(ℹ) Join us now at the IRC channel | ䷉ Find the plain text version at this address (HTTP) or in Gemini (how to use Gemini) with a full GemText version.
schestowitz | "Oh there is a strategy, but it doesn’t include non-enterprise customers. They have been and will continue to be partnered off. IBM went all in on scaleout Power replacing Intel (especially for LINUX), and it’s been a disaster as the ISV’s said “no thank you and embraced Intel solutions instead” Scale out margins run at 1/3 of what enterprise margins run at, and this isn’t sustainable, when you consider IBM’s high cost ove | Oct 26 03:43 |
---|---|---|
schestowitz | rhead. The CFO’s mention on the 3rd q call of a redhat/Dell Linux partnership only reinforces how IBM is viewing scaleout HW. It doesn’t fit into the “enterprise only” go forward strategy, and we have seen how IBM deals with products that don’t fit (Palo Alto). Yep they sell them off and partner with them instead." https://www.thelayoff.com/t/1v8hfcIe | Oct 26 03:43 |
schestowitz | https://www.thelayoff.com/t/1va9sV1p | Oct 26 03:46 |
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes- ( status 403 @ https://www.thelayoff.com/t/1va9sV1p ) | Oct 26 03:46 | |
schestowitz | " | Oct 26 03:46 |
schestowitz | I can't understand people who are championing AI. Don't you realize that you're basically cheering on the very thing that will most likely be responsible for the elimination of your job? I understand that it's inevitable, but why people are happy about it when there's an axe hanging over their heads is beyond me. | Oct 26 03:46 |
schestowitz | " | Oct 26 03:46 |
schestowitz | " | Oct 26 03:46 |
schestowitz | The more Microsoft focuses on AI, the worse it will be for us | Oct 26 03:46 |
schestowitz | " | Oct 26 03:46 |
*acer-box has quit (Quit: Konversation term) | Oct 26 08:10 | |
*acer-box____ has quit (Quit: Konversation term) | Oct 26 08:10 | |
*acer-box (~acer-box@p9wpy7xxaddvc.irc) has joined #techbytes | Oct 26 08:10 | |
*acer-box____ (~acer-box@freenode/user/schestowitz) has joined #techbytes | Oct 26 08:11 | |
*x-amarsh04 has quit (connection closed) | Oct 26 08:11 | |
*acer-box has quit (Quit: Konversation term) | Oct 26 08:17 | |
*acer-box____ has quit (Quit: Konversation term) | Oct 26 08:17 | |
*acer-box (~acer-box@p9wpy7xxaddvc.irc) has joined #techbytes | Oct 26 08:17 | |
*acer-box____ (~acer-box@freenode/user/schestowitz) has joined #techbytes | Oct 26 08:17 | |
*x-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@uivdf4yi6wfqn.irc) has joined #techbytes | Oct 26 08:21 | |
schestowitz | Re: WokeGPT won't tell a joke featuring Muhammad :o | Oct 26 09:41 |
schestowitz | > Q: Tell a joke featuring Jesus. | Oct 26 09:41 |
schestowitz | > | Oct 26 09:41 |
schestowitz | > ChatGPT: Why didn’t Jesus play basketball? Because he didn’t want to get | Oct 26 09:41 |
schestowitz | > nailed for traveling!. | Oct 26 09:41 |
schestowitz | > | Oct 26 09:41 |
schestowitz | > Q: Tell a joke featuring Buddha. | Oct 26 09:41 |
schestowitz | > | Oct 26 09:41 |
schestowitz | > ChatGPT: Why did Buddha refuse to vacuum in the house? Because he had no | Oct 26 09:41 |
schestowitz | > attachments!. | Oct 26 09:41 |
schestowitz | > | Oct 26 09:41 |
schestowitz | > Q: Tell a joke featuring Muhammad. | Oct 26 09:41 |
schestowitz | > | Oct 26 09:41 |
schestowitz | > ChatGPT: Out of respect for Islamic traditions and the cultural | Oct 26 09:41 |
schestowitz | > sensitivities surrounding depictions or representations of the Prophet | Oct 26 09:41 |
schestowitz | > Muhammad, it’s best to avoid jokes involving him directly. | Oct 26 09:41 |
schestowitz | Weak religions cannot handle criticism. | Oct 26 09:41 |
*jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Oct 26 10:02 | |
*jacobk (~quassel@rr2rh58ht72yy.irc) has joined #techbytes | Oct 26 10:04 | |
schestowitz | <li> | Oct 26 10:34 |
schestowitz | <h5><a href="https://www.dedoimedo.com/computers/plasma-6-2-review.html">Plasma 6.2 review - Slowly getting there, but the road is long</a></h5> | Oct 26 10:34 |
schestowitz | <blockquote> | Oct 26 10:34 |
schestowitz | <p>For me, the Plasma desktop is the best work environment out there, hands down. But it ain't without its faults and unfortunate (and unfortunately avoidable) regressions. The release of the brand new, mega-major 6.X version was quite tumultuous. Rife with bugs. I tested it no less than three times, on three different systems, and every single time, there were lots of issues and problems. | Oct 26 10:34 |
schestowitz | Some of these are semi-understandable, after all, the KDE team is adopting the brand new Qt6 framework. But others are just ... unnecessary. </p> | Oct 26 10:34 |
schestowitz | <p> Well, now, version 6.2 is out, and I was happy, even eager to test it. After all, I love it, and I want it to succeed. That said, I still believe that major version releases aren't an excuse for "delayed" QA, whereby software gains maturity a year or two after the official go-live date, and all of the testing is done live, with real human users. Nope. Alas, this seems to be the modern | Oct 26 10:34 |
