Just Like The Register MS, Conde Nast's Ars Technica Has Just Publicly Admitted That It Published Fake Articles (Slop) Made by LLMs About Serious Subjects
What's worse? Conde Nast's Ars Technica employing rapists of children as authors and moderators? (It has not even removed their articles, which are de facto Microsoft ads!)
Or this?
Months ago The Register MS was trying to hide the fact that it had published LLM slop as 'articles'.
Now, Conde Nast's Ars Technica, which paid salaries to support pedophilia by a Microsoft booster (who also helped promote 'secure' boot and attack GNU/Linux), openly admits that it's not to be trusted anymore.
Ars Technica is now Slop Technica. There's a good chance that for doing this the site will pay heavily; Conde Nast might shut Ars Technica down to escape the bad publicity/association. It is a serious liability. █