *liberty_box has quit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) | May 08 09:15 | |
| *rianne_ (~rianne@host81-154-169-167.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #techbytes | May 08 09:20 | |
| *liberty_box (~liberty@host81-154-169-167.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #techbytes | May 08 09:21 | |
| *SiliconBard has quit (Quit: Going offline, see ya! (www.adiirc.com)) | May 08 09:52 | |
| *rianne_ has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) | May 08 09:59 | |
| *liberty_box has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) | May 08 09:59 | |
| *rianne_ (~rianne@host81-154-169-167.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #techbytes | May 08 10:00 | |
| *liberty_box (~liberty@host81-154-169-167.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #techbytes | May 08 10:01 | |
| *SiliconBard (~SiliconBa@host86-167-57-250.range86-167.btcentralplus.com) has joined #techbytes | May 08 10:10 | |
| *liberty_box has quit (Ping timeout: 268 seconds) | May 08 10:39 | |
| *rianne_ has quit (Ping timeout: 268 seconds) | May 08 10:39 | |
| *rianne_ (~rianne@host81-154-169-167.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #techbytes | May 08 10:55 | |
| *liberty_box (~liberty@host81-154-169-167.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #techbytes | May 08 10:56 | |
| *rianne_ has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) | May 08 11:36 | |
| *rianne__ (~rianne@host81-154-169-167.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #techbytes | May 08 11:36 | |
| *liberty_box has quit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) | May 08 11:36 | |
| *liberty_box (~liberty@host81-154-169-167.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #techbytes | May 08 11:37 | |
| *rianne__ has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) | May 08 11:44 | |
| *liberty_box has quit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) | May 08 11:44 | |
| *rianne__ (~rianne@host81-154-169-167.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #techbytes | May 08 11:50 | |
| *liberty_box (~liberty@host81-154-169-167.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #techbytes | May 08 11:51 | |
| *rianne__ has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) | May 08 12:00 | |
| *liberty_box has quit (Ping timeout: 268 seconds) | May 08 12:01 | |
| *liberty_box (~liberty@host81-154-169-167.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #techbytes | May 08 12:15 | |
| *rianne__ (~rianne@host81-154-169-167.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #techbytes | May 08 12:15 | |
| schestowitz__ | [04:13] <schestowitz__> go ahead | May 08 14:20 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:13] <Anoned> im very tired it is late here, but a few years ago i was targeted in much the same way daniel pocock was | May 08 14:20 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:14] <Anoned> and it went on for years | May 08 14:20 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:14] <Anoned> to the point where both OFTC and freenode networks' staff got involved | May 08 14:20 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:15] <Anoned> so anyway i was probing into the background w/ molly de blanc at debian | May 08 14:23 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:15] <Anoned> and was approached by tom wesley (board at OFTC) | May 08 14:23 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:15] <Anoned> who asked me about my role in the RMS thing | May 08 14:23 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:15] <Anoned> since i did some PR counter-campaign work | May 08 14:23 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:15] <Anoned> i told him what i knew and was informed he was going to issue a kline by him | May 08 14:23 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:15] <Anoned> when he did he issued it for both networks | May 08 14:23 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:15] <Anoned> as he is staff at both networks now | May 08 14:23 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:16] <Anoned> i connected to OFTC by proxy to talk to their staff | May 08 14:23 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:16] <Anoned> tomaw had doug freed (dwfreed) step in | May 08 14:23 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:16] <Anoned> who reissued the kline | May 08 14:23 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:16] <Anoned> and it expired at OFTC | May 08 14:23 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:16] <Anoned> and i cleared it up w/ freenode | May 08 14:23 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:16] <Anoned> by talking to their staff | May 08 14:24 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:17] <Anoned> until today dwfreed approached me again | May 08 14:24 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:17] <Anoned> and issued a kline with no explanation other than "harassment, lol" | May 08 14:25 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:17] <Anoned> and this kline was once again on both OFTC and freenode | May 08 14:25 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:17] <Anoned> i have worked it out w/ OFTC but not freenode yet | May 08 14:25 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:17] <Anoned> work in progress | May 08 14:25 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:17] <Anoned> but | May 08 14:25 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:19] <schestowitz__> you need to backtrack a bit and explain more | May 08 14:26 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:19] <Anoned> alot of the controversy around why i was being klined left and right surrounded that i had uncovered that molly de blanc has previous smear targets | May 08 14:26 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:20] <Anoned> and that this is all centered around debian and gnome foundation | May 08 14:26 