●● IRC: #techbytes @ Techrights IRC Network: Friday, August 15, 2025 ●● ● Aug 15 [07:08] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes [07:10] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes [07:21] schestowitz[TR2] https://www.thelayoff.com/t/1k2mpyssw [07:21] -TechBytesBot/#techbytes- ( status 403 @ https://www.thelayoff.com/t/1k2mpyssw ) [07:21] schestowitz[TR2] " [07:21] schestowitz[TR2] Indias programming default for ELSE leg is Shut Down [07:21] schestowitz[TR2] 4 hours ago by Anonymous [07:21] schestowitz[TR2] | 1 reaction (+1/-0) | Reply [07:21] schestowitz[TR2] Post ID: @bp+1k2mpyssw [07:21] schestowitz[TR2] +1 [07:21] schestowitz[TR2] Who is still buying IBM in 2025?? [07:21] schestowitz[TR2] 7 hours ago by Anonymous [07:21] schestowitz[TR2] | 1 reaction (+1/-0) | Reply [07:21] schestowitz[TR2] Post ID: @b6+1k2mpyssw [07:21] schestowitz[TR2] +2 [07:21] schestowitz[TR2] Most likely caused by laying off too many people. [07:21] schestowitz[TR2] 9 hours ago by Anonymous [07:21] schestowitz[TR2] | 2 reactions (+2/-0) | Reply [07:21] schestowitz[TR2] Post ID: @ay+1k2mpyssw [07:21] schestowitz[TR2] 0 [07:21] schestowitz[TR2] Sanchit Vir Gogia, CEO and chief analyst at Greyhound Research. [07:21] schestowitz[TR2] Based in India. [07:21] schestowitz[TR2] 9 hours ago by Anonymous [07:21] schestowitz[TR2] | no reactions | Reply [07:21] schestowitz[TR2] Post ID: @ax+1k2mpyssw [07:21] schestowitz[TR2] +4 [07:21] schestowitz[TR2] Alvind is trying desperately to sink the IBM Titanic with his "IBM India Friends And Family" recruits, so he can take off with his looted bonus. [07:21] schestowitz[TR2] Not only are they incompetent, but the Indians are downright hopeless, running around like chickens without their heads. My dog is more proactive than Alvind's Pipmunks will ever be. Clouds are those fluffy white things you see in the bright blue summer sky, aren't they ? [07:21] schestowitz[TR2] " [07:46] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes [07:48] schestowitz[TR2] gemini://gemini.techrights.org/archive/EPC-1973-volume-1065-i-16208-english.gmi [07:48] schestowitz[TR2] " [07:48] schestowitz[TR2] I've not made a second pass through EPC, that is for someone else [07:48] schestowitz[TR2] but the part pertaining to the treaty seems to be done. [07:48] schestowitz[TR2] Look at the PDF and compare. If you think the rest should be done, [07:48] schestowitz[TR2] then I can do it. But for now I think what is there is enough. [07:48] schestowitz[TR2] The next part looks like administrivia. [07:48] schestowitz[TR2] Also, as mentioned, the official document was updatedd at least once" [07:59] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Aug 15 [12:08] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes [12:13] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Aug 15 [13:21] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes [13:46] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes [13:52] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes [13:54] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Aug 15 [15:10] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes [15:55] *Disconnected (Connection timed out). [15:56] *Now talking on #techbytes ● Aug 15 [16:04] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes [16:08] *psydruid has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) ● Aug 15 [17:24] *psydroid3 (~psydroid@36imbvshpgubk.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Aug 15 [18:40] schestowitz[TR2] https://www.thelayoff.com/t/1k2n6mfy7 [18:40] -TechBytesBot/#techbytes- ( status 403 @ https://www.thelayoff.com/t/1k2n6mfy7 ) [18:40] schestowitz[TR2] " [18:40] schestowitz[TR2] You could take transcripts of all the Earnings Calls, feed them into Watson, and have an AskCEO and AskCFO bot and save tens of millions a year by RAing these guys. [18:40] schestowitz[TR2] 2 hours ago by Anonymous [18:40] schestowitz[TR2] | 2 reactions (+2/-0) | Reply [18:40] schestowitz[TR2] Post ID: @df+1k2n6mfy7 [18:40] schestowitz[TR2] +2 [18:40] schestowitz[TR2] With all these Ask tools someone should Ask Alvind why hes a pompous j-rk [18:40] schestowitz[TR2] Or Krabanaugh with his obsession with Upskilling [18:40] schestowitz[TR2] Or Slob Thomas . Why does a middle aged man dress like hes in some startup [18:40] schestowitz[TR2] 2 hours ago by Anonymous [18:40] schestowitz[TR2] | 2 reactions (+2/-0) | Reply [18:40] schestowitz[TR2] Post ID: @dc+1k2n6mfy7 [18:40] schestowitz[TR2] +4 [18:40] schestowitz[TR2] You would have better luck going to the Oracle In Delphi and getting a straight answer (LOL) than from WatsonAI. Nothing but a load of bulls droppings from India if anything...the dimwits go back and forth with the same garbage that you get with the IBM India Helpdesk support till your patience wears thin, your eyes sc--w up, you get a terrible migrane and you stop responding in sheer frustration. That's what Alvind and Gin(ni) and [18:40] schestowitz[TR2] Tonic have made of IBM AI. [18:40] schestowitz[TR2] " ● Aug 15 [19:11] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Aug 15 [21:03] *psydroid3 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) ● Aug 15 [23:08] schestowitz[TR2]
  • Had D1 (US2010233441A1) disclosed "white&quot...
    Had D1 (US2010233441A1) disclosed "white" instead of "yellow" (cf. D1 @ [0099]) would the applicant then shifted instead to a "chromatic" colour? Is a "technical" problem [23:08] schestowitz[TR2] solved? Or is the background colour chosen for esthaetic considerations?

