Join us now at the IRC channel.
| *acer-box has quit (Remote host closed the connection) | Feb 22 02:34 | |
| *acer-box (~acer-box@host81-154-175-45.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #techbytes | Feb 22 02:35 | |
| *acer-box has quit (Changing host) | Feb 22 02:35 | |
| *acer-box (~acer-box@unaffiliated/schestowitz) has joined #techbytes | Feb 22 02:35 | |
| schestowitz | > Not really. I only did a proof-of-concept thing on a Raspberry pi. | Feb 22 03:57 |
|---|---|---|
| schestowitz | > However, the need to move the filtering to HV from TR means that | Feb 22 03:57 |
| schestowitz | > solution requires some way of sending info from the one machine to the | Feb 22 03:57 |
| schestowitz | > other. | Feb 22 03:57 |
| schestowitz | > | Feb 22 03:57 |
| schestowitz | > Unfortunately, HV is missing both iptables or nft. The latter is better. | Feb 22 03:57 |
| schestowitz | I have just blocked wp-login again, temporarily. | Feb 22 03:57 |
| schestowitz | >>> | Feb 22 04:09 |
| schestowitz | >>> It is, indeed, spam. Why do we still link so much to a site that we know | Feb 22 04:09 |
| schestowitz | >>> works for Microsoft and Bill? It's no better than Grauniad anymore and | Feb 22 04:09 |
| schestowitz | >>> many sites still exist which deserve traffic. | Feb 22 04:10 |
| schestowitz | >>> | Feb 22 04:10 |
| schestowitz | >> Which ones deserve traffic? I'm finding fewer and fewer. Most are | Feb 22 04:10 |
| schestowitz | >> doing like the Grauniad and covering one topic very well so they can | Feb 22 04:10 |
| schestowitz | >> spew complete and utter bullshit in all other categories. | Feb 22 04:10 |
| schestowitz | >> | Feb 22 04:10 |
| schestowitz | >> | Feb 22 04:10 |
| schestowitz | > By the way my guess about the current administration's recent noise | Feb 22 04:10 |
| schestowitz | > about Russia and the 2020 election, is that it is intended to completely | Feb 22 04:10 |
| schestowitz | > drown out coverage of Reality Winner's actions, her reasons, and her | Feb 22 04:10 |
| schestowitz | > recent request for clemency. She is the only one who has gone to jail | Feb 22 04:10 |
| schestowitz | > over the 2016 election. | Feb 22 04:10 |
| schestowitz | On the way to town I recalled your link to Mark C. | Feb 22 04:10 |
| schestowitz | Maybe add | Feb 22 04:10 |
| schestowitz | http://markcurtis.info/feed/ | Feb 22 04:10 |
| schestowitz | Is Meduza aware that their RSS feed stopped updating since their announcement "Meduza is hiring a news editor for its English-language edition"? https://meduza.io/rss/en/all | Feb 22 04:10 |
| schestowitz | I can send them an email maybe... | Feb 22 04:10 |
| schestowitz | We need to think carefully when the s/n ratio is high. The music/entertainment news site you added is low s/n. I maybe pick only 1 out of 5 from it. Unlike T.F. | Feb 22 04:10 |
| schestowitz | >> On the way to town I recalled your link to Mark C. | Feb 22 04:18 |
| schestowitz | >> | Feb 22 04:18 |
| schestowitz | >> Maybe add | Feb 22 04:18 |
| schestowitz | >> | Feb 22 04:18 |
| schestowitz | >> http://markcurtis.info/feed/ | Feb 22 04:18 |
| schestowitz | > Ok. | Feb 22 04:18 |
| schestowitz | Cool. | Feb 22 04:18 |
| schestowitz | >> Is Meduza aware that their RSS feed stopped updating since their | Feb 22 04:18 |
| schestowitz | >> announcement "Meduza is hiring a news editor for its English-language | Feb 22 04:18 |
| schestowitz | >> edition"? https://meduza.io/rss/en/all | Feb 22 04:18 |
| schestowitz | >> | Feb 22 04:18 |
| schestowitz | >> I can send them an email maybe... | Feb 22 04:18 |
| schestowitz | > I would recommend that. | Feb 22 04:18 |
| schestowitz | I've just checked. | Feb 22 04:18 |
| schestowitz | They still publish new stuff in English. | Feb 22 04:18 |
| schestowitz | It was only yesterday I suddenly realised they had gone off the radar. | Feb 22 04:19 |
| schestowitz | I'll see if I can find their contact info | Feb 22 04:19 |
| schestowitz | Feb 22 04:19 | |
| schestowitz | >> We need to think carefully when the s/n ratio is high. The | Feb 22 04:19 |
| schestowitz | >> music/entertainment news site you added is low s/n. I maybe pick only 1 | Feb 22 04:19 |
| schestowitz | >> out of 5 from it. Unlike T.F. | Feb 22 04:19 |
| schestowitz | > Right. Digital Music News has good stuff but only occasionally. Should | Feb 22 04:19 |
| schestowitz | > I move it from the automated feed to the stuff I check manually? | Feb 22 04:19 |
| schestowitz | Manually would be better, as the copyright abuse/controversies is maybe 10-20% of what's in there. | Feb 22 04:19 |
| schestowitz | Of use: | Feb 22 04:19 |
| schestowitz | https://www.democracynow.org/democracynow.rss | Feb 22 04:19 |
| schestowitz | Their RSS feeds change and break over the years, but this one is in tact... for now... | Feb 22 04:19 |
| *jr0 has quit (Quit: ZNC 1.7.3 - https://znc.in) | Feb 22 07:02 | |
| *jr0 (jr0@2600:3c02::f03c:91ff:fe2e:af5b) has joined #techbytes | Feb 22 07:07 | |
| *jr0 is now known as Guest49886 | Feb 22 07:08 | |
| *Guest49886 has quit (Quit: ZNC 1.7.3 - https://znc.in) | Feb 22 07:16 | |
| *jr0 (jr0@2600:3c02::f03c:91ff:fe2e:af5b) has joined #techbytes | Feb 22 07:31 | |
| *jr0 is now known as Guest43235 | Feb 22 07:31 | |
| *Guest43235 has quit (Client Quit) | Feb 22 07:33 | |
| *dddd (jr0@2600:3c02::f03c:91ff:fe2e:af5b) has joined #techbytes | Feb 22 07:44 | |
| *dddd has quit (Client Quit) | Feb 22 07:47 | |
| schestowitz | http://patentblog.kluweriplaw.com/2020/02/19/update-fcc-ruling-in-upca-case-expected-within-the-next-few-months/#comment | Feb 22 09:25 |
| schestowitz | " | Feb 22 09:25 |
| schestowitz | Hope dies last. How often have we heard that a decision is imminent, and that the decision would be non-admissibility of the complaint? When will this expression of wishful thinking stop? | Feb 22 09:25 |
