IRC: #techbytes @ Techrights IRC Network: Friday, March 29, 2024

*lightbringer has quit (*.net *.split)

*rianne has quit (*.net *.split)

*schestowitz-TR2 has quit (*.net *.split)

*rianne (~rianne@freenode-54p.goo.k31cok.IP) has joined #techbytes

*lightbringer (~mincer@freenode/user/lightbringer) has joined #techbytes

*208BSVZRN (~quassel@freenode-50vmi7.ldvb.0amm.hij1op.IP) has joined #techbytes

*schestowitz-TR2 (~acer-box@freenode/user/schestowitz) has joined #techbytes

*lightbringer has quit (*.net *.split)

*rianne has quit (*.net *.split)

*rianne (~rianne@freenode-54p.goo.k31cok.IP) has joined #techbytes

*lightbringer (~mincer@freenode/user/lightbringer) has joined #techbytes

schestowitz[TR2]

<xxxxxxxxx> greetings schestowitz[TR2] , heads up, the IPv4 address on your VPS will be expiring in 4 days. You should have received a new one via email, if you have any issues with updating it, please let us know, we can assist

schestowitz[TR2]

<schestowitz[TR2]> thanks!

schestowitz[TR2]

<schestowitz[TR2]> yes, i received the mail

schestowitz[TR2]

<xxxxxxxxx> perfect

schestowitz[TR2]

<schestowitz[TR2]> thanks so much for this contigency

schestowitz[TR2]

<DaemonFC> I'll probably buy a new car next year or so.

schestowitz[TR2]

<DaemonFC> The market just isn't right.

schestowitz[TR2]

<DaemonFC> I may have to borrow a little. I'm not pay 7% interest like John.

schestowitz[TR2]

DON'T! NOT the time to BORROW money!

schestowitz[TR2]

DaemonFC: what happened to you?

schestowitz[TR2]

<DaemonFC> By a little, I mean a small personal loan would do nicely.

schestowitz[TR2]

<DaemonFC> Nobody wants to write out an auto loan if you get below a certain amount.

schestowitz[TR2]

Duh. Because it is too risky, as it would be for a personal one too.

schestowitz[TR2]

<DaemonFC> They want you in for at least $15,000 of the car and then they want to string you along with precomputed interest.

schestowitz[TR2]

<DaemonFC> So even if you pay it off faster they make the entire amount.

schestowitz[TR2]

here is the thing:

schestowitz[TR2]

if people ask me for money, i say

schestowitz[TR2]

why not ask the bank

schestowitz[TR2]

the answer might be

schestowitz[TR2]

"the bank won't give itt"

schestowitz[TR2]

the response you give is,

schestowitz[TR2]

so why should _I_

schestowitz[TR2]

the Fed does not bail out individuals for failed loans

schestowitz[TR2]

you do not have debt collectors

schestowitz[TR2]

you can only be nasty to people whom you know

schestowitz[TR2]

so you end up being nasty in front of known people

schestowitz[TR2]

as a 'gift' for being generous

schestowitz[TR2]

so worst of both worlds

schestowitz[TR2]

it would be a lot cheaper to relocate neat to the place mandy works

schestowitz[TR2]

and get rid of cards

schestowitz[TR2]

*cars

schestowitz[TR2]

and a bad landlordddd

Mar 29 04:22

*jacobk (~quassel@nm9nu8gvkax2u.irc) has joined #techbytes

Mar 29 05:42

*x-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)

Mar 29 07:36

*x-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@qezxp5nudz5uq.irc) has joined #techbytes

Mar 29 07:38

*Noisytoot has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)

Mar 29 10:51

*Noisytoot (~noisytoot@tkbibjhmbkvb8.irc) has joined #techbytes

Mar 29 10:52

*jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)

Mar 29 11:19

schestowitz[TR2]

<Ingar> (in general here, the dutch-speaking people are better at english and french than the french are at english and dutch)

schestowitz[TR2]

<Ingar> janrinok: the language border is jsut around the corner

schestowitz[TR2]

<Ingar> not an issue at all

schestowitz[TR2]

<janrinok> ah, OK

schestowitz[TR2]

<Ingar> oh well, life

schestowitz[TR2]

<Ingar> first let's survive today

schestowitz[TR2]

<Ingar> and then have easter weekend

schestowitz[TR2]

<Ingar> and eat chocolate

schestowitz[TR2]

<Ingar> (and get myself a bunny)

schestowitz[TR2]

<janrinok> yep - one day at a time. Enjoy your weekend and do NOT eat too much chocky!

schestowitz[TR2]