    If the base coat colour was in fact critical to the definition of the invention, why wasn't it
    • [23:08] schestowitz[TR2]
  • Whatever possessed Agfa to go out and assert this ...
    Whatever possessed Agfa to go out and assert this heap?

    To recap, the decision revolves around this passage of the disclosure to clarify the meaning of the claims, and set out their "metes and bound [23:08] schestowitz[TR2] s", like the Muricans say:

    [0021] A chromatic colour is any colour in which one particular wavelength or hue predominates. For example, blue and green are chromatic
    • [23:08] -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-ipkitten.blogspot.com | Divergence between the UPC and EPO on claim interpretation and description definitions (Agfa v Gucci, UPC_CFI_278/2023) - The IPKat [23:08] -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-ipkitten.blogspot.com | Divergence between the UPC and EPO on claim interpretation and description definitions (Agfa v Gucci, UPC_CFI_278/2023) - The IPKat [23:12] schestowitz[TR2]
  • @ Proof of the pudding, [23:12] schestowitz[TR2] There is nothing pugilist...
    @ Proof of the pudding,

    There is nothing pugilistic in the style of my reply. The mere fact that I can return the compliment by return of post actually shows the inanity of your argumentation, and the fact that it fails to convince.

    I would be prepared to acknowledge that we strongly disagree on many points, and leave at this. The problem is that you systematica [23:12] schestowitz[TR2] lly come back
    • [23:12] -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-ipkitten.blogspot.com | [GuestPost] Has G1/24 made the referral of the question of amendment of the description from T697/22 inevitable? - The IPKat [23:53] schestowitz[TR2]
  • Agfa v Gucci should be taken with caution, as the ...
    Agfa v Gucci should be taken with caution, as the problem appears to stem primarily from inconsistent statements within the description itself. And I agree with previous comments that it is not a case of a patent m [23:53] schestowitz[TR2] onopoly being its own dictionary. The description does not contain authoritative definitions comparable with the set of definitional statements of EP3076804 which gave rise to referring decision
    • [23:53] -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-ipkitten.blogspot.com | Divergence between the UPC and EPO on claim interpretation and description definitions (Agfa v Gucci, UPC_CFI_278/2023) - The IPKat