(ℹ) Join us now at the IRC channel | ䷉ Find the plain text version at this address (HTTP) or in Gemini (how to use Gemini) with a full GemText version.
| *Noisytoot has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jul 13 00:07 | |
| *salvador has quit (Quit: Ping timeout (120 seconds)) | Jul 13 00:11 | |
| *salvador (~salvador@52inny7mrvvbk.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jul 13 00:12 | |
| *Noisytoot (~noisytoot@tkbibjhmbkvb8.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jul 13 00:13 | |
| *salvador has quit (Quit: Ping timeout (120 seconds)) | Jul 13 00:28 | |
| *salvador (~salvador@52inny7mrvvbk.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jul 13 00:28 | |
| *salvador has quit (Quit: Ping timeout (120 seconds)) | Jul 13 00:30 | |
| *salvador (~salvador@52inny7mrvvbk.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jul 13 00:30 | |
| *salvador has quit (Quit: Ping timeout (120 seconds)) | Jul 13 00:38 | |
| *salvador (~salvador@52inny7mrvvbk.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jul 13 01:02 | |
| *salvador has quit (Quit: Ping timeout (120 seconds)) | Jul 13 01:07 | |
| *salvador (~salvador@52inny7mrvvbk.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jul 13 01:12 | |
| *Noisytoot has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jul 13 01:19 | |
| *Noisytoot (~noisytoot@tkbibjhmbkvb8.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jul 13 01:32 | |
| *schestowitz-TR has quit (*.net *.split) | Jul 13 01:44 | |
| *208B5FPCY has quit (*.net *.split) | Jul 13 01:44 | |
| *rianne has quit (*.net *.split) | Jul 13 01:44 | |
| *Guest9974 has quit (*.net *.split) | Jul 13 01:44 | |
| *lightbringer has quit (*.net *.split) | Jul 13 01:44 | |
| *Disconnected (Remote host closed socket). | Jul 13 01:46 | |
| *Now talking on #techbytes | Jul 13 01:48 | |
| *316AWBX5C has quit (Ping timeout: 120 seconds) | Jul 13 01:49 | |
| *Techrights-sec (~quassel@freenode-50vmi7.ldvb.0amm.hij1op.IP) has joined #techbytes | Jul 13 01:49 | |
| *lightbringer (~mincer@freenode/user/lightbringer) has joined #techbytes | Jul 13 01:51 | |
| *rianne (~rianne@freenode-01u.ra8.a7lnth.IP) has joined #techbytes | Jul 13 01:51 | |
| *Guest9974 (sid393220@freenode-voc65p.r7an.uge0.8cnpra.IP) has joined #techbytes | Jul 13 01:51 | |
| *208B5FPCY (~quassel@freenode-k89inq.ldvb.0amm.hij1op.IP) has joined #techbytes | Jul 13 01:51 | |
| *schestowitz-TR (~acer-box@freenode/user/schestowitz) has joined #techbytes | Jul 13 01:51 | |
| *schestowitz-TR has quit (Ping timeout: 120 seconds) | Jul 13 01:51 | |
| *schestowitz-TR (~acer-box@freenode-50vmi7.ldvb.0amm.hij1op.IP) has joined #techbytes | Jul 13 01:51 | |
| *schestowitz-TR has quit (*.net *.split) | Jul 13 01:51 | |
| *Guest9974 has quit (*.net *.split) | Jul 13 01:51 | |
| *lightbringer has quit (*.net *.split) | Jul 13 01:51 | |
| *208B5FPCY has quit (*.net *.split) | Jul 13 01:51 | |
| *rianne has quit (*.net *.split) | Jul 13 01:51 | |
| *schestowitz-TR (~acer-box@freenode-50vmi7.ldvb.0amm.hij1op.IP) has joined #techbytes | Jul 13 01:51 | |
| *Guest9974 (sid393220@freenode-voc65p.r7an.uge0.8cnpra.IP) has joined #techbytes | Jul 13 01:51 | |
| *208B5FPCY (~quassel@freenode-k89inq.ldvb.0amm.hij1op.IP) has joined #techbytes | Jul 13 01:51 | |
| *lightbringer (~mincer@freenode/user/lightbringer) has joined #techbytes | Jul 13 01:51 | |
| *rianne (~rianne@freenode-01u.ra8.a7lnth.IP) has joined #techbytes | Jul 13 01:51 | |
| *rianne has quit (*.net *.split) | Jul 13 01:53 | |
| *rianne (~rianne@freenode-01u.ra8.a7lnth.IP) has joined #techbytes | Jul 13 01:53 | |
| *lightbringer has quit (*.net *.split) | Jul 13 01:55 | |
| *Guest9974 has quit (*.net *.split) | Jul 13 01:55 | |
| *schestowitz-TR has quit (*.net *.split) | Jul 13 01:55 | |
| *208B5FPCY has quit (*.net *.split) | Jul 13 01:55 | |
| *rianne has quit (*.net *.split) | Jul 13 01:55 | |
| *rsheftel1435 has quit (Ping timeout: 120 seconds) | Jul 13 01:58 | |
| *Disconnected (Remote host closed socket). | Jul 13 01:58 | |
| *Now talking on #techbytes | Jul 13 01:58 | |
| *rsheftel1435 (~rsheftel@freenode-ims.ilv.1cipql.IP) has joined #techbytes | Jul 13 01:58 | |
| *Techrights-sec (~quassel@freenode-50vmi7.ldvb.0amm.hij1op.IP) has joined #techbytes | Jul 13 01:59 | |
| *rianne has quit (*.net *.split) | Jul 13 02:00 | |
| *rianne (~rianne@freenode-01u.ra8.a7lnth.IP) has joined #techbytes | Jul 13 02:00 | |
