(ℹ) Join us now at the IRC channel | ䷉ Find the plain text version at this address (HTTP) or in Gemini (how to use Gemini) with a full GemText version.
| schestowitz[TR2] | <li> | Jan 20 04:44 |
|---|---|---|
| schestowitz[TR2] | <h5><a href="https://www.howtoforge.com/how-to-install-odoo-on-ubuntu-24-04-server/">How to Install Odoo ERP Software on Ubuntu 24.04 Server</a></h5> | Jan 20 04:44 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | <blockquote> | Jan 20 04:44 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | <p>Odoo (formerly known as OpenERP) is a self-hosted suite of over 10,000 open Odoo is a free and open-source ERP solution for multiple types of businesses. Odoo formerly OpenERP is an ERP and CRM solution and beyond. It provides customer relationship management (CRM), sales pipeline, project management, manufacturing, invoicing, accounting, eCommerce, and many more. </p> | Jan 20 04:44 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | <p> Odoo is one of the complete ERP solutions for your business. It has 30 core modules by default and provides more than 4500 community modules to help your multiple businesses. </p> | Jan 20 04:44 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | </blockquote> | Jan 20 04:44 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | </li> | Jan 20 04:44 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-www.howtoforge.com | How to Install Odoo ERP Software on Ubuntu 24.04 Server | Jan 20 04:44 | |
| schestowitz[TR2] | <li> | Jan 20 05:16 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | <h5><a href="https://thenewstack.io/ghostty-will-get-you-excited-about-using-a-terminal-again/">Ghostty Will Get You Excited About Using a Terminal Again</a></h5> | Jan 20 05:16 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | <blockquote> | Jan 20 05:16 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | <p>That new terminal app is called Ghostty, and it was created by Mitchell Hashimoto, co-founder of HashiCorp. This new terminal is lightweight, fast, feature-rich and cross-platform. </p> | Jan 20 05:16 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | <p> Ghostty does things a bit differently. Where some terminal apps have a GUI feature for configuration, this one uses a flat text file that is loaded upon launch (or reloaded manually, when you make changes). For that reason alone, Ghostty isn’t the ideal terminal for those just getting started with the command line. Instead, Ghostty is aimed at those with plenty of experience. </p> | Jan 20 05:16 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | <p> That’s not to say you can’t use Ghostty with the default minimal configuration; you certainly can, but you’d be missing out on a lot of features. </p> | Jan 20 05:16 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | </blockquote> | Jan 20 05:16 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | </li> | Jan 20 05:16 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-thenewstack.io | Ghostty Will Get You Excited About Using a Terminal Again - The New Stack | Jan 20 05:16 | |
| schestowitz[TR2] | "" | Jan 20 06:40 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | Please find the full paper including our recommendations and some additional information here." | Jan 20 06:40 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | " | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | Thank you for our meeting of XX on objective setting / I have | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | considered the target that was set for me for 2025 / [OTHER | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | INTRODUCTION WHICH YOU ARE COMFORTABLE WITH]. | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | On [FILL IN DATE] my objectives were set at [FILL IN]. As in the past, | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | I commit to working to the best of my abilities in 2025. | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | However, with regard to the proposed objectives for 2025, I sincerely | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | regret having to inform you that I cannot commit to them. | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | I would like to point out the following: | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | - The objectives set correspond to an increase of | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | production/productivity of + [FILL IN] % compared to 2024. OR | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | The objectives set correspond to the additional supplementary | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | tasks: [LIST NEW TASKS YOU HAVE BEEN ASKED TO ACCOMPLISH]. | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | - These increases are not in line with the EPO’s Financial Study | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | 2023, which plans a +2.1% increase/year/FTE in productivity in | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | order to keep a healthy financial and operational situation at | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | the EPO. I kindly request that my targets thus be reviewed to | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | the 2.1% productivity increase planned by the Financial Study. | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | - While I have nothing against challenging objectives by | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | definition, I consider it very important that my targets are | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | also achievable. This is especially true when I had no or only | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | little input in defining and setting my final objectives. | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | Achieving an objective requires a plan of how one intends to | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | arrive at the objectives. I can only note that no such plan has | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | been presented to and discussed with me and, in fact, no such | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | plan appears to exist. I am therefore left without any | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | instruction or guideline from you on how to achieve the 2025 | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | objectives. | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | - Therefore, my intention to work together with the team to achieve | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | good results finds its limits in my duty to adhere to the | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | requirements of the EPC and PCT, the decisions of the Enlarged | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | Board of Appeal, and the Guidelines for search and examination. | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | If I am expected to go beyond these limits, as is obviously | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | implied by the 2025 objectives, I kindly request a written plan | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | and corresponding written instructions on how to do so, so that | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | (1) the