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:20] <Anoned> sure ask questions | May 08 14:26 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:20] <schestowitz__> what you imply is that freenode will target us too? | May 08 14:27 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:22] <Anoned> in my case i can fart out a proxy any time i need to by clicking a button so all it has done is inconvenience me | May 08 14:29 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:25] <Anoned> Doug Freed is not currently staff but was able to get a kline on freenode at the same time he issued one on OFTC | May 08 14:32 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:25] <Anoned> so there is some relationship there i dont fully understand yet | May 08 14:32 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:25] <schestowitz__> fsf uses freenode | May 08 14:32 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:25] <schestowitz__> canonical pays freenode | May 08 14:32 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:26] <schestowitz__> but I never had bad experiences with freenode | May 08 14:32 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:26] <Anoned> they are usually pretty good | May 08 14:32 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:26] <Anoned> its the ones that are staff at OFTC that are staff at freenode that are the problem there | May 08 14:32 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:26] <Anoned> e.g. Tom Wesley and his pose | May 08 14:32 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:26] <Anoned> *posse | May 08 14:32 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:27] <Anoned> debian crossover and gnome foundation crossover is in every instance ive seen been the common association of every actor involved | May 08 14:32 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:28] <Anoned> including elana hashman and neil mcgovern | May 08 14:32 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:28] <Anoned> i am currently working on a project that will produce a new linux distribution not based on another | May 08 14:33 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:28] <Anoned> this is when the targeting really started | May 08 14:33 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:29] <Anoned> one of the debian people named Ikonia (Matt Darcy) started trying to blacklist our contributors | May 08 14:33 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:29] <Anoned> and started trying to disrupt that projects' members' relationships with other projects | May 08 14:33 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:29] <Anoned> the same strategy as done w/ daniel pocock | May 08 14:33 |
| schestowitz__ | <Anoned> who as it turns out was also targeted by molly de blanc | May 08 14:33 |
| schestowitz__ | <Anoned> which was profitable to her career | May 08 14:33 |
| schestowitz__ | <Anoned> it also helped obscure and deflect the fact that she was having an affair with chris lamb | May 08 14:33 |
| schestowitz__ | What I'm getting at here is that these all involve coordinated behaviours from people all associated with the same project [and] it consistently ties back to Debian and their sphere of influence which includes tom wesley, doug freed, and some of the other Freenode staff -- not all of them. freenode's official position will probably stay neutral while these bad actors run amok [and] most of this can be verified if you map these people | May 08 14:33 |
| schestowitz__ | on a board and look at their project associations." | May 08 14:34 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:36] <schestowitz__> I cannot say much | May 08 14:35 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:36] <schestowitz__> as I do not know you | May 08 14:35 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:36] <schestowitz__> and afaik, the main point is, | May 08 14:35 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:37] <schestowitz__> you warn me about a couple of people inside freenode who have an association with pro-monopoly cancel mobs | May 08 14:35 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:37] <schestowitz__> and they can read this | May 08 14:35 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:38] <Anoned> i would like to help expose it | May 08 14:35 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:38] <Anoned> i do not know what you need for that | May 08 14:35 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:38] <Anoned> but if you do i will try to get it for you | May 08 14:35 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:38] <schestowitz__> here is the thing: I lack context | May 08 14:35 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:39] <schestowitz__> or evidence | May 08 14:35 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:39] <schestowitz__> if you have emails of interest, send them to me | May 08 14:35 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:39] <Anoned> i have mentioned no emails there are no emails | May 08 14:35 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:39] <schestowitz__> we can start with verifiable basics | May 08 14:35 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:39] <schestowitz__> then build up from there | May 08 14:35 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:39] <schestowitz__> or freenode chat logs | May 08 14:35 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:40] <Anoned> i have ban logs | May 08 14:35 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:40] <schestowitz__> brb coffeee | May 08 14:35 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:40] <schestowitz__> I need to see context for the bans | May 08 14:35 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:40] <Anoned> i am very tired i will have to pick this up tomorrow | May 08 14:35 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:40] <Anoned> ill dig around for what logs i have | May 08 14:35 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:40] <Anoned> their asociations however are public record | May 08 14:35 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:41] <Anoned> it was easy to put it together when i looked | May 08 14:35 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:41] <Anoned> ill find some logs for you in the morning | May 08 14:35 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:46] <schestowitz__> we need to start with the basics | May 08 14:35 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:46] <schestowitz__> I will keep note of all the above | May 08 14:35 |