| *rianne has quit (*.net *.split) | Jul 13 02:04 | |
| *lightbringer has quit (Ping timeout: 120 seconds) | Jul 13 02:17 | |
| *Techrights-sec has quit (Ping timeout: 120 seconds) | Jul 13 02:19 | |
| *208B5FPCY has quit (Ping timeout: 120 seconds) | Jul 13 02:21 | |
| *Guest9974 has quit (Ping timeout: 120 seconds) | Jul 13 02:21 | |
| *rianne (~rianne@freenode-01u.ra8.a7lnth.IP) has joined #techbytes | Jul 13 02:21 | |
| *Techrights-sec (~quassel@freenode-50vmi7.ldvb.0amm.hij1op.IP) has joined #techbytes | Jul 13 02:21 | |
| *Guest9974 (sid393220@freenode-voc65p.r7an.uge0.8cnpra.IP) has joined #techbytes | Jul 13 02:22 | |
| *rianne has quit (*.net *.split) | Jul 13 02:22 | |
| *rianne (~rianne@freenode-01u.ra8.a7lnth.IP) has joined #techbytes | Jul 13 02:23 | |
| *Techrights-sec2 (~quassel@freenode-50vmi7.ldvb.0amm.hij1op.IP) has joined #techbytes | Jul 13 02:23 | |
| *lightbringer (mincer@freenode/user/lightbringer) has joined #techbytes | Jul 13 02:23 | |
| *rianne has quit (*.net *.split) | Jul 13 02:24 | |
| *rianne (~rianne@freenode-01u.ra8.a7lnth.IP) has joined #techbytes | Jul 13 02:25 | |
| schestowitz[TR2] | https://www.thelayoff.com/t/1ttxjGQo | Jul 13 02:33 |
|---|---|---|
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes- ( status 403 @ https://www.thelayoff.com/t/1ttxjGQo ) | Jul 13 02:33 | |
| schestowitz[TR2] | " | Jul 13 02:33 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | What actually happens in a lot of situations is even more depressing. Somebody will invent something, then the employing company (IBM or other, doesn't matter) will impound the IP (intellectual property) and NOT do anything with it. They won't build or market the invention for whatever reason, but they'll act as patent trolls against anyone else (including the actual inventor) who might try to make something of their invention. | Jul 13 02:33 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | The IBM of today is not the IBM of 50, 40, 30, 20 or even 10 years ago. They have dispensed with much of their manufacturing abilities, including the staff who could get things done. The executive management consists largely of finance and legal types. There are no Steve Jobs or Bill Gates types hanging around who could recognize something great (or even something GOOD) and do something with it, so the advice in previous comments i | Jul 13 02:33 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | s sound...if you come up with a good idea, keep it to yourself until you and your ideas are safe and sound in a different place. | Jul 13 02:33 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | 2 hours ago by Anonymous | Jul 13 02:33 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | | 2 reactions (+2/-0) | Jul 13 02:33 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | Post ID: @ivk+1ttxjGQo | Jul 13 02:33 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | +2 | Jul 13 02:33 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | dear god, don't give the parasite ibm any great ideas | Jul 13 02:33 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | they will just steal for the parasites above | Jul 13 02:33 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | they benefit, you get chump change and then outsourced eventually | Jul 13 02:33 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | 3 hours ago by Anonymous | Jul 13 02:33 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | | 2 reactions (+2/-0) | Jul 13 02:33 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | Post ID: @uhm+1ttxjGQo | Jul 13 02:33 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | +4 | Jul 13 02:33 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | If you have a truly great idea, do NOT tell anyone else, and develop it in your spare time. If/when you are convinced it actually works, quit, and pursue it. But make sure there is no trace of it happening while employed by IBM otherwise they can (rightfully) claim it as theirs. | Jul 13 02:33 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | Yes, this is immoral and illegal, but so is IBM. | Jul 13 02:33 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | 5 hours ago by Anonymous | Jul 13 02:33 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | | 4 reactions (+4/-0) | Jul 13 02:33 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | Post ID: @nfe+1ttxjGQo | Jul 13 02:33 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | +4 | Jul 13 02:33 