<Ingar> No promises! :)

schestowitz[TR2]

<janrinok> I've noticed that I can buy the same chocolate in a bar as they use for their eggs and bunnies, but weight for weight much cheaper!

schestowitz[TR2]

<chromas> but not shaped right

schestowitz[TR2]

* AlwaysNever has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)

schestowitz[TR2]

<schestowitz[TR]> <Ingar> don't like as in, this wasn't the job I signed for

schestowitz[TR2]

<schestowitz[TR]> i was in the same situation

schestowitz[TR2]

<schestowitz[TR]> i resigned after 12 years

*jacobk (~quassel@hqipcnw2u5ica.irc) has joined #techbytes

Mar 29 11:38

*jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)

Mar 29 12:09

*jacobk (~quassel@hqipcnw2u5ica.irc) has joined #techbytes

Mar 29 12:15

schestowitz[TR2]

<li>

schestowitz[TR2]

<h5><a href="https://thedissenter.org/uk-high-court-extradition-removes-cia-rationale-assassinating-assange/">UK High Court: Extradition Stops CIA From Killing Assange</a></h5>

schestowitz[TR2]

schestowitz[TR2]

The High Court astonishingly stated [PDF] that the “extreme measures” considered by the CIA were intended to keep Assange from fleeing to Russia. If he was “lawfully” in U.S. custody after extradition, there would no longer be a risk that the agency would kidnap or assassinate him.

schestowitz[TR2]

By drawing such a wild and erroneous conclusion, the High Court showed why they should have admitted the fresh evidence. Assange’s legal team could have helped the judges better understand the chain of alleged events, but the court justified the “serious” allegations in order to avoid proceedings that would negatively impact the United Kingdom's relationship with a close ally.

schestowitz[TR2]

</blockquote>

schestowitz[TR2]

</li>

-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-thedissenter.org | UK High Court: Extradition Stops CIA From Killing Assange

x https://ubuntu.com//blog/deploying-open-language-models-on-ubuntu

*psydroid2 (~psydroid@u8ftxtfux23wk.irc) has joined #techbytes

Mar 29 13:55

*jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)

Mar 29 15:07

*jacobk (~quassel@hqipcnw2u5ica.irc) has joined #techbytes

Mar 29 15:19

*jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)

Mar 29 15:23

*Guest19014 has quit (Ping timeout: 120 seconds)

Mar 29 15:50

*Guest19014 (~Rodney@freenode-2ue.6ih.pu7h8v.IP) has joined #techbytes

Mar 29 15:58

*Guest19014 has quit (Ping timeout: 120 seconds)

Mar 29 16:03

*jacobk (~quassel@hqipcnw2u5ica.irc) has joined #techbytes

Mar 29 16:09

*Guest19014 (~Rodney@freenode-2ue.6ih.pu7h8v.IP) has joined #techbytes

Mar 29 16:13

*jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)

Mar 29 16:26

*jacobk (~quassel@hqipcnw2u5ica.irc) has joined #techbytes

Mar 29 16:39

*jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)

Mar 29 16:58

*jacobk (~quassel@6wygwq2t5e2hw.irc) has joined #techbytes

Mar 29 17:18

*jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)

Mar 29 17:49

*jacobk (~quassel@2j2enej2k6pt4.irc) has joined #techbytes

Mar 29 18:08

*jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)

Mar 29 18:12

*parsifal (~parsifal@uuar9r28yasyu.irc) has joined #techbytes

Mar 29 18:21

*jacobk (~quassel@hqipcnw2u5ica.irc) has joined #techbytes

Mar 29 18:45

*jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)

Mar 29 18:53

schestowitz[TR2]

"Deploying Open Language Models on Ubuntu"

Mar 29 19:50

schestowitz[TR2]

Mar 29 19:50

-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-Deploying Open Language Models on Ubuntu | Ubuntu

Mar 29 19:50

schestowitz[TR2]

"From AI to UPI, PM Modi- Bill Gates discuss India's digital revolution: ‘Indians leading the way’, Microsoft boss says"

x https://www.hindustantimes.com/business/pm-modi-bill-gates-talk-on-ai-digital-payments-and-g20-101711682146066.html

schestowitz[TR2]

schestowitz[TR2]

# modi kowtows to gates

-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-www.hindustantimes.com | From AI to UPI, PM Modi- Bill Gates discuss India's digital revolution: ‘Indians leading the way’, Microsoft boss says - Hindustan Times

*psydroid2 has quit (Quit: KVIrc 5.0.0 Aria http://www.kvirc.net/)

Mar 29 21:35

schestowitz[TR2]

DaemonFC: ping

schestowitz[TR2]

<DaemonFC> I probably won't be around much next month.

schestowitz[TR2]

<DaemonFC> I have to get surgery on my shoulder.

schestowitz[TR2]

<DaemonFC> Mandy took some days off and mom is coming up on the train to be with us that week.

schestowitz[TR2]

<DaemonFC> But it'll be about a month and a half before I can do much of anything with my right arm again.

schestowitz[TR2]

canceled?

