●● IRC: #techbytes @ Techrights IRC Network: Friday, June 27, 2025 ●● ● Jun 27 [07:05] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes [07:13] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes [07:19] *pi__ has quit (Quit: https://quassel-irc.org - Chat comfortably. Anywhere.) [07:37] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes [07:39] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes [07:56] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes ● Jun 27 [08:00] *techrights-sec2 (~quassel@qiysgnj2chdjg.irc) has joined #techbytes [08:03] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes [08:36] schestowitz[TR3] [04:53] the graveley posts belatedly went 'viral' this week [08:36] schestowitz[TR3] [04:56] Oh really? [08:36] schestowitz[TR3] [04:57] Can you share? Where? [08:36] schestowitz[TR3] [04:57] not sure [08:36] schestowitz[TR3] [04:57] i don't do analytics, but I see tons of hits on all those [08:36] schestowitz[TR3] [04:57] Maybe it's the hacker news post [08:36] schestowitz[TR3] [04:57] But that was just a few hours ago [08:36] schestowitz[TR3] [04:58] it's a nasty censorship site [08:36] schestowitz[TR3] [04:58] Yeah they changed my post to his legal name and removed the copilot part [08:36] schestowitz[TR3] [04:59] 'hacker' 'noise' can go f* themsleves [08:36] schestowitz[TR3] [04:59] All these dudes are suddenly experts in evidence [08:36] schestowitz[TR3] [05:00] not even dudes per se [08:36] schestowitz[TR3] [05:00] corporates [08:36] schestowitz[TR3] [05:00] with "token" hacker [08:36] schestowitz[TR3] [05:00] for perceive "edgiiness" [08:36] schestowitz[TR3] [05:00] *perceived [08:36] schestowitz[TR3] [05:00] If it went viral 6 hours ago, that's when I posted [08:36] schestowitz[TR3] [05:01] Twitter gagging is also out of control [08:36] schestowitz[TR3] [05:01] I might stop posting anything, even copies [08:36] schestowitz[TR3] [05:01] "Hackpad" [08:36] schestowitz[TR3] [05:01] "Shagpad" [08:36] schestowitz[TR3] [05:02] "lay down, I want to practice necro" [08:36] schestowitz[TR3] [05:03] Yeah... makes you wonder what Nat knows if they spent that much time together ● Jun 27 [12:14] *[SoSo] (~SoSo@ynms75dsezgri.irc) has joined #techbytes [12:14] [SoSo] re [12:14] [SoSo] https://techrights.org/irc.shtml [12:14] -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-techrights.org | IRC and Techrights [12:31] *FANTOM has quit (Ping timeout: 120 seconds) [12:32] *[SoSo] has quit (Quit: Going offline, see ya! (www.adiirc.com)) ● Jun 27 [14:39] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes ● Jun 27 [15:12] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes [15:45] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes ● Jun 27 [16:04] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes [16:26] schestowitz[TR3]
  • [16:26] schestowitz[TR3]
    Fedora Linux ponders dropping 32-bit packages, which could impact support for Steam gaming change could also force Bazzite to shut down, according to its creator
    [16:26] schestowitz[TR3]
    [16:26] schestowitz[TR3]

    Fedora Linux developers are proposing to drop support for 32-bit packages in the upcoming Fedora 44, saying that many other projects have ceased support for it. However, the backlash from the community against this move has been swift and vocal. GamingOnLinux reported that this might be a problem for Steam gamers, as it needs 32-bit support to work properly. Even Linux gaming OS, Bazzite d [16:26] schestowitz[TR3] eveloper Kyle Gospodnetich, said this move would kill off the operating system as its happening too soon, even if Steam had the required packages to function in 64-bit. Thankfully, this is only a proposal and is still up for approval by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.

    [16:26] schestowitz[TR3]
    [16:26] schestowitz[TR3]
    • [16:26] schestowitz[TR3] [16:26] -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-www.tomshardware.com | Fedora Linux ponders dropping 32-bit packages, which could impact support for Steam gaming change could also force Bazzite to shut down, according to its creator | Tom's Hardware ● Jun 27 [17:16] schestowitz[TR3] http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2025/01/tetra-lavals-3d-shape-mark-not.html?showComment=1750774346506#c399235917294032789 [17:16] schestowitz[TR3] "The Fourth Board of Appeals agreed that the every essential element of the 3D shape was functional. That normally would call for invalidation of the trademark. But the Board then went on to apply a new argument in their decision by applying the Kit Kat case to argue that functionality only matters to those buying or using the product, such that if the functionality only exists during" [17:16] -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-ipkitten.blogspot.com | Tetra Lavals 3D shape mark not exclusively functional, rules EUIPO Board of Appeal (and, no, its not automatically bad faith to seek longer IP protection for a successful product) - The IPKat [17:27] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes [17:43] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Jun 27 [19:13] *asusbox has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) [19:14] *rianne_ has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) [19:28] *FANTOM (~fantom@freenode-ff6.5hs.anfioq.IP) has joined #techbytes