(ℹ) Join us now at the IRC channel | ䷉ Find the plain text version at this address (HTTP) or in Gemini (how to use Gemini) with a full GemText version.
| *u-amarsh04 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jan 27 04:23 | |
| *gnulinuxuser (~monkeybusiness@m5q38i7r34uc6.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 27 04:47 | |
| *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@dc77dxzcmjmaq.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 27 06:36 | |
| schestowitz[TR] | <li> | Jan 27 08:07 |
|---|---|---|
| schestowitz[TR] | <h5><a href="https://yottadb.com/graphical-monitoring-of-statistics-shared-by-processes/">Graphical Monitoring of Statistics Shared by Processes</a></h5> | Jan 27 08:07 |
| schestowitz[TR] | <blockquote> | Jan 27 08:07 |
| schestowitz[TR] | <p>YottaDB processes can opt to share their operational database statistics. If at process startup, the environment variable ydb_statshare is 1. Optionally, the environment variable ydb_statsdir can be set to a temporary directory for sharing and monitoring.</p> | Jan 27 08:07 |
| schestowitz[TR] | </blockquote> | Jan 27 08:07 |
| schestowitz[TR] | </li> | Jan 27 08:07 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-Graphical Monitoring of Statistics Shared by Processes - YottaDB | Jan 27 08:07 | |
| schestowitz[TR] | <li> | Jan 27 08:56 |
| schestowitz[TR] | <h5><a href="https://www.securityweek.com/thousands-of-gitlab-instances-unpatched-against-critical-password-reset-bug/">Thousands of GitLab Instances Unpatched Against Critical Password Reset Bug</a></h5> | Jan 27 08:56 |
| schestowitz[TR] | <blockquote> | Jan 27 08:56 |
| schestowitz[TR] | <p>Tracked as CVE-2023-7028 (CVSS score of 10), the issue allows attackers to have password reset messages sent to unverified email addresses under their control, potentially leading to account takeover. </p> | Jan 27 08:56 |
| schestowitz[TR] | <p> The flaw was introduced in GitLab 16.1.0, when a new option was added to allow users to have password reset messages sent to a secondary email address and allowed for these messages to be sent to unverified addresses. </p> | Jan 27 08:56 |
| schestowitz[TR] | </blockquote> | Jan 27 08:56 |
| schestowitz[TR] | </li> | Jan 27 08:56 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-Thousands of GitLab Instances Unpatched Against Critical Password Reset Bug - SecurityWeek | Jan 27 08:56 | |
| *sajat (~sajat@freenode-msg.p61.s2eq7b.IP) has joined #techbytes | Jan 27 10:02 | |
| *sajat (~sajat@freenode-msg.p61.s2eq7b.IP) has joined #techbytes | Jan 27 10:02 | |
| *SaphirJD (~SaphirJD@n8hky56paq4ma.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 27 10:24 | |
| *schestowitz-TR2 has quit (Quit: Konversation term) | Jan 27 12:10 | |
| *acer-box has quit (Connection closed) | Jan 27 12:10 | |
| *acer-box has quit (Connection closed) | Jan 27 12:10 | |
| *schestowitz-TR2 (~acer-box@24axkg87jqny6.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 27 12:10 | |
| *Disconnected (Remote host closed socket). | Jan 27 12:13 | |
| *Disconnected (Remote host closed socket). | Jan 27 12:13 | |
| *schestowitz-TR2 has quit (Quit: Konversation term) | Jan 27 12:16 | |
| *schestowitz-TR2 (~acer-box@24axkg87jqny6.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 27 12:16 | |
| *schestowitz-TR2 has quit (Quit: Konversation term) | Jan 27 12:28 | |
| *schestowitz-TR2 (~acer-box@24axkg87jqny6.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 27 12:28 | |
| *schestowitz-TR2 has quit (Quit: Konversation term) | Jan 27 12:35 | |
| *schestowitz-TR2 (~acer-box@24axkg87jqny6.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 27 12:35 | |
| *schestowitz-TR2 has quit (Quit: Konversation term) | Jan 27 12:35 | |
| *schestowitz-TR (~acer-box@24axkg87jqny6.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 27 12:35 | |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes | Jan 27 12:39 | |
| *Now talking on #techbytes | Jan 27 12:44 | |
| *Now talking on #techbytes | Jan 27 12:44 | |
| *schestowitz[TR] (~schestowi@freenode-ll1sn1.ldvb.0amm.hij1op.IP) has joined #techbytes | Jan 27 12:44 | |
| *u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!) | Jan 27 14:13 | |
| *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@dc77dxzcmjmaq.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 27 14:14 | |
| *u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!) | Jan 27 14:44 | |
| *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@dc77dxzcmjmaq.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 27 14:49 | |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 27 15:46 | |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes | Jan 27 15:50 | |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 27 15:55 | |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes | Jan 27 16:01 | |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 27 16:02 | |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes | Jan 27 16:03 | |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 27 16:03 | |