responsibility for the quality of “products” and the | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | consequences thereof will not be placed at my door, and (2) an | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | objective gap analysis can periodically be performed. | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | - The SP2028 mentions: “putting the wellbeing of our people first” | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | (p.17) and “The EPO aims for a complete and accurate search | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | covering all aspects of the invention and a thorough written | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | opinion.”, (p.42). I do not see how I can reach the new targets | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | without compromising my health or the quality of the final | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | product. I therefore kindly request written instructions on how | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | to perform my tasks so that the responsibility for the quality | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | of my work and the consequences thereof will not be placed on | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | my shoulders. | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | 4 | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | - My capacity does not seem to have been calculated correctly. My | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | parental leave/ home leave / unpaid leave/ part-time / [PLANNED | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | MEDICAL INTERVENTION] were not deducted from the total working | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | days. | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | - The many hours expected to be spent in training, (team) meetings, | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | system disturbances, etc… which in my case amount to | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | approximately [FILL IN AN ESTIMATON OF THE NUMBER OF DAYS THIS | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | WOULD TAKE YOU] days have also not been taken into consideration; | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | - The working tools have not evolved in a way which could help me | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | increase productivity since 2024 and nothing has changed in the | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | way I am supposed to perform my work since 2024, when my target | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | was [FILL IN YOUR TARGET FOR 2024] | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | - The ratio Search / Actions without point / Grants is influenced | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | by management decisions and/or change of work priority during | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | the year, all of which are beyond my control. | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | - The files in Search/Examination allocated to me could come from | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | technical fields outside my Area of Competence, as it happened | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | already in the past OR as already announced by team manager/ | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | director/ COO. In this case it could take me more time to deliver | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | EPC compliant products. | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | I therefore express strong reservations against the production and | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | productive objectives that are set for me for 2025. Nevertheless, as | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | mentioned above, you may of course, continue to count on me to work | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | to the best of my abilities in 2025, as I always have. | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | Best regards | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | [YOUR NAME] | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | ANNEX 2: how to append document to performance report in SuccessFactors | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | 1) print your email in pdf format | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | 2) go to q/successfactors (via EPO VPN) > top left menu > home > scroll down > | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | performance > click on 2025 performance development for [your name ] > top right of | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | the screen there is an icon with paperclip (see below), click on that and you can | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | append your email in pdf format." | Jan 20 06:47 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | Re: happy new year | Jan 20 07:07 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | > I organized a few things over the break. | Jan 20 07:07 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | > | Jan 20 07:07 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | > I've heard rumors that the invalidated "judgment" is not the end of the | Jan 20 07:07 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | > road and they are still plotting various things against my family and I. | Jan 20 07:07 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | > I am curious if you have heard any of this. | Jan 20 07:07 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | > | Jan 20 07:07 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | > I don't personally waste time on social media looking for every plot and | Jan 20 07:07 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | > conspiracy so there may be things that I haven't seen, especially over | Jan 20 07:07 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | > the holiday season. | Jan 20 07:07 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | I have not heard anything to that effect, plus we focus on the battle from Gulagboy and his masters. | Jan 20 07:07 |
| *jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jan 20 09:02 | |
| *jacobk (~quassel@syp65ggum2ibk.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 20 09:04 | |
| schestowitz[TR2] | http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2025/01/guestpost-referral-broadened-to-have.html?showComment=1737300679112#c939468779842631186 | Jan 20 09:22 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-ipkitten.blogspot.com | GuestPost: A referral broadened? To have one’s cake, to eat it...or not yet to get it (G 1/24) - The IPKat | Jan 20 09:22 | |