| schestowitz | As the UK has clearly stated that it wants to get read of the jurisdiction of the CJEU, how can UK stay member of the UPC? The problem is that London is mentioned in the text. A court sitting in a non-member state which on top refuses to accept the jurisdiction of the CJEU, and with judges citizens from this non-EU member state, can still decide on what has to happen within the EU, would make me break out in laughter if the situation | Feb 22 09:25 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-patentblog.kluweriplaw.com | UPDATE: FCC ruling in UPCA case expected 'within the next few months' - Kluwer Patent Blog | Feb 22 09:25 | |
| schestowitz | was not so tragic. | Feb 22 09:25 |
| schestowitz | I do not think that the UK PM gives a damn about the UPCA. He has a much vaster agenda to cope with. And certainly if everything has to be decided until the end of the year. | Feb 22 09:25 |
| schestowitz | On the other hand, what does it help to decide over the UPC when no decision is taken over the complaints relating to the EPO, as a unitary patent is nothing more than a patent granted by the EPO? | Feb 22 09:25 |
| schestowitz | If the application is refused or the patent revoked, there is no unitary patent, but the absence of a revision instance and of the independence of judges which might not be reappointed is a problem in both systems. | Feb 22 09:25 |
| schestowitz | The German Federal Constitutional Court has decided in March 2018 that judges can be appointed for a given length of time, but under two conditions: they have to be civil servants for life and they cannot be reappointed. This ruling applied to administrative courts in Germany, but logic implies that it should also apply to international jurisdictions. | Feb 22 09:25 |
| schestowitz | In the UPC it is worse as a judge can be removed from office by a decision of the presidium of the court, cf. Art 10 of the statute which is part of the UPCA, but there are no means of redress open to a judge removed from office. | Feb 22 09:25 |
| schestowitz | Amendment of an international treaty without an automatic necessity to ratify the amendment by the parliaments, cf. Art 87(2) UPCA, of the member states is something unheard of. There is the possibility not to accept such a decision, but it is left to the executive to decide whether a Review Conference of the Contracting Member States has to be convened, cf. Art 87(3) UPCA. Do not try to persuade me that such a provision is | Feb 22 09:25 |
| schestowitz | constitutional in any member state of the EU. | Feb 22 09:25 |
| schestowitz | I still fail to understand how such nonsense could be ratified. | Feb 22 09:25 |
| schestowitz | The German Federal Constitutional Court has still to fully accept the pre-eminence of the CJEU, and accepting such a treaty like the UPC as being conform to the German fundamental law would mean that it has given up any control of the sovereignty of Germany when it comes to international treaties. It might not want to block the EU as such, but it is has shown in the past, that it is not prepared to accept everything decided in Brussels. | Feb 22 09:25 |
| schestowitz | And the UPC is not even a court of the EU, but a court meant to accept EU legislation…. | Feb 22 09:25 |
| schestowitz | Techrights and zoobab: FINGERS OFF!!!!! I do not have to repeat myself. | Feb 22 09:25 |
| schestowitz | REPLY | Feb 22 09:25 |
| schestowitz | Jim Boff | Feb 22 09:25 |
| schestowitz | FEBRUARY 20, 2020 AT 5:34 PM | Feb 22 09:25 |
| schestowitz | The UPC Agreement does not leave it to the Executive to call for a Review Conference – every Contracting State has the right to call for a Review Conference if there is an amendment by the Administrative Council. | Feb 22 09:26 |
| schestowitz | Article 87(3) UPC Agreement | Feb 22 09:26 |
| schestowitz | “(3) A decision of the Administrative Committee taken on the basis of paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not | Feb 22 09:26 |
| schestowitz | take effect if a Contracting Member State declares within twelve months of the date of the decision, | Feb 22 09:26 |
| schestowitz | on the basis of its relevant internal decision-making procedures, that it does not wish to be bound by | Feb 22 09:26 |
| schestowitz | the decision. In this case, a Review Conference of the Contracting Member States shall | Feb 22 09:26 |
| schestowitz | be convened.” | Feb 22 09:26 |
| schestowitz | In this respect, the competence of the Administrative Council of the UPC under Article 83(2) UPC mirrors that of the Administrative Council of the EPO [Articles 33(1)(b) and 35(3) EPC] but Article 83(1) UPC goes a little further in allowing amendments to the Agreement to “improve the functioning of the Court”. This too is subject to Article 87(3) UPC. | Feb 22 09:26 |
| schestowitz | In short, if you are worried about the UPC you should be worried about the EPO. | Feb 22 09:26 |
| schestowitz | I note your concerns about the decision making processes in the EPO. Are you calling for Germany to leave the EPC? | Feb 22 09:26 |
| schestowitz | Given current circumstances, flouncing out of European co-operation agreements would be a significant escalation of an already tense situation. | Feb 22 09:26 |
| schestowitz | REPLY | Feb 22 09:26 |
| schestowitz | Attentive Observer | Feb 22 09:26 |
| schestowitz | FEBRUARY 21, 2020 AT 12:00 AM | Feb 22 09:26 |
| schestowitz | Dear Mr Boff, | Feb 22 09:26 |
| schestowitz | Thanks for a very interesting comment. | Feb 22 09:26 |
| schestowitz | I never doubted that any contracting state can call a review conference, but you are playing with words. In reality such an initiative in a contracting state has primarily to be taken by the executive, and if the executive does not wish to call a review conference, it will not do so. It should not be allowed to let an administrative body, be it called administrative committee or administrative council to amend an international | Feb 22 09:26 |
| schestowitz | Convention. At least very constraining rules should be in place. | Feb 22 09:26 |
| schestowitz | If “improving the functioning of the Court” means that for instance, non-member states of the EU can be invited to participate to the UPC, then this is not ok. | Feb 22 09:26 |