| schestowitz__ | [04:46] <schestowitz__> but we need to build on a verifiable basis | May 08 14:35 |
| *rianne__ has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) | May 08 14:38 | |
| *liberty_box has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) | May 08 14:39 | |
| schestowitz__ | http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2021/04/boeings-comma-drama-commas-and-taking.html?showComment=1620325056632#c45225573882192254 | May 08 14:54 |
| schestowitz__ | " | May 08 14:54 |
| schestowitz__ | Repy to Attentive Observer: If T1450/05 does say that the purpose of Art 69 EPC and its Protocol are to are intended to assist the patent proprietor in contending for a broader interpretation of a claim that is warranted and not for cutting down its scope, that seems to be entirely wrong. We are actually told quite specifically that the purpose is to provide fair protection for the patentee and a reasonable degree of certainty for | May 08 14:54 |
| schestowitz__ | third parties; it's there in black and white in the Protocol. That might mean providing a broader scope than a literal reading of the terms of the claim, or a a narrower scope. | May 08 14:54 |
| schestowitz__ | Based on the position the EPO takes and you appear to endorse, we have the bizarre situation that the courts/tribunals in the EPC states are required to interpret claims based on Art 69 EPC and the Protocol (as pointed out earlier in this thread, it's there in black and white in Art 69(1) EPC - shall be used to interpret), while the EPO uses a different standard. It seems remarkable that if this is what the legislator intended, it isn | May 08 14:54 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-Could not resolve host: ipkitten.blogspot.com; Unknown error ( status 0 @ https://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2021/04/boeings-comma-drama-commas-and-taking.html?showComment=1620325056632 ) | May 08 14:54 | |
| schestowitz__ | t stated in the EPC and you have to wonder why the legislator would think it appropriate that the granting body should interpret claims to a different standard to the courts. | May 08 14:54 |
| schestowitz__ | " | May 08 14:54 |
| *SiliconBard has quit (Quit: Going offline, see ya! (www.adiirc.com)) | May 08 15:06 | |
| *rianne__ (~rianne@host81-154-169-167.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #techbytes | May 08 15:08 | |
| *liberty_box (~liberty@host81-154-169-167.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #techbytes | May 08 15:08 | |
| *SiliconBard (~SiliconBa@host86-167-57-250.range86-167.btcentralplus.com) has joined #techbytes | May 08 15:51 | |
| SiliconBard | I'm back! | May 08 15:58 |
| schestowitz__ | Hi! | May 08 16:01 |
| schestowitz__ | Ready to roll? | May 08 16:01 |
| SiliconBard | Yep | May 08 16:02 |
| SiliconBard | I'm on Mumble already | May 08 16:02 |
| schestowitz__ | OK, coming in... | May 08 16:03 |
| *rianne__ has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) | May 08 16:54 | |
| *liberty_box has quit (Ping timeout: 265 seconds) | May 08 16:54 | |
| *rianne__ (~rianne@host81-154-169-167.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #techbytes | May 08 16:55 | |
| *liberty_box (~liberty@host81-154-169-167.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #techbytes | May 08 16:55 | |
| schestowitz__ | SiliconBard: encoding now | May 08 17:54 |
| schestowitz__ | ogg | May 08 17:54 |
| schestowitz__ | SiliconBard: do you want to do the shownotes? | May 08 17:54 |
| SiliconBard | :) | May 08 17:54 |
| schestowitz__ | even short... a couple paras | May 08 17:55 |
| SiliconBard | I can do them if you want np. | May 08 17:55 |
| SiliconBard | i'll get on with them now. | May 08 17:55 |
| schestowitz__ | i think you will like the music | May 08 17:57 |
| schestowitz__ | maybe i did too much bass | May 08 17:57 |
| schestowitz__ | oh well | May 08 17:57 |
| schestowitz__ | testosterone compensation, lol | May 08 17:57 |
| schestowitz__ | you asked me about audacity: http://techrights.org/2021/05/07/audacity-and-muse-group/ http://techrights.org/2021/05/07/telemetry-in-audacity/ | May 08 18:02 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-techrights.org | The Audacity Takeover by Muse Group is No Cause for Celebration | Techrights | May 08 18:02 | |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-Could not resolve host: techrights.org; Unknown error ( status 0 @ http://techrights.org/2021/05/07/telemetry-in-audacity/ ) | May 08 18:02 | |
| schestowitz__ | uploading mp3 and ogg now | May 08 18:05 |
| SiliconBard | Show notes sent - should be with you now. | May 08 18:09 |
| schestowitz__ | thanks! | May 08 18:12 |
| *SiliconBard has quit (Quit: Going offline, see ya! (www.adiirc.com)) | May 08 18:49 | |
| *SiliconBard (~SiliconBa@host86-167-57-250.range86-167.btcentralplus.com) has joined #techbytes | May 08 20:03 | |
| *rianne__ has quit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) | May 08 22:38 | |
| *liberty_box has quit (Ping timeout: 268 seconds) | May 08 22:38 | |
| *rianne__ (~rianne@host81-154-169-167.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #techbytes | May 08 22:46 | |
| *liberty_box (~liberty@host81-154-169-167.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #techbytes | May 08 22:47 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.6 | ䷉ find the plain text version at this address.