(ℹ) Join us now at the IRC channel | ䷉ Find the plain text version at this address (HTTP) or in Gemini (how to use Gemini) with a full GemText version.
| *asusbox has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jul 20 02:33 | |
| *rianne_ has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jul 20 02:33 | |
| schestowitz | http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2023/07/the-risk-of-pre-grant-description.html?showComment=1689679080055#c7055527940843991967 | Jul 20 04:00 |
|---|---|---|
| schestowitz | It seems to me to be far from certain that the Board misapplied the principles of claim interpretation in this case. That is, if we accept that the Board should use the (amended) description and drawings of the granted patent when applying Art 69(1) EPC, it does not seem unreasonable that the phrase "permanently attached" should be afforded a relatively broad interpretation.<br /><br />The problem as I see it is that the (pre- | Jul 20 04:00 |
| schestowitz | grant) amendments to the description removed some of the <b>context</b> of the original disclosure, which could well have cast a different light on the meaning of "permanently attached".<br /><br />In any event, there is little doubt that, under current EPO practice and case law, adapting the description to allowable claims has become a very complicated and risky procedure for applicants. As illustrated by T450/20, the risks f | Jul 20 04:00 |
| schestowitz | or applicants include the possibility that certain amendments to the description might inadvertently change the (post-grant) interpretation of a term used in the claims ... possibly to a meaning that cannot be clearly and unambiguously derived from the disclosures of the application as originally filed. | Jul 20 04:00 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-ipkitten.blogspot.com | The risk of pre-grant description amendments (T 450/20) - The IPKat | Jul 20 04:00 | |
| *asusbox (~rianne@3stvfjh5iuw88.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jul 20 06:21 | |
| *rianne_ (~rianne@3stvfjh5iuw88.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jul 20 06:22 | |
| *psydroid2 (~psydroid@u8ftxtfux23wk.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jul 20 07:07 | |
| *rianne_ has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jul 20 11:21 | |
| *asusbox has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jul 20 11:21 | |
| *asusbox (~rianne@3stvfjh5iuw88.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jul 20 11:22 | |
| *rianne_ (~rianne@3stvfjh5iuw88.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jul 20 11:23 | |
| *asusbox has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jul 20 11:33 | |
| *rianne_ has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jul 20 11:33 | |
| *u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!) | Jul 20 14:19 | |
| *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@h9w2ackdz5nh2.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jul 20 14:20 | |
| *psydroid2 has quit (connection closed) | Jul 20 17:11 | |
| *psydroid2 (~psydroid@u8ftxtfux23wk.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jul 20 17:34 | |
| *Tilt (~tilt@frveq6rcj5n32.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jul 20 17:58 | |
| Tilt | i have a cock | Jul 20 17:58 |
| Tilt | i have a cock | Jul 20 17:59 |
| *asusbox (~rianne@3stvfjh5iuw88.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jul 20 18:00 | |
| *rianne_ (~rianne@3stvfjh5iuw88.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jul 20 18:01 | |
| *parsifal (~parsifal@aahfbjmj4hann.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jul 20 18:35 | |
| *psydroid3 (~psydroid@u8ftxtfux23wk.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jul 20 20:43 | |
| *psydroid3 has quit (connection closed) | Jul 20 21:18 | |
| *asusbox has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jul 20 21:26 | |
| *rianne_ has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jul 20 21:26 | |
| *parsifal has quit (Quit: Leaving) | Jul 20 21:36 | |
| psydruid | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2mtwZaRObP8 | Jul 20 23:26 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-@Invidious: https://inv.bp.mutahar.rocks/watch?v=2mtwZaRObP8 | Jul 20 23:26 | |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-Peer reports it experienced an internal error. ( status 0 @ https://inv.bp.mutahar.rocks/watch?v=2mtwZaRObP8 ) | Jul 20 23:26 | |
| *psydroid2 has quit (connection closed) | Jul 20 23:58 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.6 | ䷉ find the plain text version at this address (HTTP) or in Gemini (how to use Gemini) with a full GemText version.