IRC: #techbytes @ Techrights IRC Network: Tuesday, July 16, 2024

schestowitz[TR2]

<h5><a href="https://puri.sm/posts/your-phone-is-giving-away-more-than-you-ever-bargained-for/">Your Phone is Giving Away More Than You Ever Bargained For</a></h5>

schestowitz[TR2]

schestowitz[TR2]

Fast forward 17 years to 2024, and it is not an exaggeration to say that these devices are nearly universally used and depended upon daily, worldwide.

schestowitz[TR2]

</blockquote>

schestowitz[TR2]

</li>

-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-puri.sm | Your Phone is Giving Away More Than You Ever Bargained For – Purism

schestowitz[TR2]

<li>

schestowitz[TR2]

<h5><a href="https://linuxgizmos.com/myirs-new-affordable-rk3568-dev-board-with-m-2-ssd-slot-dual-gbe/">MYIR’s New Affordable RK3568 Dev Board with M.2 SSD Slot & Dual GbE</a></h5>

schestowitz[TR2]

schestowitz[TR2]

MYIR has launched the MYC-LR3568, a cost-effective System-on-Module available for commercial and industrial applications, alongside a development board that provides access to dual Gigabit Ethernet ports, multiple display ports, and wireless connectivity.

schestowitz[TR2]

</blockquote>

schestowitz[TR2]

</li>

schestowitz[TR2]

-TechBytesBot/#techbytes- ( status 520 @ https://linuxgizmos.com/myirs-new-affordable-rk3568-dev-board-with-m-2-ssd-slot-dual-gbe/ )

*Noisytoot has quit (Quit: ZNC 1.8.2 - https://znc.in)

Jul 16 09:29

*IsambardPrince has quit (connection closed)

Jul 16 10:27

*geert (~geert@xh4tnuvizcahq.irc) has joined #techbytes

Jul 16 10:43

*GNUmoon2 has quit (connection closed)

Jul 16 12:24

*GNUmoon2 (~GNUmoon@wvn2akmfspm4n.irc) has joined #techbytes

Jul 16 12:25

geert

psydruid supsupsup

Jul 16 12:42

psydroid2

geert huphuphup

Jul 16 12:50

schestowitz[TR2]

"Zed is one of the newer code editors around: it was first released in 2023, and went open source at the start of this year. The Register sister site Dev Class checked it out back then and that story is worth a read to find out about the program." ☛ https://www.theregister.com/2024/07/15/zed_editor_arrives_on_linux/ | Source: The Register UK

Jul 16 13:03

-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-www.theregister.com | Programmer's editor Zed arrives on Linux • The Register

Jul 16 13:03

geert

:)))

Jul 16 13:21

schestowitz[TR2]

> Hey Roy,

schestowitz[TR2]

schestowitz[TR2]

> Maybe you might like;

schestowitz[TR2]

> https://cybershow.uk/blog/posts/you-are-too-dumb-for-tech

schestowitz[TR2]

schestowitz[TR2]

schestowitz[TR2]

> Do reprint large chunks if you like but please leave us the entirety

schestowitz[TR2]

> of the article linked on Cybershow,

schestowitz[TR2]

schestowitz[TR2]

> Hope you and yours are all very well,

schestowitz[TR2]

Thanks, I've just grouped that with http://news.tuxmachines.org/n/2024/07/16/Mozilla_Selling_Out_Firefox_Users.shtml

-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-cybershow.uk | You're too stupid for technology.

-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-news.tuxmachines.org | Tux Machines — Mozilla Selling Out Firefox Users

http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2024/07/crystal-clear-g-221-applied-to.html?showComment=1721069989151#c1834198684523856272

*x-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)

Jul 16 16:12

*x-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@4bk2ptyysukzu.irc) has joined #techbytes

Jul 16 16:19

*x-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)

Jul 16 16:20

*x-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@4bk2ptyysukzu.irc) has joined #techbytes

Jul 16 16:25

*parsifal (~parsifal@6thegygyadsu4.irc) has joined #techbytes

Jul 16 17:16

schestowitz[TR2]

-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-ipkitten.blogspot.com | Crystal clear? G 2/21 applied to polymorph patents (T 1994/22) - The IPKat

schestowitz[TR2]

"It is clear that the application of G 2/21 has been rather favourable to applicants or proprietors. I am inclined to claim that the boards are not always credible in their application of G 2/21. To be honest, T 116/18 is difficult to follow. The buzzword “synergy” has, in my opinion be misused by the proprietor and the board. There was a synergy originally disclosed, but for different pests. To use an American stat

schestowitz[TR2]

ement, I am not convinced that the proprietor was at the filing date in possession of the invention as it was eventually claimed. In T 1989/19, the stability originally disclosed was the stability during manufacture. In appeal the proprietor came up with stability during storage. As the patent monopoly related to a medicament, there cannot be any surprise that the medicament should be stable during storage. The buzzwor

schestowitz[TR2]

d “stability” was enough to save the patent. This goes a bit far. In T 2716/19, the proprietor came up two weeks in advance of the OP before the OD with experimental data about storage stability he kept before him a report for 18 years! The OD had not admitted the experimental data, but the board revised the decision of the OD not to admit it for the sake of G 2/21. In T 2716/19, the question which arises is t

schestowitz[TR2]

he following: is it reasonable to admit and use under G 2/21 a document which was in possession of the proprietor for 18 years before he brings it in the procedure? Reasonable doubts are permitted, even if the applicability of G 2/21 can as such not be contested. According to T 2465/19, it was not necessary for the technical effect to be recited in the application as filed. This is a rather generous application of G 2/2

schestowitz[TR2]

1 which is difficult to follow. That the examination reveals a different CPA than that know by the inventor is rather common. Construing an artificial effect on the basis of this CPA looks rather odd. In T 887/21, the board made clear that a mere hypothesis in the application as filed, without any experimental data supporting said hypothesis, is not enough to admit post- published evidence in the meaning of G 2/21. If p

schestowitz[TR2]

ost-published evidence is not supported by the original disclosure, it cannot help defining the OTP. In T 681/21, the board held that in the absence in the original description of the mention of a synergy effect, it is much more difficult to justify IS on a later alleged synergy effect. At least, the post-published submitted experimental data has to convincingly prove the alleged synergy across the entire scope of th

schestowitz[TR2]

e claim. In T 1994/22, the application as filed made no mention of the photostability of the claimed polymorph, or even polymorphs in general. A sweeping statement that "a quality product" was provided, could not be considered to encompass improved photostability. T 1994/22 is following the line of T 681/21. Not only T 1994/22, but T 681/21 and T 887/21, delineate the boundaries of a possible interp

schestowitz[TR2]

retation of G 2/21, and provide guidance on the absolute minimum disclosure requirements for a technical effect. T 1989/19, T 1989/19, T 887/21, T 681/21 and T 2716/19 were all commented in another blog."