| schestowitz | I am indeed worried about the UPC, but I am not worried about the EPO. | Feb 22 09:26 |
| schestowitz | Art 35(3) EPC requires unanimity of all member states if an amendment to the EPC under Art 33(1,b) EPC is to be decided. A decision taken on the basis of Art 33(1,b) EPC, shall not take effect if a Contracting State declares, within twelve months of the date of the decision that it does not wish to be bound by that decision. In the EPC there is thus a double barrier. First unanimity is required, and even after unanimity was acquired a | Feb 22 09:26 |
| schestowitz | contracting state still has the possibility to back out afterwards. | Feb 22 09:26 |
| schestowitz | Art 87(3) UPCA simply says that a decision not take effect if a Contracting Member State declares within twelve months of the date of the decision, on the basis of its relevant internal decision-making procedures, that it does not wish to be bound by the decision. | Feb 22 09:26 |
| schestowitz | To my knowledge, there is no unanimity required in order to amend the UPCA. It is thus not correct to say that “Article 83(2) UPC mirrors that of the Administrative Council of the EPO [Articles 33(1)(b) and 35(3) EPC]”. It is revealing to me that “Article 83(1) UPC goes a little further in allowing amendments to the Agreement to “improve the functioning of the Court”. This too is subject to Article 87(3) UPC”. | Feb 22 09:26 |
| schestowitz | It has not been defined what should be understood under “improving the functioning of the court”, and like for Art 87(2) no unanimity is required up front. Would a simple majority be enough or should it be at least a majority of three quarters like for certain amendments of the EPC? Why have all those aspects be left out in the UPCA? | Feb 22 09:26 |
| schestowitz | I am certainly in favour of European co-operation in IP matters, but certainly not the option which is offered by the UPC. The situation is certainly tense as the UPC has not been ratified quickly in order to create a fait accompli, but as more times goes by, all the drawbacks and approximations come to light. This is certainly not something wished by the proponents of the UPC in general and you in particular. | Feb 22 09:26 |
| schestowitz | Rather than directing the debate on an alleged mirroring of the UPC and the EPC, I would have wished a reply to my comment about Art 10 of the Statute or on the reappointment of judges. | Feb 22 09:26 |
| schestowitz | At least you saved the readers from the usual verbiage about the positive effects of the UPC for European industry and especially for European SMEs, which is anything but convincing. The main beneficiaries of the UPC will first be non-EU countries as it will be possible for them to have one entry point in order to attack European industry. The second beneficiaries will be big international lawyers firms acting in a multinational | Feb 22 09:26 |
| schestowitz | environment. | Feb 22 09:26 |
| schestowitz | A simple question: how many litigations in Europe go over more than one country? Only a very few. Do we need such a complicated and expensive construct like the UPC? My answer is no. | Feb 22 09:26 |
| schestowitz | I am certainly not calling for Germany to leave the EPC, but I am calling to give the Boards of Appeal true independence vis-à-vis the President of the EPO. The recent past and an actual referral by the President of the EPO shows that the Boards are not really independent. They have however shown that they want to resist the pressure from the President to rubber stamp its decisions or those of the Administrative Council, but they | Feb 22 09:26 |
| schestowitz | should be independent not just in name but also in reality. | Feb 22 09:26 |
| schestowitz | If the German Federal Constitutional Court pushes in this direction, I will certainly approve. What is at stake is not increasing the perception of independence of the Boards of Appeal, but to guarantee their true independence. | Feb 22 09:26 |
| schestowitz | Techrights and zoobab: FINGERS OFF!!!! No need to explain! | Feb 22 09:26 |
| schestowitz | REPLY | Feb 22 09:26 |
| schestowitz | MN | Feb 22 09:26 |
| schestowitz | FEBRUARY 21, 2020 AT 12:08 PM | Feb 22 09:26 |
| schestowitz | [Slightly revised and corrected version, Moderator please feel free to delete my first posting] | Feb 22 09:26 |
| schestowitz | Generally concur with Attentive Observer but I would like to add a few comments. | Feb 22 09:26 |
| schestowitz | Attentive Observer stated, “[a]mendment of an international treaty without an automatic necessity to ratify the amendment by the parliaments … is something unheard of”. Attentive Observer is here slightly mistaken. According to Art.33(1) EPC, the Administrative Council can amend certain parts of the EPC, in order “to bring them into line with an international treaty relating to patents or European Community legislation relating | Feb 22 09:26 |
| schestowitz | to patents”. Unlike a revision under Art.172 EPC, no conference or ratification by the Contracting States is necessary for such amendments. (However, since such amendments under Art.33(1) EPC are limited “to bring … into line”, it can reasonably be assumed that any international treaty or European Community legislation has already been appropriately ratified by either each EPC Contracting States and/or EU.) | Feb 22 09:27 |
| schestowitz | Attentive Observer stated, “still fail to understand how such nonsense could be ratified.” | Feb 22 09:27 |
| schestowitz | In my opinion, one good example of that is how reversal of burden of proof in case of a patented process was implemented. EU Member States must implement or follow Art.34 TRIPS [Process Patents: Burden of Proof]. Art.34 TRIPS requires that judicial authorities must have the authority to order the defendant to prove that the process to obtain an identical product is different from the patented process (a) ”if the product obtained by | Feb 22 09:27 |