| schestowitz[TR2] | "" | Jan 20 09:22 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | It is surprising that the questions referred to the EBA do not mention the principle of the broadest technically sensible interpretation which is well settled in the EPO case law . A very recent illustration is provided in T 1886/22 of 5 Nov 2024, Reason 4.1.5 but there are numerous other recent BOA decisions which apply this principle. Under this rule, the description cannot be used to read an unclaimed limitation into the claim.< | Jan 20 09:22 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | br /><br />However, the description, complemented by the drawings if any, is used in different ways : to gain understanding of the claim terms ; to ensure the interpretation is « technically sensible » and the description does not explicitly contradict the broadest interpretation, as the Board did in T 1886/22.<br /><br />The description is also to be taken into account when it contains a specific definition for a claim term, su | Jan 20 09:22 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | ch as the « gathered sheet » in EP3074804, the patent monopoly in suit in the referring decision T 439/22. Several decisions have accepted that the patent monopoly may be "its own dictionary." In such a case, it make sense for the specific definition provided by the applicant in the description of the original application to prevail over the « ordinary meaning » of the term. The applicant should not be allowed to de | Jan 20 09:22 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | part from the definition it has itself established in the description, as this would allow the applicant to make use of the famous » angora cat » game.<br /><br />It is of note that UPC CD Paris decision Njoy v Juuls of 5 Nov 2024 have included in their statement of principles regarding claim interpretation the possibility that the patent monopoly may be « its own lexicon » (see point 7.7). The same is repeated in the UPC CD Pa | Jan 20 09:22 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | ris decision of 17 Jan 2025 between the same parties (point 8.7).<br /><br />As to the link with the requirement to adapt the description to the claims, raised in the letter of the EPO president to the EBA in G 1/24, attention should be paid to point 7.9 of the Njoy v Juuls decision of 5 Nov 2024 and point 8.9 of the decision of 17 Jan 2025, which state that the description to be considered is that of the original application. If s | Jan 20 09:22 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | o, post-filing amendments of the description are irrelevant to claim interpretation. Also of note on the same line : the Hewlett packard v Lama UPC LD Paris of 13 Nov 2024, point 41, in which the court dismissed post-filing amendments of the description." | Jan 20 09:22 |
| *schestowitz-TR has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jan 20 11:25 | |
| *schestowitz-TR has quit (Ping timeout: 120 seconds) | Jan 20 11:26 | |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes | Jan 20 12:00 | |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 20 12:20 | |
| *schestowitz-TR (~acer-box@freenode/user/schestowitz) has joined #techbytes | Jan 20 12:32 | |
| *libertybox2_ (~schestowitz_log@jcfiaarnjjqje.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 20 12:33 | |
| *libertybox2_ has quit (connection closed) | Jan 20 12:33 | |
| *schestowitz-TR (~acer-box@jcfiaarnjjqje.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 20 12:33 | |
| *Techrights-sec has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jan 20 12:33 | |
| *logbackup has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jan 20 12:33 | |
| *Techrights-sec2 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jan 20 12:33 | |
| *libertybox2_ (~schestowitz_log@jcfiaarnjjqje.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 20 12:33 | |
| *techrights-sec1 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jan 20 12:33 | |
| *techrights-sec4 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jan 20 12:33 | |
| *libertybox2__ (~schestowitz_log@jcfiaarnjjqje.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 20 12:33 | |
| *libertybox2_ has quit (connection closed) | Jan 20 12:33 | |
| *libertybox2__ has quit (connection closed) | Jan 20 12:33 | |
| *techrights-sec3 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jan 20 12:34 | |
| *techrights-sec4 (~quassel@freenode-vcjae7.ldvb.0amm.hij1op.IP) has joined #techbytes | Jan 20 12:35 | |
| *techrights-sec1 (~quassel@jcfiaarnjjqje.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 20 12:35 | |
| *techrights-sec1 (~quassel@freenode-vcjae7.ldvb.0amm.hij1op.IP) has joined #techbytes | Jan 20 12:35 | |
| *techrights-sec4 (~quassel@jcfiaarnjjqje.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 20 12:35 | |
| *techrights-sec1 has quit (Connection closed) | Jan 20 12:37 | |
| *techrights-sec1 has quit (connection closed) | Jan 20 12:37 | |
| *techrights-sec4 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jan 20 12:40 | |
| *techrights-sec4 has quit (Connection closed) | Jan 20 12:41 | |
| *techrights-sec1 (~quassel@jcfiaarnjjqje.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 20 12:41 | |
| *techrights-sec1 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jan 20 12:43 | |
| *techrights-sec1 (~quassel@jcfiaarnjjqje.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 20 12:45 | |
| *techrights-sec4 (~quassel@jcfiaarnjjqje.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 20 12:45 | |
| *techrights-sec3 (~quassel@jcfiaarnjjqje.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 20 12:45 | |
| *316BH4PGI (~quassel@freenode-4hg8qs.ldvb.0amm.hij1op.IP) has joined #techbytes | Jan 20 12:45 | |
| *techrights-sec1 (~quassel@freenode-4hg8qs.ldvb.0amm.hij1op.IP) has joined #techbytes | Jan 20 12:45 | |
| *techrights-sec4 (~quassel@freenode-4hg8qs.ldvb.0amm.hij1op.IP) has joined #techbytes | Jan 20 12:46 | |
| *techrights-sec (~quassel@jcfiaarnjjqje.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 20 13:08 | |
| *techrights-sec2 (~quassel@jcfiaarnjjqje.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 20 13:10 | |
| *pi_ (~quassel@jcfiaarnjjqje.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 20 13:11 | |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes | Jan 20 13:39 | |
| *x-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!) | Jan 20 13:52 | |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 20 15:39 | |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes | Jan 20 15:46 | |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 20 15:47 | |
| *x-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@yrifiesvn57du.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 20 16:14 | |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes | Jan 20 16:16 | |
| schestowitz[TR2] | > The Register still posting this retrospective MICROS~1 self-serving | Jan 20 16:17 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | > propaganda: | Jan 20 16:17 |
| schestowitz[TR2] | > We'll cover this shortly | Jan 20 16:17 |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 20 16:44 | |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes | Jan 20 16:52 | |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 20 17:00 | |
| *psydroid3 (~psydroid@xg2evud9qdris.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 20 18:27 | |
| *jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jan 20 21:28 | |
| *psydroid3 has quit (Quit: KVIrc 5.0.0 Aria http://www.kvirc.net/) | Jan 20 21:53 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.6 | ䷉ find the plain text version at this address (HTTP) or in Gemini (how to use Gemini) with a full GemText version.