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | Why would anyone disclose a bright idea ? | Jul 13 02:33 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | 1- it will take an enormous effort to convince the mediocre cabal of IBM executives . Is it worth ? | Jul 13 02:33 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | 2- all the benefits will go to line the pockets of the dishonest cabal of IBM executives. | Jul 13 02:33 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | " | Jul 13 02:33 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | https://www.thelayoff.com/t/1trS9X5Q | Jul 13 02:36 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes- ( status 403 @ https://www.thelayoff.com/t/1trS9X5Q ) | Jul 13 02:36 | |
| schestowitz[TR2] | " | Jul 13 02:36 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | Kyndryl was IBM’s response to labor being commoditized. GTS was charging enterprise rates on their offerings when the marketplace was moving to commodity parts and as such commodity rates. With Kyndryl’s spinoff, IBM bisected their GTS offerings from their GBS offerings thus allowing the enterprise side of IBM’s house to move forward, while allowing the commodity side of IBM’s house to restructure to an offshore/commodity p | Jul 13 02:36 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | arts and services offering. IBM’s fundamental mistake was divesting Intel servers thinking Power scale out would fill the divested void. Instead the marketplace adopted Intel servers and their offerings as “good enough” and left Power as an overpriced also ran. NOTE Power has superb offerings if you are looking for performance and/or large usable memory, BUT 80% of IBM’s previous customers were able to transition to Intel o | Jul 13 02:36 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | fferings and pocket the HW/SW/services savings. That my friends is how Ginni took a 100 billion dollar all in company and managed it down to 55 billion. The market innovated and moved far faster than IBM thought it would, and IBM was caught flat footed with zero alternatives. AK has stemmed a lot of the bleeding by focusing on Enterprise offerings, but he still has not fully addressed the remaining non-enterprise offerings that lin | Jul 13 02:36 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | ger on the vine within IBM. Until he does, IBM will continue to just muddle along. | Jul 13 02:36 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | " | Jul 13 02:36 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | " | Jul 13 02:36 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | Why are the disgruntled ex GTS folks spamming IBM boards with their nonsense? Nobody at IBM gives a ra ts a rse to Kendryl, Kendra or KindDrill - get a life | Jul 13 02:36 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | " | Jul 13 02:36 |
| *Noisytoot has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jul 13 02:51 | |
| *parsifal has quit (Quit: Leaving) | Jul 13 03:55 | |
| schestowitz[TR2] | x https://www.digitalmusicnews.com/2024/07/12/confidential-tiktok-transcript-doj/ | Jul 13 04:24 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes- ( status 520 @ https://www.digitalmusicnews.com/2024/07/12/confidential-tiktok-transcript-doj/ ) | Jul 13 04:24 | |
| *vizimajac (~capybara@freenode-gnu.j7j.hcu80m.IP) has joined #techbytes | Jul 13 07:58 | |
| *x-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!) | Jul 13 09:55 | |
| *x-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@4bk2ptyysukzu.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jul 13 10:12 | |
| schestowitz[TR2] | <li> | Jul 13 10:44 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | <h5><a href="https://blog.thunderbird.net/2024/07/welcome-to-thunderbird-128-nebula/">Welcome to Thunderbird 128 "Nebula"</a></h5> | Jul 13 10:44 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | <blockquote> | Jul 13 10:44 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | <p>On behalf of the entire team, the Thunderbird Council, and our global community of contributors, I’m excited to announce the initial release of Thunderbird 128 “Nebula.” This annual Extended Support Release (ESR) builds on the solid foundation established by Supernova last year. </p> | Jul 13 10:44 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | <p> Nebula ushers in significant improvements to Thunderbird’s code, stability, overall user experience, and the speed at which we can deliver new features to you. </p> | Jul 13 10:44 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | </blockquote> | Jul 13 10:44 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | </li> | Jul 13 10:44 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-blog.thunderbird.net | Welcome to Thunderbird 128 "Nebula" | Jul 13 10:44 | |