| schestowitz | the patented process is new”; or (b) ”if there is substantial likelihood that the identical product was made by the process and the owner has been unable through reasonable efforts to determine the process actually used.” | Feb 22 09:27 |
| schestowitz | According to Art.55(1) UPCA, an ”identical product … shall, in the absence of proof to the contrary, be deemed to have been obtained by the patented process”. However, Art.55(2) UPCA then states that, ”principle set out [in Art.55(1) UPCA] … shall also apply where there is a substantial likelihood that the identical product was made by the patented process …”. But if the “product obtained is new” is the test, then | Feb 22 09:27 |
| schestowitz | there is no need to also have the more stringent “substantial likelihood” test (which not only requires a identical product as in the “product obtained is new” test but also substantial likelihood that the patented process was used and proprietor was unable to determine the process used). Furthermore, since the “substantial likelihood” test already contains the requirement of the “product obtained is new” test that the | Feb 22 09:27 |
| schestowitz | “identical product was made by the patented process” what purpose then serves the statutory language “[t]he principle set out in paragraph 1 shall also apply”? This lack of clarity what test actually applies, the “product obtained is new” test, or the more stringent “substantial likelihood” test, ought Art.55 UPCA fail the generally accepted judicial requirement of legal certainty. | Feb 22 09:27 |
| schestowitz | Subsection (3) Art. 34 TRIPS states that, ”Member shall be free to provide … only if … (a) is fulfilled or only if … (b) is fulfilled”. Stating the two test as alternatives makes it clear that these two tests are intended to be alternatives for WTO Members to select. Hence, a strict, literal interpretation of TRIPS would require a selection of one of the two alternatives, a merger of both as attempted in Art.55(2) UPCA may be | Feb 22 09:27 |
| schestowitz | deemed not to be TRIPS conform. | Feb 22 09:27 |
| schestowitz | Furthermore, according to Art.24(d) UPCA, sources of law are “other international agreements applicable to patents and binding on all the Contracting Member States”. TRIPS is such an agreement, the UPC is therefore required to follow Art.34 TRIPS (ignoring the issue whether directly applicable or not). Why then the differences in Art.55(1) UPCA that only raises question marks regarding TRIPS conformity. | Feb 22 09:27 |
| schestowitz | The author can only assume that the drafters of Art.55(1) UPCA may not quite have understood the concept of reversal of burden of proof in regard to process patents in spite of the rather clear language of Art.34 TRIPS. Or perhaps the drafters didn’t want or didn’t know which test to select, and therefore selected both. This is also surprising in view that Art.75 [Burden of proof] of the Agreement relating to Community patents and | Feb 22 09:27 |
| schestowitz | Art.13 [Process patents: burden of proof] of the Proposal for a Council Regulation on the Community patent are virtually identical in requiring the “process for obtaining a new product” test, suggesting that the “process for obtaining a new product” test is already the accepted or agreed to test. | Feb 22 09:27 |
| schestowitz | On a more philosophical level, John Locke’s statement regarding the fundamental rights – “Natural Rights to Life, Liberty, and Property” – expresses well the modern thoughts about what constitutes fundamental rights. Patent infringement, even if wilful, is not to be held to be a criminal offence; hence, “Life” and “Liberty” (of the infringer) will not be in jeopardy before the UPC. But the near unfettered powers of the | Feb 22 09:27 |
| schestowitz | UPC, not subject to any appeal to a higher court, regarding the third element of John Locke’s fundamental right, “Property”, should be held unacceptable by the Bundesverfassungsgericht. | Feb 22 09:27 |
| schestowitz | " | Feb 22 09:27 |
| *r_schestowitz has quit (Remote host closed the connection) | Feb 22 11:05 | |
| *tedbox (~roy@host81-154-175-45.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #techbytes | Feb 22 11:25 | |
| *tedbox has quit (Changing host) | Feb 22 11:25 | |
| *tedbox (~roy@unaffiliated/schestowitz) has joined #techbytes | Feb 22 11:25 | |
| schestowitz | https://twitter.com/HindAbyad/status/1231182050759192581 | Feb 22 12:10 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-@HindAbyad: @schestowitz @wikileaks Disgusting sub-human stupid con | Feb 22 12:10 | |
| schestowitz | https://twitter.com/jrobertson/status/1231181303141130242 | Feb 22 12:10 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-@jrobertson: @schestowitz Is that Simon Phipps? https://t.co/zTkUQbbyPk | Feb 22 12:10 | |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes--> en.wikipedia.org | Simon Phipps (programmer) - Wikipedia | Feb 22 12:10 | |
| schestowitz | yes, who is now angry at me for pointing this out | Feb 22 12:10 |
| schestowitz | https://twitter.com/jrobertson/status/1231180810666962945 | Feb 22 12:11 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-@jrobertson: This is what surrender looks like. #surrender2020 https://t.co/VlTOxfd9zs | Feb 22 12:11 | |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-@schestowitz: #OSI Board at #Microsoft : This is How Institutions Die or Completely Lose Their Purpose/Direction https://t.co/ek4mp588FS | Feb 22 12:11 | |
| schestowitz | https://twitter.com/2Fflandro/status/1231177878886395904 | Feb 22 12:11 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-@2Fflandro: @schestowitz This assumes the CIA acts independently of the - The Five Eyes (FVEY). | Feb 22 12:11 | |
| schestowitz | https://twitter.com/2Fflandro/status/1231176874916810753 | Feb 22 12:11 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-@2Fflandro: @schestowitz "Fire Breaks" along with "Forest Raking" are prescribed Forestry Management Protocol used to prevent u… https://t.co/YirVx6MhYy | Feb 22 12:11 | |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-@2Fflandro: @schestowitz "Fire Breaks" along with "Forest Raking" are prescribed Forestry Management Protocol used to prevent u… https://t.co/YirVx6MhYy | Feb 22 12:11 | |
