●● IRC: #techbytes @ Techrights IRC Network: Saturday, July 15, 2023 ●● ● Jul 15 [00:02] *MinceR has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) [00:04] schestowitz [00:04] schestowitz # windoze tco; ^ topic ? [00:04] -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-techrights.org | IRC: #techrights @ Techrights IRC Network: Wednesday, July 12, 2023 [00:05] *MinceR (~mincer@bringer.of.light) has joined #techbytes [00:05] *irc.techrights.org sets mode +a #techbytes MinceR [00:18] *rianne_ has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) [00:19] *asusbox has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) [00:47] *MinceR has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) [00:50] *MinceR (~mincer@bringer.of.light) has joined #techbytes [00:50] *irc.techrights.org sets mode +a #techbytes MinceR [00:54] *MinceR has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) [00:55] *MinceR (~mincer@bringer.of.light) has joined #techbytes [00:55] *irc.techrights.org sets mode +a #techbytes MinceR [00:58] *MinceR has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) ● Jul 15 [01:02] *MinceR (~mincer@bringer.of.light) has joined #techbytes [01:02] *irc.techrights.org sets mode +a #techbytes MinceR [01:04] *MinceR has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) [01:06] *MinceR (~mincer@bringer.of.light) has joined #techbytes [01:06] *irc.techrights.org sets mode +a #techbytes MinceR [01:37] *psydroid2 has quit (connection closed) [01:46] *lightbringer (mincer@freenode/user/lightbringer) has joined #techbytes ● Jul 15 [04:54] *parsifal (~parsifal@aahfbjmj4hann.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Jul 15 [05:05] *asusbox (~rianne@3stvfjh5iuw88.irc) has joined #techbytes [05:05] *rianne_ (~rianne@3stvfjh5iuw88.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Jul 15 [08:23] *u-amarsh04 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) [08:30] *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@h9w2ackdz5nh2.irc) has joined #techbytes [08:38] *u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!) [08:39] *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@h9w2ackdz5nh2.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Jul 15 [09:31] *asusbox has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!) [09:32] *asusbox (~rianne@3stvfjh5iuw88.irc) has joined #techbytes [09:42] *asusbox has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) [09:42] *rianne_ has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) ● Jul 15 [10:13] schestowitz
  • [10:13] schestowitz
    COSMIC Skies of a Colorado July
    [10:13] schestowitz
    [10:13] schestowitz

    Beyond the dazzling sea of licensed fireworks and thunderclouds lies a cosmic array of ancient stars. Its within our gaze upon these stars where we find the inspiration for COSMIC DE, our new desktop environment created for Pop!_OS and other Linux distros. Lets get into the updates!

    [10:13] schestowitz
    [10:13] schestowitz
    • [10:13] -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-blog.system76.com | COSMIC Skies of a Colorado July - System76 Blog [10:49] schestowitz
  • [10:49] schestowitz
    Childhood car (in)dependence
    [10:49] schestowitz
    [10:49] schestowitz

    I had a similar experience growing up in Singapore, though that was more for the ubiquitous, affordable, reliable, easy to understand, and safe public transport. I was allowed outside by myself when I was 9, and that was considered late by my friends.

    [10:49] schestowitz
    [10:49] schestowitz
    • [10:49] -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-Rubenerd: Childhood car (in)dependence ● Jul 15 [13:08] *u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!) [13:14] *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@h9w2ackdz5nh2.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Jul 15 [14:50] *Noisytoot has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) ● Jul 15 [15:06] *Noisytoot (~noisytoot@tkbibjhmbkvb8.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Jul 15 [16:50] *psydroid2 (~psydroid@u8ftxtfux23wk.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Jul 15 [17:31] *psydroid2 has quit (connection closed) [17:42] *psydroid2 (~psydroid@u8ftxtfux23wk.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Jul 15 [19:10] *Moocher5254 (~quassel@qy2y59ha8m3v6.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Jul 15 [20:04] schestowitz x https://futurism.com/the-byte/bill-gates-ai-elections-democracy [20:04] schestowitz # bill sez [20:04] -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-futurism.com | Bill Gates Says AI Could Undermine Elections and Democracy [20:24] *asusbox (~rianne@3stvfjh5iuw88.irc) has joined #techbytes [20:24] *rianne_ (~rianne@3stvfjh5iuw88.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Jul 15 [21:17] schestowitz http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2023/06/new-eba-referral-when-is-prior-use-of.html?showComment=1689256469937#c6568373670282779717 [21:17] -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-ipkitten.blogspot.com | New EBA referral: When is prior use of a product excluded from the prior art for lack of enablement? - The IPKat [21:17] schestowitz "I have another take from G 1/92, which is very general and from which todays Boards should take inspiration. A broader teaching of G 1/92 is to interpret the EPC as it is written and to keep away from interpretations which amount to amendments, be it the addition (the incentive to investigate in G 1/92) or the deletion of a condition.

    As to Anonymouss reference to tamper-proof products, I beg to differ. Practical [21:17] schestowitz protection devices of a commercial product could always be dismantled by the buyer to reverse engineer it. Protection against reverse engineering could only be secured by having the buyer agree on confidentiality restrictions but this is not part of a regular sales agreement and could raise competition law issues. If it is possible for software, this is because software is covered by copyright and copyright law applicable to software d [21:17] schestowitz oes include a protection against reverse compiling, the software equivalent of reverse engineering." ● Jul 15 [22:15] *parsifal has quit (Quit: Leaving) [22:21] schestowitz http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2023/06/new-eba-referral-when-is-prior-use-of.html?showComment=1689245024005#c5170299793671053899 [22:21] -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-ipkitten.blogspot.com | New EBA referral: When is prior use of a product excluded from the prior art for lack of enablement? - The IPKat [22:21] schestowitz "Anonymous of Wednesday, 12 July 2023 at 12:44:00 GMT+1, that is a very good point. But here it is not about 'enablement' in the sense of a claim being enabled. It is about a marketed product in the prior art, and so the test for 'enablement' of that is difficult to define. For example, can the teaching of the relevant patent specification be used to assist in enablement of the marketed product. To what extent must it be enabled (thinki [22:21] schestowitz ng of your wood grain point)? To the extent it falls within the claims? What happens if the claims are narrowed? Does replication of the marketed product stop being enabled below a certain claim scope because then the common general knowledge is no longer good enough, and you need the teaching in the spec?" [22:25] *psydruid has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) [22:26] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Jul 15 [23:48] *rsheftel14358 (~rsheftel@freenode-sle.jn3.t23bea.IP) has joined #techbytes [23:50] *rsheftel1435 has quit (Ping timeout: 120 seconds) [23:50] *rsheftel14358 is now known as rsheftel1435 [23:57] *rsheftel14358 (~rsheftel@freenode-sle.jn3.t23bea.IP) has joined #techbytes [23:58] *rsheftel1435 has quit (Ping timeout: 120 seconds) [23:58] *rsheftel14358 is now known as rsheftel1435