●● IRC: #techbytes @ Techrights IRC Network: Wednesday, October 08, 2025 ●● ● Oct 08 [00:30] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes [00:58] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Oct 08 [01:08] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes [01:22] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] https://www.thelayoff.com/t/1k6zsay8g [01:33] -TechBytesBot/#techbytes- ( status 403 @ https://www.thelayoff.com/t/1k6zsay8g ) [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] "It's the same old story with IBM software, they always have a "catalogue". It's the classic way to "offer more options", but to disguise the "ones that don't work"... in a way that doesn't sc--w them up too much.... [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] Same old. [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] 1 hour ago by Anonymous [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] | 2 reactions (+2/-0) | Reply [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] Post ID: @b4+1k6zsay8g [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] 0 [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] @ak [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] Exactly right. Excellent comment. [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] I wrote the comment before this one. The market valuations / stock market is broken. Things don't make sense. [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] 2 hours ago by Anonymous [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] | 2 reactions (+1/-1) | Reply [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] Post ID: @b3+1k6zsay8g [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] +1 [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] @ad [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] I just have a few simple questions (sarcasm on), why is stock being so up because of this one? [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] They like the partnership, fine. [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] But this partnership is due to a failure, called Watson. [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] And not the only failure, it's a repeat behavior. A pattern. [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] So why, why, why reward a partnership that is coming to try to fix a failure (another one)? [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] The stock market is broken. [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] 2 hours ago by Anonymous [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] | 1 reaction (+1/-0) | Reply [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] Post ID: @b2+1k6zsay8g [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] -2 [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] Does anyone actually read the press releases? [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] "Anthropic's Claude large language models will be infused into IBM's software portfolio." [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] This does not say that IBM is throwing away their AI tools. Rather, IBM integrates large language models (LLMs) into watsonx.ai by providing a studio with a diverse catalog of pre-trained models and a suite of tools for prompt engineering, tuning, and deploying custom generative AI solutions. IBM offers a variety of foundation models in watsonx.ai, which include LLMs from different sources such as IBM Granite models, Open-source mo [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] dels, User's Custom models and Agent integration to third-party LLMs such as OpenAI's GPT models - and now Anthropic's Claude models. [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] 3 hours ago by Anonymous [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] | 2 reactions (+0/-2) | Reply [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] Post ID: @av+1k6zsay8g [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] +3 [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] It would appear that way. But not sure why the stock market would assign a high valuation to IBM for becoming the 362,549th company whose AI strategy is to just build a wrapper over OpenAI's or Anthropic's AI API. [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] 4 hours ago by Anonymous [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] | 3 reactions (+3/-0) | Reply [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] Post ID: @ak+1k6zsay8g [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] +5 [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] Yes, Watson is finally dead... I feel for all the customers who got on the Watson train... looks like they will be looking at a migration very soon. [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] At the end of the day, shame on IBM... but now we got the confirmation of something we always knew: Watson was cr-p since the first day! lol! [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] 5 hours ago by Anonymous [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] | 5 reactions (+5/-0) | Reply [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] Post ID: @ad+1k6zsay8g [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] +2 [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] Yes, it's the Anthropic effect. Mostly. [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] There's also been an analyst event this week (AK was presenting). That created PPTs and analysts x'ing (tweeting), LinkedIn, etc (the market hears it, initial positive, then they think further about it, can go either way). [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] Productivity messaging with new AI tool being up. [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] Lesser effect, Granite announcements and other bits and pieces. [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] " [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] " [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] IBM stock hits all time high $300.79 - is watsonx dead and IBM going all in on Anthropic? [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] Well it is that time of year and month etc with IBM Q3 earnings up 10/22. Stock hits all time high and then.....drop 15-25 points after 10/22? [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] https://www.investors.com/news/technology/ibm-stock-breakout-anthropic-ai-partnership/ [01:33] schestowitz[TR2] " [01:34] schestowitz[TR2] https://www.thelayoff.com/t/1k5m52pyh [01:34] schestowitz[TR2] "Yes, and I've done it. It's actually quite interesting, going through real world internal use cases. What happens if you don't? She'll see it on a dashboard and likely ping your leadership. It's part of the job and therefore part of why we get paid, why not do it? I've interacted with JW a few times, she's always seemed very smart, very fast to get to grips with a subject and cuts to the heart of whatever the challenge is very qui [01:34] schestowitz[TR2] ckly. She's clearly no fool." [01:35] -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-www.investors.com | IBM Stock Breaks Out On AI Partnership With Anthropic | Investor's Business Daily [01:35] -TechBytesBot/#techbytes- ( status 403 @ https://www.thelayoff.com/t/1k5m52pyh ) [01:57] *x-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!) ● Oct 08 [02:02] *x-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@kpkpy434dfgzc.irc) has joined #techbytes [02:30] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes [02:45] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Oct 08 [04:09] schestowitz[TR2] "Yes, and I've done it. It's actually quite interesting, going through real world internal use cases. What happens if you don't? She'll see it on a dashboard and likely ping your leadership. It's part of the job and therefore part of why we get paid, why not do it? I've interacted with JW a few times, she's always seemed very smart, very fast to get to grips with a subject and cuts to the heart of whatever the challenge is very qui [04:09] schestowitz[TR2] ckly. She's clearly no fool." ● Oct 08 [06:28] schestowitz[TR2] : ● Oct 08 [12:16] *psydroid3 (~psydroid@36imbvshpgubk.irc) has joined #techbytes [12:29] schestowitz[TR2]
In this part, we are going to introduce automation to effectively monitor our deployed detections. By setting up automations at this phase we adopt a proactive approach towards maintenance, allowing our team to take [12:29] schestowitz[TR2] action before a blowout of alerts or an untuned detection is escalated by the SOC.
In this part, we are going to introduce automation to effectively monitor our deployed detections. By setting up automations at this phase we adopt a proactive approach towards maintenance, allowing our team to take [18:58] schestowitz[TR2] action before a blowout of alerts or an untuned detection is escalated by the SOC.