(ℹ) Join us now at the IRC channel | ䷉ Find the plain text version at this address (HTTP) or in Gemini (how to use Gemini) with a full GemText version.
| *liberty_box has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jun 28 04:01 | |
| *rianne_ has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) | Jun 28 04:01 | |
| *rianne has quit (Ping timeout: 120 seconds) | Jun 28 04:03 | |
| *rianne_ (~rianne@3stvfjh5iuw88.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jun 28 04:04 | |
| *rianne (~rianne@freenode-7uc.ra8.a7lnth.IP) has joined #techbytes | Jun 28 04:04 | |
| *liberty_box (~liberty@3stvfjh5iuw88.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jun 28 04:05 | |
| schestowitz[TR] | > Hi, | Jun 28 05:25 |
|---|---|---|
| schestowitz[TR] | > | Jun 28 05:25 |
| schestowitz[TR] | > Please let me know when this is published! | Jun 28 05:25 |
| schestowitz[TR] | > | Jun 28 05:25 |
| schestowitz[TR] | > Thanks, | Jun 28 05:25 |
| schestowitz[TR] | Just opened E-mail for the first time in 2 days, sorry for the delay. | Jun 28 05:25 |
| schestowitz[TR] | > Hi! | Jun 28 06:03 |
| schestowitz[TR] | > | Jun 28 06:03 |
| schestowitz[TR] | > Here it is, attached. My most wide-ranging piece yet. I put a lot of effort into this - I hope a few people read it. | Jun 28 06:03 |
| schestowitz[TR] | http://techrights.org/2023/06/28/making-community/ | ♾ Gemini address: gemini://gemini.techrights.org/2023/06/28/making-community/ | Jun 28 06:03 |
| schestowitz[TR] | only edit made: " World Library, 2013" | Jun 28 06:03 |
| schestowitz[TR] | Added full stop. | Jun 28 06:03 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-techrights.org | Making Community | Techrights | Jun 28 06:03 | |
| schestowitz[TR] | http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2023/06/keeping-digital-poker-face-assessing.html?showComment=1687708878721#c2768982617537077959 | Jun 28 06:27 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-ipkitten.blogspot.com | Keeping a digital poker face: Assessing witness credibility in the ViCo age (T 423/22) - The IPKat | Jun 28 06:27 | |
| schestowitz[TR] | Dear Max Drei,<br /><br />The only thing which is sacred for the EPO and the boards is what enables them to look even more efficient as they have looked up to now. Whether this ties up with the interests, requirements or wishes of the users is at best of no importance whatsoever. <br /><br />The EPO should actually propose to delete Art 113(1). This rule is a nuisance on the way to absolute efficiency. I take bets that the AC would | Jun 28 06:27 |
| schestowitz[TR] | agree with such a proposal should it come from the upper spheres of the EPO. <br /><br />Joke beside, a former VP1 has uttered this proposal a few years ago. Examining is just a play on words and it could be made much more efficient without this requirement. <br /><br />Early certainty can only be achieved when the procedures are as efficient as possible. <br /><br />Just look at the last amendment proposed to the RPBA. One moth to | Jun 28 06:27 |
| schestowitz[TR] | reply to a statement of grounds of appeal! the boards would however have the discretion to extend the time limit in case of a plurality of parties. <br /> | Jun 28 06:27 |
| schestowitz[TR] | Dear Max Drei,<br /><br />The only thing which is sacred for the EPO and the boards is what enables them to look even more efficient as they have looked up to now. Whether this ties up with the interests, requirements or wishes of the users is at best of no importance whatsoever. <br /><br />The EPO should actually propose to delete Art 113(1). This rule is a nuisance on the way to absolute efficiency. I take bets that the AC would | Jun 28 09:50 |
