●● IRC: #techbytes @ Techrights IRC Network: Thursday, June 29, 2023 ●●
● Jun 29
[01:49]		*psydroid3 has quit (connection closed)
[01:50]		*psydroid2 has quit (connection closed)
● Jun 29
[02:01]		*u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)
[02:06]		*u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@h9w2ackdz5nh2.irc) has joined #techbytes
● Jun 29
[04:03]	schestowitz[TR]	http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2023/06/first-patent-revocation-actions-before.html?showComment=1687877175400#c3725687105558165782
[04:03]	schestowitz[TR]	">The CMS seems to indicate that the EP 797 revocation action was filed on June 1 at 19:32 (it was the third one filed, not the first). This raises an interesting legal question. Since there was an earlier infringement action filed apparently at 13:33 on the same day, which Munich court is competent for the revocation action, central or local?"
[04:03]		-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-ipkitten.blogspot.com | First patent revocation actions before the UPC have been filed - The IPKat
[04:05]	schestowitz[TR]	"Interesting, I believe that I have stumbled on what is probably the first preliminary injunction that the UPC granted: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/did-upc-issue-its-first-preliminary-injunction-stijn-lagaert/"
[04:05]		-TechBytesBot/#techbytes-www.linkedin.com | Did the UPC issue its first preliminary injunction?
[04:35]		*u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)
[04:36]		*u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@h9w2ackdz5nh2.irc) has joined #techbytes
● Jun 29
[15:05]		*psydroid2 (~psydroid@u8ftxtfux23wk.irc) has joined #techbytes
[15:10]		*psydroid3 (~psydroid@u8ftxtfux23wk.irc) has joined #techbytes
● Jun 29
[17:08]		*psydroid2 has quit (Quit: Leaving)
[17:35]		*psydroid2 (~psydroid@u8ftxtfux23wk.irc) has joined #techbytes
● Jun 29
[22:51]		*parsifal (~parsifal@aahfbjmj4hann.irc) has joined #techbytes
● Jun 29
[23:42]		*psydroid2 has quit (connection closed)
[23:50]		*parsifal has quit (Quit: Leaving)
[23:56]		*psydroid3 has quit (connection closed)