"Journalism in Twitter" is a Paradox
"I am writing an article" is not the same as "I am writing a set of tweets" (usually random thoughts and unverified assertions, citing other unverified assertions)
No material? Watch out. Behaviour of a gambler (or gamer) only ever 'feels' productive. "Engagement" is a terrible metric (correlates with time-wasting).
Playing Social Control Media 'games' is almost always regrettable. Who stands to benefit? Participation is generally a mistake. It's a strategic error. I used to have personal accounts (not Techrights) in several networks. At the end I always regretted it. It was a waste of time. Sites just went offline, along with everybody's work. The administrators did not value that work. All connections with other people lost forever. Start again elsewhere, build up from 0.
Twitter? It's gone. Now it's "X" and the "new GAB".
Techrights spent the past 4 years writing many articles instead of clicking things to increase the "Value" of Elon Musk and other Social Control Media barons. As a result, there are many topics that only Techrights has covered (or will ever cover; no other site did so).
People don't find (hard to search for) or care about "tweets"; those orphaned, dated but unsorted things tend to be too short to have context. They have the shelf life of an apple your teeth already pierced.
Why bother?
Take time to think about it... don't rush back into old habits.
Can we encourage more people to set up sites with blog (or similar) and RSS feeds? Maybe a Gemini capsule? â–ˆ