●● IRC: #techbytes @ Techrights IRC Network: Monday, March 30, 2026 ●● ● Mar 30 [01:05] *x-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!) [01:12] *x-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@kcb99h722ua4g.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Mar 30 [02:58] schestowitz[TR3] https://www.thelayoff.com/t/1kmrejfgh [02:59] -TechBytesBot/#techbytes- ( status 403 @ https://www.thelayoff.com/t/1kmrejfgh ) [02:59] schestowitz[TR3] "" [02:59] schestowitz[TR3] so it sounds like only b10 is in trouble unless you're in albany, where everyone will be safe. [02:59] schestowitz[TR3] 4 hours ago by Anonymous [02:59] schestowitz[TR3] | 2 reactions (+2/-0) | Reply [02:59] schestowitz[TR3] Post ID: @k6+1kmrejfgh [02:59] schestowitz[TR3] +2 [02:59] schestowitz[TR3] @fg it will not just not B10. It wont just be B 10. It. Will. Not. Only. Be. B10. OP is just wrong. Do you follow? Do you understand? It. Will. Not. Be. Limited. To B10. Do you follow? Can you follow? [02:59] schestowitz[TR3] 6 hours ago by Anonymous [02:59] schestowitz[TR3] | 2 reactions (+2/-0) | Reply [02:59] schestowitz[TR3] Post ID: @jw+1kmrejfgh [02:59] schestowitz[TR3] +2 [02:59] schestowitz[TR3] OK so drop Samsung but add Lam. The idea is Albany does basic research to contribute to IBMs IP portfolio, and you better be adding to the portfolio or IBM will dump you [02:59] schestowitz[TR3] https://newsroom.ibm.com/2026-03-10-ibm-and-lam-research-announce-collaboration-to-advance-sub-1nm-logic-scaling [02:59] schestowitz[TR3] 8 hours ago by Anonymous [02:59] schestowitz[TR3] | 2 reactions (+2/-0) | Reply [02:59] schestowitz[TR3] Post ID: @jg+1kmrejfgh [02:59] schestowitz[TR3] +3 [02:59] schestowitz[TR3] @jc Samsung left like 2 years ago after a 20+ year collaboration [02:59] schestowitz[TR3] 8 hours ago by Anonymous [02:59] schestowitz[TR3] | 3 reactions (+3/-0) | Reply [02:59] schestowitz[TR3] Post ID: @je+1kmrejfgh [02:59] schestowitz[TR3] +2 [02:59] schestowitz[TR3] @Hw. Ask yourself this about being in Albany. Am I contributing to IBMs IP portfolio? Remember Albany is part of basic research with Samsung and others. If yes, you are safe. IF no then you are most likely at risk [02:59] schestowitz[TR3] 9 hours ago by Anonymous [02:59] schestowitz[TR3] | 2 reactions (+2/-0) | Reply [02:59] schestowitz[TR3] Post ID: @jc+1kmrejfgh [02:59] schestowitz[TR3] +3 [02:59] schestowitz[TR3] @hn So Albany is 100% safe? [02:59] schestowitz[TR3] 11 hours ago by Anonymous [02:59] schestowitz[TR3] | 3 reactions (+3/-0) | Reply [02:59] schestowitz[TR3] Post ID: @hw+1kmrejfgh [02:59] schestowitz[TR3] +1 [02:59] schestowitz[TR3] @hn ... Although I do not agree with much of your analysis, you are giving too much credit to the stupid Indian at the top and his cabal of thieves. These clown are not smart enough to think, they are low level gangsters. [02:59] schestowitz[TR3] " [02:59] -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-newsroom.ibm.com | IBM and Lam Research Announce Collaboration to Advance Sub-1nm Logic Scaling ● Mar 30 [06:30] *rianne (~rianne@uwb8s9bfzeyh4.irc) has joined #techbytes [06:30] *asusbox (~rianne@uwb8s9bfzeyh4.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Mar 30 [07:31] schestowitz[TR3]
  • [07:31] schestowitz[TR3]
    OpenSSH Upgrade: Enhanced Security Options for Linux Admins
    [07:31] schestowitz[TR3]
    [07:31] schestowitz[TR3]

    PerSourcePenalties in OpenSSH allows administrators to set penalties for specific IP addresses based on their behavior. This feature allows administrators to delay, restrict, or terminate connections from certain sources. With this feature comes customized rules allowing them to delay, limit, or terminate connections from specific sources.

    [07:31] schestowitz[TR3]

    Utilizing PerSourcePenalties, admins can establish differentiated penalty schemes depending on the severity or frequency of unwanted behavior from certain IP addresses. For instance, if a certain IP repeatedly attempts unauthorized access or exhibits suspicious activities, they can implement stricter penalties to reduce risk and ensure compliance.

    [07:31] schestowitz[TR3]
    [07:31] schestowitz[TR3]
    • [07:31] -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-linuxsecurity.com | OpenSSH Upgrade: Enhanced Security Options for Linux Admins [07:36] *asusbox has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) [07:37] *rianne has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) ● Mar 30 [08:57] *Disconnected (Network is unreachable). [08:58] *Now talking on #techbytes ● Mar 30 [11:02] *psydroid3 (~psydroid@36imbvshpgubk.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Mar 30 [13:50] *GNUmoon2 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) ● Mar 30 [14:04] *GNUmoon2 (~GNUmoon@p6twdb3p8mvxu.irc) has joined #techbytes ● Mar 30 [17:11] *MinceR has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s) [17:13] *MinceR (~mincer@bringer.of.light) has joined #techbytes [17:13] *irc.techrights.org sets mode +a #techbytes MinceR ● Mar 30 [21:28] *psydroid3 has quit (Quit: KVIrc 5.2.6 Quasar http://www.kvirc.net/) ● Mar 30 [23:36] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes [23:45] *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes [23:48] *psydruid has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)