| schestowitz | " | Feb 22 12:11 |
| schestowitz | "Fire Breaks" along with "Forest Raking" are prescribed Forestry Management Protocol used to prevent uncontrolled Conflagrations. | Feb 22 12:11 |
| schestowitz | Eastern Australia is still burning. | Feb 22 12:11 |
| schestowitz | " | Feb 22 12:11 |
| schestowitz | https://twitter.com/SleepyPenguin1/status/1231168716253077504 | Feb 22 12:12 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-@SleepyPenguin1: @schestowitz Might as well jump off a high building. | Feb 22 12:12 | |
| schestowitz | https://twitter.com/zoobab/status/1231159428898074625 | Feb 22 12:12 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-@zoobab: @schestowitz data in, data out, software in the middle. So yet another software patent. | Feb 22 12:12 | |
| schestowitz | https://twitter.com/Shaun_Girk/status/1231131333264412672 | Feb 22 12:14 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-@Shaun_Girk: @schestowitz Meanwhile the DNC is demanding all the caucus workers in Nevada sign NDAs. | Feb 22 12:14 | |
| schestowitz | link? | Feb 22 12:14 |
| schestowitz | https://twitter.com/We3forDemocracy/status/1231130190325006336 | Feb 22 12:14 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-@We3forDemocracy: @schestowitz Bloomberg has already reportedly spent $450 million in ads - in his attempt to effectively buy the pre… https://t.co/IFFxKJKSeI | Feb 22 12:14 | |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-@We3forDemocracy: @schestowitz Bloomberg has already reportedly spent $450 million in ads - in his attempt to effectively buy the pre… https://t.co/IFFxKJKSeI | Feb 22 12:14 | |
| schestowitz | " | Feb 22 12:14 |
| schestowitz | Bloomberg has already reportedly spent $450 million in ads - in his attempt to effectively buy the presidency. | Feb 22 12:14 |
| schestowitz | IMO - Anyone who thinks this represents “we the people” needs their head examined. | Feb 22 12:14 |
| schestowitz | " | Feb 22 12:14 |
| schestowitz | https://twitter.com/sirajs0l/status/1231116417698795521 | Feb 22 12:16 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-@sirajs0l: @schestowitz #PublicBot @labnol #Palestine #Judaism != #Zionism | Feb 22 12:16 | |
| schestowitz | https://twitter.com/LaLegale/status/1231094988810809344 | Feb 22 12:16 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-@LaLegale: @schestowitz @SkyNews @wikileaks @JohnWRees @DermotMurnaghan Indeed, undermining any confidence in the legal process. Simply wrong! | Feb 22 12:16 | |
| *tedbox has quit (Remote host closed the connection) | Feb 22 14:43 | |
| *tedbox (~roy@unaffiliated/schestowitz) has joined #techbytes | Feb 22 14:55 | |
| *tedbox has quit (Remote host closed the connection) | Feb 22 15:27 | |
| *tedbox (~roy@host81-154-175-45.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #techbytes | Feb 22 15:29 | |
| *tedbox has quit (Changing host) | Feb 22 15:29 | |
| *tedbox (~roy@unaffiliated/schestowitz) has joined #techbytes | Feb 22 15:29 | |
| *tedbox is now known as roys | Feb 22 15:49 | |
| *oiaohm has quit () | Feb 22 16:12 | |
| schestowitz | https://twitter.com/PamMaccabee/status/1231194654382739458 | Feb 22 16:34 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-@PamMaccabee: That is good. Every positive action helps. I choose Bernie and his comprehensive, transformational political agenda… https://t.co/0jWL4lZaD1 | Feb 22 16:34 | |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-@PamMaccabee: That is good. Every positive action helps. I choose Bernie and his comprehensive, transformational political agenda… https://t.co/0jWL4lZaD1 | Feb 22 16:34 | |
| schestowitz | " | Feb 22 16:34 |
| schestowitz | Pamela Maccabee @PamMaccabee 4h4 hours ago | Feb 22 16:34 |
| schestowitz | More | Feb 22 16:34 |
| schestowitz | Pamela Maccabee Retweeted Dr. Roy Schestowitz (罗伊) | Feb 22 16:34 |
| schestowitz | That is good. Every positive action helps. I choose Bernie and his comprehensive, transformational political agenda and I m glad Warren is playing her part. | Feb 22 16:34 |
| schestowitz | " | Feb 22 16:34 |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9sIiUfIoggQeuvfA2K | Feb 22 17:43 |
| schestowitz | " | Feb 22 17:43 |
| schestowitz | Users are both the key element and the main conundrum. | Feb 22 17:43 |
| schestowitz | Software Freedom offers itself to users along with developers, but the engagement is significantly different. | Feb 22 17:43 |
| schestowitz | Getting users to "care" about the software is important, even though they may not provide patches, etc. | Feb 22 17:43 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 17:43 | |
| schestowitz | " | Feb 22 17:43 |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9sIiEnUUTZ5jgBYacS | Feb 22 17:43 |
| schestowitz | " | Feb 22 17:43 |
| schestowitz | #softwarefreedom #osi | Feb 22 17:43 |
| schestowitz | Those #cowards. | Feb 22 17:43 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 17:43 | |
| schestowitz | " | Feb 22 17:43 |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9sI2Q2P1B8Hb2Pfsky | Feb 22 17:44 |
| schestowitz | " Envy is invalid." | Feb 22 17:44 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 17:44 | |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9sI2OO2pk5vla4Vj16 | Feb 22 17:44 |
| schestowitz | "@schestowitz lol. Nobody's voting bloomberg, and your polls are all rigged. Bernie won't get the nomination. Bloomberg won't get the nomination. DNC/George Soros is picking the candidate this time, and I don't think he wants Bloomberg." | Feb 22 17:44 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 17:44 | |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9sI1kc3yCfaNTU4oQC | Feb 22 17:45 |
| schestowitz | "Bloomberg's giving it all to the DNC. It's illegal campaign financing." | Feb 22 17:45 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 17:45 | |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9sHtIfJhiH9XpAbBOi | Feb 22 17:46 |
