●● IRC: #techbytes @ Techrights IRC Network: Monday, October 09, 2023 ●● ● Oct 09 [02:32] *u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!) [02:38] *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@vga34widiu32u.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Oct 09 [03:47] *jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) ● Oct 09 [04:11] *jacobk (~quassel@32hz32it3ih2k.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Oct 09 [07:31] schestowitz
  • [07:31] schestowitz
    The 11 Best Raspberry Pi Operating Systems for Different Uses
    [07:31] schestowitz
    [07:31] schestowitz

    While it is often used for electronics projects, in much the same way as a microcontroller, the Raspberry Pi is a complete computer capable of running a full operating system.

    [07:31] schestowitz

    With the wide selection of operating systems available for the line of single-board computers, Raspberry Pi users can be said to be spoilt for choice. Not every operating system will fit your specific use case though, so it is necessary to choose one that has been optimized to serve your purpose.

    [07:31] schestowitz
    [07:31] schestowitz
    • [07:31] schestowitz [07:31] -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-www.makeuseof.com | The 11 Best Raspberry Pi Operating Systems for Different Uses ● Oct 09 [09:26] schestowitz x https://www.computerworld.com/article/3707969/microsoft-copilot.html [09:26] -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-You're probably going to use Microsoft Copilot wrong | Computerworld [09:48] *TechBytesBot has quit (connection closed) [09:50] *TechBytesBot (~b0t@iijacan2vrgta.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Oct 09 [12:06] *MinceR gives voice to u-amarsh04 jacobk TechBytesBot ● Oct 09 [13:41] -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-Failed to load module HelloWorld. Reason: Not found! [13:41] *TechBytesBot has quit (connection closed) [13:54] *jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) [13:57] schestowitz http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2023/10/reliance-on-silent-technical-effect.html?showComment=1696754748899#c885743359732767676 [13:57] schestowitz "You are absolutely right, defining the art of the skilled person is the crux of the debate regarding the closest prior art. Saying that the closest prior art is supposed to relate to a use or purpose similar to the claimed subject matter implies that it belongs to the art . This tends to refer the art to a context of use, more than to a broadly defined technical field. If I take the example of a capacitor designed fo [13:57] schestowitz r high voltage grids, the skilled person is skilled in the art of high voltage grids. Any design choice is controlled by the high voltage context.

    I think it makes sense to refer to the art in the assesment of inventive step First, for the simple reason that this is the notion laid out by the explicit language of the EPC. The term not obvious is so vague in itself that it is meaningless without a definition of the [13:57] schestowitz art (and of the skill level) of the skilled person. In addition, beyond the identification of the CPA, the identification of the art is key to understand the technical problem . I note here that the use of the singular form for the problem although it is general is grossly simplistic. This is so because in any art, the problem is not just about obtaining a very specific effect, it also requires the host of constr [13:57] schestowitz aints relevant to this art (and thus known to the skilled person), often implicit in the application, to be met for the purported effect to be achieved. This is a very important consideration in the assesment of inventive step, as the skilled person would not consider prior art which fails to meet these constraints. Which is why my general recommendation for drafting practice is to carefully document in the application the context of u [13:57] schestowitz se of interest to the applicant and the relevant technical effects/advantages.

    My emphasis on the art certainly draws on my decade-long experience as a corporate patent lawwyer in several companies of the mechanical/physics sectors. I have always been struck by how narrowly specialised the real-life skilled people are. This tends to be ignored of course by examiners but also by practitioners in private practice.
    < [13:57] schestowitz br />This reminds me of a story. I was involved long time ago in meetings between experts of different fields : the car industry and the oilfield industry (which requires equipment fit for use in the high temperature, very high pressure environment of deep wells). The expectation was to share information regarding electronics compatible with high temperatures. But it became clear very quickly that no common ground could be found, becaus [13:57] schestowitz e of the huge differences between the respective contexts (primarily a ratio of 1:1000 or more as to production volumes and costs)." ● Oct 09 [14:08] *jacobk (~quassel@99ed6ukzxymmc.irc) has joined #techbytes [14:58] *jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) ● Oct 09 [15:11] *jacobk (~quassel@6wygwq2t5e2hw.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Oct 09 [19:26] *MinceR gives voice to jacobk [19:34] *jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) [19:52] *jacobk (~quassel@fczpzungrrhkg.irc) has joined #techbytes [19:56] *jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) ● Oct 09 [20:03] *jacobk (~quassel@fczpzungrrhkg.irc) has joined #techbytes [20:07] *jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) [20:16] *jacobk (~quassel@fczpzungrrhkg.irc) has joined #techbytes [20:22] *MinceR gives voice to jacobk [20:47] *jacobk has quit (Quit: http://quassel-irc.org - Chat comfortably. Anywhere.)