Fake Security Cults Trying to Impose Rust and Wayland on Everyone While Ignoring the Elephants in the Room and Advancing Actual Back Doors
Wayland pushers, no doubt some of them with redhat.com (read: IBM) or Fedora aliases, have managed to rope in KDE for their agenda. In Ubuntu, the Rust pushers did the same - to the detriment of Ubuntu itself. They tell us this will improve security whilst ignoring key factors like Microsoft being an "extension" of the NSA and GitHub's CSO being NSA. Suffice to say, Wayland has security holes in it (like every piece of software, especially "younger" software) and so does Rust, not just applications developed with it.
The same people who keep pushing Wayland and Rust just 'incidentally' push kill switches and back doors as well [1, 2].
This is something that we've long noticed. They slap labels like "confidential" on back doors and surveillance. They lie through their teeth.
Dr. Andy Farnell casually writes about those sort of people. A real security professional himself, bothered by promotion of what he deems to be "snake oil" or worse, 5 days ago he wrote: "In reality, outside a handful of universities there is no credible cybersecurity education happening. Most of it is product specific and thinly veiled sales material for companies like Microsoft or Cisco. As I've witnessed myself, even if there were, nobody hires graduates into fitting cyber roles. They end up using their skills to become cybercriminals. That's where the money is. Meanwhile industry and "capital" is "investing in AI" to bring automated security to systems. Everyone with an IQ that is a positive integer knows where this is going to end." Remember that to the British Establishment the goal isn't real security but back doors. Ultimately, the goal is to control people via their devices and insist that back doors are in fact "security" and rejection of those back doors is a rejection of security.
As we put it two days ago: "The tacit goal of the population - assuming it wishes to advance as a civilisation (not a monarchy of oligarchs, akin to feudalism with monopolies) - should be to collectively inform this population about those at the top while preventing those at the top from knowing "too much" about the population. And contrariwise, those at the top want the general population to know nothing about them; they, in turn, create agencies like the NSA to spy on whole populations in many countries, including their own. It's all about exercising power over other people. It's about keeping other people down." █