| schestowitz | "Can't read this, there is a paywall." | Feb 22 17:46 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 17:46 | |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9sGj42yuFlU8AvIlAO | Feb 22 17:46 |
| schestowitz | "@schestowitz notice how they keep bringing up the 'has one more child than allowed' as if this isn't a major crime in china for good reason?" | Feb 22 17:46 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 17:46 | |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9sGfZ9HiT3xsswftR2 | Feb 22 17:47 |
| schestowitz | "Learn from the past, Democrats. Don’t repeat old mistakes, there are so many others to choose from." | Feb 22 17:47 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 17:47 | |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9sG1Q8a3ihzJvdP1g8 | Feb 22 17:47 |
| schestowitz | " could not have said this better" | Feb 22 17:47 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 17:48 | |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9sFxYX7NyTTGWwjs5w | Feb 22 17:48 |
| schestowitz | " The mob has decided, that Stallman is unworthy and Torvalds hasn't done any interesting rants lately." | Feb 22 17:48 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 17:48 | |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9sFuAm7kERPmG1t1bk | Feb 22 17:49 |
| schestowitz | " The GDI layer is full of dragons .. and the whole Win32s API should go die in a Hungarian Notation fire." | Feb 22 17:49 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 17:49 | |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9sFtPcx2WB3YCNOhbk | Feb 22 17:49 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 17:49 | |
| schestowitz | " actually a lot of JRPGs don't work right under wine because they use undocumented reverse engineered GDI APIs" | Feb 22 17:50 |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9sFdtCbxPpK3vYcJTU | Feb 22 17:50 |
| schestowitz | " | Feb 22 17:50 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 17:50 | |
| schestowitz | Haha. Yeah that’s one thing I hear linux users say all the time. “I love linux, but gee I really miss Internet Explorer”… | Feb 22 17:50 |
| schestowitz | These clowns are just looking to make headlines in linux news circles. | Feb 22 17:51 |
| schestowitz | " | Feb 22 17:51 |
| schestowitz | and lie about "loving" Linux... with blobs that spy | Feb 22 17:51 |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9sE9w2S0SOUBV7RGka | Feb 22 17:53 |
| schestowitz | " I'd have to know more about each of these to know whether or not canada should be in them but...it's good to know of each of them. #canada" | Feb 22 17:53 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 17:53 | |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9sDrFkOlO1GmAvbePg | Feb 22 17:53 |
| schestowitz | " isn't he canadian?" | Feb 22 17:53 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 17:53 | |
| schestowitz | not sure, I suppose so... | Feb 22 17:53 |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9sDiG8PnC6114eCJDk | Feb 22 17:54 |
| schestowitz | " | Feb 22 17:54 |
| schestowitz | Wal-Mart once shut down a store in Ontario Canada when they found out the workers were about to unionize. | Feb 22 17:54 |
| schestowitz | Unions are their kryptonite. | Feb 22 17:54 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 17:54 | |
| schestowitz | " | Feb 22 17:54 |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9sDgxAtfdt7RJbZHqC\ | Feb 22 17:55 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes- ( status 400 @ https://pleroma.site/notice/9sDgxAtfdt7RJbZHqC\ ) | Feb 22 17:55 | |
| schestowitz | "Central bank collapse by 2022. Thankfully, NESARA will be mostly implemented by then." | Feb 22 17:55 |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9sDakPJM8iqaWy6wpk | Feb 22 17:55 |
| schestowitz | " took a second but... you're right" | Feb 22 17:55 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 17:55 | |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9sDaeEZ3BQpTSjVZce | Feb 22 17:55 |
| schestowitz | " um" | Feb 22 17:55 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 17:55 | |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9sDaZ2K1GzTm2s01UO | Feb 22 17:56 |
| schestowitz | " Speaking of which, apparently Buttigieg is a "Microsoft Word guy"." | Feb 22 17:56 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 17:56 | |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9sDZciS8zHPjcvzS7s | Feb 22 17:56 |
| schestowitz | " Soon, all of Epstein's friends will be exposed. It's only a matter of time." | Feb 22 17:56 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 17:56 | |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9sDDpKAmNDLh63TVeC | Feb 22 17:57 |
| schestowitz | " | Feb 22 17:57 |
| schestowitz | Last year I read "The Strange Death of Europe." It's not a great book and I think the author gets a lot of socio-economical stuff wrong ... but I also think the author makes valid points about the migrant crisis. | Feb 22 17:57 |
| schestowitz | Left leaning progressives want to help the world and the refugees .. but a lot of the refugees don't have the same views on womens' rights, LGBT rights, pornography/sex work, et. al. | Feb 22 17:57 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 17:57 | |
| schestowitz | " | Feb 22 17:57 |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9sDDlARWbhRdlHKEvg | Feb 22 17:57 |
| schestowitz | " | Feb 22 17:57 |
| schestowitz | @LPS I heard about this from @schestowitz | Feb 22 17:57 |
| schestowitz | Did we not buy him enough coffee? | Feb 22 17:57 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 17:57 | |
| schestowitz | " | Feb 22 17:57 |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9sDD2AkAdsaffAajdw | Feb 22 17:58 |
| schestowitz | "@schestowitz - It still boggles my luddite mind that people are OK with these devices in their homes and cars. No able-bodied person actually needs one of these." | Feb 22 17:58 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 17:58 | |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9sDAYmqkCVAnFcWhZQ | Feb 22 17:58 |