| schestowitz[TR2] | <li> | Jul 13 10:50 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | <h5><a href="https://blog.thunderbird.net/2024/07/thunderbird-for-android-k-9-mail-june-2024-progress-report/">Thunderbird for Android / K-9 Mail: June 2024 Progress Report</a></h5> | Jul 13 10:50 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | <blockquote> | Jul 13 10:50 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | <p>This year Thunderbird has hired a lot of new people. I’m very happy to report that this also included a manager who will coordinate all of our mobile efforts. Some of you may already know him. Philipp Kewisch has been working on the calendar integrated into Thunderbird for desktop and has been with the project in one capacity or another for a very long time. We’re very excited to have | Jul 13 10:50 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | him (back). </p> | Jul 13 10:50 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | </blockquote> | Jul 13 10:50 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | </li> | Jul 13 10:50 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-blog.thunderbird.net | Thunderbird for Android / K-9 Mail: June 2024 Progress Report | Jul 13 10:50 | |
| schestowitz[TR2] | <li> | Jul 13 10:50 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | <h5><a href="https://lwn.net/Articles/979522/">PostmarketOS: Linux for phones and more</a></h5> | Jul 13 10:50 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | <blockquote> | Jul 13 10:50 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | <p>PostmarketOS is based on Alpine Linux, a lightweight Linux distribution that also serves as a popular base for Linux containers. The recently announced v24.06 release is built on Alpine Linux 3.20. All of the interfaces have received an upgrade since the v23.12 release from December 2023. In particular, KDE Plasma Mobile 6 provides a lot of new functionality, including the introduction of | Jul 13 10:50 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | a new home screen that allows users to customize pages with apps, folders, and widgets. </p> | Jul 13 10:50 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | </blockquote> | Jul 13 10:50 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | </li> | Jul 13 10:50 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | Jul 13 10:50 | |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-PostmarketOS: Linux for phones and more [LWN.net] | Jul 13 10:50 | |
| *x-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!) | Jul 13 11:02 | |
| *x-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@4bk2ptyysukzu.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jul 13 11:03 | |
| schestowitz[TR2] | <li> | Jul 13 11:05 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | <h5><a href="https://linuxiac.com/kde-frameworks-6-4-0-released/">KDE Frameworks 6.4.0 Rolls Out, Here’s What’s New</a></h5> | Jul 13 11:05 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | <blockquote> | Jul 13 11:05 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | <p>Over a month after the previous 6.3.0 release, KDE announced the launch of Frameworks 6.4.0, expanding its collection of addon libraries to Qt and enhancing functionality available to developers across various platforms. </p> | Jul 13 11:05 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | </blockquote> | Jul 13 11:05 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | </li> | Jul 13 11:05 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-linuxiac.com | KDE Frameworks 6.4.0 Rolls Out, Here’s What’s New | Jul 13 11:05 | |
| *vizimajac has quit (Ping timeout: 120 seconds) | Jul 13 11:54 | |
| *psydroid3 (~psydroid@j9gt2haw74jrk.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jul 13 11:58 | |
| *IsambardPrince has quit (connection closed) | Jul 13 12:07 | |
| *Noisytoot (~noisytoot@tkbibjhmbkvb8.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jul 13 12:23 | |
| *GNUmoon2 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jul 13 12:46 | |
