The Catching of Luigi Mangione Shows We Need Not Have More Surveillance (Than We Already Have; It's Excessive Anyway)
LAST night we mentioned so-called "Insurance Companies" (which barely insure anything; many false promises and abundant complacency) and why murdering people isn't the solution. Based on this report, it seems like they caught the guy who had killed the healthcare CEO and have some handwritten notes to confirm it was him (read third paragraph).
I asked associates if our stance on the matter is agreeable. "I agree, in principle, on the non-killing but doubt the efficacy of individual boycotts," one said. "Remember that the CxOs and especially the CEOs have the ear of congress and can and do spin events with lies and disinformation, e.g. in another sector, decreased sales mis-attributed to 'piracy' both with music and with whitebox computer sales, to name two variants of that one example..."
They also seem incapable of seeing the correlation between Windows and the data breaches. "Linux is not even mentioned," an associate said, "let alone the problem of Windows..."
Instead of getting rid of Windows they have begun selling insurance for Windows data breaches.
"The insurance industry is or has become graft and fraud though," an associate said. "It'll only get worse once the grifter in chief takes office in January and the government dissolves. At that point it will become an unprecedented free-for-all."
"Here is the wrong take on the incident. The solution is not more security but to provide an environment or service where there is no need or desire to shoot CEOs [...] Adding more layers and distance in an increasingly caste based society only worsens the inequity".
In some way we're relieved that they caught the guy because, instead of saying surveillance is insufficient and thus we need more of it, now they can claim they have enough of it. █