| schestowitz | "@EMPEROR @hello @schestowitz are you using tor?" | Feb 22 17:58 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 17:58 | |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9sD7rpe5jJfXYtzwGm | Feb 22 17:58 |
| schestowitz | " | Feb 22 17:58 |
| schestowitz | @jeffcliff @hello @schestowitz | Feb 22 17:58 |
| schestowitz | server not found | Feb 22 17:58 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 17:58 | |
| schestowitz | " | Feb 22 17:58 |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9sD4PsC6MSRtUlsmUy | Feb 22 17:59 |
| schestowitz | "find Rush #Limbaugh" | Feb 22 17:59 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 17:59 | |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9sC9KJYxzsbfFlmovQ | Feb 22 18:00 |
| schestowitz | "Is there a DRM-free version?" | Feb 22 18:00 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 18:00 | |
| schestowitz | forks | Feb 22 18:00 |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9sBj5JwBizcFGMq0Ia | Feb 22 18:00 |
| schestowitz | " there's really no longer any reason for using firefox now. I don't understand why they didn't commit to improving the debugging tools instead of developing malicious features..." | Feb 22 18:00 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 18:01 | |
| schestowitz | Google lost as a major sponsor | Feb 22 18:01 |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9sBhvg3iWUHP1OCIKW | Feb 22 18:01 |
| schestowitz | "and you should also pay for it..." | Feb 22 18:01 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 18:01 | |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9s9JcsDCKPUXzkDFRY | Feb 22 18:02 |
| schestowitz | "@schestowitz actually, LTE-M generates much less radiated power verses GSM and CDMA2000, so it's less radiation in general." | Feb 22 18:02 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 18:02 | |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9s8yiZQkyIIORhQimm | Feb 22 18:03 |
| schestowitz | " | Feb 22 18:03 |
| schestowitz | hmm yessss... but it consumed more energy in a week then what it costs to run a raspberry pi for a whole year 24/7 | Feb 22 18:03 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 18:03 | |
| schestowitz | and the tantallium, cobalt, aluminium, copper, gold, in one 486 can build at least 10 pi boxes.. and so... it might still be greener to recycle the old thing. | Feb 22 18:03 |
| schestowitz | though it might end up on a scrapheap instead... and all the plastic thats another headache. | Feb 22 18:03 |
| schestowitz | there is so much these grazy humans need to fix... | Feb 22 18:03 |
| schestowitz | " | Feb 22 18:03 |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9s8qrNPyCjn2A6kZuq | Feb 22 18:03 |
| schestowitz | "@EMPEROR @schestowitz @hello http://searxes.nmqnkngye4ct7bgss4bmv5ca3wpa55yugvxen5kz2bbq67lwy6ps54yd.onion/" | Feb 22 18:03 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 18:03 | |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9s8obwKORTcZtMeYUq | Feb 22 18:03 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-searxes.nmqnkngye4ct7bgss4bmv5ca3wpa55yugvxen5kz2bbq67lwy6ps54yd.onion | | Feb 22 18:03 | |
| schestowitz | "So what is preferable search engine now?" | Feb 22 18:03 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 18:03 | |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9s8c1Yg5hE3EfSggvw | Feb 22 18:04 |
| schestowitz | "@schestowitz Can you do me a favor? When Anthony Weiner's laptop's contents are released in October, and you finally have to come to terms of which side you're defending, can you take a few steps back, maybe smoke a nice fat joint, and try to slay your confirmation bias once and for all? It might end up with you having to struggle with the notion that Barr isn't the devil you think he is, but you'll end up being a better person for the | Feb 22 18:04 |
| schestowitz | internal dialogue you'll have." | Feb 22 18:04 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 18:04 | |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9s8bmghdZrS5DGJuL2 | Feb 22 18:05 |
| schestowitz | " | Feb 22 18:05 |
| schestowitz | @schestowitz It's true that you could switch desktop without switching distros, but it's something I wouldn't encourage end-users to try, unless they enjoy learning how to do some of the vertical integration work themselves. | Feb 22 18:05 |
| schestowitz | I say this while using #KDE on #Fedora and #ArchLinux. Both distros ship up-to-date and relatively unadulterated KDE packages, but there was definitely more configuration work to be done beyond installing the right packages. | Feb 22 18:05 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 18:05 | |
| schestowitz | " | Feb 22 18:05 |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9s8a691MJdjidLh89Q | Feb 22 18:05 |
| schestowitz | "On one hand, this allows for tribal rights under UNDRIP. On the other hand, it creates an opposing land title claim for the US, allowing other countries to meddle in internal affairs." | Feb 22 18:05 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 18:05 | |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9s8UBlvcUFI31fJJ4a | Feb 22 18:05 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 18:05 | |
| schestowitz | " it bought waterfox browser recently..." | Feb 22 18:05 |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9s7Ts9eQNmgNeOxAEC | Feb 22 18:06 |
| schestowitz | "Of course it runs NetBSD! ™" | Feb 22 18:06 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 18:06 | |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9s6stldSwhwfRXPWQC | Feb 22 18:07 |
| schestowitz | "so do I" | Feb 22 18:07 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 18:07 | |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9s6snj9lFZxa16dWCG | Feb 22 18:07 |