DaemonFC

Yeah.

schestowitz[TR2]

<schestowitz> good luck with the procedure

schestowitz[TR2]

<schestowitz> health first

schestowitz[TR2]

<DaemonFC> Thanks.

schestowitz[TR2]

<DaemonFC> Who knew that some fragments of bone just a couple millimeters could cause so much trouble?

schestowitz[TR2]

good to cancel imho

DaemonFC

Spoke to the doctor yesterday.

schestowitz[TR2]

seems riskty

DaemonFC

She said she got away from that hospital system when they weren't paying rent on their medical building.

schestowitz[TR2]

<DaemonFC> I haven't been in so much pain since the chiropractor helped me out, but my arm is still impinged at a certain point.

schestowitz[TR2]

<DaemonFC> The doctor says he thinks he can get the fragments out with minimally invasive arthroscopic surgery.

schestowitz[TR2]

<DaemonFC> He said it shouldn't take more than an hour. I'll be under a general though.

schestowitz[TR2]

doesn't matter how long

DaemonFC

Half the doctors weren't being paid and bolted.

schestowitz[TR2]

the length does not matter

schestowitz[TR2]

they can leave it worse off

schestowitz[TR2]

and then they say they tried their best

schestowitz[TR2]

it's like car mechanics

schestowitz[TR2]

but you can replace the car

DaemonFC

She said get a second opinion and don't do it at that hospital because she wouldn't want me there if anything happened during the surgery.

schestowitz[TR2]

btw, next up i might show lozza faking addresses

schestowitz[TR2]

in formal documents

schestowitz[TR2]

afaik, it's a crime

schestowitz[TR2]

they get him to sign

schestowitz[TR2]

something like

schestowitz[TR2]

i hereby acceptt

schestowitz[TR2]

that i fill it correctly

schestowitz[TR2]

to best of my knowledge

schestowitz[TR2]

and face legal consequences if I lied

http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2024/03/discrepancies-in-description-should-be.html?showComment=1711529808078#c558519449646535998

schestowitz[TR2]

to that aspect might be interesting

Mar 29 21:50

schestowitz[TR2]

but i will cover this slowly and gradually

Mar 29 21:50

*jacobk (~quassel@6wygwq2t5e2hw.irc) has joined #techbytes

Mar 29 22:07

*jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)

Mar 29 22:34

schestowitz[TR2]

schestowitz[TR2]

"Mr Hagel, Use of “preferably” or “for example” in a claim is not generally objectionable. It simply means that the following feature is not limiting. A claim for a shoe, preferably a climbing shoe, means simply that the claim relates to a shoe in general and not to a climbing shoe. Such an expression is only objectionable if it introduces an ambiguity. I refer here to the Guidelines F-IV, 4.9. As fa

schestowitz[TR2]

r as reference signs in the claims are concerned, their purpose is to increase the intelligibility of the claim, and they cannot be construed as limiting the claim. This does however not mean that any equivalent of the feature designated by a reference sign is part of the claim, unless this equivalent is disclosed directly and unambiguously disclosed in the description. Leaving in the description the optional character

schestowitz[TR2]

of a feature introduced in an independent claim is, contrary to what you might think, introducing an inconsistency between claims and description. Claim interpretation is open to national judges and they can decide as they they think fit. Nothing would withhold a national judge to nevertheless consider the feature at stake as being optional, since it is said so in the description. It is certainly not for the EPO to pres

schestowitz[TR2]

cribe a national judge how it has to interpret a claim under Art 69 and the Protocol, it is simply to avoid misinterpretations at national level by removing before grant any inconsistencies between claims and description as required by Art 84, support. Lack of clarity is neither a ground for opposition nor for nullity, hence it is important for the EPO to check, before grant, if all aspects of Art 84 are fulfilled, espe

schestowitz[TR2]

cially clarity and support. Carrying out this check does by no way “negate the crucial and obvious role of the description and of the drawings, if any, to gain understanding of and convey meaning to the terms of the claims”. "

-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-ipkitten.blogspot.com | Discrepancies in the description should be amended in line with the claims, but do not affect interpretation of the claims (T 0447/22) - The IPKat