| schestowitz[TR] | agree with such a proposal should it come from the upper spheres of the EPO. <br /><br />Joke beside, a former VP1 has uttered this proposal a few years ago. Examining is just a play on words and it could be made much more efficient without this requirement. <br /><br />Early certainty can only be achieved when the procedures are as efficient as possible. <br /><br />Just look at the last amendment proposed to the RPBA. One moth to | Jun 28 09:50 |
| schestowitz[TR] | reply to a statement of grounds of appeal! the boards would however have the discretion to extend the time limit in case of a plurality of parties. <br />> OK! | Jun 28 09:50 |
| schestowitz[TR] | > | Jun 28 09:50 |
| schestowitz[TR] | > Thanks | Jun 28 09:50 |
| schestowitz[TR] | Very good article and TIMELY too, due to: | Jun 28 09:50 |
| schestowitz[TR] | http://techrights.org/2023/06/27/the-global-empire-strikes-back/ | Jun 28 09:50 |
| schestowitz[TR] | partly inspired by the draft you had sent | Jun 28 09:50 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-techrights.org | Free Software Communities Make Red Bait (IBM), Google, Microsoft (GAFAM) and Others Obsolete, But They’re Fighting Back Viciously and Mercilessly | Techrights | Jun 28 09:50 | |
| schestowitz[TR] | > Oh, I just noticed that you have dropped the "i" from Grzybowski when you posted the piece. I hope you can fix that. | Jun 28 09:53 |
| schestowitz[TR] | Oops. Fixed. | Jun 28 09:53 |
| schestowitz[TR] | Wondering how that happened, maybe mouse. | Jun 28 09:53 |
| schestowitz[TR] | See https://yewtu.be/watch?v=AfKZclMWS1U | Jun 28 09:53 |
| -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-yewtu.be | Grzegorz Brzęczyszczykiewicz (HD) - Invidious | Jun 28 09:53 | |
| schestowitz[TR] | > Hi there! | Jun 28 09:58 |
| schestowitz[TR] | > | Jun 28 09:58 |
| schestowitz[TR] | > I'm not sure if you're still an editor with Tech Rights (If you aren't, | Jun 28 09:58 |
| schestowitz[TR] | > can I please be pointed in the right direction? Many thanks in advance!) | Jun 28 09:58 |
| schestowitz[TR] | > anyhow, if you are still an editor, is there any way for my name to be | Jun 28 09:58 |
| schestowitz[TR] | > removed from this signed list | Jun 28 09:58 |
| schestowitz[TR] | > <http://techrights.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/open-letter-rms-april-27.txt>? I am plenty aware of where it came from, but I would still like to have it removed on your end if that's at all possible due to privacy issues. | Jun 28 09:58 |
| schestowitz[TR] | > | Jun 28 09:58 |
| schestowitz[TR] | > Thank you so much! | Jun 28 09:58 |
| schestowitz[TR] | The list is a public list of names of people who had themselves signed a public and open letter. They moreover had a chance to withdraw their name from it. | Jun 28 09:58 |
| schestowitz[TR] | Privacy is freedom from snooping, not a freedom from consequences for public actions. | Jun 28 09:58 |
| schestowitz[TR] | Kind regards, | Jun 28 09:58 |
| *psydroid2 (~psydroid@u8ftxtfux23wk.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jun 28 10:41 | |
| *psydroid3 (~psydroid@u8ftxtfux23wk.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jun 28 14:02 | |
| *GNUmoon2 has quit (connection closed) | Jun 28 14:11 | |
| *GNUmoon2 (~GNUmoon@i4i4k5b832g88.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jun 28 14:11 | |
| *u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!) | Jun 28 16:25 | |
| *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@h9w2ackdz5nh2.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jun 28 16:30 | |
| *parsifal (~parsifal@aahfbjmj4hann.irc) has joined #techbytes | Jun 28 18:07 | |
| *parsifal has quit (Quit: Leaving) | Jun 28 23:52 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.6 | ䷉ find the plain text version at this address (HTTP) or in Gemini (how to use Gemini) with a full GemText version.