| schestowitz | "@EMPEROR @hello @schestowitz for the record: i use ddg as my #1 search engine still" | Feb 22 18:07 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 18:07 | |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9s6siH5qA3zRX4Cc9w | Feb 22 18:07 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 18:07 | |
| schestowitz | "@EMPEROR @schestowitz That I'll have to defer to @hello on" | Feb 22 18:07 |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9s6qP1JuNhiLCcTQxM | Feb 22 18:08 |
| schestowitz | "No, Hard evidence that duckduckgo is tracking users." | Feb 22 18:08 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 18:08 | |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9s6qHk2cE2uBaNukt6 | Feb 22 18:08 |
| schestowitz | " 3) brave appears to be developed primarily in the nsamicrosoft walled garden" | Feb 22 18:08 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 18:08 | |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9s6qBTQF6LfSJ0ydCy | Feb 22 18:09 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 18:09 | |
| schestowitz | "@EMPEROR @hello @schestowitz https://reproducible-builds.org/who/ brave is not listed here" | Feb 22 18:09 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-reproducible-builds.org | Who is involved? — reproducible-builds.org | Feb 22 18:09 | |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9s6q1Wp3bXuFxIqEj2 | Feb 22 18:09 |
| schestowitz | " it's still in wnpp" | Feb 22 18:09 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 18:09 | |
| schestowitz | https://pleroma.site/notice/9s6pxoB38dF4ccM2Qy | Feb 22 18:09 |
| schestowitz | "hard evidence that it's not in debian?" | Feb 22 18:09 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-pleroma.site | Pleroma | Feb 22 18:09 | |
| schestowitz | https://twitter.com/BrideOfLinux/status/1231266153399488512 | Feb 22 18:17 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-@BrideOfLinux: Reading between the lines here, the author's position seems to be 'damned if you do, damned if you don't': Even Wor… https://t.co/1kbFuxmRK2 | Feb 22 18:17 | |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-@BrideOfLinux: Reading between the lines here, the author's position seems to be 'damned if you do, damned if you don't': Even Wor… https://t.co/1kbFuxmRK2 | Feb 22 18:17 | |
| schestowitz | "Reading between the lines here, the author's position seems to be 'damned if you do, damned if you don't': Even Worse Than Microsoft Inside the Board of the OSI @OpenSourceOrg" | Feb 22 18:17 |
| schestowitz | https://twitter.com/webmink/status/1231268108691742720 | Feb 22 18:17 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-@webmink: @BrideOfLinux @OpenSourceOrg Wretched stuff this democracy, huh. | Feb 22 18:17 | |
| schestowitz | https://twitter.com/BrideOfLinux/status/1231268547277533184 | Feb 22 18:18 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-@BrideOfLinux: @webmink @OpenSourceOrg But if you try sometime you just might find, you get what you need. | Feb 22 18:18 | |
| schestowitz | It's a bit like superdelegates-type democracy with corporations playing a greater role and tipping scales | Feb 22 18:19 |
| schestowitz | got some info e fsf | Feb 22 18:43 |
| schestowitz | dynamite | Feb 22 18:43 |
| schestowitz | > Keep up the great stuff, | Feb 22 18:43 |
| schestowitz | I'll need to sit and think hard about this. | Feb 22 18:43 |
| schestowitz | For now, no word said or written (except my wife). | Feb 22 18:43 |
| schestowitz | >>>> https://www.democracynow.org/democracynow.rss | Feb 22 18:47 |
| schestowitz | >>>> | Feb 22 18:47 |
| schestowitz | >>>> Their RSS feeds change and break over the years, but this one is in | Feb 22 18:47 |
| schestowitz | >>>> tact... for now... | Feb 22 18:47 |
| schestowitz | >>> Ok. I've added it. They've got several page layouts, so keep an eye on | Feb 22 18:47 |
| schestowitz | >>> what the script has produced and let me know when it breaks and on which | Feb 22 18:47 |
| schestowitz | >>> URLs. | Feb 22 18:47 |
| schestowitz | >> Yes, some feeds are not predictable. Inconsistent form. | Feb 22 18:47 |
| schestowitz | > If you see something consistent in the unpredictability, or even if you | Feb 22 18:47 |
| schestowitz | > don't, can you send some of the bad URLs so I can take a closer look? | Feb 22 18:47 |
| schestowitz | > I've learned a few new methods when updating the script this morning and | Feb 22 18:47 |
| schestowitz | > might be able to tweak the parsing to accommodate additional variations. | Feb 22 18:47 |
| schestowitz | Excellent, thank you. | Feb 22 18:47 |
| schestowitz | I've just received FSF leaks. | Feb 22 18:47 |
| schestowitz | I don't know what to do about these... | Feb 22 18:47 |
| schestowitz | Or how to handle these... | Feb 22 18:47 |
| schestowitz | >>> I'll cover Digital Music News manually but have added Democracy Now and | Feb 22 18:48 |
| schestowitz | >>> Mark Curtis. Both new feeds needed a little trickery with the parsing | Feb 22 18:48 |
| schestowitz | >>> so let me know when they break. Also, speaking of breaking, git seems | Feb 22 18:48 |
| schestowitz | >>> no longer working on TR. | Feb 22 18:48 |
| schestowitz | >> I have not made any changes recently. Maybe it broke itself? Or fell | Feb 22 18:48 |
| schestowitz | >> into a bad state? | Feb 22 18:48 |
| schestowitz | > I'll try taking a look this weekend, probably first on a machine or two | Feb 22 18:48 |
| schestowitz | > here. I'm an absolute novice when it comes to Git. | Feb 22 18:48 |
| schestowitz | I never inspired me 9 years ago when I started using it because everyone put it in a prison called github. | Feb 22 18:48 |
| *schestowitz has quit (Quit: Konversation term) | Feb 22 18:49 | |
| *schestowitz (~schestowi@host81-154-175-45.range81-154.btcentralplus.com) has joined #techbytes | Feb 22 18:50 | |
| *schestowitz has quit (Changing host) | Feb 22 18:50 | |
| *schestowitz (~schestowi@unaffiliated/schestowitz) has joined #techbytes | Feb 22 18:50 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.6 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!