Possibly Worse Than Bribes: US Politicians and Lawmakers Who Are Microsoft Shareholders
They will keep bailing out Microsoft to bail themselves out.
Microsoft has gotten the FUD machine working again, or so it would seem today or this week. Perhaps struggling to connect some Go or Python programs that can be installed and then be run on "Linux" to an inherent issue in Linux itself (or somehow blame VMware holes on "Linux"), they came up with this anti-SSH slant ("Microsoft Says Windows Not Impacted by regreSSHion as Second OpenSSH Bug Is Found"). That's almost like saying that Linux is not impacted by Windows Update issues. But "regreSSHion" is hype, it's some 'brand'. So it seems like Microsoft spam - akin to all this Xz noise that started from inside Microsoft and at a very strategic time helped distract from Microsoft getting cracked completely both by Russia and by China (separately). Later one sighs and wonders, why on Earth does the US Government carry on giving Microsoft big contracts? To get cracked again, enabling political espionage some more? Microsoft also causes industrial espionage; it doesn't get held accountable for it.
Speaking of Microsoft spam, as associate sent along this piece, asserting that is is spam "though does shed light on her conflict of interest regarding national level ICT policy" (Pelosi as Microsoft shareholder).
Absurdly, Microsoft even earns more money when its systems get breached and it comes in as "consultants".
As long as the regime is financially vested in Microsoft, none of this will improve. As for the media, it is trying to make money by lying for Microsoft. █