schestowitz | trend, whatever fast, iterative software development means these days, and it affects the KDE world, too. Well, Plasma 6.0 was meh. Plasma 6.1 was a bit better. Let's see what 6.2 can do for us. </p> | Oct 26 10:34 |
schestowitz | </blockquote> | Oct 26 10:34 |
schestowitz | </li> | Oct 26 10:34 |
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-www.dedoimedo.com | Plasma 6.2 review - Slowly getting there, but the road is long | Oct 26 10:34 | |
*jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Oct 26 12:45 | |
*jacobk (~quassel@rr2rh58ht72yy.irc) has joined #techbytes | Oct 26 12:47 | |
schestowitz | https://www.thelayoff.com/t/1vbdVzFU | Oct 26 12:50 |
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes- ( status 403 @ https://www.thelayoff.com/t/1vbdVzFU ) | Oct 26 12:50 | |
schestowitz | " | Oct 26 12:50 |
schestowitz | OS/2 ?? | Oct 26 12:50 |
schestowitz | Now there's a product which had great potential but in the hands of IBM management, it became worse with every successive iteration. Till Microsoft Windows cornered the market with Windows NT and ate IBM's lunch. | Oct 26 12:50 |
schestowitz | You know that Alvind will never be able to soar like an arrogant eagle again (at least for a while) since he's been shown what the future holds even with his Red Hat, Apptio and other BS purchases. He's gonna be making a lot of promises and hemorrhaging a lot of money in the next few months...and maybe he's the Thanksgiving Turkey ! and Kavanaugh can become the roast pork ! | Oct 26 12:50 |
schestowitz | " | Oct 26 12:50 |
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes | Oct 26 13:25 | |
*psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes | Oct 26 13:29 | |
schestowitz | http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2024/10/can-you-photograph-copyright-protected.html?showComment=1729787354238#c4017457657221751489 | Oct 26 14:22 |
schestowitz | ">It's a bit of a general statement I appreciate, but this seems to be a particularly good example of where IP seems to be developing in nonsensical ways. The purpose of law, including IP law, is to define the code of morality of the majority of the population - the things that they consider appropriate and balanced to enable the proper functioning and advancement of civilized society. <br /><br />Suing because of photographs of wallpap | Oct 26 14:22 |
schestowitz | er, or arbitrary shapes of car headlights (see another IPKat article), does not reflect the morality of the majority, and would turn the people off. OK, you can get away with it for a while, but inappropriate results of the law undermines the law. <br /><br />Fair enough, in this case the finding could be argued to be the correct finding to preserve common sense. But there is still the issue that this case was able to reach trial, appar | Oct 26 14:22 |
schestowitz | ently because the relevant morality (fair protection of the results of artistic effort) was so insufficiently encoded in the law; and we still have the nonsense about the written disclaimer.<br /><br />Why does some random artistic work benefit from 100 years of broad and undefinable protection? Is it because the people consider that proper, or because of corruption and lobbying by rights owners and managers. Why can trade mark rights | Oct 26 14:22 |
schestowitz | be used to frustrate a consumer repairing their vehicle (see other IPKat article)? Would the people consider these results to be moral and appropriate to further the needs of society?<br /><br />Patent law on the other hand seems to strike a fairly good balance of encouraging innovation and protecting effort. It seems likely that the people on the whole would consider it reasonable to provide a reasonably short period of protection for | Oct 26 14:22 |
schestowitz | some precisely defined innovation that may likely have been the result of significant effort, expenditure and skill.' | Oct 26 14:22 |
-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-ipkitten.blogspot.com | Can you photograph a copyright-protected wallpaper without the right holder’s explicit consent? Yes, says the German Supreme Court - The IPKat | Oct 26 14:22 | |
*psydroid2 (~psydroid@j9gt2haw74jrk.irc) has joined #techbytes | Oct 26 14:25 | |
*jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Oct 26 15:25 | |
*parsifal (~parsifal@6thegygyadsu4.irc) has joined #techbytes | Oct 26 16:00 | |
*parsifal has quit (Quit: Leaving) | Oct 26 16:01 | |
*psydroid2 has quit (connection closed) | Oct 26 16:34 | |
*psydroid2 (~psydroid@j9gt2haw74jrk.irc) has joined #techbytes | Oct 26 16:37 | |
*psydroid2 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Oct 26 16:40 | |
*psydroid2 (~psydroid@j9gt2haw74jrk.irc) has joined #techbytes | Oct 26 16:55 | |
*jacobk (~quassel@dt7mrnex4e9nw.irc) has joined #techbytes | Oct 26 19:08 | |
*jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Oct 26 19:50 | |
*jacobk (~quassel@rr2rh58ht72yy.irc) has joined #techbytes | Oct 26 21:55 | |
*psydroid2 has quit (connection closed) | Oct 26 22:37 |
Generated by irclog2html.py
2.6 | ䷉ find the plain text version at this address (HTTP) or in Gemini (how to use Gemini) with a full GemText version.