| *Noisytoot has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jul 13 13:03 | |
| *Noisytoot (~noisytoot@tkbibjhmbkvb8.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jul 13 13:03 | |
| *GNUmoon2 (~GNUmoon@bb5fs7uveq34y.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jul 13 13:08 | |
| *Noisytoot has quit (Quit: ZNC 1.8.2 - https://znc.in) | Jul 13 14:59 | |
| *Noisytoot (~noisytoot@tkbibjhmbkvb8.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jul 13 15:00 | |
| *Noisytoot has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jul 13 15:06 | |
| *Noisytoot (~noisytoot@tkbibjhmbkvb8.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jul 13 15:09 | |
| *psydroid2 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jul 13 15:48 | |
| *Noisytoot has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jul 13 15:51 | |
| *psydroid2 (~psydroid@j9gt2haw74jrk.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jul 13 15:52 | |
| *Noisytoot (~noisytoot@tkbibjhmbkvb8.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jul 13 15:52 | |
| *psydroid2 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jul 13 16:16 | |
| *psydroid2 (~psydroid@j9gt2haw74jrk.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jul 13 17:00 | |
| *psydroid3 has quit (Quit: KVIrc 5.0.0 Aria http://www.kvirc.net/) | Jul 13 18:11 | |
| *Noisytoot has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jul 13 18:26 | |
| *Noisytoot (~noisytoot@tkbibjhmbkvb8.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jul 13 18:28 | |
| *Disconnected (Network is unreachable). | Jul 13 21:07 | |
| *Now talking on #techbytes | Jul 13 21:10 | |
| schestowitz[TR2] | http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2024/07/breaking-referral-to-enlarged-board-of.html?showComment=1720774693483#c6903714032667331165 | Jul 13 21:42 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-ipkitten.blogspot.com | BREAKING: Referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal on claim interpretation confirmed (G1/24) - The IPKat | Jul 13 21:42 | |
| schestowitz[TR2] | "The comment by D X Thomas that in the UK prior to 1978 the notion of inventive step was unknown in the UK needs feedback.<br /><br />Whether or not the notion of "inventive step" was known, the notion of obviousness certainly was, as Anonymous has helpfully explained. What DXT might have had in mind is that the duties of a UK Patent Office person, examining for patentability back then, ex parte, prior to grant, did not i | Jul 13 21:42 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | nclude an enquiry into obviousness. Back then, it was thought that the only meaningful enquiry into obviousness was one conducted inter Partes, so that the decision-maker could do it with the benefit of having received "both sides" of the obviousness debate. An Applicant "deserved their day in court" it was thought, rather than losing their pending patent monopoly application to a negative subjective opinion of | Jul 13 21:42 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | a mere Patent Office Examiner. So, novel but obvious subject matter got through to grant (unless somebody chose to delay grant by filing filing a pre-grant opposition fully loaded with evidence and argument of obviousness).<br /><br />What a ,long way we have come, since then, on the notion of what is a patentably inventive step." | Jul 13 21:42 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | "Just for completeness, under the UK Patents Act 1949 (the "Pre-EPC" UK Patents Act) obviousness was available as a ground of revocation post grant before the Comptroller or the Courts:<br /><br />https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo6/12-13-14/87/section/32<br />https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo6/12-13-14/87/section/33" | Jul 13 21:42 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes- ( status 404 @ https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo6/12-13-14/87/section/32<br ) | Jul 13 21:42 | |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-www.legislation.gov.uk | Patents Act 1949 | Jul 13 21:42 | |
| *IsambardPrince (~isambardprince@4v769nvtshzqw.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jul 13 22:40 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.6 | ䷉ find the plain text version at this address (HTTP) or in Gemini (how to use Gemini) with a full GemText version.