| *synapse has quit (Ping timeout: 120 seconds) | Jan 27 16:11 | |
| *synapse has quit (Ping timeout: 120 seconds) | Jan 27 16:11 | |
| *synapse (~synapse@freenode-2ue.6ih.pu7h8v.IP) has joined #techbytes | Jan 27 16:13 | |
| *synapse (~synapse@freenode-2ue.6ih.pu7h8v.IP) has joined #techbytes | Jan 27 16:13 | |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes | Jan 27 16:20 | |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 27 16:22 | |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes | Jan 27 16:35 | |
| *u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!) | Jan 27 17:53 | |
| *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@dc77dxzcmjmaq.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 27 17:57 | |
| *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 27 18:03 | |
| *psydroid2 (~psydroid@u8ftxtfux23wk.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 27 18:23 | |
| *psydroid2 has quit (Quit: KVIrc 5.0.0 Aria http://www.kvirc.net/) | Jan 27 22:05 | |
| schestowitz[TR] | http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2024/01/upc-munich-local-division-takes-novel.html?showComment=1706268461917#c8376487880173107141 | Jan 27 22:36 |
| schestowitz[TR] | "Added-matter is indeed a powerful attack in opposition at the EPO. When looking at national case law, it is manifest that the way added-matter is handled is quite different, actually more lenient. <br /><br />The EPO as granting authority is bound by the case law of the BA/EBA. Before obtaining a European patent monopoly with or without unitary effect, the first instance divisions will apply the Guidelines and the case law of the E | Jan 27 22:36 |
| schestowitz[TR] | BA. It might thus happen, that a patent monopoly is not even granted due to added-matter. <br /><br />In case of a parallel opposition and infringement/validity litigation at the UPC, we might end up with contrary decisions between the BA/EBA of the EPO as to the validity. The UPC might consider the patent monopoly valid, not having problems with added-matter, and infringed, whereas at the end of the opposition procedure, the patent | Jan 27 22:36 |
| schestowitz[TR] | monopoly might be revoked by the BA for added-matter. <br /><br />Nobody has ever required the UPC to wholesale import all case law from the EPO. There are however strong supporters of the UPC, for instance Sir Robin Jacob, who press the EPO to accept the case law of the UPC. I doubt that this will ever happen. <br /><br />When you look at the case law of the BA/EBA, the reasons for the very strict approach in added-matter, it is c | Jan 27 22:36 |
| schestowitz[TR] | lear that applicants/proprietors would be unduly advantaged if added-matter would be tolerated, and this would be unfair to third parties. Coming up with fairness for litigants is thus not convincing at all. <br /><br />The UPC is already advantaging litigants as the basic fee for infringement is much lower than that for a nullity action. There is no reasonable explanation for this discrepancy in basic fees." | Jan 27 22:36 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-ipkitten.blogspot.com | UPC Munich Local Division takes a novel approach to claim interpretation (SES vs Hanshow, UPC-CFI-292/2023) - The IPKat | Jan 27 22:36 | |
| schestowitz[TR] | http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2024/01/upc-munich-local-division-takes-novel.html?showComment=1706268708564#c4954995977663329446 | Jan 27 22:37 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-ipkitten.blogspot.com | UPC Munich Local Division takes a novel approach to claim interpretation (SES vs Hanshow, UPC-CFI-292/2023) - The IPKat | Jan 27 22:37 | |
| schestowitz[TR] | "Before we can say what the case law of the UPC will be, we will have to wait until the Court of Appeal gives a series of decisions. This will take some time.<br /><br />German judges of the Munich LD might have departed in a single case from the German patentee-friendly doctrine and asserted their independence, but this does by no way mean that it will be the position of th UPC as a whole. " | Jan 27 22:38 |
| *Noisytoot has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jan 27 23:32 | |
| *Noisytoot (~noisytoot@tkbibjhmbkvb8.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jan 27 23:32 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.6 | ䷉ find the plain text version at this address (HTTP) or in Gemini (how to use Gemini) with a full GemText version.