This Site Could Not be Done by LLMs Even If It Wanted to (Because It's Not a Parrot of What Other Sites Say)
LLMs are "bull**** generators", according to the founder of GNU/Linux, who pointed this out last week in Germany (fairly mainstream technology-centric press over there has since then covered it in German and English). They merely repeat a bunch of stuff, and they do so very poorly, which severely limits their use cases. They can turn factual statements, even in considerable volume, into inaccurate statements and even harmful lies (not by intention, not even "realising" it; LLMs have no knowledge or deep understanding of anything).
Nothing original or credible can come out of LLMs, i.e. no research, investigation, analysis, or explosive leaks (except security breaches in the LLMs themselves, or LLMs tricked into divulging private data of users).
Now let's consider again or go back to the founder of GNU/Linux, whose views are "controversial" (as in, not so widespread). It's not about folk worship; I particularly like what he said about "AI", as he himself has a lot of experience in this area, going back to 1980 (predating much of the hype about and from Geoff Hinton, conveniently propped up by oligarchy to inflate the dangerous bubble).
As somebody put it a few hours ago in Hacker [sic] News [sic]: "It looks like the FSF is going to sit this one out like the SaaS revolution, to which they reacted late with the AGPL but did not push it. They are not working on a new license and Siewicz is already low-key pushing in favor of LLMs: [...]"
"Well yes," someone said, "LLMs like Claude Code are merely a "copyright violation as a service". Everyone is so focused on the next new "AI" feature but we haven't actually resolved the issue of all model providers using stolen code to train their models and their lack of transparency on sourced training data."
One more person said: "I have zero trust in the FSF since they backstabbed Stallman."
The FSF has since then reversed course and is now fully supporting him.
To be clear, he has long cautioned about LLMs being "parrots" or "bull**** generators"; so he never took them too seriously. They're a passing fad, riding fraudulent economics. They will eventually self-detonate and surveys show their usage is already declining. People wise up to the lies and the false marketing. █